We're seeing it now.Of course this begs the question, if he had been healthy the last few years, what would have been? One maybe two Superbowls possibly. As good as Gronk has been, we were robbed of seeing his very best.
I'm not so sure about that. The guy is like Frankenstein's monster after all the surgeries he's had. Physically he has to have lost a significant amount from all those injuries. What we are seeing now is his best after 2 lost years and a ton of injuries. My point is, just imagine what those last two years would have looked like without the injuries. Scarey.But then again, if my Aunt had balls she'd be my Uncle.We're seeing it now.Of course this begs the question, if he had been healthy the last few years, what would have been? One maybe two Superbowls possibly. As good as Gronk has been, we were robbed of seeing his very best.
Not mine. :(This guy is going to win leagues given his low ADP. Drafted him in three this summer (3rd round dynasty PPR, $25 in keeper auction, and 4th in redraft PPR).
I'd say you have to offer Graham straight up. I don't think you have the juice to go Thomas+ to get Gronk unless you've got draft picks and the other guy is interested.What kind of an offer does someone makes for Gronk? In a 12 team (40 man rosters) dynasty League with 1.5 TEppr, have to start one can start two TEs.
Team in sig, don't really need Gronk, just want him.
would prolly take thomas and maclin without giving up grahamWhat kind of an offer does someone makes for Gronk? In a 12 team (40 man rosters) dynasty League with 1.5 TEppr, have to start one can start two TEs.
Team in sig, don't really need Gronk, just want him.
Say it loud and proud!Just updated my cross-positional dynasty rankings for the first time since August. I had Gronkowski at #4 in my last update. He's up to my #1 overall dynasty player today.
GRONKSMASH
As an FYI I traded him away...results were not good yesterday but am hoping for the bestin the playoffs.What kind of an offer does someone makes for Gronk? In a 12 team (40 man rosters) dynasty League with 1.5 TEppr, have to start one can start two TEs.
Team in sig, don't really need Gronk, just want him.
If I were the Gronk owner? It would take Julius Thomas + LeSean McCoy. Seriously. I've got Gronk #1, McCoy #17, and Thomas #18 in my most recent dynasty rankings, but that's just generic PPR. In TE-premium, Gronk rises all the way up to #-4.What kind of an offer does someone makes for Gronk? In a 12 team (40 man rosters) dynasty League with 1.5 TEppr, have to start one can start two TEs.
Team in sig, don't really need Gronk, just want him.
Dynasty or redraft?As an FYI I traded him away...results were not good yesterday but am hoping for the bestin the playoffs.What kind of an offer does someone makes for Gronk? In a 12 team (40 man rosters) dynasty League with 1.5 TEppr, have to start one can start two TEs.
Team in sig, don't really need Gronk, just want him.
In a PPR I traded Gronk, Hopkins and Baldwin for AJ Green, Gordon, R, Jennings and J. reed
AJ and Gordon (who I am low on) is probably fair for Gronk, but you got robbed on Hopkins.As an FYI I traded him away...results were not good yesterday but am hoping for the bestin the playoffs.What kind of an offer does someone makes for Gronk? In a 12 team (40 man rosters) dynasty League with 1.5 TEppr, have to start one can start two TEs.
Team in sig, don't really need Gronk, just want him.
In a PPR I traded Gronk, Hopkins and Baldwin for AJ Green, Gordon, R, Jennings and J. reed
Redraft. My RBs are a nightmare, and i think (hope) that Jennings is able to step in and be a top 12 guy the rest of the way.Dynasty or redraft?As an FYI I traded him away...results were not good yesterday but am hoping for the bestin the playoffs.What kind of an offer does someone makes for Gronk? In a 12 team (40 man rosters) dynasty League with 1.5 TEppr, have to start one can start two TEs.
Team in sig, don't really need Gronk, just want him.
