I think this will be a tougher call on closer inspection. Reports I read were that the robbers had been firing indiscriminately almost from the time they hijacked the truck. I think Police had to take risks here.
This is such a terrible description of what actually happened.Using civilians as human shields too.
Yeah utter BS. These guys were firing weapons at will. I happened to watch the entire thing live on my local news down here in South Florida. Law Enforcement had no choice. They started spraying bullets at the police the moment they started to approach the truck to get them to surrender. No win situation.This is such a terrible description of what actually happened.
CBS news must have a bunch of visually impaired reporters. First they couldn't tell that they watched surveillance video at 5 times normal speed involving the cruise ship incident and now they say this...
Ummmm.... You can see the flashes clear as day in the truck???News helicopters were following the chase and at least one showed the conclusion live, with one person falling out of the vehicle's passenger side after several shots were fired. It was unclear if the shots were fired from inside the truck, from law enforcement who were moving in or some combination thereof.
I am old enough to remember the north hollywood shootout. Those officers were lauded. Bet you they would be skewered by twitter trolls today.Yeah utter BS. These guys were firing weapons at will. I happened to watch the entire thing live on my local news down here in South Florida. Law Enforcement had no choice. They started spraying bullets at the police the moment they started to approach the truck to get them to surrender. No win situation.
But there will be lawsuits, hyperbole reaction and rhetoric and it will be a giant ####show like everything else these days in the world of 24/7 media news cycles and social media.
Had you said they used civilian occupied vehicles as cover would at least be an accurate description.I'm not going to argue with you that they probably had no choice, but there's no denying they were using civilian occupied vehicles as cover during a shootout.
SO tell me...what would you do if you are in that same exact situation. Get shot? Take bullets? It is natural survival instinct to seek cover when bullets are flying by your head.I'm not going to argue with you that they probably had no choice, but there's no denying they were using civilian occupied vehicles as cover during a shootout.
Yeah and I reserve judgement till all the ballistics are done. That will paint the picture and does not lie.CBS news must have a bunch of visually impaired reporters. First they couldn't tell that they watched surveillance video at 5 times normal speed involving the cruise ship incident and now they say this...
Ummmm.... You can see the flashes clear as day in the truck???
I don't think any civilians were killed in the North Hollywood shootout though.I am old enough to remember the north hollywood shootout. Those officers were lauded. Bet you they would be skewered by twitter trolls today.
OMG they went and got AR15's from a pawn shop!!! They had a military vehicle! Thieves and militarized hoodlums those cops! Should have just let those guys go!
Although we still had skeezy lawyers back then since one of the robber's family sued the police. Yes. You read that right. The robber's.
Luck. There were people everywhere. Again it was a no win situation. And everything happened very very fast. It is a terrible thing what happened yesterday. But I don't blame law enforcement. They had no choice to act they way they did. It was the freaking wild wild west.I don't think any civilians were killed in the North Hollywood shootout though.
Several were shot though.I don't think any civilians were killed in the North Hollywood shootout though.
And your post is a prime example of how messed up this country is criticizing law enforcement. Why don't you spend your outrage on the criminals who started the whole mess by shooting a jewelry store worker in the head and then took an innocent man hostage?Joe had that post about whether the public perception of police has changed which I mostly avoided, but this is a prime example of how messed up law enforcement is in our country these days, IMO. A completely disproportionate response that resulted in chaos and innocent deaths which, IMO, comes from the "warrior/warzone" mentality that many police and even departments promote within the profession.
In situations like this, the expected procedure is to back off the pursuit, follow with air support, and force a confrontation when it is appropriate. I've seen that posted by multiple LE people on various different websites also criticizing this police response. There's zero defense of what those police did. They forced a confrontation in a crowded area and likely killed two innocent people in their rush to play soldier.And your post is a prime example of how messed up this country is criticizing law enforcement. Why don't you spend your outrage on the criminals who started the whole mess by shooting a jewelry store worker in the head and then took an innocent man hostage?
Damned if they do, damned if they don't. If the police back off these dangerous criminals and they end up killing a family in a car accident or take 30 people hostage, you will just spend your time complaining about the police didn't do enough to protect innocent lives.
yeah, back off of two armed criminals who already shot somebody in the head - now I know you are trolling on a Friday night. Nice job.In situations like this, the expected procedure is to back off the pursuit, follow with air support, and force a confrontation when it is appropriate. I've seen that posted by multiple LE people on various different websites also criticizing this police response. There's zero defense of what those police did. They forced a confrontation in a crowded area and likely killed two innocent people in their rush to play soldier.
Backing off would have been the proper procedure and follow by chopper until they either ditch or get to a less populated area. The officers there were acting on orders but their orders were bull####.yeah, back off of two armed criminals who already shot somebody in the head - now I know you are trolling on a Friday night. Nice job.
Maybe next time you should personally invite them into your home to allow them to peacefully surrender to police.
Did the police even have a helicopter in the air?Backing off would have been the proper procedure and follow by chopper until they either ditch or get to a less populated area. The officers there were acting on orders but their orders were bull####.
I know the woman at the store had already been shot. Was she shot in the head?yeah, back off of two armed criminals who already shot somebody in the head - now I know you are trolling on a Friday night. Nice job.
Maybe next time you should personally invite them into your home to allow them to peacefully surrender to police.
