Don't agree at all that a unique 1-2 punch is a good plan. Pats like to mix up the game plan depending on the D. They need the bruiser back for that.In terms of the cap, they should be able to clear up about 20m. The bigger concern is 2017 when virtually the entire NE defense enters FA, they will probably start restructuring this offseason. Their biggest Oline issues were that they started off hurt and not only didn't recover everyone else slowly got hurt as well, the interior is fine and has depth, at tackle they have a great/elite LT and RT, but no depth. The Pats will likely be losing a WR, TE and RB through cuts or FA (Lafell, Chandler, Blount). I think they will look to fill all three of those vacancies, and hope to have around 5m to play with in the season.Bayhawks said:Did they? How many years?Run It Up said:They offered Vereen around 3.5m expecting to be fine with White+FA if they couldn't retain him. I think 30 year old Matt Forte is better for the next two years than 2014 Shane Vereen.
I think if Forte can get that over 2 years (maybe not "guaranteed" but likely years/money), that might do it.
If they did that, how would that leave them, cap-wise? Would they be able to improve their O-line, get another WR, tie-up some of the defense guys? 1 of these 3? 2?
If they're able to get him & address some of these other areas, they obviously look good for next year.
Also, assuming that happens, would you agree that it will lessen the FF impact of Forte AND Lewis?
As far as the FF impact, I think the easy answer is yeah it probably will reduce both of their ff impact - or at least Fortes production could take a hit from its ridiculous levels. If NE managed to sign him I think they would offer a unique 1-2 punch. A duo that share and compliment each other. We've seen it with TEs in the past in NE, I think its entirely possible with RBs as well.