@gianmarco, it occurs to me: We're a bunch of boys who love to run around a lot ..and then brag about it. We like to swim and ride bikes. We really enjoy running around in the woods and climbing mountains. We can fussy about what we eat. We're fascinated with boobies, and we can never get enough poop stories, which we think are hilarious. As a kid doc, you're in the perfect place.Are you a doctor or nurse? Or did you have this? You seem pretty knowledgeable.
Hmmmm. My Hanson's plan has me running 12 miles with 10 at GMP exactly 10 days before the race. I'm guessing 14 and 14 is doable and won't be bad. I wouldn't go higher than 14 though.This reminds me - it totally depends on my recovery this week, but if I'm feeling good by week's end is 14 GMP too much for 14 days out from race day? I felt great on Saturday's 12 GMP and this is where that thought stemmed from. As I neared the end of the run I was telling myself I can definitely keep going, but knowing what lies ahead Monday I'm not going to. But what's the risk/reward behind going further next weekend?
This was the extent of my taper plan when I wrote it out a few weeks ago, I haven't touched it since, and looking at it just now - it isn't changing/just need to start filling in the actual mileage.
Today- recover
Tomorrow- rest
Sometime this weekend- something good (if sufficiently recovered, GMP - if not then intervals)
8-9 days from now- last call (if I did the GMP then tempo today, if I didn't then GMP today)
With your increased mileage, you should start to see some gains. That being said, I haven't looked closely at your workouts but I think to effectively run a HM, you need to have some speed workouts, at pace workouts and easy workouts as a part of your training plan each and every week.Some fun with numbers this morning. Been thinking about how to pace this 1/2 next Saturday, since my fitness is about as good as I can be right now considering my body hates me now. I ran this same race at 1:55:59 last spring with little training. So here is my mileage last year:
January: 50.16 miles
February: 34.87 miles
March: 65.93 miles
So far this year:
January: 75.23 miles
February: 85.09 miles
March: 95.99 miles
So then I compared a long run from the same period last year versus this year. I ran that 13 mile run this last weekend, and looking back I ran that exact run almost the exact same weekend as last year. (so a GREAT comparison)
Last year: 13.1 miles. 9:37 pace. 166 HR
This year: 13.1 miles. 9.36 pace. 166 HR
Couldn't believe it. So I feel pretty good I can run a 1:55 or so for this race. Which is probably my goal, which would help wipe the bad taste out of my mouth from that fall race. So I then looked at all of my 1/2 marathons where I had HR data to see what my effort was on race day.
April 2015: 8:29 pace. 174 HR. 1:51:20
April 2016: 8:09 pace. 174 HR. 1:46:55
April 2017: 8:51 pace. 172 HR. 1:56:00
October 2017: 9:32 pace. 168 HR. 2:06:40 (was completely wiped this race if you recall)
So I feel comfortable running this race in the 170-175 HR zone. My last few long runs have felt strong - meaning I'm not feeling completely wiped at the end. So I figure if my nutrition is good and weather cooperates, I should be good.
I also now know that this really is probably my last half I'll run. One of the disheartening things is even with increased mileage this year and actually "feeling better", it seems I can't get over the hump to start approaching some faster times. And for me, I don't want to run a 1/2 just to do it. If I can't see real gains then I think my time with distance running is over.
I know the only real way to see gains again is by mileage. And I've learned I can't push my body too hard or it makes me pay. I can run 4 days a week and still feel somewhat normal. I supposed I could try and maximize those four days with volume, and that may be something worth looking into.
Or, I just start exploring the trail thing and see what happens.
So, since in my mind since this is my last half, I'm thinking of trying to pace this thing a little more aggressively. If I remember from my last race report in April last year, I believe there were a few more minutes left on the course. So I'm thinking of shooting for an 8:30 pace, but keeping an eye on my HR throughout - at least the first part of the race - and use 175 as my target HR.
I think I can get there, and at this point I'd rather go in with the mentality of: "fook it - don't leave any time out there."
I think you can do this plan based on what I've seen. The key is picking the right pace so your body doesn't get hurt. If you pick a pace too fast, you'll start to break down. A pace too slow, and you'll be bored and not seeing the gains you want. Also,Do you guys think this is a reasonable training plan for me at this point? I know it's for advanced runners which I'm not, but I like the mileage totals and workouts. I figure as a base plan and covering 12 weeks, it'll cover April/May/June. During that time I've got the trail relay early June and a 5k later in June.
