Fully agree here. Ability to get to the opposing QB has a higher priority than a position with an average lifespan of less than 3 years.100% disagree. He's just a cog. Maybe a top-10 player on the team...maybe. Pollard is likely only a small drop off. They got over 1,000 yards from end of career Darren McFadden, and several quality starts from Alfred Morris 2 years ago.
Lawrence is a much better, and more important player than Zeke. Plus he was in a contract year. Paying him over Zeke was a no-brainer. Dak, Cooper, Byron Jones, and Jaylon Smith are all more important than Zeke too, and all of them need contracts soon.
Zeke has even less leverage than Gordon, who has none himself. 90% certain both offenses barely notice they are gone if they hold out into the season.
Don’t forget to breathe, son.I'm good, you seem confused.
Certainly misinformed - about "playing hard ball" (Zeke is under contract), about the Cowboys "gambling" (Zeke's contract is part of the rookie CBA), and about him making less than Witten (he isn't).
In hindsight, that covers about your entire run here.
Take a breath, son. You seem upset
Don’t forget to breathe, son.
I think he was pretty clear above with the facts of the situation. Zeke's contract was dictated by the spot in which he was drafted (which for a RB was extremely high - which is really the only thing that Dallas could have dictated in this situation). Even with that predetermined contract, Zeke right now (3 years later) is still the 10th highest paid player at his position, and is the 9th highest salary cap number on the Cowboys (and is scheduled to be the 6th highest salary cap number on that team next year, and 3rd highest guaranteed amount, when he's still under contract).Don’t forget to breathe, son.
When your most important player (Zeke), gets paid a nickel more than your 53rd most important player (Witten), don’t be flabbergasted when the best player wants more. Write that down, son.
Wth?Don’t forget to breathe, son.
When your most important player (Zeke), gets paid a nickel more than your 53rd most important player (Witten), don’t be flabbergasted when the best player wants more. Write that down, son.
Deserving more money and being the highest paid in the league are 2 different thingsI don't think what Jerry said was smart at all. It was disrespectful and it certainly didn't help the situation. I think Zeke deserves more money and should get it.
Dallas isn't going anywhere without him.
I got him in the 3rd round at 3.07 in a superflex draft, with keepers being some of the first two rounds.Anyways back to Zeke.
It's interesting how far he is slipping right now. Just did a slow draft that started today and he went 1.11. Another one he went 1.04. 1.07 in a third. I always thought the Gordon situation was much worse than his but not looking good right now. Going to need to get Pollard before those owners jump on him.
What do you mean by he has been gifted loads of money?so weird seeing a fanbase happy their most talented player isn't out there playing, and sitting back encouraging the creepy old pervert owner who has been gifted loads of money
Stinky baitWhat do you mean by he has been gifted loads of money?
Your efforts to get personal here are a little creepy.Don’t forget to breathe, son.
When your most important player (Zeke), gets paid a nickel more than your 53rd most important player (Witten), don’t be flabbergasted when the best player wants more. Write that down, son.
No doubt. Strange how personal people get over pro athletes. The fans care so much more about their team than the players. It's all about the money for most players.Lots of dumb suddenly in this thread.
Does anybody complain when they sign their slotted draft contract? Of course not.Lost in @Edgar's passive aggressive posting is that I agree that Zeke is in an unfair position.
Unfortunately "fair" really has nothing to do with it. And he wan't complaining about "fair" a couple years ago when he took the $16M bonus and signed the $25M guaranteed contract.
These are the contracts they agreed to, not just individually, but as a players union. Trying to characterize the owners/NFL doing exactly what the player and players agreed to as anything other than such is disingenuous.Does anybody complain when they sign their slotted draft contract? Of course not.
Next year we could see this predicament with some combo of Kamara/McCaffrey/Mixon and two years from now, Saquon/Chubb.
I’m not being disingenuous. I’m pointing out that nobody complains about their assigned draft slot pay, so your “he wasn’t complaining when he signed his rookie deal” argument doesn’t hold water.These are the contracts they agreed to, not just individually, but as a players union. Trying to characterize the owners/NFL doing exactly what the player and players agreed to as anything other than such is disingenuous.