In a PPR I traded Gronk, Hopkins and Baldwin for AJ Green, Gordon, R, Jennings and J. reed
Gronk is awesome but there's too much temptation by defenders to go low on him. Not much else 200 lb. guy can do against him.I feel like the kind of hit Ward went for is gonna happen to Gronk sometimes unfortunately, considering how hard he is to bring down plus all of the rules against hitting up high. IMO we have to hope he doesn't get put in that exact kind of spot a lot.
I'm with most everyone else in here, love Gronk, love having him on my teams. The crazy one handed catch, and then they motion him out wide and get him the TD - I was giddy. Just so good and pretty much just a hilarious big kid to boot. Seems like when Ridley went down the Pats scrapped a lot of the run heavy game plan and are going to center the offense around Brady throwing, and Gronk is going to be the main target.
cstu said:Gronk is awesome but there's too much temptation by defenders to go low on him. Not much else 200 lb. guy can do against him.Ted Mullins said:I feel like the kind of hit Ward went for is gonna happen to Gronk sometimes unfortunately, considering how hard he is to bring down plus all of the rules against hitting up high. IMO we have to hope he doesn't get put in that exact kind of spot a lot.
I'm with most everyone else in here, love Gronk, love having him on my teams. The crazy one handed catch, and then they motion him out wide and get him the TD - I was giddy. Just so good and pretty much just a hilarious big kid to boot. Seems like when Ridley went down the Pats scrapped a lot of the run heavy game plan and are going to center the offense around Brady throwing, and Gronk is going to be the main target.
So, Brady telegraphs where he's throwing and locks in on Gronk, yet he still waltzes in with a touchdown? Good grief...maybe he is unstoppable.
He deserved that TD after making that insane catch right before. I was praying Brady would reward the man and they did. That LB was helpless out there.So, Brady telegraphs where he's throwing and locks in on Gronk, yet he still waltzes in with a touchdown? Good grief...maybe he is unstoppable.
I see plays like this with Jimmy Graham too and I have no idea why some teams insist on putting LB on him when they plainly can't cover him. It's like a gift every time. They see TE, put LB on TE, boom.He deserved that TD after making that insane catch right before. I was praying Brady would reward the man and they did. That LB was helpless out there.So, Brady telegraphs where he's throwing and locks in on Gronk, yet he still waltzes in with a touchdown? Good grief...maybe he is unstoppable.
Happens all the time, I don't get it.I see plays like this with Jimmy Graham too and I have no idea why some teams insist on putting LB on him when they plainly can't cover him. It's like a gift every time. They see TE, put LB on TE, boom.He deserved that TD after making that insane catch right before. I was praying Brady would reward the man and they did. That LB was helpless out there.So, Brady telegraphs where he's throwing and locks in on Gronk, yet he still waltzes in with a touchdown? Good grief...maybe he is unstoppable.
But they weren't running it up (at least, not when Gronk broke 100 yards).Without an effective run game, you cant trust your run game to not lose you the game, or at least to not give the other team free opportunities.
Run it up, put every game away.
Counting the two-point conversion, New England ran 11 plays inside the red zone. 10 of them were passes (the 11th was a sack). 9 of those passes were targeted at someone other than Rob Gronkowski.Another thing that is important/interesting, IMO.
During the Patriots last drive, they ran the ball exclusively with Gray, except for 1 pass to Gronkowski, that got him over 100 yards. There was no reason to pass there, they were already up 22 & the game was out of reach. It was 2nd down, not third, and when they had a subsequent 2nd down (and longer distance), they just ran it.
It seems like it's becoming a focus of Brady/the Pats to get Gronk to produce. They used a challenge to try to get him a TD, when 1st and goal from the 1, they could have just tried to slam it into the EZ. Then, they ran the very next play for Gronk in the EZ. Then later, when passing was absolutely not necessary, they ran 1 pass play, to Gronk, to get him over the 100 yard mark.
It reminds me of 2007, when Brady and Moss broke the TD pass and TD reception marks. The Patriots were throwing the ball late in a number of games when it wasn't needed, almost like they were trying to get those numbers for Brady/Moss. That was obviously a very good year for their FF owners.
