Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
That's just one site, and they're not even affiliated with the NFL
For the past few years, (I believe it was) Organized Chaos put up a real time scoring app, and charged a paltry $2.00 for it. (Easily the best $2.00 I spent all year.)
Sure it is bass... Harder to change your team 200+ times when you have limited time available!
Yes, I put up semi-live scoring 3 of the last 4 years... I will see if I can do it again this year, we'll see though. I am much busier this year then in previous years. Honestly, I hope that FBG does this eventually, it's a lot of work to keep it up and work through the off stats etc.Also, for those asking about previous years numbers, here you go.http://ffltools.com/fbg35k/2008.phphttp://ffltools.com/fbg35k/2009.phphttp://ffltools.com/fbg35k/2010.phphttp://ffltools.com/fbg35k/2011.php
Then it's sure to be up by the 17th!
QB - Aaron Rodgers - GB/10 - $31RB - Arian Foster - HOU/8 - $34RB - Ben Tate - HOU/8 - $12WR - Calvin Johnson - DET/5 - $29WR - Eddie Royal - SD/7 - $2WR - Kyle Williams - SF/9 - $2TE - Jimmy Graham - NO/6 - $29TE - Rob Gronkowski - NE/9 - $28PK - David Akers - SF/9 - $6PK - Sebastian Janikowski - OAK/5 - $6PK - Garrett Hartley - NO/6 - $6PK - Stephen Gostkowski - NE/9 - $6PK - Dan Bailey - DAL/5 - $5PK - Phil Dawson - CLE/10 - $3PK - Ryan Succop - KC/7 - $3PK - Dan Carpenter - MIA/7 - $3PK - Matt Prater - DEN/7 - $3PK - Josh Brown - NYJ/9 - $3PK - Rian Lindell - BUF/8 - $3PK - Blair Walsh - MIN/11 - $3PK - Jay Feely - ARI/10 - $3PK - Shaun Suisham - PIT/4 - $3PK - Neil Rackers - WAS/10 - $3PK - Justin Medlock - CAR/6 - $3PK - Connor Barth - TB/5 - $3PK - Greg Zuerlein - STL/9 - $3PK - Lawrence Tynes - NYG/11 - $3PK - Josh Scobee - JAX/6 - $3PK - Mike Nugent - CIN/8 - $3TD - Indianapolis Colts - IND/4 - $3
Am I missing something iggy?
I was only being half-serious. There's a reason we prefer that bye weeks aren't displayed on the entry form, and it's better not to remind people about them. A lot of people seem to forget to take them into consideration, which is better for the rest of us. But most people who hang out in this thread probably don't have that issue, so it's not really that big a deal to post them here. More of a running joke than a serious concern.
there are a lot of rubes who screw up their bye weeks
I am still trying to find the value of kickers and defense...
Got it. Post edited.
They're actually less steep than last year (i.e. more teams will make it through week 5 this year than in previous years). Perhaps they wanted to keep more people interested a little longer.Revised cut lines for weeks 1-5 will weed out 50% of the entries early on.
I am assuming they are anticipating more entries this year.They're actually less steep than last year (i.e. more teams will make it through week 5 this year than in previous years). Perhaps they wanted to keep more people interested a little longer.Revised cut lines for weeks 1-5 will weed out 50% of the entries early on.
This is probably it considering the "free" subscriptions they're doing with FanDuel.I am assuming they are anticipating more entries this year.They're actually less steep than last year (i.e. more teams will make it through week 5 this year than in previous years). Perhaps they wanted to keep more people interested a little longer.Revised cut lines for weeks 1-5 will weed out 50% of the entries early on.
Yeah, as much fun as it is to tinker, I'm thinking about just letting it be for a while until we get some real info (at least as real as pre-season football can give you). There's nothing like finally getting something you're happy with and then hearing some $10 RB is now on top of the depth chart...and I don't have him...yet.But seriously, the strategy for selecting RB's always drives me crazy. I can never settle on what I think the correct combination of stud, solid guys, sleepers and long shots should be.
I've been playing this contest for at least five years now, and I'm not convinced I have any better idea how to do this than I did five years ago. That's the beauty of it.
I am the other way. I think I get better at this every year. I am working on a computer program to optimize my roster this season.
Looks like you need to draft more kickers this year to maximize your advantage.
