This is all just stupid. Just because everyone overreacts to Manning's postseason résumé does not mean the correct response is for everyone else to overreact to Brady's out of spite. When someone does something stupid, the correct course of action is not doing something else equally stupid to show them what stupid looks like. Both Brady and Manning are good postseason QBs. Pretty much equally good, actually- they're 10th and 11th all time in postseason passer rating. Brady's recent struggles prove exactly as much as his early successes- basically, lolsamplesize. And anyone still crying about spygate is really reaching at this point. In any given season, only 1/32 of the NFL QBs win a title. The fact that a lot of the time, that QB hasn't been Brady (or Manning, or Marino, or whoever) proves absolutely nothing. People who like to draw conclusions based on small samples in the postseason are the same people who looked like idiots when Elway won his back to back, and when Cowher won his, and when Manning won his, and when Ryan led the comeback against Seattle, and when everyone else who they'd labeled a choker proved again and again that there's no such thing as a choker in the NFL.