I didn't leave it out. I said he didn't find the end zone one time in five games and proceeded to list his receptions and yardage in those five games. And I listed the 8 receptions for 120 yards game. What's the problem?Not for nothing, but you also posted that his first game back in that regular season he went for 120 yards - which you conveniently left out. This game was against the Falcons where Hoyer was throwing the ball everywhere (322 yds).
There's something to be said for a talented player entering his first game back after a long hiatus. Many believe he's lost a step or will need time to acclimate, and it's during this time of underestimating a player that they tend to shine. I'd have to think there should be a small bump in projections because of this type of situation.
Latest conversations were more about yardage and not TDs, but that's fine. My point was more in what you missed in my post in that his first game back it appears as if Gordon may have been under-estimated, thus him go for 120 yards. As you said, that was a non-playoff week - but so is his return for this weeks game. That was more my point. My perception of your post is that you moved away from that phenomenon to focus more on his lackluster performances and ignored the statistical anomaly of his first game back after a long hiatus.I didn't leave it out. I said he didn't find the end zone one time in five games and proceeded to list his receptions and yardage in those five games. And I listed the 8 receptions for 120 yards game. What's the problem?
I also mentioned that in the three fantasy playoff weeks, he had 15, 45, and 48 yards. And 9 catches. Total.
Bottom line is, no one has any clue what Gordon will do on Sunday. I guess if Kizor force feeds him 15 targets, he could have a productive day. But that in-and-of-itself is a complete unknown. Maybe it's Coleman he has more faith in and Gordon gets 5 targets and 3 catches. I guess if someone is desperate and wants to take a flyer on him being 2013-Gordon and not 2014-Gordon, they have the right. As someone who's been disappointed in Diggs as my WR3, I hope he is every bit of 2013-Gordon. But I'll gladly leave those points on the bench for one week before utilizing him rather than risk a 2 receptions for 20 yards game.Latest conversations were more about yardage and not TDs, but that's fine. My point was more in what you missed in my post in that his first game back it appears as if Gordon may have been under-estimated, thus him go for 120 yards. As you said, that was a non-playoff week - but so is his return for this weeks game. That was more my point. My perception of your post is that you moved away from that phenomenon to focus more on his lackluster performances and ignored the statistical anomaly of his first game back after a long hiatus.
In the end, who really knows how he'll do. It comes down to how much you (the FF Team Manager) perceive his value to be vs any other player. In the case of Dez vs Gordon, I see a little more upside with Gordon than I do Dez this week, hence my point in putting Gordon in over Dez. YMMV.
One thing to note, at least Kizer can get the ball downfield. That wasn't really the case with any of our former QB's. That said if Kizer gets hurt and the midget comes in, we're ####ed.True, he wont have studs throwing him the ball like he did before
The biggest takeaway I got out of that article came from the comments section. Not sure if it's been brought up or not.
So that's why you wasted 2 years...6.1 pts?Wait... So he averages 61yds/game that 5 game season?
Is that more than 55yds,or no?
Fun would be 120 yards and 2 TDs. 61 yards would not be so much fun.Sunday will be fun. Especially against an elite pass DEF
Soulfly was betting his posting future based on Manziel being the QB. So not only was he all in on Gordon, he was all in on Manziel.And wasn't Johnny Football his QB during those dog#### games? I'm asking b/c I'm not sure. I just recall Manziel missing him a bunch during that stretch. Kizer >>>>>>>>> Manziel
Well, if Dez is unbenchable w less, Gordon would be too, w 6.1So that's why you wasted 2 years...6.1 pts?
more of a bar than a yoga classhe was at a yoga class Tuesday night so i guess he's got that going for him.
I haven't owned Dez in years. I'd bench them both for Robbie Anderson if I hadn't wasted a roster spot on Gordon and had acquired Anderson. But alas, Crabtree is suspended and I have to start the two legged dumpster fire this week.Well, if Dez is unbenchable w less, Gordon would be too, w 6.1
I like you, man.I haven't owned Dez in years. I'd bench them both for Robbie Anderson if I hadn't wasted a roster spot on Gordon and had acquired Anderson. But alas, Crabtree is suspended and I have to start the two legged dumpster fire this week.
take a deep breath.Wow, just wow. This argument, is...just wow.
Dez hasnt topped 73 yards since week 4? Gordon hasnt gained 1 yard in 3 years, I mean....your shtick is tired.
I'm sure when you say Gordon is in your lineup no matter what, means nothing to any person...they see your bias and irrational remarks regarding Gordon.
