What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

CB Richard Sherman (1 Viewer)

I haven't been buying into the Seahawks shutting down top receivers this year, because plenty of good ones have put up good numbers. This week will be interesting though, because Vincent Jackson has a long history of getting shut down any time he plays a quality defense/corner. WIth Williams out, I'd like to think that Sherman will play a lot of man coverage on him, and if so, this is one of those games where I would be scared of starting my top WR against the Seahawks.

 
I haven't been buying into the Seahawks shutting down top receivers this year, because plenty of good ones have put up good numbers. This week will be interesting though, because Vincent Jackson has a long history of getting shut down any time he plays a quality defense/corner. WIth Williams out, I'd like to think that Sherman will play a lot of man coverage on him, and if so, this is one of those games where I would be scared of starting my top WR against the Seahawks.
I was curious to see what would happen here. Jackson seemed to play an equal amount on each side of the field with both Browner and Sherman lined up across from him. Both of his catches were for very short gains. Jackson wasn't targeted deep all game long.

 
I haven't been buying into the Seahawks shutting down top receivers this year, because plenty of good ones have put up good numbers. This week will be interesting though, because Vincent Jackson has a long history of getting shut down any time he plays a quality defense/corner. WIth Williams out, I'd like to think that Sherman will play a lot of man coverage on him, and if so, this is one of those games where I would be scared of starting my top WR against the Seahawks.
I was curious to see what would happen here. Jackson seemed to play an equal amount on each side of the field with both Browner and Sherman lined up across from him. Both of his catches were for very short gains. Jackson wasn't targeted deep all game long.
Meh, this wasn't a game to be happy about defensively. We sucked giant, throbbing, veiny, #### on defense. It was a ####show we should not be proud of. It is similar to saying we stopped the LG from scoring a TD.

 
I haven't been buying into the Seahawks shutting down top receivers this year, because plenty of good ones have put up good numbers. This week will be interesting though, because Vincent Jackson has a long history of getting shut down any time he plays a quality defense/corner. WIth Williams out, I'd like to think that Sherman will play a lot of man coverage on him, and if so, this is one of those games where I would be scared of starting my top WR against the Seahawks.
I was curious to see what would happen here. Jackson seemed to play an equal amount on each side of the field with both Browner and Sherman lined up across from him. Both of his catches were for very short gains. Jackson wasn't targeted deep all game long.
Meh, this wasn't a game to be happy about defensively. We sucked giant, throbbing, veiny, #### on defense. It was a ####show we should not be proud of. It is similar to saying we stopped the LG from scoring a TD.
One of the things I enjoy so much about Pete Carroll as a coach is that he's not wrapped up in positive and negative emotional responses like the average fan. They have "Tell the truth Mondays" for a reason. They will watch the film and everyone will get graded. The CBs will grade out well. Perhaps after you have your emotional rant you'll take a moment to consider who played well and who played poorly. Further, you might note that they made great adjustments after halftime and only have up three points in the final thirty five minutes.

I'm having some serious questions about the attacking style that Dan Quinn is having the defensive lineman play. More than once I saw Red Bryant getting trapped in the wrong gap. They're gambling a bit up front, and get torched because of it.

 
Sherman is mediocre at best. The PEDs speak volumes. I'd rather have Talib.
:lmao: He made All-Pro last year without them (even if you think he took them, he certainly didn't after the test). This year he's among the CBs leading the league in interceptions. There was no dropoff from his supposed PED use and he was voted the best at his position. I guess the rest of the league, by your standards, are below mediocre.

 
I’m Richard Sherman. I’m a guy who plays cornerback for the Seahawks, who makes $550,000 a year to control a small sliver of one of 32 NFL fields on any given Sunday. But let’s imagine, for a moment, I’m a much more powerful man, one who earns a salary—$30 million—higher than the best-paid player in the league. I’m the man who, for better or worse, holds the future of pro football in his palm.

I’m the commissioner of the NFL.

It’s a difficult job, I’m sure, working for the owners while looking out for the welfare of the players. It always seems like a happy balance is being struck in late April, when a parade of draftees crosses the stage at Radio City Music Hall, each one giving Roger Goodell a handshake and a hug after his name is called. But for the rest of the year it’s clear that the interests of the 1,700 players pale in importance to those of the 32 owners.

