Does the phrase "You cannot legislate usage" have any meaning in your life?Won't be any bids in any of my 3 leagues. I drafted Chubb in all 3 and waiting for Haley to Wake the ~F~ up.
Does the phraseDoes the phrase "You cannot legislate usage" have any meaning in your life?
22-3 yesterday.
I don't want to sink into this bicker-fest, but Hyde does have some checkmarks on his side in terms of intangibles (veteranosity, consistency, dependability) and probably some tangibles like doesn't fumble, picks up blitzes, etc. Leaning on Hyde isn't irrational.Does the phrase
”assumption of rational coaching” have any meaning in your life?
Veteranosity? lolI don't want to sink into this bicker-fest, but Hyde does have some checkmarks on his side in terms of intangibles (veteranosity, consistency, dependability) and probably some tangibles like doesn't fumble, picks up blitzes, etc. Leaning on Hyde isn't irrational.
If you don't like that phrase specifically, then pick whichever coachspeak cliche you prefer instead. The point remains, the rational coaching choice is more nuanced than "who had the longest TD run last week"?Veteranosity? lol
When the other guy is better it is.Leaning on Hyde isn't irrational.
When will coach W wake up and realize player X is the best position Y on team Z? has a lot of meaning in my life. Often the answer is "A long time". Alex collins was a season long example last year.Does the phrase
”assumption of rational coaching” have any meaning in your life?
You may be operating with a different definition of "better" than the one the coaches use.When the other guy is better it is.
A wat-fest? Guess I should thrown in some emoji eh.I don't want to sink into this bicker-fest, but Hyde does have some checkmarks on his side in terms of intangibles (veteranosity, consistency, dependability) and probably some tangibles like doesn't fumble, picks up blitzes, etc. Leaning on Hyde isn't irrational.
Pass protection issues are such a cliche and so wrong at this point. I'm pretty sure also that Chubb isn't a 180 lb speedster that cant handle short yardage work. And Hyde couldn't be a worse receiving back. Chubb should really be getting more carries and using big words to sound smart and pompous doesn't prove your point. It's just embarrassing.If you don't like that phrase specifically, then pick whichever coachspeak cliche you prefer instead. The point remains, the rational coaching choice is more nuanced than "who had the longest TD run last week"?
Has to be. I remember a game against the Titans in 2009 where Maurice Jones-Drew had 8 carries for like 180 yards and 2 TD's, that is the closest thing I can recall.so that is the best 3 carry stat line of all time... right?
O/U on that has to be like Week 7, right?Drafted Chubb in almost all of my 13 re-draft leagues, hoping/thinking he'd crack the starting lineup sometime before November. I hope yesterday helps him move ahead of Hyde but I think it might take a Hyde injury for him to become the starter.
Yikes! No idea what I said to prompt that attack.voiceofunreason said:Pass protection issues are such a cliche and so wrong at this point. I'm pretty sure also that Chubb isn't a 180 lb speedster that cant handle short yardage work. And Hyde couldn't be a worse receiving back. Chubb should really be getting more carries and using big words to sound smart and pompous doesn't prove your point. It's just embarrassing.
I saw something that it was the only time in nfl history a player rushed for over a hundred yards and two touchdowns on 3 carriesiamkoza said:so that is the best 3 carry stat line of all time... right?
We'll see what Hue has to say about thatThere are some good times ahead Browns fans. Jealous but happy for them.
If Chubb get continue to get at least 3 carries per game I would go with Nick.ROS Chubb or D. Henry?
This last paragraph is true and why YPC without context is not a good indicator of talent, but there's a reason Hyde signed a relatively meager contract (cuttable after 1 year) and Chubb was seen as a first round talent before a horrific injury. At this point it seems Chubb is that back again. If the Browns want to win games, Chubb is clearly the choice. He can't be worse at pass catching than Hyde and he offers the same inside running skills with a bonus of long speed. Pass protection is something I'm not familiar with in terms of Hyde, but I know Chubb graded out well (not elite, but one of the best) as a rookie. It wouldn't surprise me to learn that Hyde was better, but I don't think Chubb is a liability.A wat-fest? Guess I should thrown in some emoji eh.
I start Hyde every week. Got him in like the 8th.9th, figured he would be the bell cow (didn't anticipate DJJ would be underutilized though.)
I'll try to pick up Chubb as the cuff, but there's been no indication they're going to move on from Hyde, who has been effective and probably has the coaches trust. Not gonna debate whether Hue Jackson is a wise man or good football coach.
"You can't legislate usage" simply means your evaluation should take into account usage and the range of possibilities that lie ahead. It's silly - and happens every day in TSP - to complain "how can these coaches give RB A touches when RB B is clearly superior." In many cases RB A is the guy who has the bulk of the inside duties that setup plays / play action they'll want to employ later. Meanwhile RB B gets to come in and run CoP back plays like toss sweeps, counters, screens and flares - stuff that was setup by establishing the run game with RB B. Folks who never watch film look at the box score and conclude "OMG how is this older than dirt vet (he's 28) getting more touches than this young stud. YPC, duh."