Curious what your algorithm would look like to optimize the roster. I've considered doing the same, but can't come up with a way to fairly value the players. What I mean is, I can't find a way to capture the week to week variance that is the advantage of having a larger roster.I am the other way. I think I get better at this every year. I am working on a computer program to optimize my roster this season.
You can get the top 22 kickers for a TOTAL of $88. It's a no-brainer IMO. The winning roster this year is going to look something like this:
QB M Stafford DET $26RB D McFadden OAK $26RB A Peterson MIN $21WR L Fitzgerald ARI $25WR G Jennings GB $21WR M Austin DAL $20TE V Davis SF $17PK D Akers SF $6PK S Janikowski OAK $6PK G Hartley NO $6PK S Gostkowski NE $6PK D Bailey DAL $5PK M Crosby GB $5PK N Kaeding SD $4PK A Henery PHI $4PK J Hanson DET $4PK M Bryant ATL $4PK B Cundiff BAL $4PK R Bullock HOU $4PK R Bironas TEN $3PK S Hauschka SEA $3PK R Gould CHI $3PK A Vinatieri IND $3PK P Dawson CLE $3PK R Succop KC $3PK D Carpenter MIA $3PK M Prater DEN $3PK J Brown NYJ $3PK R Lindell BUF $3TD 49ers SF $6This is where I was like two years ago. I've since concluded that, while it's a lot of fun, it's mostly a fruitless exercise.I am the other way. I think I get better at this every year. I am working on a computer program to optimize my roster this season.
I agree. I think I could actually create a roster where all my RB/WR's were $15 or less and be very happy with it. Like I said before, my struggles in this contest mainly come from trying to determine the optimal mix of Stud vs Solid vs. Breakout Potential vs. Long Shots.I'm glad we seem to have decided on one thread for this so I'll repost this from the other thread.
After reading through all 70+ pages from last years thread, I'm not totally convinced of the many kicker strategy. I'm going to try the many kicker/defense combo. I think 8 kickers @ 8 defenses, at $3 each for $48 total, then 14 über-studs ad the obligatory $3 RB & WR, should be a good start.'Ignoratio Elenchi said:'BassNBrew said:Code:QB M Stafford DET $26RB D McFadden OAK $26RB A Peterson MIN $21WR L Fitzgerald ARI $25WR G Jennings GB $21WR M Austin DAL $20TE V Davis SF $17PK D Akers SF $6PK S Janikowski OAK $6PK G Hartley NO $6PK S Gostkowski NE $6PK D Bailey DAL $5PK M Crosby GB $5PK N Kaeding SD $4PK A Henery PHI $4PK J Hanson DET $4PK M Bryant ATL $4PK B Cundiff BAL $4PK R Bullock HOU $4PK R Bironas TEN $3PK S Hauschka SEA $3PK R Gould CHI $3PK A Vinatieri IND $3PK P Dawson CLE $3PK R Succop KC $3PK D Carpenter MIA $3PK M Prater DEN $3PK J Brown NYJ $3PK R Lindell BUF $3TD 49ers SF $6
Fortune favors the bold, my friend. Go 22 kickers or go home imo.
I am simulating season stats for every player. I will probably do something like 10000 simulated seasons and the algorithm will pick the roster that does the best on average. I still am not entirely sure what the best is either. Some combination of a good last 3 weeks and not going near the cut line. Generating random seasons is where a lot of the work comes in. The basis is my ranking of each player and the expected weekly score and weekly variance based on that ranking. I have generated regression equations based on past seasons for these. I am currently working on a random factor that will allow a players ranking to deviate from my projections as well. I am currently allowing for injury chance. I am trying to couple this with increasing the score of the backup but don't have that coded yet.'Modog814 said:Curious what your algorithm would look like to optimize the roster. I've considered doing the same, but can't come up with a way to fairly value the players. What I mean is, I can't find a way to capture the week to week variance that is the advantage of having a larger roster.'Drunken Cowboy said:I am the other way. I think I get better at this every year. I am working on a computer program to optimize my roster this season.'Ignoratio Elenchi said:'Modog814 said:
Nothing will change. The players and prices are set in stone.
Remember last year there was a position change. Rb-Wr
That wasn't meant to happen. Dodds had changed something in a master database and it accidentally changed McCluster in the contest. He changed it back after he saw what happened.
It kills me that I still have $1 left, but even if he were added I don't think I could spend it on him.
.
