Hankmoody
Footballguy
fruity pebbles said:was offered him for Mahomes and im actually balking
You know it's a fair trade when both sides hate it.Exact opposite situation .. was offer Mahomes and I'm balking
fruity pebbles said:was offered him for Mahomes and im actually balking
You know it's a fair trade when both sides hate it.Exact opposite situation .. was offer Mahomes and I'm balking
Because he says he's a far cry from where he wants to be and he wasn't 100% as of two weeks ago. LinkWhy are we saying he’s not 100%? Has there been some news/chatter?
He’s been a full participant in practice save for pre-determined rest days. Honestly, I feel like this has kind of turned into a non-issue. Rust is a different story.
Dead link.Because he says he's a far cry from where he wants to be and he wasn't 100% as of two weeks ago. Link.
According to Stephen Holder of The Athletic, Andrew Luck's "fastball" still isn't "where it needs to be."
Luck's velocity isn't all the way back following last year's shoulder surgery, though Holder acknowledges it's still "early in the process." The former first overall pick is coming off an encouraging performance in his latest preseason game and has shown well when throwing to T.Y. Hilton this summer. Luck is going as a borderline QB1 in most fantasy drafts.
Source: Stephen Holder on Twitter
Aug 26 - 10:12 AM
There is literally zero scenario where i can envision luck landing as a top 3 QB this year even if he is somehow magically 100% (which I don’t think he is), and doesn’t have rust (which I think he does). He has one WR and a middling Line.I certainly get the cautious approach to a guy coming off a career-threatening injury to the most important part of his trade. Something to chew on though...
1) QB19 is Alex Smith. QB20 is Dak Prescott. We continue to talk about how QB is ridiculously deep this year (it was last year too). When this is the case, I see a lot of owners simply going with one QB thinking they could grab someone off WW if necessary (happened with me last year, lost Rodgers, grabbed Goff). So the exposure if you take a chance on Luck is actually fairly minimal. And if you decide to grab a QB2 - there are solid options.
2) If Luck is right, he is QB9 right now. He has upside to be QB2-3. if he stays healthy, he sleep walks to QB9 status.
So you're either getting incredible value OR you expose yourself at a deep position where there are a lot of Plan B solutions available.
I’m concerned about his lack if weapons. After T.Y. and Doyle/Ebron they are dreadful. If Luck plays all 16 I still think he sneaks into the top 10 towards the end. I still would not feel comfortable with him as my QB1. He’s more of a late round QB2 flier.There is literally zero scenario where i can envision luck landing as a top 3 QB this year even if he is somehow magically 100% (which I don’t think he is), and doesn’t have rust (which I think he does). He has one WR and a middling Line.
Youre forced to pay for much of Luck’s upside, and many of us think you’re not going to get what you pay for.
Gun to my head, I see Luck landing somewhere between QB12 and QB18.
Is it really any different from 2016 when Luck had 4200 yards and 31 TDs in 15 games? Hilton was the #1. Moncrief got hurt in and only played 9 games- only had 307 yards. Dwayne Allen and Jack Doyle combined for 11 TDs. As bad as Ebron is, he's not worse than Allen. Gore was the RB. They have never been able to give Luck weapons.I’m concerned about his lack if weapons. After T.Y. and Doyle/Ebron they are dreadful. If Luck plays all 16 I still think he sneaks into the top 10 towards the end. I still would not feel comfortable with him as my QB1. He’s more of a late round QB2 flier.
Right now, QB2 is a guy whose played 6+ career games coming off an ACL injury. Why is Luck regaining form (with an improved OL but little running game) so implausible?There is literally zero scenario where i can envision luck landing as a top 3 QB this year even if he is somehow magically 100% (which I don’t think he is), and doesn’t have rust (which I think he does). He has one WR and a middling Line.
Youre forced to pay for much of Luck’s upside, and many of us think you’re not going to get what you pay for.
Gun to my head, I see Luck landing somewhere between QB12 and QB18.
Of course that could happen and I agree that enough pieces are on the roster that if absolutely everything falls into place it could happen.Is it really any different from 2016 when Luck had 4200 yards and 31 TDs in 15 games? Hilton was the #1. Moncrief got hurt in and only played 9 games- only had 307 yards. Dwayne Allen and Jack Doyle combined for 11 TDs. As bad as Ebron is, he's not worse than Allen. Gore was the RB. They have never been able to give Luck weapons.
Because people are overdrafting Watson and he didn't have an injury to his throwing shoulder that kept him out for over a full season.Right now, QB2 is a guy whose played 6+ career games coming off an ACL injury. Why is Luck regaining form (with an improved OL but little running game) so implausible?
