thatguythere
Footballguy
How about Freeman's fumble last week....was that a good one tooThat was definitely good to see for Freeman owners..Coleman fumble? Freeman is gonna be even a bigger beast then before now.
How about Freeman's fumble last week....was that a good one tooThat was definitely good to see for Freeman owners..Coleman fumble? Freeman is gonna be even a bigger beast then before now.
No.. I'm not saying the fumble is going to ruin Tevin Coleman, just that they are less likely to give him the rock this game.How about Freeman's fumble last week....was that a good one tooThat was definitely good to see for Freeman owners..Coleman fumble? Freeman is gonna be even a bigger beast then before now.
ya but Freeman is the clear starter and won't be punished for fumbles. If you're trying to cut into the starters playing time and fumble the ball, that's far worse. Not sure what you're fighting for here.How about Freeman's fumble last week....was that a good one tooThat was definitely good to see for Freeman owners..Coleman fumble? Freeman is gonna be even a bigger beast then before now.
I see...so starters are immune. I got it now. Carry on with the sack licking.ya but Freeman is the clear starter and won't be punished for fumbles. If you're trying to cut into the starters playing time and fumble the ball, that's far worse. Not sure what you're fighting for here.How about Freeman's fumble last week....was that a good one tooThat was definitely good to see for Freeman owners..Coleman fumble? Freeman is gonna be even a bigger beast then before now.
Man, I know Coleman owners aren't happy, but this bitterness is getting out of hand. Let it go and drop Coleman, your hopes are over.I see...so starters are immune. I got it now. Carry on with the sack licking.ya but Freeman is the clear starter and won't be punished for fumbles. If you're trying to cut into the starters playing time and fumble the ball, that's far worse. Not sure what you're fighting for here.How about Freeman's fumble last week....was that a good one tooThat was definitely good to see for Freeman owners..Coleman fumble? Freeman is gonna be even a bigger beast then before now.
Yes, starters are more immune then backups in terms of fumbles. A backup RB fumbles and his carries will go down by a larger percentage then a starter fumbling. We know you own coleman but don't pretend to be that dumb.I see...so starters are immune. I got it now. Carry on with the sack licking.ya but Freeman is the clear starter and won't be punished for fumbles. If you're trying to cut into the starters playing time and fumble the ball, that's far worse. Not sure what you're fighting for here.How about Freeman's fumble last week....was that a good one tooThat was definitely good to see for Freeman owners..Coleman fumble? Freeman is gonna be even a bigger beast then before now.
Get ur #### straight if you are going to try to rub it in.....Whoops missed that 1 yard rush.. my bad
I was in the Freeman sucks club up until 3 weeks ago. Unfortunately I don't even own him so I have no credibility anywaysGet ur #### straight if you are going to try to rub it in.....Whoops missed that 1 yard rush.. my bad
You are not alone.Just to be clear.. He is really good though. I was waaaaaaayy off
Damn it feels good to own both, because if Freeman goes down Coleman will do just as good behind that line club is even better.Deamon said:thatguythere is down in the dumps, dont rub it in.Damn it feels good to be a gangsta. I mean a Freeman-not-Coleman owner.
Even if that was true - which it isn't - taking care of the ball is pretty important to coaches.Milkman said:I'd still trade him. It's pretty obvious he's not special just in a great situation and Coleman looked better again before he fumbled.
That would be insane.Deamon said:I own both too... thinking about dropping coleman now.montana_grizzly_bears said:Damn it feels good to own both, because if Freeman goes down Coleman will do just as good behind that line club is even better.Deamon said:thatguythere is down in the dumps, dont rub it in.Damn it feels good to be a gangsta. I mean a Freeman-not-Coleman owner.
I own Freeman and LeVeon Bell and I'm in a tie for last place at 1-4 thanks to Seattle wanting a receiving TE and Caldwell herminating Calvin Johnson.Probably in last place if I had to guess
It's ok to be wrong bro. You are just being silly at this point.Milkman said:I'd still trade him. It's pretty obvious he's not special just in a great situation and Coleman looked better again before he fumbled.
Why? Coleman's doing nothing. He's getting dropped in some money leagues I'm in too and no one went for him. Don't think its that insane with a 15 man roster to drop him... he only has value if Freeman goes down, no?That would be insane.Deamon said:I own both too... thinking about dropping coleman now.montana_grizzly_bears said:Damn it feels good to own both, because if Freeman goes down Coleman will do just as good behind that line club is even better.Deamon said:thatguythere is down in the dumps, dont rub it in.Damn it feels good to be a gangsta. I mean a Freeman-not-Coleman owner.