Coach Hue Jackson is hoping for more from Chubb in the “now.”
″[Starter Carlos] Hyde is playing well, but this guy is scoring touchdowns from long ways away,” Jackson said. “I watched those two touchdowns on tape today, and they were even better than they were on the field. It just looked natural and easy.”
Same. He's on par or possibly better than Barkley talent wise, lest we forget. He will get his opp by eos.Won't be any bids in any of my 3 leagues. I drafted Chubb in all 3 and waiting for Haley to Wake the ~F~ up.
Ahh, so Hue has reviewed the tape...
In a few redraft leagues that I have Hyde I didn't get Chubb. The tough thing was that Hyde was my 4th or 5th RB and Chubb usually ended up going where I was taking much needed WRs. Tough to handcuff a RB 4/5.Wow. Bad news for those of us that rostered Hyde without Chubb as a handcuff.
That's spot on. His ADP didn't demand a cuff, and probably worked against it. It's just that I'm feeling a little nervous now about losing that valuable work he was getting, as I also drafted some dead weight in Lamar Miller and Crowell and Powell and am counting on Hyde at FLEX, who has carried me once.In a few redraft leagues that I have Hyde I didn't get Chubb. The tough thing was that Hyde was my 4th or 5th RB and Chubb usually ended up going where I was taking much needed WRs. Tough to handcuff a RB 4/5.
So trueThat's spot on. His ADP didn't demand a cuff, and probably worked against it. It's just that I'm feeling a little nervous now about losing that valuable work he was getting, as I also drafted some dead weight in Lamar Miller and Crowell and Powell and am counting on Hyde at FLEX, who has carried me once.
He's not better nor is he on par with Barkley on a talent basis despite Waldman's opinion.Same. He's on par or possibly better than Barkley talent wise, lest we forget. He will get his opp by eos.
Pre-injury he absolutely was. The biggest question is how close to his pre-injury form he can get to.He's not better nor is he on par with Barkley on a talent basis despite Waldman's opinion.
If those two runs mean he is not quite back from pre-injury form...then I cannot wait to see if he has more progress to make.Pre-injury he absolutely was. The biggest question is how close to his pre-injury form he can get to.
Nick Chubb or Corey Davis going forward for Flex in PPR which one more valuable WW pick-up?
I won’t disagree with you but I was responding to someone who was speaking in the PRESENT tense.Pre-injury he absolutely was. The biggest question is how close to his pre-injury form he can get to.
I don't really know what to tell you about the other guys, but I don't see script or previous usage in favor of Crowell, either, though the Jets have used their running backs weirdly this year. That said, four rushes for zero yards last week is a killer if you started him, which I had to in a huge league.As a Hyde owner with the chance to get Chubb via waivers, do you consider him more valuable than some of the "flavor of the week" options like Cohen, Hines, Davis, who may or may not have a more defined role than Chubb right now? Really considering dropping Crowell for him (or one of the others) as I do not see game script playing into Crowell's favor vs. Powell.
I was unaware of Wildman's opinion and that further strengthens my stance from watching his college footage. He was a guy I definitely targeted and as far as his value in the draft compared to Barkley on a talent value basis, has a much better value and this will be evident by eos.He's not better nor is he on par with Barkley on a talent basis despite Waldman's opinion.
non-Chubb related; I'm just incredibly surprised that Waldman autocorrects to Wildman anywhere.I was unaware of Wildman's opinion and that further strengthens my stance from watching his college footage. He was a guy I definitely targeted and as far as his value in the draft compared to Barkley on a talent value basis, has a much better value and this will be evident by eos.
Edit: Waldman *Auto correct
Google voice talking into your phone is an incredible Adventure. No idea why it capitalizes keywords either like Adventure above.non-Chubb related; I'm just incredibly surprised that Waldman autocorrects to Wildman anywhere.
I am targeting him over the other flavors of the week, because I am a Hyde owner. I really am kicking myself for not dropping Lat Murray before his game on Thursday night. Someone dropped Chubb on Wednesday and Chubb cleared waivers on Friday morning. Now I'll have to likely pay top dollar in a league where backs are extremely valued high.As a Hyde owner with the chance to get Chubb via waivers, do you consider him more valuable than some of the "flavor of the week" options like Cohen, Hines, Davis, who may or may not have a more defined role than Chubb right now? Really considering dropping Crowell for him (or one of the others) as I do not see game script playing into Crowell's favor vs. Powell and lean Chubb to lock up one backfield vs. making decision on when to plug in some of the the aforementioned options.