This "predicament" is a function of the business agreement they made when they signed up to play for the NFL.
I believe they get a chance to negotiate again soon. It is business.
Actually a lot of players complain about their contracts when they achieve greatness. Running back holdouts seem to get more press than OL, DB or other positions.I’m not being disingenuous. I’m pointing out that nobody complains about their assigned draft slot pay, so your “he wasn’t complaining when he signed his rookie deal” argument doesn’t hold water.
This is true, to a degree. The elite running backs are a little more rare than you imply.Unfortunately for the players, they play a position that is currently not a priority in today's NFL. QBs, DEs, and WRs get the top money. Just the way of the NFL. RBs are replaceable.
Maybe they win one fewer game without Elliott, but they didn’t miss him much in 2017, and pollard looks better than anyone they had then, plus they had a less talented team overall.Come on.
No one believes Elliott is a JAG. Yes, he's a generational talent. Unfortunately its at a position team salary cap structures don't prioritize. There isn't a single RB among the top 25 highest paid players going into 2019.This is true, to a degree. The elite running backs are a little more rare than you imply.
Elliott is arguably the best RB in the NFL right now. If the Cowboys believe he’s a JAG benefitting from a great OL, then sure - they can throw some combination of mediocre talent on the field & see how that works for them. They’ll probably save a ton of $ doing it.
But something tells me they know what they have in Elliott & will eventually get something done. Because the VORP is strong enough to equal wins, and make no mistake, Jerry Jones wants to win above everything else.
That doesn’t mean the cowboys won’t pay him.No one believes Elliott is a JAG. Yes, he's a generational talent. Unfortunately its at a position team salary cap structures don't prioritize. There isn't a single RB among the top 25 highest paid players going into 2019.
Elliott isn’t a JAG, but I can’t see the case for him as the best rb in the league. He’s been in a perfect situation his entire career. He’s also only above average in the passing game.This is true, to a degree. The elite running backs are a little more rare than you imply.
Elliott is arguably the best RB in the NFL right now. If the Cowboys believe he’s a JAG benefitting from a great OL, then sure - they can throw some combination of mediocre talent on the field & see how that works for them. They’ll probably save a ton of $ doing it.
But something tells me they know what they have in Elliott & will eventually get something done. Because the VORP is strong enough to equal wins, and make no mistake, Jerry Jones wants to win above everything else.
Hey, as an Eagles fan I can't wait for the Cowboys to give Zeke and Dak monster contracts. Hope it happens.That doesn’t mean the cowboys won’t pay him.
I’d be shocked if he’s out more than 2 games, if any.
I’ve watched him play. He’s incredibly talented. Speed/power combo, with great vision & fluid hips. He’s got moves to make defenders miss in the open field & nose for the end zone. Excels in short yardage. He is above average in the passing game, yes - you imply that’s a negative, which is preposterous. It is in fact yet another tool in his skill set to acknowledge since most RBs tend to be below average unless that’s specifically their role (ala James White)Elliott isn’t a JAG, but I can’t see the case for him as the best rb in the league. He’s been in a perfect situation his entire career. He’s also only above average in the passing game.
I’m less high on Dak.Hey, as an Eagles fan I can't wait for the Cowboys to give Zeke and Dak monster contracts. Hope it happens.
As a talent, so am I. But in terms of team priorities it should be the QB and WR (with an eye towards future defensive FAs) before the RB.I’m less high on Dak.
IF they believe Dak is the future at QB, sure.As a talent, so am I. But in terms of team priorities it should be the QB and WR (with an eye towards future defensive FAs) before the RB.
You said: "Pollard is likely only a small drop off." Elliot put up 2,001 yards and 9 TDs last season - Pollard wouldn't sniff 75% of that even if he looks good against vanilla preseason defenses.Maybe they win one fewer game without Elliott, but they didn’t miss him much in 2017, and pollard looks better than anyone they had then, plus they had a less talented team overall.