But I, Commissioner Sherman, am here to fix that, so let’s get started.

The first thing I would do is give up some of my power. I’d leave the whole fine system for on-field actions to a committee of former players and former coaches. I’d create a system of checks and balances, something like a democracy. (Crazy, right?)

If I were commissioner, I’d listen to Brandon Meriweather because he’s expressed something that many players think but are afraid to say. When the Redskins safety said he was going to start targeting the ACLs of offensive players, his message was understood by his peers but confusing to fans and media. The defenseless-receiver rule is forcing tacklers to target knees. Offensive players bend down to protect their knees, and if we target the waist, we collide with their heads and get fined. If we target the knees, we don’t get fined, and sometimes they don’t get up.

If I were commissioner, I’d listen to Hamza Abdullah, too. He’s the former pro who just blasted the league on Twitter for several things, including its handling of retiree benefits. I’d streamline the system to make it easier for players who need disability money to get it. Many ex-players would rather suffer than jump through the NFL’s hoops. They have to file paperwork, wait several months, go see this doctor on this day, a specialist on that day, and if they miss a deadline, they’re ineligible. That’s just how the league is, but not the way it has to be.

If I were commissioner, I wouldn’t ask a player to take a pay cut to play for a championship. Players are now paid postseason bonuses that are usually less than their standard regular-season game check. The compensation should consistently mirror the profits, regular season or not.

If I were commissioner, I’d be very transparent about where fines end up. In my regime all the money from helmet-to-helmet fines would go directly to fund treatment for players suffering from injuries from head trauma.

If I were commissioner, I’d give the players back their individuality. I wouldn’t pretend that knee and thigh pads prevent injuries. I’d never fine players for wearing the wrong length socks or cleats with too much or too little of one team color. I’d let them wear whatever they want for interviews at their own lockers. Seahawks running back Marshawn Lynch would be free to promote his Beast Mode merchandise—which supports his charity—in any way he chooses, as long as he doesn’t do it during a game. I’d understand that this league is not all about “the Shield” and all the name brands this commissioner has sold it to. The NFL is nothing without the players, individuals whose creativity should be celebrated.

If I were commissioner, I’d actually care about my players. I’d recognize that most of them don’t spend more than three years in the NFL, and when they’re done, many of them are broken in mind and body, and I’d do everything I could to genuinely help them in their transition from athlete to retiree.

And if that were too difficult, if I found it was impossible to do the job asked of me by NFL owners and still do right by players, I’d do those incoming rookies the favor of not offering a hug they’ll soon regret.

http://mmqb.si.com/2013/11/06/richard-sherman-if-i-was-commissioner/

 
Things like that need to make people realize that some of these "punk" players, especially CB's, put on that persona on the field to get into their opponents minds and pump themselves up. Whether it's Sherman, Finnigan, Jenkin, Hall, etc., these dudes are all obnoxious to opposing receivers as part of their on-field play. I don't know it if necessarily works or not, and some of these guys probably are punks all the time--but I'm not going to assume they are just based on their trash talk on the field.

 
How awesome would it be if after interceptions/big plays Sherman started giving the "commish hug" to a teammate as his celebration?

 
Sherman goes back to ATL this week. He played well early last year against Roddy White, but ended up getting burned when he fell down on a deep ball. Leading up to that play Sherman made a spectacle of himself doing the finger twirl around the ear when balls were thrown his way signaling "you crazy" for trying that.

Asked about the challenge of covering Roddy White this week he responded, "What challenge?"

 
Things like that need to make people realize that some of these "punk" players, especially CB's, put on that persona on the field to get into their opponents minds and pump themselves up. Whether it's Sherman, Finnigan, Jenkin, Hall, etc., these dudes are all obnoxious to opposing receivers as part of their on-field play. I don't know it if necessarily works or not, and some of these guys probably are punks all the time--but I'm not going to assume they are just based on their trash talk on the field.
Sherman in particular is absolutely punk trash all of the time. No doubt in my mind.