That's very interesting, but it's not really what I was talking about.Counting the two-point conversion, New England ran 11 plays inside the red zone. 10 of them were passes (the 11th was a sack). 9 of those passes were targeted at someone other than Rob Gronkowski.Another thing that is important/interesting, IMO.
During the Patriots last drive, they ran the ball exclusively with Gray, except for 1 pass to Gronkowski, that got him over 100 yards. There was no reason to pass there, they were already up 22 & the game was out of reach. It was 2nd down, not third, and when they had a subsequent 2nd down (and longer distance), they just ran it.
It seems like it's becoming a focus of Brady/the Pats to get Gronk to produce. They used a challenge to try to get him a TD, when 1st and goal from the 1, they could have just tried to slam it into the EZ. Then, they ran the very next play for Gronk in the EZ. Then later, when passing was absolutely not necessary, they ran 1 pass play, to Gronk, to get him over the 100 yard mark.
It reminds me of 2007, when Brady and Moss broke the TD pass and TD reception marks. The Patriots were throwing the ball late in a number of games when it wasn't needed, almost like they were trying to get those numbers for Brady/Moss. That was obviously a very good year for their FF owners.
Red-zone targets:
Julian Edelman - 4
Shane Vereen - 3
Brandon LaFell - 2
Rob Gronkowski - 1
If New England's goal is to get Rob Gronkowski huge numbers this season, they're sure not going about it in a very intelligent manner.
Not that Gronk is particularly coverable, but NE did a fantasic job of exploiting the attention he was getting vs. DEN. He would constantly draw the attention of three DBs whenever they were in the RZ leaving everyone else wideee open. The one time they left Gronk on an island he scored with essentially zero effort.Counting the two-point conversion, New England ran 11 plays inside the red zone. 10 of them were passes (the 11th was a sack). 9 of those passes were targeted at someone other than Rob Gronkowski.Another thing that is important/interesting, IMO.
During the Patriots last drive, they ran the ball exclusively with Gray, except for 1 pass to Gronkowski, that got him over 100 yards. There was no reason to pass there, they were already up 22 & the game was out of reach. It was 2nd down, not third, and when they had a subsequent 2nd down (and longer distance), they just ran it.
It seems like it's becoming a focus of Brady/the Pats to get Gronk to produce. They used a challenge to try to get him a TD, when 1st and goal from the 1, they could have just tried to slam it into the EZ. Then, they ran the very next play for Gronk in the EZ. Then later, when passing was absolutely not necessary, they ran 1 pass play, to Gronk, to get him over the 100 yard mark.
It reminds me of 2007, when Brady and Moss broke the TD pass and TD reception marks. The Patriots were throwing the ball late in a number of games when it wasn't needed, almost like they were trying to get those numbers for Brady/Moss. That was obviously a very good year for their FF owners.
Red-zone targets:
Julian Edelman - 4
Shane Vereen - 3
Brandon LaFell - 2
Rob Gronkowski - 1
If New England's goal is to get Rob Gronkowski huge numbers this season, they're sure not going about it in a very intelligent manner.
If we can assume that that is all true, what is the problem? This is the NFL, not college ball or peewee football. If a team can't stop you, then that there's fault. Sure, you can sometimes question the logic of having a player with an injury history in a game late when the outcome is not in doubt, but from a competitive standpoint, it is not a team's job to try and stop scoring; it is the other team's job to stop them. And throwing the ball to a beast like Gronk will always improve your chances of scoring.That's very interesting, but it's not really what I was talking about.Counting the two-point conversion, New England ran 11 plays inside the red zone. 10 of them were passes (the 11th was a sack). 9 of those passes were targeted at someone other than Rob Gronkowski.Another thing that is important/interesting, IMO.
