Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
Dinsy Ejotuz

George Zimmerman Questioned by Police for Threatening Wife With Gun

Recommended Posts

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

While I agree with the former statement, the bolded is delusional.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

Or it could be that some people think he murdered that kid even though the jury got it right due to the lack of evidence, and that those same people think he continues to be a danger to society and, for that reason, his subsequent behavior and arrest is newsworthy.

Actually, there was a ton of evidence. There was an eye-witness who saw Martin beating on Zimmerman. There is a 9-11 call that you can hear a man screaming, which is without a doubt Zimmerman. Unless you are stupid enough to want to believe that Martin while on top of Zimmerman beating on him 'MMA style' was the one screaming for his life. There is forensic evidence which supports Zimmerman shooting at close distance. There were injuries to Zimmerman documented by photos. There were grass stains on Zimmerman's back. Zimmerman was interrogated multiple times by authorities, and the lead investigator believed Zimmerman was basically telling the truth.

ETA: All the experts and Martin fanatics told me there would be more evidence brought out in the trial which would prove Zimmerman's guilt. Time after time, what little new evidence was revealed exonerated Zimmerman even more. It was a horrible case, and the prosecution did the absolute best job they could of trying to focus on the emotional aspects of the case, but the facts certainly did not support a prima facie case against the defendant.

No they ####### didn't. Technically, guys like me and Christo are "experts" and while we supported the idea there was lack of evidence to convict, there was no indication of "more evidence." Stop speaking in ridiculous hyperbole.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

Or it could be that some people think he murdered that kid even though the jury got it right due to the lack of evidence, and that those same people think he continues to be a danger to society and, for that reason, his subsequent behavior and arrest is newsworthy.

Actually, there was a ton of evidence. There was an eye-witness who saw Martin beating on Zimmerman. There is a 9-11 call that you can hear a man screaming, which is without a doubt Zimmerman. Unless you are stupid enough to want to believe that Martin while on top of Zimmerman beating on him 'MMA style' was the one screaming for his life. There is forensic evidence which supports Zimmerman shooting at close distance. There were injuries to Zimmerman documented by photos. There were grass stains on Zimmerman's back. Zimmerman was interrogated multiple times by authorities, and the lead investigator believed Zimmerman was basically telling the truth.

ETA: All the experts and Martin fanatics told me there would be more evidence brought out in the trial which would prove Zimmerman's guilt. Time after time, what little new evidence was revealed exonerated Zimmerman even more. It was a horrible case, and the prosecution did the absolute best job they could of trying to focus on the emotional aspects of the case, but the facts certainly did not support a prima facie case against the defendant.

Did you intend to quote my post? Because I don't see how anything you just wrote was responsive to what I posted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

Or it could be that some people think he murdered that kid even though the jury got it right due to the lack of evidence, and that those same people think he continues to be a danger to society and, for that reason, his subsequent behavior and arrest is newsworthy.

:lmao::goodposting:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

While I agree with the former statement, the bolded is delusional.

What evidence showed it was anything but self-defense? How do you overcome a witness who saw Martin beating on Zimmerman? How do you overcome a tape which was clearly a man (Zimmerman) screaming for his life? The prosecution had nothing. The case was a joke, purely emotional.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

Or it could be that some people think he murdered that kid even though the jury got it right due to the lack of evidence, and that those same people think he continues to be a danger to society and, for that reason, his subsequent behavior and arrest is newsworthy.

Actually, there was a ton of evidence. There was an eye-witness who saw Martin beating on Zimmerman. There is a 9-11 call that you can hear a man screaming, which is without a doubt Zimmerman. Unless you are stupid enough to want to believe that Martin while on top of Zimmerman beating on him 'MMA style' was the one screaming for his life. There is forensic evidence which supports Zimmerman shooting at close distance. There were injuries to Zimmerman documented by photos. There were grass stains on Zimmerman's back. Zimmerman was interrogated multiple times by authorities, and the lead investigator believed Zimmerman was basically telling the truth.

ETA: All the experts and Martin fanatics told me there would be more evidence brought out in the trial which would prove Zimmerman's guilt. Time after time, what little new evidence was revealed exonerated Zimmerman even more. It was a horrible case, and the prosecution did the absolute best job they could of trying to focus on the emotional aspects of the case, but the facts certainly did not support a prima facie case against the defendant.

No they ####### didn't. Technically, guys like me and Christo are "experts" and while we supported the idea there was lack of evidence to convict, there was no indication of "more evidence." Stop speaking in ridiculous hyperbole.