 
Things like that need to make people realize that some of these "punk" players, especially CB's, put on that persona on the field to get into their opponents minds and pump themselves up. Whether it's Sherman, Finnigan, Jenkin, Hall, etc., these dudes are all obnoxious to opposing receivers as part of their on-field play. I don't know it if necessarily works or not, and some of these guys probably are punks all the time--but I'm not going to assume they are just based on their trash talk on the field.
Sherman in particular is absolutely punk trash all of the time. No doubt in my mind.
This is evidence that he's doing a great job of getting his brand known. Sherman is much more of a choir boy than people think. If you pay attention to him from week to week you'll see he does nothing but praise opponents that he respects (which is most players on other teams). He gives guys like White a bad time because he perceives him to be punk. Sherman wants nothing to do with the "thug" culture. If he perceives a player to be a punk he lets it be known that he has no respect for that particular player.

 
Things like that need to make people realize that some of these "punk" players, especially CB's, put on that persona on the field to get into their opponents minds and pump themselves up. Whether it's Sherman, Finnigan, Jenkin, Hall, etc., these dudes are all obnoxious to opposing receivers as part of their on-field play. I don't know it if necessarily works or not, and some of these guys probably are punks all the time--but I'm not going to assume they are just based on their trash talk on the field.
Sherman in particular is absolutely punk trash all of the time. No doubt in my mind.
Seems like u mad bro.

 
Hooper31 said:
Warrior said:
Things like that need to make people realize that some of these "punk" players, especially CB's, put on that persona on the field to get into their opponents minds and pump themselves up. Whether it's Sherman, Finnigan, Jenkin, Hall, etc., these dudes are all obnoxious to opposing receivers as part of their on-field play. I don't know it if necessarily works or not, and some of these guys probably are punks all the time--but I'm not going to assume they are just based on their trash talk on the field.
Sherman in particular is absolutely punk trash all of the time. No doubt in my mind.
This is evidence that he's doing a great job of getting his brand known. Sherman is much more of a choir boy than people think. If you pay attention to him from week to week you'll see he does nothing but praise opponents that he respects (which is most players on other teams). He gives guys like White a bad time because he perceives him to be punk. Sherman wants nothing to do with the "thug" culture. If he perceives a player to be a punk he lets it be known that he has no respect for that particular player.
The problem is...to many NFL fans...Sherman is the one coming off like a punk/thug with the talk before and during and after games.

 
OH MAN, it was all just a dream...

I was on the computer and this thread....it just died. I mean nobody would post in it. And in this dream I couldn't find my keyboard so I'm running around the room trying to save it. And all of you just sat by and watched, similar to Kitty Genovese.

But thank god--we have a few very dedicated souls in here to make sure that doesn't happen. I for one can wipe my brow and sigh a big sigh of relief.

 
OH MAN, it was all just a dream...

I was on the computer and this thread....it just died. I mean nobody would post in it. And in this dream I couldn't find my keyboard so I'm running around the room trying to save it. And all of you just sat by and watched, similar to Kitty Genovese.

But thank god--we have a few very dedicated souls in here to make sure that doesn't happen. I for one can wipe my brow and sigh a big sigh of relief.
You should have less creepy dreams. I think there are drugs for that.

 
OH MAN, it was all just a dream...

I was on the computer and this thread....it just died. I mean nobody would post in it. And in this dream I couldn't find my keyboard so I'm running around the room trying to save it. And all of you just sat by and watched, similar to Kitty Genovese.

But thank god--we have a few very dedicated souls in here to make sure that doesn't happen. I for one can wipe my brow and sigh a big sigh of relief.
You mean like when a fan of your team bumped it back up?

 
OH MAN, it was all just a dream...

I was on the computer and this thread....it just died. I mean nobody would post in it. And in this dream I couldn't find my keyboard so I'm running around the room trying to save it. And all of you just sat by and watched, similar to Kitty Genovese.

But thank god--we have a few very dedicated souls in here to make sure that doesn't happen. I for one can wipe my brow and sigh a big sigh of relief.
You mean like when a fan of your team bumped it back up?
If either of you have a problem with the post I made just say so. No need to be coy. Do I think that the thread was started with idiotic purposes? You bet, but that doesn't mean we can't attempt to turn into a worthwhile conversation.

IMO the valuable aspect of a message board like this one is to share information about NFL teams. I think you'll find that if you sort through my posts I rarely if ever post anything about fantasy football. You certainly won't find me posting anything about my fantasy roster. I try to post information about the Seahawks that might be worth knowing if you want to know more about Seattle. I know I appreciate it when fans of other teams share information about their team that I might not have known.