Just because people are wildly over-drafting Watson doesn't really mean anything as it relates to Luck. Watson's ADP and Watson's ranking by experts is one of the widest gaps I can recall.Right now, QB2 is a guy whose played 6+ career games coming off an ACL injury. Why is Luck regaining form (with an improved OL but little running game) so implausible?
Luck's injury is more worrisome but he's also had a very long time to recovery. Luck has something Watson doesn't: sustained fantasy success. Luck has played 70 NFL games and has a 16 game average of 4300 and 30, with 300 and 3 on the ground. Their is injury risk, but he has a very high ceiling.Because people are overdrafting Watson and he didn't have an injury to his throwing shoulder that kept him out for over a full season.
If the rankings are that fluid...would seem to me that there is plenty of opportunity fo someone to ascend to QB2-3 territory. Your stance was that you couldn’t envision any scenario where that could be Luck.Just because people are wildly over-drafting Watson doesn't really mean anything as it relates to Luck. Watson's ADP and Watson's ranking by experts is one of the widest gaps I can recall.
I said that? I think I am here defending Luck.If the rankings are that fluid...would seem to me that there is plenty of opportunity fo someone to ascend to QB2-3 territory. Your stance was that you couldn’t envision any scenario where that could be Luck.
But if in fact he’s healthy...he’s been able to perform at that level before.
My bad - thought you were [icon]I said that? I think I am here defending Luck.
All true but injuries don't cause players to miss over a full season unless they're really bad. He literally had not thrown a pass in game action since January first 2017. Some would argue that he still hasn't.Luck's injury is more worrisome but he's also had a very long time to recovery. Luck has something Watson doesn't: sustained fantasy success. Luck has played 70 NFL games and has a 16 game average of 4300 and 30, with 300 and 3 on the ground. Their is injury risk, but he has a very high ceiling.
Are you worried he’s not healed? Or that he won’t regain arm strength?All true but injuries don't cause players to miss over a full season unless they're really bad. He literally had not thrown a pass in game action since January first 2017. Some would argue that he still hasn't.
I am surprised that Watson is good to go but he is. People shouldn't expect him to be back to his old self for awhile but it is reasonable to expect that he will be because we understand the nature of his common injury. Luck's injury is simply not common enough for us to understand the implications and possible outcomes.
He definitely has high upside but his level of uncertainty is unusual and difficult to predict.
I am concerned with uncertainty.Are you worried he’s not healed? Or that he won’t regain arm strength?
Sometimes I wonder if the folks who start tuning into the NFL/FF about now have an advantage in a situation like this. 2 months ago, in the dead part of the NFL season...there was this consensus ‘no way I’m touching Luck’ vibe. Those paying attention were worried that he wasn’t throwing ‘The Duke’ yet.I am concerned with uncertainty.
I am not certain you have the right read on Luck as a QB. He is not a Peyton Manning cerebral QB who doesn't need a fastball to be elite. He's a career sub 60% passer who does a good enough job of taking care of the ball and has good mobility to get him out of trouble. He still has time to morph into the high percentage passer that Manning was but I think he has absolutely been a guy who has relied on his arm talent to make up for questionable decision making. That may not fly now and his ability to change his playing style comes comes into question now.Sometimes I wonder if the folks who start tuning into the NFL/FF about now have an advantage in a situation like this. 2 months ago, in the dead part of the NFL season...there was this consensus ‘no way I’m touching Luck’ vibe. Those paying attention were worried that he wasn’t throwing ‘The Duke’ yet.
Yet here we are two months later and in two of his three appearances, he’s shown pretty darn good. But we remember that two months ago there was all this concern. I actually understand Luck saying he’s not close to 100% because in his mind, he won’t feel truly 100% until he’s doing this during the regular season. And maybe he is a different QB post injury than he was prior. Maybe his fastball isn’t mid 90’s, but low 90’s. But he was never a ‘flamethrower’ per se. He was special because he knew how to pitch. That part of him was never injured.
Luck's fantasy success has been a function of extreme workload; he's #2 among active QBs in pass attempts per game, and in the middle to bottom of most rate statistics. (#13 in yards/attempt, #24 in completion %, #12 in interception %). Unless he performs much better per attempt than he has in the past, or throws it 600+ times again, he's not going to finish near the top in fantasy.Luck's injury is more worrisome but he's also had a very long time to recovery. Luck has something Watson doesn't: sustained fantasy success. Luck has played 70 NFL games and has a 16 game average of 4300 and 30, with 300 and 3 on the ground. Their is injury risk, but he has a very high ceiling.