Gordon is the last ranked WR in every single league right now.
No bueno, I mean, this is how easy it is to decimate an argument when the person uses shtick to make points.
Your argument for benching Dez is he is WR23, so a WR2 to most teams. lol Are we serious here?
I actually agree with this. Dez is just a name now. It's unlikely he's going to win you a week anymore. Gordon is surely risky - but he has potential for a big week at least. Even, if he does not come through it's unlikely that you'll miss Dez' 4-55 stat-line in your lineup.Dez isnt winning you games. Not once this season. He puts up abysmal weeks and a couple ok ones.
Benching him for Gordon, worst case, will lose you what exactly? Guy is averaging 55yds a game.
If you think Gordon comes in and can't possibly get 55yds,then ok... Im wrong.
Even w a 3yr layoff, Gordon can hit 55yds on one catch, imo. No idea how this is schtick. By saying id start him over a near dud? Please.
Literally three posts above yours FBG_Moderator asked people to stop trading jabs.Wow, just wow. This argument, is...just wow.
Dez hasnt topped 73 yards since week 4? Gordon hasnt gained 1 yard in 3 years, I mean....your shtick is tired.
I'm sure when you say Gordon is in your lineup no matter what, means nothing to any person...they see your bias and irrational remarks regarding Gordon.
Gordon is the last ranked WR in every single league right now.
No bueno, I mean, this is how easy it is to decimate an argument when the person uses shtick to make points.
Your argument for benching Dez is he is WR23, so a WR2 to most teams. lol Are we serious here?
Looks like Dez Bryant's production this year. Last five games:Guys, I know we all want to talk about Gordon's one big season, but let's not forget the fact that the last time this guy played in the league, he was very average. He played in 5 games in 2014 and didn't score a single touchdown.
Here are his stats for the 2014 season:
Week 12: 8 receptions 120 yards
Week 13: 7 rec 75 yards
Week 14: 2 rec 15 yards
Week 15: 3 rec 48 yards
Week 16: 4 rec 45 yards
That killed many people's fantasy playoffs. And that was three years ago. So proceded with caution.
Agree. If desperation calls for it, roll the dice. You never know.Looks like Dez Bryant's production this year. Last five games:
4 - 39
6 - 73
4 - 39
8 - 63
3 - 37
That said, if you're hurting at WR or Flex, then maybe, just maybe start Gordon. But I would wait a week if it were me. Kizer is no Brian Hoyer.
You're gonna blame blown coverage when he busts a 60yd TD in his first game back, arent you?Its clear some people have forgotten Gordon has been out of the league and not playing football for 3 years.
So, if Gordon busts a big play in his first game back it's due to "here and there" philosophy?If Stills still had Moore, I may roll Stills, but since Cutler is back, you could roll Gordon there. Benching Dez is just a riskier proposition. Anyone can get a 60 yard TD any given week, doesnt mean they were the best play going into the week. Travis Benjamin gets a big play here and there, is he a better start then Michael Thomas because he pops big TDs?
Yes, I am.Not many so called "experts" are very high on Josh Gordon this week for several reasons, are you?
I sense your complete enthusiasm and all in on Josh. For your sake I hope for the best for you. I'd love to watch a Gordon TD on replay over and over and over again...Yes, I am.
Despite a tough opponent, despite being out of te league. He and his manager are talking like he's coming in with no rust. Best shape, mentally or physically.
So I trust he'll put his money where his mouth is.
I fully expect a few bumps sunday. But I'm the conductor of this train and have been for like 4yrs... If you think Im hopping off, you're wild. I'm throwing loads of coal in the engine as we speak.
?????I love the spin some attempt to put on predictions and the understanding of risk vs. reward. #NeverForget
It's part of him trying to convince someone to pay him too much money. It's all about the Benjamin's.Only negative thing in this whole comeback, is the amount of talking he's doing.
I get this is likely part of the plan, and part of the "rehab process" - coming clean... But still... meh.
Just wanna see him on the field. That's all.
It's still dumb and that SI article was a real bad look for Gordon and his manager. What is especially stupid about it is if he wants to get paid all he has to do is ball out. That is all, nothing else to worry about. That article worried me to be honest. Just did not seem like a conducive environment for staying clean and also some things are just better left unspoken. And really if he thinks he's winning people over telling his drug dealing gang banging past he is getting some stinky advice.It's part of him trying to convince someone to pay him too much money. It's all about the Benjamin's.
Week 13:Soulfly3 said:On field production. For WRs. I'm your man.