I was talking about all the expert talking heads Tim kept parroting from CNN and MSNBC and whatever other sources him and others would quote.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

Or it could be that some people think he murdered that kid even though the jury got it right due to the lack of evidence, and that those same people think he continues to be a danger to society and, for that reason, his subsequent behavior and arrest is newsworthy.

:lmao::goodposting:

Being a danger to society does not change the initial case, which was a joke. Zimmerman was innocent under the law. Not due to a lack of evidence, but because the evidence supported his case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

While I agree with the former statement, the bolded is delusional.

What evidence showed it was anything but self-defense? How do you overcome a witness who saw Martin beating on Zimmerman? How do you overcome a tape which was clearly a man (Zimmerman) screaming for his life? The prosecution had nothing. The case was a joke, purely emotional.

Self defense is an affirmative defense, knucklehead. All the State needs to establish PC is evidence showing that Zimmerman intended to kill Martin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

While I agree with the former statement, the bolded is delusional.

What evidence showed it was anything but self-defense? How do you overcome a witness who saw Martin beating on Zimmerman? How do you overcome a tape which was clearly a man (Zimmerman) screaming for his life? The prosecution had nothing. The case was a joke, purely emotional.

Self defense is an affirmative defense, knucklehead. All the State needs to establish PC is evidence showing that Zimmerman intended to kill Martin.

It is also preponderance of evidence, and the prosecution was well aware the evidence was there for self-defense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

While I agree with the former statement, the bolded is delusional.

What evidence showed it was anything but self-defense? How do you overcome a witness who saw Martin beating on Zimmerman? How do you overcome a tape which was clearly a man (Zimmerman) screaming for his life? The prosecution had nothing. The case was a joke, purely emotional.

Self defense is an affirmative defense, knucklehead. All the State needs to establish PC is evidence showing that Zimmerman intended to kill Martin.

It is also preponderance of evidence, and the prosecution was well aware the evidence was there for self-defense.

:sigh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

Or it could be that some people think he murdered that kid even though the jury got it right due to the lack of evidence, and that those same people think he continues to be a danger to society and, for that reason, his subsequent behavior and arrest is newsworthy.

:lmao::goodposting:

Being a danger to society does not change the initial case, which was a joke. Zimmerman was innocent under the law. Not due to a lack of evidence, but because the evidence supported his case.

Dude...give it up,you`re embarrassing yourself.Nobody cares about that case anymore....Zimmy keeps showing a pattern of behavior that shows what type of person he really is.Technically he was found not guilty ,but judging by his recent actions im sure that he is morally guilty for causing the events that lead to Treys death.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

While I agree with the former statement, the bolded is delusional.

What evidence showed it was anything but self-defense? How do you overcome a witness who saw Martin beating on Zimmerman? How do you overcome a tape which was clearly a man (Zimmerman) screaming for his life? The prosecution had nothing. The case was a joke, purely emotional.

Self defense is an affirmative defense, knucklehead. All the State needs to establish PC is evidence showing that Zimmerman intended to kill Martin.

It is also preponderance of evidence, and the prosecution was well aware the evidence was there for self-defense.

:sigh:

Oh please. Prosecutors do not take cases to court unless they were confident they had a chance to win. This case never had a prayer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

Or it could be that some people think he murdered that kid even though the jury got it right due to the lack of evidence, and that those same people think he continues to be a danger to society and, for that reason, his subsequent behavior and arrest is newsworthy.

:lmao::goodposting:

Being a danger to society does not change the initial case, which was a joke. Zimmerman was innocent under the law. Not due to a lack of evidence, but because the evidence supported his case.

Dude...give it up,you`re embarrassing yourself.Nobody cares about that case anymore....Zimmy keeps showing a pattern of behavior that shows what type of person he really is.Technically he was found not guilty ,but judging by his recent actions im sure that he is morally guilty for causing the events that lead to Treys death.

Being morally guilty by your standards is not sufficient enough to lock someone up. I am not going to defend Zimmerman on moral grounds because he is a loose-cannon and probably is a danger and perhaps even mentally unstable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who posted in: George Zimmerman Questioned by Police...

Member name Posts

jon_mx 20

BustedKnuckles 17

The Commish 16

fatness 16

5 digit know nothing 15

TheIronSheik

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

Or it could be that some people think he murdered that kid even though the jury got it right due to the lack of evidence, and that those same people think he continues to be a danger to society and, for that reason, his subsequent behavior and arrest is newsworthy.

