Exactly why I bit the bullet and dropped Hill. If he goes off later in the season I have no regrets because it gives me peace of mind. It also allows me to play better weekly options based upon matchups instead of blindly inserting a guy that was supposed to be a stud and FBG's keeps promoting higher than anybody should.Keith1 said:I have been doing this for weeks. Too difficult picking which one will go off, week after week.mikel0254 said:Both Gio and Hill may both be startable...even on the same fantasy team. Something I'm debating this week w/ byes and injuries adding up.
Certainly he hasn't played like his owners expected so far but he's still the #24 RB in my leagues. Benchable for the time being? Sure. Droppable? No way, IMO. Good offense/team that loves to run the ball and wants him to get to where he was last season. I think patient Hill owners will be rewarded...Exactly why I bit the bullet and dropped Hill. If he goes off later in the season I have no regrets because it gives me peace of mind. It also allows me to play better weekly options based upon matchups instead of blindly inserting a guy that was supposed to be a stud and FBG's keeps promoting higher than anybody should.Keith1 said:I have been doing this for weeks. Too difficult picking which one will go off, week after week.mikel0254 said:Both Gio and Hill may both be startable...even on the same fantasy team. Something I'm debating this week w/ byes and injuries adding up.
Hill looks good. Gio is pretty much just playing passing downs.Just about thru 3
Hill 10-55
Bernard 0 carries
What the....
The digs on Dalton are getting old and are unfounded. This isn't the Dalton of previous years.Can't believe they are not running more with a back who is averaging 5.5 yds per carry. Ugh
Or, trust Andy "big game" Dalton.
Easy choice imho. Over coaching in this one.
He looks better for sure. I still they're going to want to take some pressure off of him as weather gets colder and get closer to the playoffs.The digs on Dalton are getting old and are unfounded. This isn't the Dalton of previous years.Can't believe they are not running more with a back who is averaging 5.5 yds per carry. Ugh
Or, trust Andy "big game" Dalton.
Easy choice imho. Over coaching in this one.
people are resistant to change.The digs on Dalton are getting old and are unfounded. This isn't the Dalton of previous years.Can't believe they are not running more with a back who is averaging 5.5 yds per carry. Ugh
Or, trust Andy "big game" Dalton.
Easy choice imho. Over coaching in this one.
Yeah, but he didn't really have a good game today.people are resistant to change.The digs on Dalton are getting old and are unfounded. This isn't the Dalton of previous years.Can't believe they are not running more with a back who is averaging 5.5 yds per carry. Ugh
Or, trust Andy "big game" Dalton.
Easy choice imho. Over coaching in this one.
Right before your eyes amigo if you are willing to look. Today is proof positive.Yeah, if they are saying it in the media, it must be true.Not worried at all. If my team sucked though I would probably be panicking so I get the fear and frustration from some in here. A balanced team can remedy any slow start. Still a believer in Hill and apparently so are the Bengals.
Hill had more touches, however I don't know if today was a great endorsement for Hill going forward. Game flow dictates their usage. The offense has been much better all year with Gio as the primary guy. Today, Cincy had their worst game offensively and what was the one thing that was different? Gio was somehow forgotten about. This year when Cincy is down, in hurry up or looking to get better flow it has been with Gio.georg013 said:Right before your eyes amigo if you are willing to look. Today is proof positive.massraider said:Yeah, if they are saying it in the media, it must be true.georg013 said:Not worried at all. If my team sucked though I would probably be panicking so I get the fear and frustration from some in here. A balanced team can remedy any slow start. Still a believer in Hill and apparently so are the Bengals.
You can't be this bias.Hill had more touches, however I don't know if today was a great endorsement for Hill going forward. Game flow dictates their usage. The offense has been much better all year with Gio as the primary guy. Today, Cincy had their worst game offensively and what was the one thing that was different? Gio was somehow forgotten about. This year when Cincy is down, in hurry up or looking to get better flow it has been with Gio. Hill had some nice runs today but at the end of the day it was a sub par day. 15 carries for 60 yards for a 4 ypc average and 1 reception for 8 yards. For Hill owners it is a good sign that they want to get Hill going. But for Cincy as a team they may want to evaluate what is their best play going forward.georg013 said:Right before your eyes amigo if you are willing to look. Today is proof positive.massraider said:Yeah, if they are saying it in the media, it must be true.georg013 said:Not worried at all. If my team sucked though I would probably be panicking so I get the fear and frustration from some in here. A balanced team can remedy any slow start. Still a believer in Hill and apparently so are the Bengals.
How so?You can't be this bias.Hill had more touches, however I don't know if today was a great endorsement for Hill going forward. Game flow dictates their usage. The offense has been much better all year with Gio as the primary guy. Today, Cincy had their worst game offensively and what was the one thing that was different? Gio was somehow forgotten about. This year when Cincy is down, in hurry up or looking to get better flow it has been with Gio. Hill had some nice runs today but at the end of the day it was a sub par day. 15 carries for 60 yards for a 4 ypc average and 1 reception for 8 yards. For Hill owners it is a good sign that they want to get Hill going. But for Cincy as a team they may want to evaluate what is their best play going forward.georg013 said:Right before your eyes amigo if you are willing to look. Today is proof positive.massraider said:Yeah, if they are saying it in the media, it must be true.georg013 said:Not worried at all. If my team sucked though I would probably be panicking so I get the fear and frustration from some in here. A balanced team can remedy any slow start. Still a believer in Hill and apparently so are the Bengals.
Hill was decent today, and Dalton was bad; I am not disputing that.The difference in the offense was clearly that Dalton had his worst game of the year. Hill looked good.