You mean aside from the major shoulder surgery rife with setbacks causing him to be away from the game for 20 months, and TY hitting 29 years old (downslope) instead of 27 (late prime)?Is it really any different from 2016 when Luck had 4200 yards and 31 TDs in 15 games? .
The “return to sport” data for shoulder surgery on atheletes who throw a ball for a living is not on his side. It’s possible he’s gone from “Cant throw a football for 20 months” right back to his old self in a matter of a month or so... but you’ll have to forgive my skepticism.Are you worried he’s not healed? Or that he won’t regain arm strength?
What weapons did he have in the past? How was his o-line in the past? Worse than middling?There is literally zero scenario where i can envision luck landing as a top 3 QB this year even if he is somehow magically 100% (which I don’t think he is), and doesn’t have rust (which I think he does). He has one WR and a middling Line.
Youre forced to pay for much of Luck’s upside, and many of us think you’re not going to get what you pay for.
Gun to my head, I see Luck landing somewhere between QB12 and QB18.
He may be a career sub 60% passer, but in 2016 that number had moved up to 63.5%. He’s only sub 60 because his rookie year still represents a decent portion of his career. Manning wasn’t hyper accurate during the first stage of his career either and thru 5 seasons had a 3.5% INT rate to Luck’s 2.6%. They QB’ed in different eras, but we remember late stage Peyton who was significantly more efficient and explosive. And obviously Peyton’s injury came later in his career.I am not certain you have the right read on Luck as a QB. He is not a Peyton Manning cerebral QB who doesn't need a fastball to be elite. He's a career sub 60% passer who does a good enough job of taking care of the ball and has good mobility to get him out of trouble. He still has time to morph into the high percentage passer that Manning was but I think he has absolutely been a guy who has relied on his arm talent to make up for questionable decision making. That may not fly now and his ability to change his playing style comes comes into question now.
I think his draft stock inflates people's perception of him as a QB.
Luck is a 60.8% passer in 2024 attempts since his rookie year. Manning jumped from 56.7% in his rookie year to 62.1% and didn't drop below that for 16 years. He was above 65% for 12 of those seasons. His % increased every season for the first seven years of his career to a high water mark of 67.6%. That is the kind of accuracy you need to be successful without a 98mph fastball.He may be a career sub 60% passer, but in 2016 that number had moved up to 63.5%. He’s only sub 60 because his rookie year still represents a decent portion of his career. Manning wasn’t hyper accurate during the first stage of his career either and thru 5 seasons had a 3.5% INT rate to Luck’s 2.6%. They QB’ed in different eras, but we remember late stage Peyton who was significantly more efficient and explosive. And obviously Peyton’s injury came later in his career.
I have gone back and forth on Luck for the last couple of weeks but have made the final decision to stay away. His arm is not quite back. His WRs are not good. The running game is not great making defenses respect a balanced attack. And, there are plenty of other QBs available.I don't like him coming off an injury that is sort of unprecedented, in terms of the re-injury, long recovery time, etc.
I don't like his weapons. Heck, I don't like his weapons if this was a COLLEGE team.
Plays the Texans and Jags twice.
Rather just have Stafford in same area.
Like/UnlikeI have gone back and forth on Luck for the last couple of weeks but have made the final decision to stay away. His arm is not quite back. His WRs are not good. The running game is not great making defenses respect a balanced attack. And, there are plenty of other QBs available.
Well, The one year everyone here is secretly pining for (4700/40) whether they’ll admit it or not, he had:What weapons did he have in the past? How was his o-line in the past? Worse than middling?
You got Wayne & Hilton's numbers backwards. But, yes I don't see the same supporting talent as 2014.Well, The one year everyone here is secretly pining for he had:
Reggie Wayne 82 catches for 1385yds
TY Hilton 64/779
Colby Fleener 51/774
plus Hakeem Nicks, Ahmad Bradshaw, Donte Moncreif, Trent Richardson... by all counts a VERY solid core of receiving options.
Anyone that thinks he has anything near that now and wants to use that season as a factor in comparison is not just drinking the kool aid, they’re drowning in it.
Which is why I hate him as a QB1 due to the busy/injury risk but if you can get him late he’s worth the potential as a high-upside QB2. The upside means he could outscore your QB1 and be a top option if you waited on QB.The “return to sport” data for shoulder surgery on atheletes who throw a ball for a living is not on his side. It’s possible he’s gone from “Cant throw a football for 20 months” right back to his old self in a matter of a month or so... but you’ll have to forgive my skepticism.