Actually, there was a ton of evidence. There was an eye-witness who saw Martin beating on Zimmerman. There is a 9-11 call that you can hear a man screaming, which is without a doubt Zimmerman. Unless you are stupid enough to want to believe that Martin while on top of Zimmerman beating on him 'MMA style' was the one screaming for his life. There is forensic evidence which supports Zimmerman shooting at close distance. There were injuries to Zimmerman documented by photos. There were grass stains on Zimmerman's back. Zimmerman was interrogated multiple times by authorities, and the lead investigator believed Zimmerman was basically telling the truth.

ETA: All the experts and Martin fanatics told me there would be more evidence brought out in the trial which would prove Zimmerman's guilt. Time after time, what little new evidence was revealed exonerated Zimmerman even more. It was a horrible case, and the prosecution did the absolute best job they could of trying to focus on the emotional aspects of the case, but the facts certainly did not support a prima facie case against the defendant.

No they ####### didn't. Technically, guys like me and Christo are "experts" and while we supported the idea there was lack of evidence to convict, there was no indication of "more evidence." Stop speaking in ridiculous hyperbole.

I was talking about all the expert talking heads Tim kept parroting from CNN and MSNBC and whatever other sources him and others would quote.

Why am I getting blamed for your utter hyperbole? That's on YOU!

And as far as ridiculous commentary, that didn't come from the anti-Zimmerman side. We felt he committed murder, and hoped there would be enough evidence to prove it, but most of us acknowledged there probably wasn't.

It was the pro-Zimmerman people who behaved in that thread in ways so absurd and sometimes nauseating that it was actually unpleasant to read. Remember Trayvon's formula for making PCP out of iced tea? Or how about Trayvon's "criminal" background (which was ugly racism)? Or how about Carolina Hustler, who spent multiple pages arguing that a 911 operator had no police authority? And you dare to call the anti-Zimmerman crowd irrational? Talk about revisionist history...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

Or it could be that some people think he murdered that kid even though the jury got it right due to the lack of evidence, and that those same people think he continues to be a danger to society and, for that reason, his subsequent behavior and arrest is newsworthy.

Actually, there was a ton of evidence. There was an eye-witness who saw Martin beating on Zimmerman. There is a 9-11 call that you can hear a man screaming, which is without a doubt Zimmerman. Unless you are stupid enough to want to believe that Martin while on top of Zimmerman beating on him 'MMA style' was the one screaming for his life. There is forensic evidence which supports Zimmerman shooting at close distance. There were injuries to Zimmerman documented by photos. There were grass stains on Zimmerman's back. Zimmerman was interrogated multiple times by authorities, and the lead investigator believed Zimmerman was basically telling the truth.

ETA: All the experts and Martin fanatics told me there would be more evidence brought out in the trial which would prove Zimmerman's guilt. Time after time, what little new evidence was revealed exonerated Zimmerman even more. It was a horrible case, and the prosecution did the absolute best job they could of trying to focus on the emotional aspects of the case, but the facts certainly did not support a prima facie case against the defendant.

No they ####### didn't. Technically, guys like me and Christo are "experts" and while we supported the idea there was lack of evidence to convict, there was no indication of "more evidence." Stop speaking in ridiculous hyperbole.

I was talking about all the expert talking heads Tim kept parroting from CNN and MSNBC and whatever other sources him and others would quote.

Why am I getting blamed for your utter hyperbole? That's on YOU!

And as far as ridiculous commentary, that didn't come from the anti-Zimmerman side. We felt he committed murder, and hoped there would be enough evidence to prove it, but most of us acknowledged there probably wasn't.

It was the pro-Zimmerman people who behaved in that thread in ways so absurd and sometimes nauseating that it was actually unpleasant to read. Remember Trayvon's formula for making PCP out of iced tea? Or how about Trayvon's "criminal" background (which was ugly racism)? Or how about Carolina Hustler, who spent multiple pages arguing that a 911 operator had no police authority? And you dare to call the anti-Zimmerman crowd irrational? Talk about revisionist history...

Are you denying that you stated numerous times that you were absolutely convinced that more evidence against Zimmerman would come out???????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

Or it could be that some people think he murdered that kid even though the jury got it right due to the lack of evidence, and that those same people think he continues to be a danger to society and, for that reason, his subsequent behavior and arrest is newsworthy.

Actually, there was a ton of evidence. There was an eye-witness who saw Martin beating on Zimmerman. There is a 9-11 call that you can hear a man screaming, which is without a doubt Zimmerman. Unless you are stupid enough to want to believe that Martin while on top of Zimmerman beating on him 'MMA style' was the one screaming for his life. There is forensic evidence which supports Zimmerman shooting at close distance. There were injuries to Zimmerman documented by photos. There were grass stains on Zimmerman's back. Zimmerman was interrogated multiple times by authorities, and the lead investigator believed Zimmerman was basically telling the truth.

