Andy,If you want to give me one go ahead.Okay, we've got all but New Orleans and Baltimore teed up for now.I know nobody wants to predict what the Chiefs will do, so I'll give it a go.
Take Baltimore.Andy,If you want to give me one go ahead.Okay, we've got all but New Orleans and Baltimore teed up for now.I know nobody wants to predict what the Chiefs will do, so I'll give it a go.
I dont think theres any CHANCE that happens. Guards dont get taken #1. If they like joeckel, theyll let albert go. If they keep albert, theyll take one of the stud dlinemen or reach at qb.It goes without saying that this is a bad year for the Chiefs to be at #1. The spot normally dictates taking one of a QB, DE, or LT.But there's no QB worthy of the #1, they've already got a LT, and they run the 3-4.So...what to do? If they take Joeckel, they have to move Albert to guard, which he's adamantly stated he does not want to do. So isn't the net result the same if they take Warmack...except that they haven't pissed off one of their only good players. Plus, they've taken what many, many scouts consider the best player available in the draft. Add into that the idea that the rookie wage scale makes this a much less bitter pill to swallow, I think that the Chiefs should...and will...take:1.01 - Chance Warmack, OG - Alabama
I see what you did there.Under the old CBA there was no way that guards got taken that high. The contract situation is completely different now.I dont think theres any CHANCE that happens. Guards dont get taken #1. If they like joeckel, theyll let albert go. If they keep albert, theyll take one of the stud dlinemen or reach at qb.
Albert is a free agent, so theyd probably save money by letting him go and drafting joeckel. As for Warmack, cba or not, guards dont have the position value to go that high. Even just last year we saw an wlite guard prospect fall (decastro) bc of position value. I think chance could go top 10, which really speaks volume to his talent (hutchinson went 17th), but i would say the odds are very slim he goes first.I see what you did there.Under the old CBA there was no way that guards got taken that high. The contract situation is completely different now.I dont think theres any CHANCE that happens. Guards dont get taken #1. If they like joeckel, theyll let albert go. If they keep albert, theyll take one of the stud dlinemen or reach at qb.
There's no way they're taking a QB at #1.
And which "stud" d-lineman would they take now that Lotulelei is out of the running for that? The only other "stud" would be Floyd. And I already said that would be a consideration. Werner and Moore are not "studs".
Drafting Joeckel and releasing Albert puts them right back where they started from.
I agree. Even if KC LOVES Warmack and is willing to trade down for less value than the #1 overall should get I think they do that rather than take him at #1. Especially seeing that Cooper is pretty dang good as well and they could easily pick him up in the 2nd with a trade down package.KC is hamstrung here IMO. They need to take either of the top tackles or the best defensive player on their board, likely a Dlineman.Albert is a free agent, so theyd probably save money by letting him go and drafting joeckel. As for Warmack, cba or not, guards dont have the position value to go that high. Even just last year we saw an wlite guard prospect fall (decastro) bc of position value. I think chance could go top 10, which really speaks volume to his talent (hutchinson went 17th), but i would say the odds are very slim he goes first. Like it or not, in todays nfl, qb is always a possibility at 1. Highest position value, new regime, lower salary so lower risk.
I love Mingo more than most but have to agree. I think Ansah is the pick here if they go in that direction. Moore or Werner are also nice options.I think the position selection is fine, but Mingo's stock isn't nearly that high.
Last year was certainly telling about how the NFL feels about OG. DeCastro was consistantly rated by everyone as a top 10-12 prospect, but fell to 24. I'd bet my next paycheck that Warmack will be chosen in the 10-15 range.Albert is a free agent, so theyd probably save money by letting him go and drafting joeckel. As for Warmack, cba or not, guards dont have the position value to go that high. Even just last year we saw an wlite guard prospect fall (decastro) bc of position value. I think chance could go top 10, which really speaks volume to his talent (hutchinson went 17th), but i would say the odds are very slim he goes first.I see what you did there.Under the old CBA there was no way that guards got taken that high. The contract situation is completely different now.I dont think theres any CHANCE that happens. Guards dont get taken #1. If they like joeckel, theyll let albert go. If they keep albert, theyll take one of the stud dlinemen or reach at qb.
There's no way they're taking a QB at #1.
And which "stud" d-lineman would they take now that Lotulelei is out of the running for that? The only other "stud" would be Floyd. And I already said that would be a consideration. Werner and Moore are not "studs".
Drafting Joeckel and releasing Albert puts them right back where they started from.
Like it or not, in todays nfl, qb is always a possibility at 1. Highest position value, new regime, lower salary so lower risk.
See what his stock is after today. Just ran a 4.53.I think the position selection is fine, but Mingo's stock isn't nearly that high.
It doesn't add to his game tape.Edit: I think the Floyd pick to the Raiders is the correct one. And one last thing about the Chiefs pick...if they could pick up a ham sandwich to trade out of that #1 pick I think they'd do it.See what his stock is after today. Just ran a 4.53.I think the position selection is fine, but Mingo's stock isn't nearly that high.
SliderAge:79 years oldBirthday:August 17, 1933Location: SE PA
He can take his #1 money and buy several million White Castle burgers.Round 11. Kansas City - Chance Warmack, OG - Alabama
I'm interested, but I'm going to wait until I see who is available at #17.Rascal, give me picks #28 and #60 for my #17 and a conditional 4th rounder. Do it.
Fair enough.I'm interested, but I'm going to wait until I see who is available at #17.Rascal, give me picks #28 and #60 for my #17 and a conditional 4th rounder. Do it.
I'm going to institute a 2 hour time limit here. We'll start it at 1:00 Central, meaning give Slider until then to make a pick.After that we'll go to a 2 hour limit.I know this is just for fun but it's not fun just sitting around.
Huh, thought for sure Joekel would be the pick. Interesting....Eric Fisher it is
I thought there would be a Duck reunion in PhillyEric Fisher it is
They do need CB and safety bad but it's a deep draft for those. Jason Peters coming off a torn twice achillies and is 31. Plus Herremans is much better at guard. Very much think it's the right way to go. Although I really like Eric Fisher and he may turn out better I would've went Joeckel.I'm guessing the Eagles drafter will be drooling here since both OT's are available, but I honestly don't think that's the right way to go.
You don't go wrong with Joeckel or Fisher, even Lane Johnson possibly. I would prefer Joeckel out of those three.All reports are Peters is looking great. This is insurance but he can play RT this year better than Joeckel imo.
Obviously a WR, we know the LionsPretty much a no brainer here, ramrod.Peace
Him or a DE I'd thinkLions could go Dee Milliner
LT is my pick if I was the GM. Have Joekel(SP) at LT and Rielly Rieff at RT, that's great protection for Stafford. All they do is throw, plus in division pass rushers: Jared Allen, Peppers, MatthewsHim or a DE I'd thinkLions could go Dee Milliner
Re: The LionsThey did just re-sign Backus, but he's 87 years old. And Gosder Cherilus has more reported knee problems...I'll take the Saints. Will try to be here as often as possible.