Yep. This is why a clock should be enforced. Pitta goes down and the guy who is averaging a cool 5 and a half hours/pick is, of course, sitting on the clock waiting to scoop up the backup.Why not wait all day to make your pick? Wait until someone is hurt in training camp. Mquinnjr takes Dickson. Shocker! Nice job.
I took Dickson for him. However, I checked and the injury happened when he was still on the clock. Had he been way, way over at the time of the injury, I would have given him someone else. As I mentioned in one of the other threads, when I make a pick for someone, I take the player that I would take if it really were my team. In all of these leagues, Dickson should be the next player picked.Why not wait all day to make your pick? Wait until someone is hurt in training camp. Mquinnjr takes Dickson. Shocker! Nice job.
Oh?In all of these leagues, Dickson should be the next player picked.
Most of these drafts are 150 or 200+ picks in. So I stand by my statement that Dickson should be the next guy picked given his potential upside with Pitta out, especially in this scoring format.Oh?In all of these leagues, Dickson should be the next player picked.
This is entirely your choice as to move things along and if an owner does not care enough to make their own pick for themselves in a timely manner, I think any method of assigning a pick would be fine, darts, roulette, guns at dawn. All seems fair enough to me and I do enjoy the chaos and randomness of course.
However I am going to have to disagree with your assessment that Dickson should be the next player picked. This is what The Man had to say about Dickson:
Dickson is bigger and faster than Pitta, but he kind of sucks. Not elusive but worst of all are his terrible hands. He drops everything. Ravens are already in talks with Vishante Shiancoe and I wouldn't be surprised to see them re-sign Vonta Leach and move the rookie Harvard fullback they drafted to Tight End.
Dickson will be the #1 guy, but his numbers will be mediocre.
And The Man ate his donuts this morning.
Here's the thing. Quinn had been making picks, did not need to be picked for, and then suddenly was way late for a pick. Was he just busy? Did he drop out? Does that make him a deadbeat? Who knows what happened to him.A case could certainly be made that "deadbeats" shouldn't be given BPA, but instead like fifth best player available. Let's say Pitta's injury makes a guy like Dickson an obvious choice to all of a sudden be best player on board. Should we really reward the team that has abandoned the league and stopped picking with an impact player like that? I get competitive balance issues and stuff, but I think you also don't want to alienate or anger those who do stick around.
Now, I'm neither alienated nor angered and I doubt anyone else is either. And I actually think Dickson may be overrated as a knee jerk to Pitta'a injury. But the overall point about potentially rewarding "bad" owners is a mildly interesting subject, I think.
Here's the thing. You can apply this statement to more than half the teams in the NFL. Just change the player and change the team. The following teams seem to have some sort of battle or unclear situation as to who their WR2 will be (or are going with a guy that is not 100% proven): BUF, NE, NYJ, BAL, CIN, TEN, KC, OAK, SD, PHI, WAS, DET, MIN, CAR, ARI, SEA, SFO, STL. If people want to debate which teams should or should not be on that list, that's not the point.Rod Streater (12.1) - A perfect WR4 in this contest. He has been getting tons of praise lately, and could easily finish in the top-30 WRs.
The thing is, players taken as WR4s in 16-team leagues are lucky to finish as high as he did last year, in his UDFA rookie season as the 3rd or 4th WR. Will he do better than that? It is almost guaranteed. Honestly, anything more than WR50 finish and be will be outperforming his draft position for me.Anarchy99 said:Here's the thing. You can apply this statement to more than half the teams in the NFL. Just change the player and change the team. The following teams seem to have some sort of battle or unclear situation as to who their WR2 will be (or are going with a guy that is not 100% proven): BUF, NE, NYJ, BAL, CIN, TEN, KC, OAK, SD, PHI, WAS, DET, MIN, CAR, ARI, SEA, SFO, STL. If people want to debate which teams should or should not be on that list, that's not the point.Streater could emerge as a Top 30 WR. But so could any of the WRs in similar situations on other teams. Bottom line, there are opportunities all over the place this year for people to seize the moment and break out.gandalas said:Rod Streater (12.1) - A perfect WR4 in this contest. He has been getting tons of praise lately, and could easily finish in the top-30 WRs.
I have no idea how Streater will do and maybe he will end up in the Top 30. But it's pretty clear in reading the write ups of the teams in these different threads that a lot of players *COULD* have better than expected years. Hope springs eternal as we count down the days until the season starts . . .
I'm really sorry about that. I have no idea how I missed that.Ha! Borden makes a pick, back on the clock 2 seconds later because of autopicks, but obviously doesn't realize it.