 
Hooper31 said:
Warrior said:
Things like that need to make people realize that some of these "punk" players, especially CB's, put on that persona on the field to get into their opponents minds and pump themselves up. Whether it's Sherman, Finnigan, Jenkin, Hall, etc., these dudes are all obnoxious to opposing receivers as part of their on-field play. I don't know it if necessarily works or not, and some of these guys probably are punks all the time--but I'm not going to assume they are just based on their trash talk on the field.
Sherman in particular is absolutely punk trash all of the time. No doubt in my mind.
If he perceives a player to be a punk he lets it be known that he has no respect for that particular player.
He perceives Tom Brady as a punk? He trashed talk the s*#t outta him and even posted some pic on his twitter of him yelling at Brady (which someone infinitely smarter than him advised that he remove - and he did - I'm sure you can still find it on the web).

C'mon man. I thought you were one of the reasonable ones. Don't make stuff up to blindly support your guy. Unless, of course, he actually thinks Brady is a thug or punk, in which case I give up - Sherman's an idiot.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He perceives Tom Brady as a punk? He trashed talk the s*#t outta him and even posted some pic on his twitter of him yelling at Brady (which someone infinitely smarter than him advised that he remove - and he did - I'm sure you can still find it on the web).

C'mon man. I thought you were one of the reasonable ones. Don't make stuff up to blindly support your guy. Unless, of course, he actually thinks Brady is a thug or punk, in which case I give up - Sherman's an idiot.
You're correct. Punk is the wrong word. I doubt he perceives Brady in that light. However, he certainly doesn't respect Brady as a person. Does that fit better? Also, he didn't trash talk the #### of Brady. He responded to Brady after they had a confrontation at halftime. Brady told him they were going to talk after the game and NE had won. Well, Brady lost and chose to walk away. Sherman responded in a rather loud fashion.

I'm not the one that will blindly defend "my guy". I don't have any guys. I appreciate watching NFL football and mostly watch the Seahawks. That's the team that resides closest to me. Its the team that generally is on the front page of my sports section. I appreciate and respect NFL players all across the NFL. I'm no blind homer. If you like we can start tearing Seahawks players apart. I'm good for that. There are several that I think have serious issues. Many with their lack of ability. Several others with their personality issues.

To be fair, I see a lot more of Sherman than you probably have. I read his blog now and then. I see all his press conferences. I think he's made an ### of himself on a few occasions, but those are rare and way overblown partially because he wants them to be overblown. He's doing what he perceives as necessary to sell his brand. We're not talking about a wealthy player in a major market. He's intelligent enough to know a player in Seattle has to work to get himself noticed.

 
He perceives Tom Brady as a punk? He trashed talk the s*#t outta him and even posted some pic on his twitter of him yelling at Brady (which someone infinitely smarter than him advised that he remove - and he did - I'm sure you can still find it on the web).

C'mon man. I thought you were one of the reasonable ones. Don't make stuff up to blindly support your guy. Unless, of course, he actually thinks Brady is a thug or punk, in which case I give up - Sherman's an idiot.
You're correct. Punk is the wrong word. I doubt he perceives Brady in that light. However, he certainly doesn't respect Brady as a person. Does that fit better? Also, he didn't trash talk the #### of Brady. He responded to Brady after they had a confrontation at halftime. Brady told him they were going to talk after the game and NE had won. Well, Brady lost and chose to walk away. Sherman responded in a rather loud fashion.

I'm not the one that will blindly defend "my guy". I don't have any guys. I appreciate watching NFL football and mostly watch the Seahawks. That's the team that resides closest to me. Its the team that generally is on the front page of my sports section. I appreciate and respect NFL players all across the NFL. I'm no blind homer. If you like we can start tearing Seahawks players apart. I'm good for that. There are several that I think have serious issues. Many with their lack of ability. Several others with their personality issues.

To be fair, I see a lot more of Sherman than you probably have. I read his blog now and then. I see all his press conferences. I think he's made an ### of himself on a few occasions, but those are rare and way overblown partially because he wants them to be overblown. He's doing what he perceives as necessary to sell his brand. We're not talking about a wealthy player in a major market. He's intelligent enough to know a player in Seattle has to work to get himself noticed.
Fair enough.

