It's a partnership. it's mutually profitable. Besides, both are just giving you and I an avenue to enrich your football watching experience. It's up to us to be responsible and put ourselves in the best position to win. Those of us that make little money have strict rules and do not outside from them.You're 100% right.dude, the site is ripping you off; do your best to stay away and theres no shame in seeking help for gambling. Your not the 1st and you won't be the last.Has anyone else struggled with this?
But I like FBGs a lot. Why are they choosing to be partners with a site that rips people off?
How is their the potential to "win more money if not make your money back at worst" playing at Draftstreet?Draftstreet is way better...got hooked on that recently. Smaller buy-ins ($5, $11, $22, etc) and potential to win more money if not make your money back at worst.
Don't quite understand your question - but my point was from what it sounds like at Fanduel, its hard to win $$ (especially if you have to bet $100 to win $80 or whatever the OP said)...at Draftstreet, you can bet $2 or $5 and still win $40-$50 fairly easily, and they have payouts to top 10, top 20, etc depending on what type of league you join. If you bet more (the $22 or $55 or $109 leagues), you can obviously win more.It's a partnership. it's mutually profitable. Besides, both are just giving you and I an avenue to enrich your football watching experience. It's up to us to be responsible and put ourselves in the best position to win. Those of us that make little money have strict rules and do not outside from them.You're 100% right.dude, the site is ripping you off; do your best to stay away and theres no shame in seeking help for gambling. Your not the 1st and you won't be the last.Has anyone else struggled with this?
But I like FBGs a lot. Why are they choosing to be partners with a site that rips people off?
How is their the potential to "win more money if not make your money back at worst" playing at Draftstreet?Draftstreet is way better...got hooked on that recently. Smaller buy-ins ($5, $11, $22, etc) and potential to win more money if not make your money back at worst.
I really hope this entire thread is a fishing trip.it's a shame that FBG promotes gambling. I understand wanting to make money but if you continue to disgust your customer base you're going to end up making less money in the long run.
He should have lost you a long time ago. You know he's making it all up.OK, Little Larry...you lost me right here.You're 100% right.dude, the site is ripping you off; do your best to stay away and theres no shame in seeking help for gambling. Your not the 1st and you won't be the last.Has anyone else struggled with this?
But I like FBGs a lot. Why are they choosing to be partners with a site that rips people off?
Its one thing to get involved with something that could lead to an addiction. Its something totally different to bash FBGs or Fanduel for their business deals.
Untrue.lol no way. It's your own fault pal, don't blame anyone but yourself. You need discipline.I wonder if the FBG site owners feel any responsibility for this.Pretty cool marketing for Fanduel.
Its an unavoidable problem. I tried FD and its not just the best fantasy players... but its the guys linked into team sources that began to pop up. And then cloning began. It was ok if it was one guy with one account but then it became one guy with 50 accounts. Its not something I'd want to invest in. These high stakes guys can make money but we're talking about guys with huge bankrolls that can handle big buy ins in multiple leagues or sustain big losses if that happens.If you went to Vegas and the best poker players in the world cloned themselves so they could sit at every table in the city at the same time, would you ever play? If you would, what if the casinos also increased their traditional rake by 400%? Still interested? Welcome to weekly fantasy football.
I would ask the poker clones some trick question designed to reveal their true identity and then I'd own them on the tables. Then I'd profit.If you went to Vegas and the best poker players in the world cloned themselves so they could sit at every table in the city at the same time, would you ever play? If you would, what if the casinos also increased their traditional rake by 400%? Still interested? Welcome to weekly fantasy football.
Meh, the best poker players in the world are already in places like Las Vegas and there are so many of them and they play such long hours they may as well be "clones" of them at the tables. If your point is the level of competition is high compared to Yahoo or your local league than, yeah you have a point. I'm not so sure the level is all that much higher than the other "serious" fantasy football sites though.If you went to Vegas and the best poker players in the world cloned themselves so they could sit at every table in the city at the same time, would you ever play? If you would, what if the casinos also increased their traditional rake by 400%? Still interested? Welcome to weekly fantasy football.
I hear Fanduel adds on the radio and see them on TV. There will be PLENTY of dead money in there to start this season imo.Isnt the paranoia at a high level if you think that most of the competition is a few guys with cloned accounts?
Even if it is, submit a better roster and beat them!
There is a threshhold in fantasy football where incremental gains in information or skill provide little benefit. ESPECIALLY when it is weekly contest. Unless their inside info tells them the offensive game plan of the team?
I assume people reading this site are relatively close to this point of incremental gain.
It is like the early days of online poker, ya it might be rigged so that others can make more money, but as long as you are making money no problem. If you arent....stop playing.