ETA: All the experts and Martin fanatics told me there would be more evidence brought out in the trial which would prove Zimmerman's guilt. Time after time, what little new evidence was revealed exonerated Zimmerman even more. It was a horrible case, and the prosecution did the absolute best job they could of trying to focus on the emotional aspects of the case, but the facts certainly did not support a prima facie case against the defendant.

No they ####### didn't. Technically, guys like me and Christo are "experts" and while we supported the idea there was lack of evidence to convict, there was no indication of "more evidence." Stop speaking in ridiculous hyperbole.

I was talking about all the expert talking heads Tim kept parroting from CNN and MSNBC and whatever other sources him and others would quote.

Why am I getting blamed for your utter hyperbole? That's on YOU!

And as far as ridiculous commentary, that didn't come from the anti-Zimmerman side. We felt he committed murder, and hoped there would be enough evidence to prove it, but most of us acknowledged there probably wasn't.

It was the pro-Zimmerman people who behaved in that thread in ways so absurd and sometimes nauseating that it was actually unpleasant to read. Remember Trayvon's formula for making PCP out of iced tea? Or how about Trayvon's "criminal" background (which was ugly racism)? Or how about Carolina Hustler, who spent multiple pages arguing that a 911 operator had no police authority? And you dare to call the anti-Zimmerman crowd irrational? Talk about revisionist history...

Are you denying that you stated numerous times that you were absolutely convinced that more evidence against Zimmerman would come out???????

Seven question marks? You seem to have your panties in a bind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

Or it could be that some people think he murdered that kid even though the jury got it right due to the lack of evidence, and that those same people think he continues to be a danger to society and, for that reason, his subsequent behavior and arrest is newsworthy.

Actually, there was a ton of evidence. There was an eye-witness who saw Martin beating on Zimmerman. There is a 9-11 call that you can hear a man screaming, which is without a doubt Zimmerman. Unless you are stupid enough to want to believe that Martin while on top of Zimmerman beating on him 'MMA style' was the one screaming for his life. There is forensic evidence which supports Zimmerman shooting at close distance. There were injuries to Zimmerman documented by photos. There were grass stains on Zimmerman's back. Zimmerman was interrogated multiple times by authorities, and the lead investigator believed Zimmerman was basically telling the truth.

ETA: All the experts and Martin fanatics told me there would be more evidence brought out in the trial which would prove Zimmerman's guilt. Time after time, what little new evidence was revealed exonerated Zimmerman even more. It was a horrible case, and the prosecution did the absolute best job they could of trying to focus on the emotional aspects of the case, but the facts certainly did not support a prima facie case against the defendant.

No they ####### didn't. Technically, guys like me and Christo are "experts" and while we supported the idea there was lack of evidence to convict, there was no indication of "more evidence." Stop speaking in ridiculous hyperbole.

I was talking about all the expert talking heads Tim kept parroting from CNN and MSNBC and whatever other sources him and others would quote.

Why am I getting blamed for your utter hyperbole? That's on YOU!

And as far as ridiculous commentary, that didn't come from the anti-Zimmerman side. We felt he committed murder, and hoped there would be enough evidence to prove it, but most of us acknowledged there probably wasn't.

It was the pro-Zimmerman people who behaved in that thread in ways so absurd and sometimes nauseating that it was actually unpleasant to read. Remember Trayvon's formula for making PCP out of iced tea? Or how about Trayvon's "criminal" background (which was ugly racism)? Or how about Carolina Hustler, who spent multiple pages arguing that a 911 operator had no police authority? And you dare to call the anti-Zimmerman crowd irrational? Talk about revisionist history...

Are you denying that you stated numerous times that you were absolutely convinced that more evidence against Zimmerman would come out???????

Seven question marks? You seem to have your panties in a bind.

No, I am just in a bit of a stupor that Tim is denying something he was very vocal about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What am I denying exactly? I need you to be more specific.

You said many times prior to the trial that the prosecution had a lot more evidence against Zimmerman which was not known publicly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG you guys take what is actually a really interesting real-life scenario rich with legal and social issues and make it ####### insufferable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What am I denying exactly? I need you to be more specific.