During the Patriots last drive, they ran the ball exclusively with Gray, except for 1 pass to Gronkowski, that got him over 100 yards. There was no reason to pass there, they were already up 22 & the game was out of reach. It was 2nd down, not third, and when they had a subsequent 2nd down (and longer distance), they just ran it.
It seems like it's becoming a focus of Brady/the Pats to get Gronk to produce. They used a challenge to try to get him a TD, when 1st and goal from the 1, they could have just tried to slam it into the EZ. Then, they ran the very next play for Gronk in the EZ. Then later, when passing was absolutely not necessary, they ran 1 pass play, to Gronk, to get him over the 100 yard mark.
It reminds me of 2007, when Brady and Moss broke the TD pass and TD reception marks. The Patriots were throwing the ball late in a number of games when it wasn't needed, almost like they were trying to get those numbers for Brady/Moss. That was obviously a very good year for their FF owners.
Red-zone targets:
Julian Edelman - 4
Shane Vereen - 3
Brandon LaFell - 2
Rob Gronkowski - 1
If New England's goal is to get Rob Gronkowski huge numbers this season, they're sure not going about it in a very intelligent manner.
I'm not suggesting that when NE is game-planning each week, that they start with: "How do we make Gronkowski the focal point of our offense?" I'm not even suggesting that Brady is lobbying BB or McDaniels for more Gronk plays.
Rather, what I'm suggesting is that when NE/Brady has a choice, they looked to be trying to get Gronk some stats. The challenge on his crazy catch (when it seemed obvious that he was short of the GL), the TD play, the 1 pass to get him over 100. They didn't need to focus on him for those plays, but the game was pretty much in-hand, and they looked, 3 different times, to get him a stat (catch, TD, yardage, etc) that wasn't necessary to winning the game. Gronk's "huge numbers" aren't the focus, but they seemed to be important after the the outcome was determined.
When Gronk had his record setting year, I remember something similar. His catch that gave him the TE yardage mark came with less than 2 minutes left in a game where they were up 4 scores. They ran the ball every other play that drive, but put up one pass attempt, which got him the yardage mark, then took him out of the game.
Maybe this is purely coincidence, but that's the way it seems to me.
I would be really surprised to find out Belicheck cares in the slightest about getting Gronk a TD instead of someone else or getting to 100 yards - I mean unless maybe he has him on his fantasy team. I think he just wants to win and doesn't care how it gets done, there's a reason the Pats are always at the top of the standings....That's very interesting, but it's not really what I was talking about.
I'm not suggesting that when NE is game-planning each week, that they start with: "How do we make Gronkowski the focal point of our offense?" I'm not even suggesting that Brady is lobbying BB or McDaniels for more Gronk plays.
Rather, what I'm suggesting is that when NE/Brady has a choice, they looked to be trying to get Gronk some stats. The challenge on his crazy catch (when it seemed obvious that he was short of the GL), the TD play, the 1 pass to get him over 100. They didn't need to focus on him for those plays, but the game was pretty much in-hand, and they looked, 3 different times, to get him a stat (catch, TD, yardage, etc) that wasn't necessary to winning the game. Gronk's "huge numbers" aren't the focus, but they seemed to be important after the the outcome was determined.
When Gronk had his record setting year, I remember something similar. His catch that gave him the TE yardage mark came with less than 2 minutes left in a game where they were up 4 scores. They ran the ball every other play that drive, but put up one pass attempt, which got him the yardage mark, then took him out of the game.
Maybe this is purely coincidence, but that's the way it seems to me.
I didn't say it was a problem; in fact I pointed out the 2007 season when Brady and Moss blew up as what I thought was a similar situation.If we can assume that that is all true, what is the problem? This is the NFL, not college ball or peewee football. If a team can't stop you, then that there's fault. Sure, you can sometimes question the logic of having a player with an injury history in a game late when the outcome is not in doubt, but from a competitive standpoint, it is not a team's job to try and stop scoring; it is the other team's job to stop them. And throwing the ball to a beast like Gronk will always improve your chances of scoring.That's very interesting, but it's not really what I was talking about.Counting the two-point conversion, New England ran 11 plays inside the red zone. 10 of them were passes (the 11th was a sack). 9 of those passes were targeted at someone other than Rob Gronkowski.Another thing that is important/interesting, IMO.