At that point I can then do a 12 week HM program for the race in October.
Thoughts? Any tweaks to it? If anything, I might add an actual rest day and double up on one day/week.
I think 20 2 weeks before is really pushing it unless you are a huge mileage guy (100+ miles a week).I'll just say that my buddy did his last 20-miler (including some hard stuff) two weeks out from Carmel, and he totally regrets it. His heart rate for the marathon was in the 170s starting at mile 12, so he effectively had to gut out a 16-mile tempo run to finish the marathon. He still made it sub-3:10 like he wanted, but it was a suckfest. I ended up leaving him at mile 19 or so.
I think Higdon does a better job with this than the others so you may not need it, but do not hesitate to call an audible when/if your body asks for a step back week. If you're going to bail on one of his workouts pick one (or both) during the week. They're designed to be difficult weekends. If you don't get to the weekend ready to rock you won't experience the full benefits.Do you guys think this is a reasonable training plan for me at this point? I know it's for advanced runners which I'm not, but I like the mileage totals and workouts. I figure as a base plan and covering 12 weeks, it'll cover April/May/June. During that time I've got the trail relay early June and a 5k later in June.
At that point I can then do a 12 week HM program for the race in October.
Thoughts? Any tweaks to it? If anything, I might add an actual rest day and double up on one day/week.
For me, I'd avoid the doubles and make sure you take a rest day every week. Maybe on Friday. That plan has something going on every day, where typically you have run anywhere from 3-5 days a week.Do you guys think this is a reasonable training plan for me at this point? I know it's for advanced runners which I'm not, but I like the mileage totals and workouts. I figure as a base plan and covering 12 weeks, it'll cover April/May/June. During that time I've got the trail relay early June and a 5k later in June.
At that point I can then do a 12 week HM program for the race in October.
Thoughts? Any tweaks to it? If anything, I might add an actual rest day and double up on one day/week.
Well, the reason for the doubles is to get ready for the trail relay in less than 2 months. I'm going to have to run hard, rest < 3 hours, run hard, and then do it once more. So, doing one double/week over the next 2 months will hopefully at least get me a little used to going back out there for multiple runs in a day. That also then allows me to take a full rest day each week was my thought.For me, I'd avoid the doubles and make sure you take a rest day every week. Maybe on Friday. That plan has something going on every day, where typically you have run anywhere from 3-5 days a week.
And then you are really going to get serious getting into a 12 week HM plan right after.
If it's me (and others are way better at this than me) I'd modify that plan a bit and try to have a longer slower run during the week (like maybe a 6-8 miler). Slow mileage right now will benefit you long term. And with the combo of that speed work you will be dynamite once your formal HM training starts.
Thank you all.To echo this, I follow the Hanson's marathon plan. Hanson's says you realize fitness gains 10 days after the workout. Therefore, for the Hanson's marathon plan, the last hard workout is 10 days before the race. I can't imagine its any different for a half marathon.
If I were in your shoes, I would go long 10+ on Thursday (10 days before your race). After that, its all easys -- anywhere from 4 to 7 miles.
Good luck!
A good saying to remember, @jabarony, is that it's better to be 100% healthy and 80% trained vs. 100% trained and 80% healthy. Take the fitness that you've got and run the race based on that! Maybe plan a good mantra or two or three to carry you through the final few miles. Let the mind carry you when the body can't.Thank you all.
I'll see what i can do about getting in a long run on Thursday. Weekdays are usually tough. But considering Thursday will have the best weather all week (43F and partly cloudy!!!!), I'll try and make it happen.
I'm not looking for fitness gains at this point. Probably tok late for that anyways. I just want my energy meter as full as possible gping in. I'm going to finish that race even if i have to moonwalk that 13th mile.
There's an official mantra from this thread.A good saying to remember, @jabarony, is that it's better to be 100% healthy and 80% trained vs. 100% trained and 80% healthy. Take the fitness that you've got and run the race based on that! Maybe plan a good mantra or two or three to carry you through the final few miles. Let the mind carry you when the body can't.
We even have accessories.gianmarco said:There's an official mantra from this thread.
BMF!!