You said many times prior to the trial that the prosecution had a lot more evidence against Zimmerman which was not known publicly.

if my memory is correct i believe that Tim changed his mind many times as the case changed with different evidence that came in...even i knew that they wouldnt get a conviction based on the lack of evidence in treyvons favor...without direct testimony from the dead kid it wasnt gonna happen. I stood firm in my belief that Zimmy caused the events to transpire by profiling Treyvon.

Edited by BustedKnuckles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What am I denying exactly? I need you to be more specific.

You said many times prior to the trial that the prosecution had a lot more evidence against Zimmerman which was not known publicly.
Ah. What I think I wrote was that I HOPED that was the case.

But who cares? How does that compare to iced tea being a key ingredient for angel dust?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

Or it could be that some people think he murdered that kid even though the jury got it right due to the lack of evidence, and that those same people think he continues to be a danger to society and, for that reason, his subsequent behavior and arrest is newsworthy.

Thank You BB, well said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see jon still fighting the good fight :lmao: Can we get the posts in this tread included with the posts from the other Zimmerman thread in the "most whacko shtick" contest jon was proposing??? It's not often he has a chance of winning many...with this thread included he should win by a landslide.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

Or it could be that some people think he murdered that kid even though the jury got it right due to the lack of evidence, and that those same people think he continues to be a danger to society and, for that reason, his subsequent behavior and arrest is newsworthy.

Actually, there was a ton of evidence. There was an eye-witness who saw Martin beating on Zimmerman. There is a 9-11 call that you can hear a man screaming, which is without a doubt Zimmerman. Unless you are stupid enough to want to believe that Martin while on top of Zimmerman beating on him 'MMA style' was the one screaming for his life. There is forensic evidence which supports Zimmerman shooting at close distance. There were injuries to Zimmerman documented by photos. There were grass stains on Zimmerman's back. Zimmerman was interrogated multiple times by authorities, and the lead investigator believed Zimmerman was basically telling the truth.

ETA: All the experts and Martin fanatics told me there would be more evidence brought out in the trial which would prove Zimmerman's guilt. Time after time, what little new evidence was revealed exonerated Zimmerman even more. It was a horrible case, and the prosecution did the absolute best job they could of trying to focus on the emotional aspects of the case, but the facts certainly did not support a prima facie case against the defendant.

Did you intend to quote my post? Because I don't see how anything you just wrote was responsive to what I posted.

Probably the he murdered that kid part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do this many people still have their panties in a bind over a case the jury clearly got right and which never had any evidence which merited it going to court? So what if Zimmerman is scum. It changes nothing.

Or it could be that some people think he murdered that kid even though the jury got it right due to the lack of evidence, and that those same people think he continues to be a danger to society and, for that reason, his subsequent behavior and arrest is newsworthy.

Actually, there was a ton of evidence. There was an eye-witness who saw Martin beating on Zimmerman. There is a 9-11 call that you can hear a man screaming, which is without a doubt Zimmerman. Unless you are stupid enough to want to believe that Martin while on top of Zimmerman beating on him 'MMA style' was the one screaming for his life. There is forensic evidence which supports Zimmerman shooting at close distance. There were injuries to Zimmerman documented by photos. There were grass stains on Zimmerman's back. Zimmerman was interrogated multiple times by authorities, and the lead investigator believed Zimmerman was basically telling the truth.

ETA: All the experts and Martin fanatics told me there would be more evidence brought out in the trial which would prove Zimmerman's guilt. Time after time, what little new evidence was revealed exonerated Zimmerman even more. It was a horrible case, and the prosecution did the absolute best job they could of trying to focus on the emotional aspects of the case, but the facts certainly did not support a prima facie case against the defendant.

No they ####### didn't. Technically, guys like me and Christo are "experts" and while we supported the idea there was lack of evidence to convict, there was no indication of "more evidence." Stop speaking in ridiculous hyperbole.

It's jon_mx, so let's keep our expectations realistic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Let's keep talking about the trial so they don't keep talking about our hero Zimmerman being arrested for something else."

:lmao:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see jon still fighting the good fight :lmao: Can we get the posts in this tread included with the posts from the other Zimmerman thread in the "most whacko shtick" contest jon was proposing??? It's not often he has a chance of winning many...with this thread included he should win by a landslide.

Nutjob Comment Scorecard

Not counting smartass comments meant to be humorous. Mostly looking for crazy ### speculation which proved to be incorrect.

