Dear SeniorVBDStudent,
I've posted it twice now. If that isn't adequate, read the transcript of his appeal. I've posted that link twice, as well.
I've read your posts including the excerpts from the appeal. Your posts were not adequate, so I asked you the questions I asked you.
He was asked how long it has been his policy to destroy his cell phone when he replaces it. He said ever since he has had a cell phone.
Actually, as you posted, he said "I think for as long as I have had a cell phone". The inference of course is that he does not have perfect recall as to something as trivial as used phone disposition.
Again, try reading the appeal. Right after he said "I think for as long as I have had a cell phone," he reinforced that answer with "ever since I have been in the NFL." Correct me if I'm wrong, but he was in the NFL all of 2014 right? You know when he replaced the phone he didn't destroy, like he "always" does? Besides that, the origin of this supposed practice of his isn't in question, it's the application of it. There's no reason to debate whether he started this policy when he was a junior in college, when he was a rookie in the NFL, or in 2006. There's no debating that he claims this policy was in place when the phones in question were in use.
He, WITHOUT being asked a question, went back to this topic, and reiterated, that he always tells the guy to destroy his phone. He didn't say it once, but twice. He wasn't tricked into saying it, it wasn't the NFL lawyers manipulating his words. HE SAID, TWICE, that he ALWAYS destroys his cell phone when he replaces it (to prevent the contents from becoming public).
I always have a bowel movement in the morning after I have a cup of coffee. No, seriously, always. Well, perhaps there have been one or two occasions when I had some Mexican food and took a nap and ate again later where I pooped in the afternoon. but for the most part its always in the morning.
Similarly, most normal people have regular habits and practices that they use the word always to describe, when in fact always is not technically correct. This does not mean that when I have a bowel movement in the afternoon and then tell people that I always have same in the morning after coffee that I am a liar and attempting to hide the truth about why I pooped in the afternoon.
Thanks for sharing your ####ting habits. If you were under oath, and said you always pooped in the morning, and then it could be proven that you don't always poop in the morning, you'd have committed perjury, which means you'd have lied.
This is a lie, because the phone he had prior to the one he destroyed to keep it from the NFL had not been destroyed, despite being replaced months earlier.
See above.
See above.
Additionally, let's imagine for a moment that the construct was a lie. I've never met Tom Brady but I'm going to go ahead and guess that he's not going to intentially lie about an issue like this knowing in fact he has phone(s) laying around that are inconsistent with the "always" statement. If you choose to believe he is stupid and accidentally stepped in it, good on you.
I've never met Tom Brady, either. That doesn't change the fact that there is proof that he lied, under oath. If you choose to ignore that fact, good on you.
With regards to the "debunking," you are confused. The idea that has been debunked is that the reason he didn't let the NFL have his phone is because he was worried about personal info getting leaked. This has been debunked by the fact that the NFL NEVER ASKED FOR PHYSICAL POSSESSION OF HIS PHONE. They wanted him (or his laywer) to provide copies of electronic communications off the phone. The pics/emails/contacts he was worried about leaking couldn't have leaked, unless he or his lawyer leaked them. It has been discussed countless times in this thread. If you don't want to read the thread, google "Wells never asked for Brady's phone."
Now I fear you are really confused. His personal practice of destroying old phones pre-dates this incident (note that he states he's been doing it ever since he had his first cell phone) and has to do with personal information security. He destroys old phones because he doesn't know whether they will fall into the wrong hands. The argument that he had no reason to destroy old phones because the NFL didn't ask for them is specious on its face.
Again, you are confused. What I said has been debunked is the claim (not by Brady, but by posters in this thread) that Brady didn't turn his phone over b/c he was worried (due to the other leaks in this whole debacle) about his personal info getting leaked. Since the NFL never asked for physical possession of the phone, that fear of an NFL leak as the reason for not sharing the info with the NFL has been debunked.
When Brady destroyed his phone, he made those electronic communications the NFL was interested in irretrievable (according to his cell phone carrier).
Gee, that's a shame. Too bad that's what he does with used phones. Not every single one (sometimes I poop in the afternoon), but that's his stated policy.
No, his stated policy is that he ALWAYS destroys his used phones. There is no proof that he actually practices this policy; but there is proof that he doesn't.
Now go prove intent.
I don't need to, nor does the NFL, or the judge deciding this court case. Why Brady lied is irrelevant; the fact that Brady lied, under oath, brings his credibility & his entire testimony into question.