 
OH MAN, it was all just a dream...

I was on the computer and this thread....it just died. I mean nobody would post in it. And in this dream I couldn't find my keyboard so I'm running around the room trying to save it. And all of you just sat by and watched, similar to Kitty Genovese.

But thank god--we have a few very dedicated souls in here to make sure that doesn't happen. I for one can wipe my brow and sigh a big sigh of relief.
You mean like when a fan of your team bumped it back up?
If either of you have a problem with the post I made just say so. No need to be coy. Do I think that the thread was started with idiotic purposes? You bet, but that doesn't mean we can't attempt to turn into a worthwhile conversation.

IMO the valuable aspect of a message board like this one is to share information about NFL teams. I think you'll find that if you sort through my posts I rarely if ever post anything about fantasy football. You certainly won't find me posting anything about my fantasy roster. I try to post information about the Seahawks that might be worth knowing if you want to know more about Seattle. I know I appreciate it when fans of other teams share information about their team that I might not have known.
If we created a new thread that was simply "Richard Sherman" I wouldn't mind it. What I don't want is the constant reminder of this idiotic thread ITS started. It doesn't make sense and everytime people see it they feel the distinct need to come in and start thrashing around. This is purely a PR move so we can wash off the stink of our less than humble fanbase.

 
proninja said:
OH MAN, it was all just a dream...

I was on the computer and this thread....it just died. I mean nobody would post in it. And in this dream I couldn't find my keyboard so I'm running around the room trying to save it. And all of you just sat by and watched, similar to Kitty Genovese.

But thank god--we have a few very dedicated souls in here to make sure that doesn't happen. I for one can wipe my brow and sigh a big sigh of relief.
You mean like when a fan of your team bumped it back up?
If either of you have a problem with the post I made just say so. No need to be coy. Do I think that the thread was started with idiotic purposes? You bet, but that doesn't mean we can't attempt to turn into a worthwhile conversation.

IMO the valuable aspect of a message board like this one is to share information about NFL teams. I think you'll find that if you sort through my posts I rarely if ever post anything about fantasy football. You certainly won't find me posting anything about my fantasy roster. I try to post information about the Seahawks that might be worth knowing if you want to know more about Seattle. I know I appreciate it when fans of other teams share information about their team that I might not have known.
If we created a new thread that was simply "Richard Sherman" I wouldn't mind it. What I don't want is the constant reminder of this idiotic thread ITS started. It doesn't make sense and everytime people see it they feel the distinct need to come in and start thrashing around. This is purely a PR move so we can wash off the stink of our less than humble fanbase.
I'm on board with this. This is my last post in the thread.
Ditto.

 
OH MAN, it was all just a dream...

I was on the computer and this thread....it just died. I mean nobody would post in it. And in this dream I couldn't find my keyboard so I'm running around the room trying to save it. And all of you just sat by and watched, similar to Kitty Genovese.

But thank god--we have a few very dedicated souls in here to make sure that doesn't happen. I for one can wipe my brow and sigh a big sigh of relief.
You mean like when a fan of your team bumped it back up?
If either of you have a problem with the post I made just say so. No need to be coy. Do I think that the thread was started with idiotic purposes? You bet, but that doesn't mean we can't attempt to turn into a worthwhile conversation.

IMO the valuable aspect of a message board like this one is to share information about NFL teams. I think you'll find that if you sort through my posts I rarely if ever post anything about fantasy football. You certainly won't find me posting anything about my fantasy roster. I try to post information about the Seahawks that might be worth knowing if you want to know more about Seattle. I know I appreciate it when fans of other teams share information about their team that I might not have known.
I have no problem with it...just pointing out to him as he was bashing people for bumping this back up...that it was a Hawks fan who did the bumping.