Zeke is absolutely a superior player, but the Cowboys went 3-4 to start the 2018 season and 7-2 after they traded for Cooper. Cooper is also looking for a payday and they don't have a franchise QB under a long-term contract.You could be right as far as their record but Zeke surely makes things easier for them and to say there would be little drop off with Pollard is taking the "RBs are devalued" thing to hyperbolic levels.
Specifically Pollard looked good against preseason 2nd stringers, AKA “future insurance salesmen”.You said: "Pollard is likely only a small drop off." Elliot put up 2,001 yards and 9 TDs last season - Pollard wouldn't sniff 75% of that even if he looks good against vanilla preseason defenses.
As far as winning "one fewer game", I have serious doubts about that since their offense flows through Zeke but I guess it's easy to say it since it couldn't ever be proven right or wrong. They went 3-3 without Elliot (2 of the wins came against the 7-9 Redskins and 3-13 Giants) and 6-4 with him in 2017.
You could be right as far as their record but Zeke surely makes things easier for them and to say there would be little drop off with Pollard is taking the "RBs are devalued" thing to hyperbolic levels.
That word. I do not think it means what he thinks it means.What, Murray is dead? Burned and then run into the ground?
Somebody's going to jail for this I would think. Even in Texas.
Hey! I'm an insurance salesman!Specifically Pollard looked good against preseason 2nd stringers, AKA “future insurance salesmen”.
i just read that Elliott has averaged 2000+/13
Pollard + anyone else sharing carries won’t sniff that, I agree.
You sucked making that tackle on Pollard in the 3rd quarter. Tighten up, pal.Hey! I'm an insurance salesman!
I’d estimate Zeke at +2 wins over replacement player over the course of the season.I’m not saying that there isn’t a drop off from Zeke to pollard, but it’s not as big win/loss wise, to the drop from dak to rush, or cooper to Noah brown, or Byron Jones to whomever.
He is there most important player IMO. Not buying Dak and Cooper are the come first $ guys, especially Dak. I watched a running back up my way carry a team for years and Zeke is on that level.I’d estimate Zeke at +2 wins over replacement player over the course of the season.
He’s averaged 2000+/13, & much of that against quality defenses.
You can’t easily replace that production. And in a game where every win is critical, 1-2 wins could mean missing the playoffs.
And they won how many championships during that time?He is there most important player IMO. Not buying Dak and Cooper are the come first $ guys, especially Dak. I watched a running back up my way carry a team for years and Zeke is on that level.
So important players are only on championship winning teams?And they won how many championships during that time?
No, I'm pointing towards the pay scale in today's NFL and how it places a low priority on high priced RBs. Yes, the Vikings had AP and I really don't know what % of the cap he accounted for, but they didn't win a championship with him. So pointing at AP isn't a reason to pay Zeke.So important players are only on championship winning teams?
And when Dak and Cooper leave, they become the Giants.In a league that devalues RBs, Zeke is the exception that proves the rule. All this talk of Tony Pollard being exceptional is just plain silly. If the Cowboys don't sign Zeke, they are screwed. Sorry, but Dak is good, but not good enough to elevate a team without a superior supporting cast. EVERYTHING Dallas does is predicated on the ability to run the football and control the flow of the game. The Cowboys are in a world of hurt if we play negative game script situations: Garrett cannot manage the clock and Dak turns the ball over too much.
JJ knows this and will pay him. He's the most important cog in the offensive machinery.
He’s definitely the engine that makes that team go. Dak / AC are better for his presence.He is there most important player IMO. Not buying Dak and Cooper are the come first $ guys, especially Dak. I watched a running back up my way carry a team for years and Zeke is on that level.
I think Cooper is the guy that they let walk.And when Dak and Cooper leave, they become the Giants.
Hello, straw man/false dilemma.And they won how many championships during that time?
Very possible. But like I pointed out - they didn't start winning last year until they traded for Cooper. Zeke played all 16 games.I think Cooper is the guy that they let walk.
Think they eventually (overpay) Dak.