yeah. It is the second time in a few weeks that someone mentioned itGood answer. Hope you know I'm just giving you grief.
yeah. It is the second time in a few weeks that someone mentioned itGood answer. Hope you know I'm just giving you grief.
I took your advice. ( not really) I saw the writing on the wall. A 2016 2nd, 2017 1st and a 2018 1st from a really bad team is gold.I called this last year. LOLOLOL @tone1oc
I know it seems bleak, and I drafted this guy.. but a glimmer of deja vu hope in this thread for some kharma..
This was last years week 1 stat line, also awful for Freeman... let's see what happens week 2...
Rushing
ATT
YDS
TD
LG
T. Coleman
20
80
0
20
D. Freeman
10
18
0
9
M. Ryan
5
7
0
6
Receiving
REC
YDS
TD
LG
J. Jones
9
141
2
44
R. White
4
84
0
25
D. Freeman
3
29
0
12
J. Tamme
3
19
0
8
L. Hankerson
2
16
0
13
N. Williams
1
5
0
5
L. Toilolo
1
4
0
4
The only reason for the change was Coleman's injury. Coleman was the lead back in game 2, but went out in the middle with the fractured rib, missed a few games and the rest is history. Last year, it seemed like Coleman was the coach's preference going into the season (which is still bizarre), so I do think that there is some cause for concern.I feel better reading this now... last year he also had a miserable game 1....
I effeminately didn't take his advice. I rode Freeman to a championship last year - then traded him for 2017 1.1 pre-NFL draft. I expected somewhat of a split, just not as large as initially indicated by week 1.I took your advice. ( not really) I saw the writing on the wall. A 2016 2nd, 2017 1st and a 2018 1st from a really bad team is gold.
You didn't call diddly squat. You said Freeman sucks a$$.....and we know that's not true. You're seeing that Coleman is actually a pretty talented player, so ATL is smart to get him some touches. Great for the Falcons, sucks for Freeman owners.I called this last year. LOLOLOL @tone1oc
Another troll job that won't be reported. LololYou didn't call diddly squat. You said Freeman sucks a$$.....and we know that's not true. You're seeing that Coleman is actually a pretty talented player, so ATL is smart to get him some touches. Great for the Falcons, sucks for Freeman owners.
Coleman played better last Sunday.....so what, it's one game. It looked like Freeman was usually in the game at the goalline, which is very helpful to his owners.
Freeman is not likely to deliver to his ADP (I avoided him at his ADP this year), but it's not because he sucks.
Honestly...excluding the first game this year, over the last four games last season, Tevin Coleman had 7 carries. Two of those four games were against Carolina, against whom Coleman tallied three carries.Matthew Berry Verified account @MatthewBerryTMR Sep 12
Last 5 games, Devonta Freeman has averaged 2.87 yards per carry.
Over that same time frame, Tevin Coleman has averaged 5.08 yards per carry.
If you go further back, Devonta Freeman has actually only averaged 2.96 yars per carry over his last 7 games.
So while Devonta Freeman did go absolutely nuclear for a 6-game span last season (you can't take that away from him), he has looked VERY PEDESTRIAN in the other 26 career games he has played (211 total carries, 658 yards, 3.12 ypc, 4 TDs).
What about the stats for the 5, 7, or 26 Freeman games?Honestly...excluding the first game this year, over the last four games last season, Tevin Coleman had 7 carries. Two of those four games were against Carolina, against whom Coleman tallied three carries.
This is just cherry-picking, and not of the very logical variety.
It's Matt Berry, what do you expect?Honestly...excluding the first game this year, over the last four games last season, Tevin Coleman had 7 carries. Two of those four games were against Carolina, against whom Coleman tallied three carries.
This is just cherry-picking, and not of the very logical variety.
I'd be much more concerned if Coleman looked good in the running game while Freeman was faltering. Fact is, neither was anything to write home about Week 1I'd be VERY concerned if I owned him.
Over the last 6-8 games they've played that has happened actually.Slapdash said:I'd be much more concerned if Coleman looked good in the running game while Freeman was faltering. Fact is, neither was anything to write home about Week 1
You better believe he will play, he's worrying about Coleman and should be.Devonta Freeman (quad) was a full participant at Thursday's practice.
Freeman was limited at Wednesday's session. His full participation on Thursday should erase any lingering doubt about his status for Week 2. With Tevin Coleman emerging as a real threat to his workload, Freeman will be right on the RB2/3 cutoff for Sunday's game in Oakland.
Source: D. Orlando Ledbetter on Twitte
I think I'm right there with you. Jeremy Hill time to get those goal line touches.I'm benching both. Sterling Smith, you're up.
Not really.Over the last 6-8 games they've played that has happened actually.
Lol well one guy had like less than 3 ypc average (or something terrible like that) and one guy averaged over 5 during that same span. It's exactly what you said you would be worried about.Not really.
And my comment only specified week 1
Maltease FalconHe is still the pass-receiving and goalline back back.
That's horrible news. Best case scenario now involves either one vastly outplaying the other and earning the most reps, or an injury. I'm not one who will ever root for an injury. But to use a first round pic on a guy who is in a RBBC starting week one is painful. I'm gonna need to strike WW gold to recover from this.http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/9423/devonta-freeman
According to NFL Network's Ian Rapoport, the Falcons still consider Devonta Freeman their starter but believe Tevin Coleman is "just as talented."
One source told Rapsheet, "We know it's a fantasy nightmare." You can say that again. The Falcons took a committee approach in Week 1 and there's nothing to suggest that will change anytime soon. Freeman might see slightly more carries and is probably first in line for goal-line work, but Coleman is going to have an important role as well and appears to have the edge in passing-game usage. Freeman is a back-end RB2 while Coleman is in the flex conversation. Owners who invested an early-round pick on Freeman have to be regretting their decision. Sep 18 - 10:01 AM
Source: Ian Rapoport on Twitter
I did... benched Ware for both in a start 2 no flex. Might just save me from starting Gronk.Amazing that Coleman is the goal line back right now. Freeman looks really strong running the ball tonight. Should have started both
Nice, I'll win despite it.I did... benched Ware for both in a start 2 no flex. Might just save me from starting Gronk.
This was the biggest reason.Nice, I'll win despite it.
Starting both is a legit option if Atlanta can run like this. Offensive line is gelling. First time this year they have gotten Freeman involved in the passing game.
New Orleans does suck though.
Coleman was at 3.55 per carry (on non td runs, less if you include them) and yet Freeman was at 10.9. On the year DF is almost twice the ypc as TC.Saints D is awful
We can all see that with our eyes before we study the statsColeman was at 3.55 per carry (on non td runs, less if you include them) and yet Freeman was at 10.9. On the year DF is almost twice the ypc as TC.
They leading the division.These paid professional coaches, though - they're smart
Started them both this past week and benched Ware. Very happy with the result. Pretty sure I am starting them both this week as well.Hinted at up thread here, but is anyone starting both Freeman and Coleman down the stretch? Atlanta's schedule isn't awesome for RBs, but it's not terrible... between the two, I would think you're looking at 30-35 touches a week, including 5+ receptions, strong yardage, and a good bet at a TD.