As for OP, you need to learn to stop.
I really hope this entire thread is a fishing trip.it's a shame that FBG promotes gambling. I understand wanting to make money but if you continue to disgust your customer base you're going to end up making less money in the long run.
Fanduel(and now FBG's) have "turned you into" a compulsive gambler. Well, stay locked in your house without a lifeline to the outside world because Krispy Kreme and McDonalds are forcing you to have a heart attack, Visa is crippling you under a mountain of debt, and Coors is forcing you to drink and drive.
Or... you need take responsibility for the actions you take and choices you make. I guess that decision is up to yo...... well, hell, I don't know who your decisions are up to since you seem incapable of making your own decisions.
I don't think anyone believe that most of the competition is cloned accounts, but it's a fact that the top winners have 8-20 accounts (like I said on page one is the reason I won't do 50/50 leagues anymore). They play in 500 to 1200 games a week between 1-125 dollars and have win percentages over .850 if you track them on sites like rotogrinders.com. There is a certain tier that you don't want to go against. These are the same guys that have an in with the site (condia is associated with fanduel now) and some of these top guys help set the price point for players according to Ray Flowers. It's against the terms and conditions to have multiple accounts and be in the same leagues on fanduel. The problem was unavoidable when fanduel started limited the number of potential games one player could play. They also match the initial bankroll for new accounts and offer incentives for one account recruiting friends. Frankly, fanduel doesn't care because they are making money every time someone submits a roster. They are not taking risk of a loss. It's their daily celebrities that they are promoting that are the culprits so reporting them and their cloned lineups do zero good.The Duff Man said:Isnt the paranoia at a high level if you think that most of the competition is a few guys with cloned accounts?
Even if it is, submit a better roster and beat them!
There is a threshhold in fantasy football where incremental gains in information or skill provide little benefit. ESPECIALLY when it is weekly contest. Unless their inside info tells them the offensive game plan of the team?
I assume people reading this site are relatively close to this point of incremental gain.
It is like the early days of online poker, ya it might be rigged so that others can make more money, but as long as you are making money no problem. If you arent....stop playing.
As for OP, you need to learn to stop.
Yeah, that's my strategy. That's why I don't do 50/50's anymore. I did the math and I have a 72 percent winning percentage in 2 man leagues and a 56% win percentage in 50/50's. I keep on top of these things. Those that don't pay that close of attention are destined to go backwards and wonder why they are not covering rake.After your edit, yeah it seems shady, but I will bow out if I cant win. Until then....
Its not so much paranoia as it is between the house rake and competition, you need to break .700 to make your money back.
No...No you don't.Its not so much paranoia as it is between the house rake and competition, you need to break .700 to make your money back.
have to agree with this as well.I wont pay for FBG again just because they constantly spam me to play fanduel. If my subscription were free, then fine. But dont make me pay for a subscription then spam me for some rip off site. It's non stop. Most people who pay for FFL advice know where to gamble already
online rake was much lower than casino rakeI've never been on the site, but is that really their rake? 100 to win 80? And people are still flocking to play there? If so: wow.You have to tally 5 wins to every 4 losses to make up for the 'rake' that FanDuel gets. For every $100 bet you make, if you win, you'll only take home $80.
I remember the early 2000s, when the big online poker sites first launched, and all the bold predictions that the days of 10%-to-$4 per hand rake was over, that thanks to the lower overhead costs and intense competition the rake would eventually settle out everywhere at a buck or less. Yeah, not so much.
So I guess I shouldn't be surprised that sites like Fanduel can manage to scrape that much off the top either. But you'll excuse me for not rushing to sign up.
Cuz, as it turns out, half of them were stacking the deck anyway.online rake was much lower than casino rakeI've never been on the site, but is that really their rake? 100 to win 80? And people are still flocking to play there? If so: wow.You have to tally 5 wins to every 4 losses to make up for the 'rake' that FanDuel gets. For every $100 bet you make, if you win, you'll only take home $80.
I remember the early 2000s, when the big online poker sites first launched, and all the bold predictions that the days of 10%-to-$4 per hand rake was over, that thanks to the lower overhead costs and intense competition the rake would eventually settle out everywhere at a buck or less. Yeah, not so much.
So I guess I shouldn't be surprised that sites like Fanduel can manage to scrape that much off the top either. But you'll excuse me for not rushing to sign up.
really. always a few schmoes like this. setting email filter -"fan duel" down?have to agree with this as well.I wont pay for FBG again just because they constantly spam me to play fanduel. If my subscription were free, then fine. But dont make me pay for a subscription then spam me for some rip off site. It's non stop. Most people who pay for FFL advice know where to gamble already
what games do you play? Looks like I'm in the money in my $25 50/50, but out in that $10 1000+ people one. So, if I only won $10 while you tripled up, clearly I'm doing it wrong.Deposited $100 last year. Played a little and tripled it up (cashed out $320ish).