Page 1: PlasmaDogPlasma 3X, Mello 2X, Football Menance

Page 2: Jobber, Mr. Pack, Clifford, SacramentoBob 3X, BustedKnuckes,…….Christo plus several others try to reign in the loony comments

Page 3-4: NCCommish, Topes 2X, Clifford 6X, Splasdash

Page 5: Splasdash, Clifford, NCCommish (probable he pulled the gun inciting some kind of dustup.), Christo

There is the scorecard for first 5 pages....you do the next five.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see jon still fighting the good fight :lmao: Can we get the posts in this tread included with the posts from the other Zimmerman thread in the "most whacko shtick" contest jon was proposing??? It's not often he has a chance of winning many...with this thread included he should win by a landslide.

Nutjob Comment Scorecard

Not counting smartass comments meant to be humorous. Mostly looking for crazy ### speculation which proved to be incorrect.

Page 1: PlasmaDogPlasma 3X, Mello 2X, Football Menance

Page 2: Jobber, Mr. Pack, Clifford, SacramentoBob 3X, BustedKnuckes,…….Christo plus several others try to reign in the loony comments

Page 3-4: NCCommish, Topes 2X, Clifford 6X, Splasdash

Page 5: Splasdash, Clifford, NCCommish (probable he pulled the gun inciting some kind of dustup.), Christo

There is the scorecard for first 5 pages....you do the next five.

ah....nice deflection, well played.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see jon still fighting the good fight :lmao: Can we get the posts in this tread included with the posts from the other Zimmerman thread in the "most whacko shtick" contest jon was proposing??? It's not often he has a chance of winning many...with this thread included he should win by a landslide.

Nutjob Comment Scorecard

Not counting smartass comments meant to be humorous. Mostly looking for crazy ### speculation which proved to be incorrect.

Page 1: PlasmaDogPlasma 3X, Mello 2X, Football Menance

Page 2: Jobber, Mr. Pack, Clifford, SacramentoBob 3X, BustedKnuckes,…….Christo plus several others try to reign in the loony comments

Page 3-4: NCCommish, Topes 2X, Clifford 6X, Splasdash

Page 5: Splasdash, Clifford, NCCommish (probable he pulled the gun inciting some kind of dustup.), Christo

There is the scorecard for first 5 pages....you do the next five.

ah....nice deflection, well played.

OK what is your definition of a nutjob. Being a ######## for a half dozen pages because of semantics over the use of the term Stand Your Ground? You insisting that it can only be used for the doctrine of SYG which differentiates SYG defense against other types of self-defense vs. the definition that every media outlet was using in that it applied to the SYG laws as passed in Florida which included a whole bunch of stuff like pretrial motions for dismissal and immunity from civil cases? That is what you call a nutjob, your ridiculous insistance that the term can only be used in the most narrow way which went against the common use of the term by most everyone else in the country?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see jon still fighting the good fight :lmao: Can we get the posts in this tread included with the posts from the other Zimmerman thread in the "most whacko shtick" contest jon was proposing??? It's not often he has a chance of winning many...with this thread included he should win by a landslide.

Nutjob Comment Scorecard

Not counting smartass comments meant to be humorous. Mostly looking for crazy ### speculation which proved to be incorrect.

Page 1: PlasmaDogPlasma 3X, Mello 2X, Football Menance

Page 2: Jobber, Mr. Pack, Clifford, SacramentoBob 3X, BustedKnuckes,…….Christo plus several others try to reign in the loony comments

Page 3-4: NCCommish, Topes 2X, Clifford 6X, Splasdash

Page 5: Splasdash, Clifford, NCCommish (probable he pulled the gun inciting some kind of dustup.), Christo

There is the scorecard for first 5 pages....you do the next five.

ah....nice deflection, well played.

OK what is your definition of a nutjob. Being a ######## for a half dozen pages because of semantics over the use of the term Stand Your Ground? You insisting that it can only be used for the doctrine of SYG which differentiates SYG defense against other types of self-defense vs. the definition that every media outlet was using in that it applied to the SYG laws as passed in Florida which included a whole bunch of stuff like pretrial motions for dismissal and immunity from civil cases? That is what you call a nutjob, your ridiculous insistance that the term can only be used in the most narrow way which went against the common use of the term by most everyone else in the country?

:lmao:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see jon still fighting the good fight :lmao: Can we get the posts in this tread included with the posts from the other Zimmerman thread in the "most whacko shtick" contest jon was proposing??? It's not often he has a chance of winning many...with this thread included he should win by a landslide.

Nutjob Comment Scorecard

Not counting smartass comments meant to be humorous. Mostly looking for crazy ### speculation which proved to be incorrect.