Pretty sure he's being facetious. But if not, then yes... silly.It's ok to be wrong bro. You are just being silly at this point.Milkman said:I'd still trade him. It's pretty obvious he's not special just in a great situation and Coleman looked better again before he fumbled.
That's surprising. Freeman should have carried even a poor roster to 2 wins at least. Rest of the team must be very rough.I own Freeman and LeVeon Bell and I'm in a tie for last place at 1-4 thanks to Seattle wanting a receiving TE and Caldwell herminating Calvin Johnson.Probably in last place if I had to guess
But man, I like this guy.
I'd trade him for Bell I think. Maybe AP. But that's legit it.Besides the ridiculous Coleman owners here... Real talk, is there anyone you guys rather have than Freeman right now? His situation is the best out of everyone and he's on fire...
WtfMilkman said:I'd still trade him. It's pretty obvious he's not special just in a great situation and Coleman looked better again before he fumbled.
Ignore Milkmans fantasy takes.WtfMilkman said:I'd still trade him. It's pretty obvious he's not special just in a great situation and Coleman looked better again before he fumbled.
We're approaching LT / Priest Holmes territory with his total yards/rec/TDs pace. Ridiculous.Besides the ridiculous Coleman owners here... Real talk, is there anyone you guys rather have than Freeman right now? His situation is the best out of everyone and he's on fire... Reminds me of when Deangelo Williams lit up the league, Michael Turner, Jamaal Charles, Foster, etc. There's always one that isn't highly drafted that just lights it up.
This.####, the lesson isn't knock Freeman down as subpar talent. It's handcuff Freeman with Coleman if you can. Lock down that spot.
If Freeman gets hurt, Coleman is a top 10 RB, that's why.Why? Coleman's doing nothing. He's getting dropped in some money leagues I'm in too and no one went for him. Don't think its that insane with a 15 man roster to drop him... he only has value if Freeman goes down, no?That would be insane.Deamon said:I own both too... thinking about dropping coleman now.montana_grizzly_bears said:Damn it feels good to own both, because if Freeman goes down Coleman will do just as good behind that line club is even better.Deamon said:thatguythere is down in the dumps, dont rub it in.Damn it feels good to be a gangsta. I mean a Freeman-not-Coleman owner.
Easy there sparky.Zone blocking scheme has helped Freeman but he is also very talented. Coleman is also very good, maybe the best 1-2 punch in all of football. I'm just glad I'm starting him every week on my Daily Fantasy Leagues.
I don't see the major need of holding a "if a guy gets hurt then he's huge" player in short bench leagues.If Freeman gets hurt, Coleman is a top 10 RB, that's why.Why? Coleman's doing nothing. He's getting dropped in some money leagues I'm in too and no one went for him. Don't think its that insane with a 15 man roster to drop him... he only has value if Freeman goes down, no?That would be insane.Deamon said:I own both too... thinking about dropping coleman now.montana_grizzly_bears said:Damn it feels good to own both, because if Freeman goes down Coleman will do just as good behind that line club is even better.Deamon said:thatguythere is down in the dumps, dont rub it in.Damn it feels good to be a gangsta. I mean a Freeman-not-Coleman owner.
Are you watching these games? The holes are gigantic, Coleman had a 10 ypc tonight too. The situation is phenomenal.
I'll take Freeman-Coleman over Bell / insert your choice of Steeler RB here for the rest of the season.Easy there sparky.Zone blocking scheme has helped Freeman but he is also very talented. Coleman is also very good, maybe the best 1-2 punch in all of football. I'm just glad I'm starting him every week on my Daily Fantasy Leagues.
/signed a Steeler fan.
If you play in atypical leagues, you should mention that when you post. Coleman should be owned in the vast majority of leagues, and for good reason. Freeman is no Bell either.I don't see the major need of holding a "if a guy gets hurt then he's huge" player in short bench leagues.If Freeman gets hurt, Coleman is a top 10 RB, that's why.Why? Coleman's doing nothing. He's getting dropped in some money leagues I'm in too and no one went for him. Don't think its that insane with a 15 man roster to drop him... he only has value if Freeman goes down, no?That would be insane.Deamon said:I own both too... thinking about dropping coleman now.montana_grizzly_bears said:Damn it feels good to own both, because if Freeman goes down Coleman will do just as good behind that line club is even better.Deamon said:thatguythere is down in the dumps, dont rub it in.Damn it feels good to be a gangsta. I mean a Freeman-not-Coleman owner.
Are you watching these games? The holes are gigantic, Coleman had a 10 ypc tonight too. The situation is phenomenal.
What about Deangello Williams? He was dropped in almost every league, and if Bell gets hurt, he's also a top 10 RB. He's fine to keep, or drop, but I don't think dropping him is as exaggerated of a mistake as you're making it.