Deposited $100 this year. Looking like I'll just about triple up week 1. As long as so many terrible players exist at the $10-25 limit levels I'll keep playing.
Played 5 leagues on fanduel:(HULK) said:what games do you play? Looks like I'm in the money in my $25 50/50, but out in that $10 1000+ people one. So, if I only won $10 while you tripled up, clearly I'm doing it wrong.Deposited $100 last year. Played a little and tripled it up (cashed out $320ish).
Deposited $100 this year. Looking like I'll just about triple up week 1. As long as so many terrible players exist at the $10-25 limit levels I'll keep playing.
Wow, worst-case scenario is I break even? I gotta get to Draftstreet!Draftstreet is way better...got hooked on that recently. Smaller buy-ins ($5, $11, $22, etc) and potential to win more money if not make your money back at worst.
So the cheap games are less shark/hawk infested? I prefer to gamble against suckers imo.Played 5 leagues on fanduel:(HULK) said:what games do you play? Looks like I'm in the money in my $25 50/50, but out in that $10 1000+ people one. So, if I only won $10 while you tripled up, clearly I'm doing it wrong.Deposited $100 last year. Played a little and tripled it up (cashed out $320ish).
Deposited $100 this year. Looking like I'll just about triple up week 1. As long as so many terrible players exist at the $10-25 limit levels I'll keep playing.
3 double ups (5/10/25): won all
1 triple up (25): won it
One 10T league ($5): finished 1st for 22.50
Played 3 leagues in draft day:
1) $20k frenzy (15) that barely cashed for 20
2) double up (11): won it
3) target league (150pts) (11 buy): hit for 82.50
Cashed in every one. Not going to happen every week but the competition sucks out there, GB!
So the cheap games are less shark/hawk infested? I prefer to gamble against suckers imo.Played 5 leagues on fanduel:(HULK) said:what games do you play? Looks like I'm in the money in my $25 50/50, but out in that $10 1000+ people one. So, if I only won $10 while you tripled up, clearly I'm doing it wrong.Deposited $100 last year. Played a little and tripled it up (cashed out $320ish).
Deposited $100 this year. Looking like I'll just about triple up week 1. As long as so many terrible players exist at the $10-25 limit levels I'll keep playing.
3 double ups (5/10/25): won all
1 triple up (25): won it
One 10T league ($5): finished 1st for 22.50
Played 3 leagues in draft day:
1) $20k frenzy (15) that barely cashed for 20
2) double up (11): won it
3) target league (150pts) (11 buy): hit for 82.50
Cashed in every one. Not going to happen every week but the competition sucks out there, GB!
yeah, Draftstreet is better, more positions and better salary on the players IMOWow, worst-case scenario is I break even? I gotta get to Draftstreet!Draftstreet is way better...got hooked on that recently. Smaller buy-ins ($5, $11, $22, etc) and potential to win more money if not make your money back at worst.
That would be a rake of 4.13%. For each pair of entrants, the site collects $218, gives the winner his $109 back plus $100 profit, and keeps $9 for itself.The $109 50/50s that OP loves to play gives back $100 to the top half. That's a take of 9/109=8.26%.
If I'm putting $100 down on a pick'em against the book in vegas and they take $9 off the top is the rake 4.5%?That would be a rake of 4.13%. For each pair of entrants, the site collects $218, gives the winner his $109 back plus $100 profit, and keeps $9 for itself.The $109 50/50s that OP loves to play gives back $100 to the top half. That's a take of 9/109=8.26%.
9/218 = 4.13%.
Yes. If you're betting $100 to win $91, that's a 4.5% vig. (In Vegas, you typically bet $110 to win $100, which is a 4.55% vig.)If I'm putting $100 down on a pick'em against the book in vegas and they take $9 off the top is the rake 4.5%?That would be a rake of 4.13%. For each pair of entrants, the site collects $218, gives the winner his $109 back plus $100 profit, and keeps $9 for itself.The $109 50/50s that OP loves to play gives back $100 to the top half. That's a take of 9/109=8.26%.
9/218 = 4.13%.
Not currently a subscriber but Dodd's subscriber articles were pretty good, hes apparently even more involved this year so I wouldn't be surprised if they were better done.for the guys playing Fan Duel what are the best sites dedicated to this for advice on lineups and value plays? I have checked out Rotogrinders.com... are there certain guys to follow on twitter with daily baseball tips?