Until a few days ago, the presumption was that if he didn’t sign the tag by 11/13, and if he were to be tagged again in 2019, he’d be tagged at the same level. The players did not get this in the last CBA, and it’s not clearly stated one way or the other (which is why it was being reported differently until recently). The NFL and Steelers just recently announced that they will agree that the next tag will be the 3rd tag, irregardless of whether he actually plays under the 2nd tag.
This is new info, because even those people who recognized the ambiguity of the CBA’s wording with regards to this (
@Hankmoody , I think in this thread) believed the Steelers and the NFL would argue (likely in court) that he has to actually play under the 2nd tag to “move” up. The NFL conceding this point, because of Bells actions, will have huge ramifications. Every player knows that I’d they don’t want to play under the tag, they can sit out, and automatically get a larger salary the next year (in the event of another tag) or become a FA. Teams will have to be even more careful about tagging players, because they will have to reserve the cap space to fit the player, but risk the player not showing at all, and effectively playing this year with a smaller cap, as the Steelers have had to do this year.
The tag has been weakened as a bargaining tool for the teams, and the players have gained leverage in future situation, BECAUSE of Bell’s actions forcing the NFL to stipulate this point, without a court having to read/interpret the CBA.