Scooby1974
Footballguy
You, Sir, are welcome. You can thank the 3am wake up call made by my sinuses for this.Now I know what I'm having for dinner. Veal parm sounds great.
You, Sir, are welcome. You can thank the 3am wake up call made by my sinuses for this.Now I know what I'm having for dinner. Veal parm sounds great.
Interesting re-vealDang, I had a contusion one time and ended up on crutches and needing a handicapped parking spot for two weeks after a buddy barely kicked me in the calf. And since you all want to know, no, I didn't eat the calf. The calf was my leg.
It's a nothing burger when the team chooses to not even do further testing. They did an MRI on McCoy and nothing on Williams. That should indicate a low level of concern.Except, according to Dr. Chao (on CBS’ fantasy football podcast), there are different types of bone bruises. The type you are probably thinking of (like when you bang your shin), and the type where the bruise is on a joint. The 2nd type is worse & not a “nothing burger.”
Day of rest?It's a nothing burger when the team chooses to not even do further testing. They did an MRI on McCoy and nothing on Williams. That should indicate a low level of concern.
That just doesn’t make sense. Your earlier post referenced the specific injury, not the team’s reaction to it. My response was with regards to that line of reasoning. If you want to move the goalposts and say a team not doing testing makes it a nothing burger, that’s a different point.It's a nothing burger when the team chooses to not even do further testing. They did an MRI on McCoy and nothing on Williams. That should indicate a low level of concern.
As with everything, context is king. We don't have access to Williams' knee so we obviously can't be making a diagnosis. But with context, we can discern a low level of concern from the team as evidenced by their actions in regards to McCoy's injury and how that compares to their actions in regards to Williams' injury. Couple that with the fact that the Chiefs were up big after William's injury and the most likely explanation is that it's not a big deal.That just doesn’t make sense. Your earlier post referenced the specific injury, not the team’s reaction to it. My response was with regards to that line of reasoning. If you want to move the goalposts and say a team not doing testing makes it a nothing burger, that’s a different point.
They taste like chickenEarly signs aren't good, but it's only Wednesday - Friday will be the key.
And I'd like to try a nothing burger - never heard of one nor had it before.
This is some very wishful thinking. Everything that you posted about Williams is true of McCoy, save the MRI, which revealed no significant damage. We don't have access to McCoy's ankle, the Chiefs were up big after McCoy's injury, as well, he was most likely kept out of a blowout game to be careful, and is likely receiving a typical vet resting day.As with everything, context is king. We don't have access to Williams' knee so we obviously can't be making a diagnosis. But with context, we can discern a low level of concern from the team as evidenced by their actions in regards to McCoy's injury and how that compares to their actions in regards to Williams' injury. Couple that with the fact that the Chiefs were up big after William's injury and the most likely explanation is that it's not a big deal.
Most likely, it's a low level bone bruise and he was kept out of a blowout game to be careful. No further tests were done and he's currently resting on a typical vet resting day.
We won't know til Sunday but, until then, he's slotted in my flex spot and I would bet, if either one misses the game this week, it will be McCoy.
I can tell you all about them.Early signs aren't good, but it's only Wednesday - Friday will be the key.
And I'd like to try a nothing burger - never heard of one nor had it before.
You picked up on that one. Like a beagle on the trail.I see that.
Just hope he doesn't thwock my nose with a newspaper.You picked up on that one. Like a beagle on the trail.
You should check out the Gallup threadMan I came for some insight but definitely sticking around for the puns
Saddling up and heading over there now.You should check out the Gallup thread
.Saddling up and heading over there now
Quit horsing around. No horse play in the Shark Pool.Giddy up.
That wasn't very neighborly of you.Quit horsing around. No horse play in the Shark Pool.
That’s kind of the whole point. Chiefs were concerned enough about McCoy’s injury to take a precautionary MRI.This is some very wishful thinking. Everything that you posted about Williams is true of McCoy, save the MRI...
It's not so much that you started it, it's only getting to the finish line that matters.Oh gawd, what did I start....
The question is is Dwill on the rail.It's not so much that you started it, it's only getting to the finish line that matters.