I have no issue with your post or it being bumped back up at all.

 
sho nuff said:
Hooper31 said:
Warrior said:
Things like that need to make people realize that some of these "punk" players, especially CB's, put on that persona on the field to get into their opponents minds and pump themselves up. Whether it's Sherman, Finnigan, Jenkin, Hall, etc., these dudes are all obnoxious to opposing receivers as part of their on-field play. I don't know it if necessarily works or not, and some of these guys probably are punks all the time--but I'm not going to assume they are just based on their trash talk on the field.
Sherman in particular is absolutely punk trash all of the time. No doubt in my mind.
This is evidence that he's doing a great job of getting his brand known. Sherman is much more of a choir boy than people think. If you pay attention to him from week to week you'll see he does nothing but praise opponents that he respects (which is most players on other teams). He gives guys like White a bad time because he perceives him to be punk. Sherman wants nothing to do with the "thug" culture. If he perceives a player to be a punk he lets it be known that he has no respect for that particular player.
The problem is...to many NFL fans...Sherman is the one coming off like a punk/thug with the talk before and during and after games.
When has Sherman ever showed the littlest, eensiest bit of thug?
 
LeaveNoDoubt²₀⁶ ‏@SEA12thWOman 4m

“@Michael_Sawyer: So apparently, Richard Sherman went into coverage on 36 snaps. Matt Ryan threw at him ZERO times. #Shutdown”

@RSherman_25

Retweeted by Richard Sherman
Thats Lockdown. :moneybag:

 
Pats losing and Sherman getting dominated so he has to keep his mouth shut at the same time will make me a happy Super Bowl spectator.

Sherman is the only obnoxious player on the Seahawks and unfortunately the few obnoxious fans like ITS and people like him make other people hate the Seahawks. You know it's bad if I'm considering rooting for the Pats just to get them to shut up.

 
Dude isn't shying away from saying Pats won't get punished because Goodell is friends with Kraft etc. Just interviewed him at Pro Bowl sideline, thought he would sidestep it but says they won't cause league is too busy handling Marshawn antics.

 
BusterTBronco said:
Julian Edelman to be on lockdown on Sunday.

Here's my prediction for Edelman's stats for the superbowl. (pay attention)

No catches. No yards. No touchdowns.

Oh, yeah. The Shermanator to get a couple of picks including a pick six.

You want predictions? Seahawks 30, Pats 10. Richard Sherman superbowl MVP!

Book it!
My prediction for Edelman is he just walks to the other side of the field and catches balls over there.

 
Run It Up said:
BusterTBronco said:
Julian Edelman to be on lockdown on Sunday.

Here's my prediction for Edelman's stats for the superbowl. (pay attention)

No catches. No yards. No touchdowns.

Oh, yeah. The Shermanator to get a couple of picks including a pick six.

You want predictions? Seahawks 30, Pats 10. Richard Sherman superbowl MVP!

Book it!
My prediction for Edelman is he just walks to the other side of the field and catches balls over there.
Exactly Sherman can't shutdown any WR unless the offense allows it. That's part of the reason when Peterson and other elite CBs call him out they can get away with it.

Now if Sherman could pick the guy to lineup in front of him he might be on to something but last time I checked that was still the offenses choice.

 
I'

proninja said:
Lol at Peterson and "elite" being in the same sentence. Haven't seen that in a year or so.
I've never seen the fans of such a good team be so consistently insecure and jealous.

I get a kick out of the times guys like you and Hooper pretend to be less pathetic than ITS. Remember moments like these when you pontificate on how awesome most of you REALLY are, and how the rest of us are just lumping you together with the "few rotten apples" in the future.

 
I'

proninja said:
Lol at Peterson and "elite" being in the same sentence. Haven't seen that in a year or so.
I've never seen the fans of such a good team be so consistently insecure and jealous.

I get a kick out of the times guys like you and Hooper pretend to be less pathetic than ITS. Remember moments like these when you pontificate on how awesome most of you REALLY are, and how the rest of us are just lumping you together with the "few rotten apples" in the future.
What he said was pretty much 100% facutal

 
I'

proninja said:
Lol at Peterson and "elite" being in the same sentence. Haven't seen that in a year or so.
I've never seen the fans of such a good team be so consistently insecure and jealous.