During the Patriots last drive, they ran the ball exclusively with Gray, except for 1 pass to Gronkowski, that got him over 100 yards. There was no reason to pass there, they were already up 22 & the game was out of reach. It was 2nd down, not third, and when they had a subsequent 2nd down (and longer distance), they just ran it.
It seems like it's becoming a focus of Brady/the Pats to get Gronk to produce. They used a challenge to try to get him a TD, when 1st and goal from the 1, they could have just tried to slam it into the EZ. Then, they ran the very next play for Gronk in the EZ. Then later, when passing was absolutely not necessary, they ran 1 pass play, to Gronk, to get him over the 100 yard mark.
It reminds me of 2007, when Brady and Moss broke the TD pass and TD reception marks. The Patriots were throwing the ball late in a number of games when it wasn't needed, almost like they were trying to get those numbers for Brady/Moss. That was obviously a very good year for their FF owners.
Red-zone targets:
Julian Edelman - 4
Shane Vereen - 3
Brandon LaFell - 2
Rob Gronkowski - 1
If New England's goal is to get Rob Gronkowski huge numbers this season, they're sure not going about it in a very intelligent manner.
I'm not suggesting that when NE is game-planning each week, that they start with: "How do we make Gronkowski the focal point of our offense?" I'm not even suggesting that Brady is lobbying BB or McDaniels for more Gronk plays.
Rather, what I'm suggesting is that when NE/Brady has a choice, they looked to be trying to get Gronk some stats. The challenge on his crazy catch (when it seemed obvious that he was short of the GL), the TD play, the 1 pass to get him over 100. They didn't need to focus on him for those plays, but the game was pretty much in-hand, and they looked, 3 different times, to get him a stat (catch, TD, yardage, etc) that wasn't necessary to winning the game. Gronk's "huge numbers" aren't the focus, but they seemed to be important after the the outcome was determined.
When Gronk had his record setting year, I remember something similar. His catch that gave him the TE yardage mark came with less than 2 minutes left in a game where they were up 4 scores. They ran the ball every other play that drive, but put up one pass attempt, which got him the yardage mark, then took him out of the game.
Maybe this is purely coincidence, but that's the way it seems to me.
See previous post, but I'm not suggesting that BB is directly involved, but why throw that pass to Gronk, but not throw one on 2nd and 11 or 3rd and 6 on the same drive?I would be really surprised to find out Belicheck cares in the slightest about getting Gronk a TD instead of someone else or getting to 100 yards - I mean unless maybe he has him on his fantasy team. I think he just wants to win and doesn't care how it gets done, there's a reason the Pats are always at the top of the standings....That's very interesting, but it's not really what I was talking about.
I'm not suggesting that when NE is game-planning each week, that they start with: "How do we make Gronkowski the focal point of our offense?" I'm not even suggesting that Brady is lobbying BB or McDaniels for more Gronk plays.
Rather, what I'm suggesting is that when NE/Brady has a choice, they looked to be trying to get Gronk some stats. The challenge on his crazy catch (when it seemed obvious that he was short of the GL), the TD play, the 1 pass to get him over 100. They didn't need to focus on him for those plays, but the game was pretty much in-hand, and they looked, 3 different times, to get him a stat (catch, TD, yardage, etc) that wasn't necessary to winning the game. Gronk's "huge numbers" aren't the focus, but they seemed to be important after the the outcome was determined.
When Gronk had his record setting year, I remember something similar. His catch that gave him the TE yardage mark came with less than 2 minutes left in a game where they were up 4 scores. They ran the ball every other play that drive, but put up one pass attempt, which got him the yardage mark, then took him out of the game.
Maybe this is purely coincidence, but that's the way it seems to me.