I can actually see both your points. It's pointless at this point to really debate it. We'll find out when we find out.That’s kind of the whole point. Chiefs were concerned enough about McCoy’s injury to take a precautionary MRI.
Williams didn’t even need one.
You cant pretend the concern level for an injury is the same for a player who needed an MRI.
Maybe you can enlighten me on his point because I don’t see it.I can actually see both your points. It's pointless at this point to really debate it. We'll find out when we find out.
That you had shifted the focus from the injury to the team's reaction, which actually only allows us to see heads or tails without probability. What we know is that McCoy's MRI came back clean. We have no update on the contusion. That could mean that it's worse. It could also mean that it's better and that they didn't have him for further testing means they're not concerned. Like I said, you each could be right about what it means.Maybe you can enlighten me on his point because I don’t see it.
How could it mean it’s worse though? That’s my point. The fact that you go to get an MRI on your head after an injury to the head and it comes back clean does not mean you’re healthier than someone who didn’t need to get an MRI in the first place.That you had shifted the focus from the injury to the team's reaction, which actually only allows us to see heads or tails without probability. What we know is that McCoy's MRI came back clean. We have no update on the contusion. That could mean that it's worse. It could also mean that it's better and that they didn't have him for further testing means they're not concerned. Like I said, you each could be right about what it means.
I personally don't know. I'll wait. Right now, I'm stuck with three KC backs and no idea who to play. Frustrating.
Mayhaps they trailered DWill off to the glue factory and didn't tell us yet? That's what happened to my white gelding Elmer.How could it mean it’s worse though? That’s my point. The fact that you go to get an MRI on your head after an injury to the head and it comes back clean does not mean you’re healthier than someone who didn’t need to get an MRI in the first place.
I get that line of logic, but perhaps the injury DWill suffered isn't about further testing, it's about time and healing. That was part of Bayhawks point. I see how either could be true, is all.How could it mean it’s worse though? That’s my point. The fact that you go to get an MRI on your head after an injury to the head and it comes back clean does not mean you’re healthier than someone who didn’t need to get an MRI in the first place.
You can't pretend that the concern level for a player who NEVER HAD A CHANCE to practice today is the same as a player who DID HAVE A CHANCE to practice today. Chiefs knew Williams' injury was bad enough that he couldn't have practiced, while McCoy's was not as severe, as he had a chance to practice.ATB said:That’s kind of the whole point. Chiefs were concerned enough about McCoy’s injury to take a precautionary MRI.
Williams didn’t even need one.
You cant pretend the concern level for an injury is the same for a player who needed an MRI.
You posted "his injury's a nothing burger." When I pointed out that a fairly well-respected medical source said that it wasn't necessarily a nothing burger, you moved the goal-posts and said "I meant KC sent McCoy to get an MRI, but not Williams, so it's a nothing burger."ATB said:Maybe you can enlighten me on his point because I don’t see it.
You are talking apples and oranges.ATB said:Maybe you can enlighten me on his point because I don’t see it.
Or apparently horse joke references. LolFriendly reminder. Please keep this 100% on Football. Not back and forth shots at each other.
Some are saying knee, some groin, some contusion. We don't really know and can't know. All I know is Reid didn't expect Williams to suit up at all, and that's no bueno.Ruh ruh. Now I'm reading it's a groin injury. One of the three dreadeds (along with hammy and turf toe). This is becoming muddier by the day.
YeahWhy am I sensing a Darrell Williams ascension coming soon just to really muther eff everyone.
Maybe it's because I was one of the fool's holding the Spencer B. Ware bag last year when DWill swooped.
I own both McCoy and MGD and can see big Andy getting me once again.
If I remember correctly, Ware got hurt - thats the reason Williams became relevant. It wasnt an Andy Reid muther eff was it?Why am I sensing a Darrell Williams ascension coming soon just to really muther eff everyone.
Maybe it's because I was one of the fool's holding the Spencer B. Ware bag last year when DWill swooped.
I own both McCoy and MGD and can see big Andy getting me once again.
Where are you seeing this? I can’t find anything like that. ThxSome are saying knee, some groin, some contusion. We don't really know and can't know. All I know is Reid didn't expect Williams to suit up at all, and that's no bueno.