Page 1: PlasmaDogPlasma 3X, Mello 2X, Football Menance

Page 2: Jobber, Mr. Pack, Clifford, SacramentoBob 3X, BustedKnuckes,…….Christo plus several others try to reign in the loony comments

Page 3-4: NCCommish, Topes 2X, Clifford 6X, Splasdash

Page 5: Splasdash, Clifford, NCCommish (probable he pulled the gun inciting some kind of dustup.), Christo

There is the scorecard for first 5 pages....you do the next five.

ah....nice deflection, well played.

OK what is your definition of a nutjob. Being a ######## for a half dozen pages because of semantics over the use of the term Stand Your Ground? You insisting that it can only be used for the doctrine of SYG which differentiates SYG defense against other types of self-defense vs. the definition that every media outlet was using in that it applied to the SYG laws as passed in Florida which included a whole bunch of stuff like pretrial motions for dismissal and immunity from civil cases? That is what you call a nutjob, your ridiculous insistance that the term can only be used in the most narrow way which went against the common use of the term by most everyone else in the country?

:lmao:

"I'm not a nutjob! I'm not, I'm not, I'm not!!!!!" :rant:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see jon still fighting the good fight :lmao: Can we get the posts in this tread included with the posts from the other Zimmerman thread in the "most whacko shtick" contest jon was proposing??? It's not often he has a chance of winning many...with this thread included he should win by a landslide.

Nutjob Comment Scorecard

Not counting smartass comments meant to be humorous. Mostly looking for crazy ### speculation which proved to be incorrect.

Page 1: PlasmaDogPlasma 3X, Mello 2X, Football Menance

Page 2: Jobber, Mr. Pack, Clifford, SacramentoBob 3X, BustedKnuckes,…….Christo plus several others try to reign in the loony comments

Page 3-4: NCCommish, Topes 2X, Clifford 6X, Splasdash

Page 5: Splasdash, Clifford, NCCommish (probable he pulled the gun inciting some kind of dustup.), Christo

There is the scorecard for first 5 pages....you do the next five.

ah....nice deflection, well played.

OK what is your definition of a nutjob. Being a ######## for a half dozen pages because of semantics over the use of the term Stand Your Ground? You insisting that it can only be used for the doctrine of SYG which differentiates SYG defense against other types of self-defense vs. the definition that every media outlet was using in that it applied to the SYG laws as passed in Florida which included a whole bunch of stuff like pretrial motions for dismissal and immunity from civil cases? That is what you call a nutjob, your ridiculous insistance that the term can only be used in the most narrow way which went against the common use of the term by most everyone else in the country?

:lmao:

:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dont give up jon, dont ever give up

Why should I? It is amazing the revisionist history that is being put forth here. My biggest problem was being right so damn often. It is all in black and white.

Edited by jon_mx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dont give up jon, dont ever give up

If nutty adherence to ultra-conservative views of the world was a religion, jon_mx would be Grand Mufti.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dont give up jon, dont ever give up

If nutty adherence to ultra-conservative views of the world was a religion, jon_mx would be Grand Mufti.

Can you link me to some of these so-called ultra conservative views. TIA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dont give up jon, dont ever give up

Why should I? It is amazing the revisionist history that is being put forth here. My biggest problem was being right so damn often. It is all in black and white.

Nutjob says what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dont give up jon, dont ever give up

If nutty adherence to ultra-conservative views of the world was a religion, jon_mx would be Grand Mufti.

Can you link me to some of these so-called ultra conservative views. TIA

http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?app=core&module=search&do=user_activity&search_app=forums&mid=7205&sid=63c5fdd23870bdf0e619bf8f4969c0c5&search_app_filters[forums][searchInKey]=&userMode=content

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dont give up jon, dont ever give up

If nutty adherence to ultra-conservative views of the world was a religion, jon_mx would be Grand Mufti.

Can you link me to some of these so-called ultra conservative views. TIA

http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?app=core&module=search&do=user_activity&search_app=forums&mid=7205&sid=63c5fdd23870bdf0e619bf8f4969c0c5&search_app_filters[forums][searchInKey]=&userMode=content

See you have nothing. Point to my ridiculous positions, but try to keep it to the last couple of years. It should be very easy to find many specific examples of my nut job positions. :coffee:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jons like a little kid trying to hit a pinata that will never break

And then bragging about being right that it won't break.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I get all the left-wing kooks hate me, but where are all my loony right-wing nutjob positions. I can easily name a dozen things I was right about in the Zimmerman thread which that other people on that thread were wrong about. Here are a half-dozen i recall without digging through the mess.

1. Zimmerman did not need to testify for self-defense (he did not and still won).

2. The all-woman jury was not a huge win for the prosecution (I pointed out couple were gun-owners, which was a huge win for the Defense).