I get a kick out of the times guys like you and Hooper pretend to be less pathetic than ITS. Remember moments like these when you pontificate on how awesome most of you REALLY are, and how the rest of us are just lumping you together with the "few rotten apples" in the future.
:unsure:

Proninja is a pretty solid dude and don't think he's made any attacks or said anything "insecure or jealous" that I've seen. And I'm no seattle fan.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
GoBirds said:
Dude isn't shying away from saying Pats won't get punished because Goodell is friends with Kraft etc. Just interviewed him at Pro Bowl sideline, thought he would sidestep it but says they won't cause league is too busy handling Marshawn antics.
That's his way of trying to get the public to demand discipline before the super bowl. If he was a real man he'd just ignore the subject instead of complaining to the media. His voice and all the words out of his mouth are just incredibly annoying. It's too bad because if he'd just shut up, be humble about his skills, and quit crying about other things then he'd be one of the best and most well respected players in the league. Instead he acts like a tool and makes his fans think they can act like tools too.

Changed my mind and will be rooting for the Patriots now.

 
GoBirds said:
Dude isn't shying away from saying Pats won't get punished because Goodell is friends with Kraft etc. Just interviewed him at Pro Bowl sideline, thought he would sidestep it but says they won't cause league is too busy handling Marshawn antics.
That's his way of trying to get the public to demand discipline before the super bowl. If he was a real man he'd just ignore the subject instead of complaining to the media. His voice and all the words out of his mouth are just incredibly annoying. It's too bad because if he'd just shut up, be humble about his skills, and quit crying about other things then he'd be one of the best and most well respected players in the league. Instead he acts like a tool and makes his fans think they can act like tools too.

Changed my mind and will be rooting for the Patriots now.
They asked him a question, he answered. Didn't hear crying more of just taking a jab at Goodell. Said deflating balls doesn't matter in earlier interviews when asked.

And, he is one of he most respected players in the league.

Do we want every player to just say a bunch of "take it a day a time" "just happy to be here" lines? Lynch doesn't want to answer questions and people kill him for that. Brady, Russell, Manning, etc are pretty boring to listen to. Rarely say anything other than generic cliches. Pretty sure I could do their interviews for them at this point.

 
GoBirds said:
Dude isn't shying away from saying Pats won't get punished because Goodell is friends with Kraft etc. Just interviewed him at Pro Bowl sideline, thought he would sidestep it but says they won't cause league is too busy handling Marshawn antics.
That's his way of trying to get the public to demand discipline before the super bowl. If he was a real man he'd just ignore the subject instead of complaining to the media. His voice and all the words out of his mouth are just incredibly annoying. It's too bad because if he'd just shut up, be humble about his skills, and quit crying about other things then he'd be one of the best and most well respected players in the league. Instead he acts like a tool and makes his fans think they can act like tools too.

Changed my mind and will be rooting for the Patriots now.
They asked him a question, he answered. Didn't hear crying more of just taking a jab at Goodell. Said deflating balls doesn't matter in earlier interviews when asked.

And, he is one of he most respected players in the league.

Do we want every player to just say a bunch of "take it a day a time" "just happy to be here" lines? Lynch doesn't want to answer questions and people kill him for that. Brady, Russell, Manning, etc are pretty boring to listen to. Rarely say anything other than generic cliches. Pretty sure I could do their interviews for them at this point.
He said the league won't handle the situation because they're too busy handling Marshawn. He could have said something about how he hopes that the league will handle it before the super bowl, but they are going to prep for them regardless. Marshawn has nothing to do with it so the only point of him bringing it up is because he's trying to be a d-bag. He's a smart guy, he knows that the handling of the Patriots and the handling of Marshawn have nothing at all to do with each other. Everything he says is either bragging about himself, talking down someone else, or complaining. No, I don't want him to give the generic answers that coaches and QB's give, but he can answer questions without being a d-bag and making everything personal.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
GoBirds said:
Dude isn't shying away from saying Pats won't get punished because Goodell is friends with Kraft etc. Just interviewed him at Pro Bowl sideline, thought he would sidestep it but says they won't cause league is too busy handling Marshawn antics.
That's his way of trying to get the public to demand discipline before the super bowl. If he was a real man he'd just ignore the subject instead of complaining to the media. His voice and all the words out of his mouth are just incredibly annoying. It's too bad because if he'd just shut up, be humble about his skills, and quit crying about other things then he'd be one of the best and most well respected players in the league. Instead he acts like a tool and makes his fans think they can act like tools too.

Changed my mind and will be rooting for the Patriots now.
They asked him a question, he answered. Didn't hear crying more of just taking a jab at Goodell. Said deflating balls doesn't matter in earlier interviews when asked.