Eh, I've been hooked for a good bit now. We'll see how following an actual training plan goes, but even if I can't stick to it and never get much faster, I'm ok with that because I love where I am and what I've been able to do. It's funny that I've been asked a couple times over last few months if I'm a runner and I've always hesitated to answer "yes"....I'd just answer with "Well, I run some but I just started a little bit ago" or something along those lines. But, I finally feel like I can just say "yes" to that question. It's strange, but it's something that I just do now and who I am. And it doesn't feel right if I've gone more than a couple days without getting out.ChiefD said:
Good luck and can't wait to hear how it goes.jabarony said:Thank you all.
I'll see what i can do about getting in a long run on Thursday. Weekdays are usually tough. But considering Thursday will have the best weather all week (43F and partly cloudy!!!!), I'll try and make it happen.
I'm not looking for fitness gains at this point. Probably tok late for that anyways. I just want my energy meter as full as possible gping in. I'm going to finish that race even if i have to moonwalk that 13th mile.
I like you getting on plan and the double idea will pay off phyically/mentally/prep-wise even a couple times leading up. Manage the frequency if it gets too much (rest when you need it) and keep the easy miles easy as prescribed and you’ll be seeing solid improvements.gianmarco said:Well, the reason for the doubles is to get ready for the trail relay in less than 2 months. I'm going to have to run hard, rest < 3 hours, run hard, and then do it once more. So, doing one double/week over the next 2 months will hopefully at least get me a little used to going back out there for multiple runs in a day. That also then allows me to take a full rest day each week was my thought.
This will be my first time doing actual organized speed work and following an actual plan. We'll see how it goes and if I can even stick with it.
I have Strava (sex club advertisements and all!) on my phone if that's what you mean.Good luck and can't wait to hear how it goes.
Do you have tracking info?
Did you join the Strava group here?I have Strava (sex club advertisements and all!) on my phone if that's what you mean.
Beyond the recovery issue @gruecd cited, everything I've read indicates you probably won't realize those benefits anyway. Shorter/faster workouts provide benefits within 10 days or so, but the long ones usually take longer.SteelCurtain said:I think 20 2 weeks before is really pushing it unless you are a huge mileage guy (100+ miles a week).
Have you considered running a tuneup race this weekend? I like the idea of racing a 10K 2-3 weeks out. I am looking forward to seeing what you can do on race day.Beyond the recovery issue @gruecd cited, everything I've read indicates you probably won't realize those benefits anyway. Shorter/faster workouts provide benefits within 10 days or so, but the long ones usually take longer.
Given where I am right now and my main goal later this month I'm going to walk back the 14 GMP. Juice vs squeeze. I'll either do 10-12 this weekend or 7-8 middle of next week. Hopefully I'm recovered enough to do it this weekend because I like the GMP/Tempo combo option better than intervals/mini GMP.
Yes, but then my wife signed up for one before I mentioned it Probably for the best anyway - I seem to take longer than most to recover from max effort runs and even if I went into it telling myself to keep it sub 90% that'd change to empty the tank once the gun goes off. I think it was @Hang 10 that floated it out there, but I like the idea of finding a shorter race about a month after the marathon. Take advantage of the shape I'm in but without that giant marathon matzah ball hanging out in the back of my head.Have you considered running a tuneup race this weekend? I like the idea of racing a 10K 2-3 weeks out. I am looking forward to seeing what you can do on race day.
Haven't used that one but Polar pretty much invented hr monitors and is still considered one of the standards, so that's probably a good one.Does anyone wear a heart rate monitor that you'd recommend? I'm looking for one with a chest strap and around $100 or less. This wouldn't be strictly for running more general exercise at home and gym. Here's one I was considering: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00WLKH81G/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?smid=A207G8FGT0Y15F&psc=1
I'm currently using the Wahoo TickrX. Prior to this I used the base Tickr model but when I started more treadmill workouts I needed the TickrX (which has a cadence sensor) to be able to upload those workouts to Strava. I've been really happy with both for tracking HR. The Android watch I have also tracks HR but is garbage unless I wear it really tight. And even then if I get above 150 it loses track. So I stick with the chest strap.Does anyone wear a heart rate monitor that you'd recommend? I'm looking for one with a chest strap and around $100 or less. This wouldn't be strictly for running more general exercise at home and gym. Here's one I was considering: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00WLKH81G/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?smid=A207G8FGT0Y15F&psc=1
That does seem to be the case from what I've been readingHaven't used that one but Polar pretty much invented hr monitors and is still considered one of the standards, so that's probably a good one.