3. That Zimmerman would not accept a plea bargain. (he obviously did not, and someone owes me $100).

4. That there jury would not convict.

5. That the first judge said things which crossed the line. Many people here cheered his comments. (the judge was removed).

6. It was Zimmerman screaming (only a whackjob still believes it could have possible been Martin screaming for help as he was going off MMA style on Zimmerman, and the only real eye-witness said it was Zimmerman).

Edited by jon_mx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see jon still fighting the good fight :lmao: Can we get the posts in this tread included with the posts from the other Zimmerman thread in the "most whacko shtick" contest jon was proposing??? It's not often he has a chance of winning many...with this thread included he should win by a landslide.

Nutjob Comment Scorecard

Not counting smartass comments meant to be humorous. Mostly looking for crazy ### speculation which proved to be incorrect.

Page 1: PlasmaDogPlasma 3X, Mello 2X, Football Menance

Page 2: Jobber, Mr. Pack, Clifford, SacramentoBob 3X, BustedKnuckes,…….Christo plus several others try to reign in the loony comments

Page 3-4: NCCommish, Topes 2X, Clifford 6X, Splasdash

Page 5: Splasdash, Clifford, NCCommish (probable he pulled the gun inciting some kind of dustup.), Christo

There is the scorecard for first 5 pages....you do the next five.

ah....nice deflection, well played.

OK what is your definition of a nutjob. Being a ######## for a half dozen pages because of semantics over the use of the term Stand Your Ground? You insisting that it can only be used for the doctrine of SYG which differentiates SYG defense against other types of self-defense vs. the definition that every media outlet was using in that it applied to the SYG laws as passed in Florida which included a whole bunch of stuff like pretrial motions for dismissal and immunity from civil cases? That is what you call a nutjob, your ridiculous insistance that the term can only be used in the most narrow way which went against the common use of the term by most everyone else in the country?

:lmao:

:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:

Did you finally sober up to see it?? :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I get all the left-wing kooks hate me, but where are all my loony right-wing nutjob positions. I can easily name a dozen things I was right about in the Zimmerman thread which that other people on that thread were wrong about. Here are a half-dozen i recall without digging through the mess.

1. Zimmerman did not to testify for self-defense (he did not and still won).

2. The all-woman jury was not a huge win for the prosecution (I pointed out couple were gun-owners, which was a huge win for the Defense).

3. That Zimmerman would not accept a plea bargain. (he obviously did not, and someone owes me $100).

4. That there jury would not convict.

5. That the first judge said things which crossed the line. Many people here cheered his comments. (the judge was removed).

6. It was Zimmerman screaming (only a whackjob still believes it could have possible been Martin screaming for help as he was going off MMA style on Zimmerman, and the only real eye-witness said it was Zimmerman).

You are seriously like the terminator. props for that bro

Just know, we are not laughing with you but rather at you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see jon still fighting the good fight :lmao: Can we get the posts in this tread included with the posts from the other Zimmerman thread in the "most whacko shtick" contest jon was proposing??? It's not often he has a chance of winning many...with this thread included he should win by a landslide.

Nutjob Comment Scorecard

Not counting smartass comments meant to be humorous. Mostly looking for crazy ### speculation which proved to be incorrect.

Page 1: PlasmaDogPlasma 3X, Mello 2X, Football Menance

Page 2: Jobber, Mr. Pack, Clifford, SacramentoBob 3X, BustedKnuckes,…….Christo plus several others try to reign in the loony comments

Page 3-4: NCCommish, Topes 2X, Clifford 6X, Splasdash

Page 5: Splasdash, Clifford, NCCommish (probable he pulled the gun inciting some kind of dustup.), Christo

There is the scorecard for first 5 pages....you do the next five.

ah....nice deflection, well played.

OK what is your definition of a nutjob. Being a ######## for a half dozen pages because of semantics over the use of the term Stand Your Ground? You insisting that it can only be used for the doctrine of SYG which differentiates SYG defense against other types of self-defense vs. the definition that every media outlet was using in that it applied to the SYG laws as passed in Florida which included a whole bunch of stuff like pretrial motions for dismissal and immunity from civil cases? That is what you call a nutjob, your ridiculous insistance that the term can only be used in the most narrow way which went against the common use of the term by most everyone else in the country?

:lmao:

:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:

Did you finally sober up to see it?? :lol:

No....I am laughing at all the lefties who were constantly wrong throughout the whole thread and now want to pretend they had it right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.