People keep saying this. Hill had some nice runs today like a starting NFL rb should have, but at the end of the day it was just an ok game for him.Tool said:Hill looked pretty good today. Everything in your post ignored that and spun it to your preconceived notions.How so?You can't be this bias.Hill had more touches, however I don't know if today was a great endorsement for Hill going forward. Game flow dictates their usage. The offense has been much better all year with Gio as the primary guy. Today, Cincy had their worst game offensively and what was the one thing that was different? Gio was somehow forgotten about. This year when Cincy is down, in hurry up or looking to get better flow it has been with Gio. Hill had some nice runs today but at the end of the day it was a sub par day. 15 carries for 60 yards for a 4 ypc average and 1 reception for 8 yards. For Hill owners it is a good sign that they want to get Hill going. But for Cincy as a team they may want to evaluate what is their best play going forward.georg013 said:Right before your eyes amigo if you are willing to look. Today is proof positive.massraider said:Yeah, if they are saying it in the media, it must be true.georg013 said:Not worried at all. If my team sucked though I would probably be panicking so I get the fear and frustration from some in here. A balanced team can remedy any slow start. Still a believer in Hill and apparently so are the Bengals.
I am not being objective?
OK. No need to continue if you can't be objective. Continue your crusade in the Gio thread, then.
Yes. It was a big win for Cin.,this win and Hills contribution (fantasy #'s aside) as part of the game plan bodes well for his use moving forward.I am not being objective?
OK. No need to continue if you can't be objective. Continue your crusade in the Gio thread, then.
You say Hill looked good today, while I said he looked decent. Both of those are subjective. The only thing objective we can go by is stats and in NFL and in fantasy Hill's numbers were both below average. Am I missing something?
Hill is always going to be a part of the game plan but some games more than others.Yes. It was a big win for Cin.,this win and Hills contribution (fantasy #'s aside) as part of the game plan bodes well for his use moving forward.I am not being objective?
OK. No need to continue if you can't be objective. Continue your crusade in the Gio thread, then.
You say Hill looked good today, while I said he looked decent. Both of those are subjective. The only thing objective we can go by is stats and in NFL and in fantasy Hill's numbers were both below average. Am I missing something?
Nope. Running game was working. Dalton wasn't. It's really that simple boys. Without the Ben error, they lose because they should have been running it more ... Not because of the ginger haired kid.duaneok66 said:true, but he isn't going to have 16 great games.
people love to criticize with the same old narrative.
He was averaging 5.0 ypc until their last drive, when everyone and their mother knew they were going to run the ball.Hill was decent today, and Dalton was bad; I am not disputing that.The difference in the offense was clearly that Dalton had his worst game of the year. Hill looked good.
Here is what I am getting at though. Gio is under appreciated in the shark pool specifically by the Hill owners. When Gio is in the game Cincy looks more dangerous and dynamic because of his versatility. He is running extremely well inside and outside. He also poses a much larger threat than Hill as a receiving back and they will line him up and go empty set and actually throw to him. This versatility opens up other things on O. The D has to account for a lot more when Gio is in the game.
This is not last year running the ball Hill we are talking about. We are talking about you saying it was a good game out of Hill who just averaged 4.0 ypc.
Not good enough. Especially with guys like Gurley running wild.He was averaging 5.0 ypc until their last drive, when everyone and their mother knew they were going to run the ball.Hill was decent today, and Dalton was bad; I am not disputing that.Here is what I am getting at though. Gio is under appreciated in the shark pool specifically by the Hill owners. When Gio is in the game Cincy looks more dangerous and dynamic because of his versatility. He is running extremely well inside and outside. He also poses a much larger threat than Hill as a receiving back and they will line him up and go empty set and actually throw to him. This versatility opens up other things on O. The D has to account for a lot more when Gio is in the game.The difference in the offense was clearly that Dalton had his worst game of the year. Hill looked good.
This is not last year running the ball Hill we are talking about. We are talking about you saying it was a good game out of Hill who just averaged 4.0 ypc.
Dalton's pick in the end zone was a terrible throw. It was right at the S. Why are you ignoring that one?Dalton hits his receiver in stride in the hands and the ball pops up and gets intercepted, so Dalton had a bad game?
Start your engines.....I have been doing this for weeks. Too difficult picking which one will go off, week after week.Both Gio and Hill may both be startable...even on the same fantasy team. Something I'm debating this week w/ byes and injuries adding up.
Bengals OC Hue Jackson said "the arrow is pointing up" on Jeremy Hill.
Hill has yet to break out on a per-carry basis, but he has at least 15 carries in each of the last two games against tough defensive fronts. He also out-touched Giovani Bernard 16-3 last week and played two more snaps than the passing-down back. The Cincinnati backfield will be a timeshare all season, but Hill is finally getting enough work to be in the RB2 mix. He is a must-start this week against the Browns barely-there run defense.
RotoGrinders.com Daily Slant: Hill has been an afterthought in DFS circles during a very up-and-down year, but this week's match-up with the Browns is a great opportunity for him to explode. Hue Jackson clearly wants to get him more involved since he'll be an important piece of their potential playoff run, and the Browns league-worst run defense will provide a perfect chance to give Hill a heavy workload. Cleveland is allowing over 130 yards on the ground to opposing RBs this year.
Source: Paul Dehner on Twitter
Nov 3 - 12:54 PM
FWIW: I am starting Hill (with little confidence) over Dion Lewis (in PPR, no less). You have gotta love the matchup, but Hill has given us no reason to trust him.Anybody starting Hill tomorrow?
I have him on the bench but im tempted to put him in. If i bench him i have to start Murray, Lacy or Mike Evans in my flex. The Bengals like to toss the ball around too much lol.