IMO we have a rusty Luck who hasn’t seen real game action in an extended period, who by his own admission isn’t 100% and likely won’t be in the immediate future (if ever), throwing to an WR1 entering the twilight of his career followed by a middling to poor set of receiving targets. I’m also guessing we see a less mobile Luck by design, at least initially.
If I were doing a bell curve and assuming he plays a full 16 games (far from a sure thing), I’d say we are looking at Downside: QB16 / Median: QB10 / Upside: QB6. If we assume there is some risk of setback that inhibits performance or worse yet gets him shut down for a period of time... then that slides downward.
None of us know for certain, and we will see as the season unfolds. If he comes out as the Luck of old after a few games, I’ll be the first one back in here admitting I was overly skeptical and will congratulate him on getting back to his old self.
Now you're just trying to find reasons not to like Luck.TY hitting 29 years old (downslope) instead of 27 (late prime)?
TY is one of the reasons I would be willing to draft Luck.Now you're just trying to find reasons not to like Luck.
I don't own him and doubt I'd draft him due to his shoulder but he has a better o-line now and at least equal weapons. You said if you knew he was 100% healthy you wouldn't trust him due to his weapons and poor o-line.Well, The one year everyone here is secretly pining for (4700/40) whether they’ll admit it or not, he had:
Reggie Wayne 82 catches for 1385yds
TY Hilton 64/779
Colby Fleener 51/774
plus Hakeem Nicks, Ahmad Bradshaw, Donte Moncreif, Trent Richardson... by all counts a VERY solid core of receiving options. Outside a 29yo TY Hilton he’s got nothing close to that, now.
Anyone that thinks he has anything near that now and wants to use that season as a factor in comparison is not just drinking the kool aid, they’re drowning in it.
Tough crowd. Since his rookie year, his 16 game averages are:Luck is a 60.8% passer in 2024 attempts since his rookie year. Manning jumped from 56.7% in his rookie year to 62.1% and didn't drop below that for 16 years. He was above 65% for 12 of those seasons. His % increased every season for the first seven years of his career to a high water mark of 67.6%. That is the kind of accuracy you need to be successful without a 98mph fastball.
I use Manning as a comparison not because he has a similar game to Luck, he didn't but because it is the natural comparison everyone makes as Luck was Manning's immediate successor.
Luck still has a lot to prove as a QB.
Please go ahead and provide the “at least as good” comparisons on this year’s team:I don't own him and doubt I'd draft him due to his shoulder but he has a better o-line now and at least equal weapons. You said if you knew he was 100% healthy you wouldn't trust him due to his weapons and poor o-line.
I’m just being realistic about his weapons. I’m not saying TY isn’t a great receiver anymore... but is anyone here not of the opinion that he’s hitting the downslope of his career now that he’s turning 29?Now you're just trying to find reasons not to like Luck.
26YO TY Hilton = 29 YO TY Hilton (yes they are equal - 29 is still the prime of a WRs career)Please go ahead and provide the “at least as good” comparisons on this year’s team:
26YO TY Hilton = 29YO TY Hilton
Reggie Wayne = ?
Colby Fleener = ?
Hakeem Nicks = ?
Donte Moncreif = ?
Ahmad Bradshaw = ?
Trent Richardson = ?
it's a jokeNow you're just trying to find reasons not to like Luck.
maybe do some research on if WRs lose anything at age 29? Are you just trolling now?I’m just being realistic about his weapons. I’m not saying TY isn’t a great receiver anymore... but is anyone here not of the opinion that he’s hitting the downslope of his career now that he’s turning 29?
Well whatever about everything else, it's silly to downgrade any at all because TY is all of the sudden 29. How much are you down grading Ben since AB is 29?I’m just being realistic about his weapons. I’m not saying TY isn’t a great receiver anymore... but is anyone here not of the opinion that he’s hitting the downslope of his career now that he’s turning 29?
Even assuming 29yo TY hasn’t lost anything from 26yo TY, the other options just aren’t there.
Unfortunately this is the absolute worst time to debate a player. You generally have people who are extremely emotionally invested in someone having just drafted them… And yet you are a week or two away from actually seeing any game data that can provide real feedback on how good the players. In Luck’s extreme case, you’re approaching two years without any viable data.
There’s not much sense in going back-and-forth… I’ve stated my case pretty clearly and throwing up studies on return to sport for shoulder surgery on throwing Atheletes.
I was called crazy for my stance back once 2017 too. At least he’s finally been able to throw a football over the last few weeks. I sincerely hope in four or five weeks I can come in here and say that Luck is his old self and I was wrong about him. Good luck to those who invested in him this season.