And, he is one of he most respected players in the league.

Do we want every player to just say a bunch of "take it a day a time" "just happy to be here" lines? Lynch doesn't want to answer questions and people kill him for that. Brady, Russell, Manning, etc are pretty boring to listen to. Rarely say anything other than generic cliches. Pretty sure I could do their interviews for them at this point.
He said the league won't handle the situation because they're too busy handling Marshawn. He could have said something about how he hopes that the league will handle it before the super bowl, but they are going to prep for them regardless. Marshawn has nothing to do with it so the only point of him bringing it up is because he's trying to be a d-bag. He's a smart guy, he knows that the handling of the Patriots and the handling of Marshawn have nothing at all to do with each other. Everything he says is either bragging about himself, talking down someone else, or complaining. No, I don't want him to give the generic answers that coaches and QB's give, but he can answer questions without being a d-bag and making everything personal.
Or he's bringing it up because Marshawn's media relations, cleats, and TD celebrations have zero impact on the game played and the accusations being thrown at the Patriots have an impact, but the only urgency shown by the NFL to get this resolved ahead of the SB is in rectifying the trivial issues with Marshawn.

I suppose the "d-bag" label depends on your bias.

 
GoBirds said:
Dude isn't shying away from saying Pats won't get punished because Goodell is friends with Kraft etc. Just interviewed him at Pro Bowl sideline, thought he would sidestep it but says they won't cause league is too busy handling Marshawn antics.
That's his way of trying to get the public to demand discipline before the super bowl. If he was a real man he'd just ignore the subject instead of complaining to the media. His voice and all the words out of his mouth are just incredibly annoying. It's too bad because if he'd just shut up, be humble about his skills, and quit crying about other things then he'd be one of the best and most well respected players in the league. Instead he acts like a tool and makes his fans think they can act like tools too.

Changed my mind and will be rooting for the Patriots now.
They asked him a question, he answered. Didn't hear crying more of just taking a jab at Goodell. Said deflating balls doesn't matter in earlier interviews when asked.

And, he is one of he most respected players in the league.

Do we want every player to just say a bunch of "take it a day a time" "just happy to be here" lines? Lynch doesn't want to answer questions and people kill him for that. Brady, Russell, Manning, etc are pretty boring to listen to. Rarely say anything other than generic cliches. Pretty sure I could do their interviews for them at this point.
He said the league won't handle the situation because they're too busy handling Marshawn. He could have said something about how he hopes that the league will handle it before the super bowl, but they are going to prep for them regardless. Marshawn has nothing to do with it so the only point of him bringing it up is because he's trying to be a d-bag. He's a smart guy, he knows that the handling of the Patriots and the handling of Marshawn have nothing at all to do with each other. Everything he says is either bragging about himself, talking down someone else, or complaining. No, I don't want him to give the generic answers that coaches and QB's give, but he can answer questions without being a d-bag and making everything personal.
Or he's bringing it up because Marshawn's media relations, cleats, and TD celebrations have zero impact on the game played and the accusations being thrown at the Patriots have an impact, but the only urgency shown by the NFL to get this resolved ahead of the SB is in rectifying the trivial issues with Marshawn.

I suppose the "d-bag" label depends on your bias.
I don't think there's a lack of urgency. I think it's a complicated issue and considering the fact that they haven't even interviewed Brady yet shows that there's a lot of politics regarding the players union with this. Marshawn using illegal equipment or refusing to talk to the media is an easy situation to deal with. Maybe it takes an hour out of somebody's day to check the rule and his history and decide on the fine? There is a lot of red tape regarding the Patriots investigation and if they cross any boundaries that they shouldn't then the entire case will get thrown out. They have to be careful and diligent with the investigation. Everybody in the Pats organization acting like they have no clue about anything doesn't speed anything up either.

 
Sherman will cover Gronk.book it.Pats WRs dont do things on the outsides, its all inside out..they can cover Edelman and Amendola with CBs one on one. this offense isnt scary.Watch what the Jets do to them..you simply have to tackle well.

Brady cant throw the deep ball as well as he used to, so you can cheat safeties up near the line.LaFell doesnt scare anyone.

attack Brady he gets happy feet and throws the ball at WRs feet..

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top