That's definitely close to what I'm looking for. I don't have a smart watch and I would need to pair it with my phone if I go with one that doesn't include a watch. I'm mostly just wanting to measure my heart rate while I'm working out to track effort/intensity of my workouts. Extra features would be good but not necessarily really a strong selling point for my first one.I'm currently using the Wahoo TickrX. Prior to this I used the base Tickr model but when I started more treadmill workouts I needed the TickrX (which has a cadence sensor) to be able to upload those workouts to Strava. I've been really happy with both for tracking HR. The Android watch I have also tracks HR but is garbage unless I wear it really tight. And even then if I get above 150 it loses track. So I stick with the chest strap.
The TickrX can record data on its own and then upload to your phone or it can also just link to your phone realtime and record data that way.
Do you have any wearable currently? What do you want to do with the info? Just see it? Store it? TSS/IF/CTL?Does anyone wear a heart rate monitor that you'd recommend? I'm looking for one with a chest strap and around $100 or less. This wouldn't be strictly for running more general exercise at home and gym. Here's one I was considering: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00WLKH81G/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?smid=A207G8FGT0Y15F&psc=1
No, I've never had one. I really just want to see it while I'm working out. I don't know that I'd do a lot with the info if it were stored somewhere but it would be interesting to see.Do you have any wearable currently? What do you want to do with the info? Just see it? Store it? TSS/IF/CTL?
Im the same way ... its really hard to not go all out in a race.Yes, but then my wife signed up for one before I mentioned it Probably for the best anyway - I seem to take longer than most to recover from max effort runs and even if I went into it telling myself to keep it sub 90% that'd change to empty the tank once the gun goes off. I think it was @Hang 10 that floated it out there, but I like the idea of finding a shorter race about a month after the marathon. Take advantage of the shape I'm in but without that giant marathon matzah ball hanging out in the back of my head.
Is interesting worth $200?No, I've never had one. I really just want to see it while I'm working out. I don't know that I'd do a lot with the info if it were stored somewhere but it would be interesting to see.
Probably not which is why I was looking for something less expensive.Is interesting worth $200?
Friend got this one: https://www.amazon.com/Garmin-vívoactive-Smart-Watch-Regular/dp/B01BKUB6BA/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1522852111&sr=8-3&keywords=vivoactive+HRProbably not which is why I was looking for something less expensive.
Thanks for the links. I'm hesitant to get one without a chest strap but I'm sure some of the better watches will provide accurate measurements without it. Maybe this wasn't the best thread for my question but I didn't know where else to ask. To clarify though I only run semi-regularly. I have nerve damage in my leg which makes it difficult to do too often. I would mostly be using this while I'm working out at home or in the gym.Friend got this one: https://www.amazon.com/Garmin-vívoactive-Smart-Watch-Regular/dp/B01BKUB6BA/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1522852111&sr=8-3&keywords=vivoactive+HR
He likes it a lot. Ive run with him and it works for his output which is around 10 miles per week.
BIL got this one: https://www.amazon.com/Garmin-Forerunner-235-Black-010-03717-54/dp/B0160BC1FO/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1522852258&sr=8-3&keywords=forerunner+235
He loves it. He runs/bikes a good bit. No regrets either.
Both of those watches will upload to Garmin Connect, Strava, Training Peaks, etc. If you are not sure how much you will get into it, I would go with the Vivoactive. If you would like to do your own research, DC Rainmaker is the "be all end all" of wearables: https://www.dcrainmaker.com/
I use a chest strap. I have this setup: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B012J1DVH6/ref=oh_aui_search_detailpage?ie=UTF8&psc=1Thanks for the links. I'm hesitant to get one without a chest strap but I'm sure some of the better watches will provide accurate measurements without it. Maybe this wasn't the best thread for my question but I didn't know where else to ask. To clarify though I only run semi-regularly. I have nerve damage in my leg which makes it difficult to do too often. I would mostly be using this while I'm working out at home or in the gym.
These two crack me up. You completely kicked ### having to sheeeeit your pants the whole time AND slowing down for your buddy.
- Unfortunately, still felt like I was going to #### my pants pretty much the entire race starting around mile 2-3. It would come and go, but eventually it got to the point that if I stopped I wasn't sure I'd be able to get going again, so I just gutted it out. Literally.
- My buddy and I ran side-by-side for the first 10-11 miles, but slowly he started to fall a few steps behind me. I'd slow down a tad and he'd catch up, but then he'd fall back again. Ended up dropping him around mile 19.
Thanks, I definitely appreciate the adviceI use a chest strap. I have this setup: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B012J1DVH6/ref=oh_aui_search_detailpage?ie=UTF8&psc=1
That setup is not what you are looking for.
That said, if I went back in time and decided I only wanted to run semi-regularyl, I would get one of those 2 watches. Thats because they are geared to HR. My buddy hasnt had any issue with his unit and loves using it. He wears it all the time. It will also show his HR over the past X hours.
With the strap its work. I need to clean mine regularly. I need to replace batteries regularly. I think it would be much simpler with the watch by itself.
Good luck with whatever you choose. IM(biased)O I would go with Garmin over Polar. With the research that I did, Garmin customer service is way beyond Polar. As an example, the strap broke on my HRM-Swim. I ask Garmin customer service about what my warranty options were. They just asked for my address and shipped me a new one. Yes ... I am a Garmin fanboy. I even bought their stock because of how great of a brand and company they maintain (still up 20%!)
Good luck with whatever you choose.
FYPLook at me, I'm just going to slow down for my buddy and have to #### for 26 miles and still run my 4th fastest marathon while seeing my family and oh yeah i didn't even drink a lot of water.
Nice work.
I think I am seeing the results of this. I am pretty sure this is the fittest I have ever been. My aerobic runs (HR under 153) are starting to creep around the low 7:00s. I think I broke through a nice plateau and as Grue mentioned, I am recovering nicely after my marathon. I think I did exactly what I wanted, treat it as more of a 26.2 mile long run. I have a race 4 straight weekends in a row (5K, 16K, 5K, 7 mile trail run, now I know how OS feels), and I am expecting some PRs. We’ll see!Yes, but then my wife signed up for one before I mentioned it Probably for the best anyway - I seem to take longer than most to recover from max effort runs and even if I went into it telling myself to keep it sub 90% that'd change to empty the tank once the gun goes off. I think it was @Hang 10 that floated it out there, but I like the idea of finding a shorter race about a month after the marathon. Take advantage of the shape I'm in but without that giant marathon matzah ball hanging out in the back of my head.
I've always used this as my "official" training volumes as well. What are you seeing that is no longer accurate?Heads up for everyone that uses the garmin progress summary reports (I think @Hang 10 did), they changed the format which is slightly annoying. The real annoying part is that the reports are no longer accurate. It looks like I'll have to generate my own reports from my individual activities.
The average HR is no longer calculated correctly, after I saw that I gave up on the rest of the report so I am not sure what else is inaccurate.I've always used this as my "official" training volumes as well. What are you seeing that is no longer accurate?
It does look like I can only see 16 months at a time though (grouped by month)? And the UX is terrible (setting the dates, for example).
ETA, actually looks like my issue was the lack of grouping for type of activity - there's no "running" category that captures the sub-categories, and it looks like different watches I've had have logged the activities differently. Annoying.
I had a chance to look at it again it and they are equally weighing each activity regardless of duration in their average calculation, so if you have a 30 minute run at 130 HR and 90 minute run at 140 HR the progress summary report will now show an average HR of 135 instead of 137.5.I've always used this as my "official" training volumes as well. What are you seeing that is no longer accurate?
It does look like I can only see 16 months at a time though (grouped by month)? And the UX is terrible (setting the dates, for example).
ETA, actually looks like my issue was the lack of grouping for type of activity - there's no "running" category that captures the sub-categories, and it looks like different watches I've had have logged the activities differently. Annoying.
A little @tri-man 47 foot rub will girth that right up.....Got a feet scan at fleet foot this morning, turns out I've been wearing shoes 1.5 sizes too small.
Has anyone else got this? It's pretty cool even if it does say my ball girth is small.
Been a few days since my last ball scan. But results were negative as I recallGot a feet scan at fleet foot this morning, turns out I've been wearing shoes 1.5 sizes too small.
Has anyone else got this? It's pretty cool even if it does say my ball girth is small.
My toe to heel length is already above average.A little @tri-man 47 foot rub will girth that right up.....