What if they weren't planning on going to a less populated area? Two armed criminals facing life in prison have very little to lose at that point. What if their next move would have been a crowded mall or shopping center and they are able to take 30-40 people hostage?Backing off would have been the proper procedure and follow by chopper until they either ditch or get to a less populated area. The officers there were acting on orders but their orders were bull####.
So you’re law enforcement? Cause that’s not how we train with our LE operations.What if they weren't planning on going to a less populated area? Two armed criminals facing life in prison have very little to lose at that point. What if their next move would have been a crowded mall or shopping center and they are able to take 30-40 people hostage?
This is the problem with Monday morning keyboard warriors. They never think the situation could be 1000x worse. And if the situation does escalate to 1000x worse, they will just complain about that.
I've never once indicated sympathy for the criminals. I'd appreciate if you'd stop implying that I have.yeah, back off of two armed criminals who already shot somebody in the head - now I know you are trolling on a Friday night. Nice job.
Maybe next time you should personally invite them into your home to allow them to peacefully surrender to police.
Multiple, from what I heard. There were also several news helicopters and this happened on live TV.Did the police even have a helicopter in the air?
I knew there was a news helicopter, but figured there were liability issues involved with just abandoning pursuit and leaving it in the hands of the news crew. Wasnt sure if they had police helicopters.Multiple, from what I heard. There were also several news helicopters and this happened on live TV.
She was reportedly hit by a ricochet from a shot fired into the floor by one of the criminals. Thankfully minor injuries.I know the woman at the store had already been shot. Was she shot in the head?
The truck was stuck behind civilian vehicles not police vehicles. That was the wrong sport to approach knowing that gunfire was probable. It’s not like the spike stripped the vehicle and had it disabled with a controlled highway; would you want to be in a vehicle next to this! Would you want this approach if your family was in a vehicle next to the truck?What if they weren't planning on going to a less populated area? Two armed criminals facing life in prison have very little to lose at that point. What if their next move would have been a crowded mall or shopping center and they are able to take 30-40 people hostage?
This is the problem with Monday morning keyboard warriors. They never think the situation could be 1000x worse. And if the situation does escalate to 1000x worse, they will just complain about that.
This CBS News article has a quote from the former Miami-Dade Police Chief:The truck was stuck behind civilian vehicles not police vehicles. That was the wrong sport to approach knowing that gunfire was probable. It’s not like the spike stripped the vehicle and had it disabled with a controlled highway; would you want to be in a vehicle next to this! Would you want this approach if your family was in a vehicle next to the truck?
Sadly, it also seems pretty likely that the police are responsible for both innocent deaths. There is graphic video from the TV coverage of the UPS driver being shot after trying to crawl out from under one of the suspects. The bystander was 350 feet ahead of the UPS truck having just made a right turn out of the wide intersection, while all of the responding police are parallel or behind the UPS truck while the shooting happens. Which is exactly why the former police chief says you don't do that.Miami-Dade's police director, Juan Perez, explained why officers had to move in on the suspects, saying the suspects weren't just fleeing, they were being violent and "confronting officers shooting at them."
But Manny Orosa, who was Miami-Dade's police chief from 2011 to 2015, questions the tactic given the number of civilians and the hostage.
"If you're shooting into a truck and you don't have a clear vision of who you're shooting at, you don't just shoot at the truck," Orosa said.
Imo the criminals are responsible for the deaths but I don’t think the cops should have engaged the way that they did. They are honestly very lucky the number was not higher.This CBS News article has a quote from the former Miami-Dade Police Chief:
Sadly, it also seems pretty likely that the police are responsible for both innocent deaths. There is graphic video from the TV coverage of the UPS driver being shot after trying to crawl out from under one of the suspects. The bystander was 350 feet ahead of the UPS truck having just made a right turn out of the wide intersection, while all of the responding police are parallel or behind the UPS truck while the shooting happens. Which is exactly why the former police chief says you don't do that.
The more I think about it the more I wonder what would have happened if one of the vehicles they were using as cover through it in reverse or gassed it to get out of there. Would they have shot at them if the driver in a panic ran over or was going to run over a cop? If it’s just me in the car then maybe I would have ditched out and ran but if my kids are in there no way I’m just staying there parked while being used for cover.rockaction said:Count me in as thinking that high speed chases should not be engaged nor allowed unless the most stringent of protocols is engaged and followed.
It's silly, disturbing, and just plain wrong to have an incident like this.
In speaking to the rest of the thread, was up by Fullerton the other week and said a prayer for Kelly Thomas's soul, that it rests in peace.
I don't usually do that.
So messy. I'd say that I'm all about abiding the law, but I'm really not a positive law guy. I'm a natural law sympathizer, and there is virtually no societal reason not to let the property go to the thieving victors other than general deterrence, a rubric's reasoning which is trumped here, IMHO, by the innocent lives lost.The more I think about it the more I wonder what would have happened if one of the vehicles they were using as cover through it in reverse or gassed it to get out of there. Would they have shot at them if the driver in a panic ran over or was going to run over a cop? If it’s just me in the car then maybe I would have ditched out and ran but if my kids are in there no way I’m just staying there parked while being used for cover.
This is a terrible idea. Milwaukee tried no chase policing. They have reversed their decision.rockaction said:Count me in as thinking that high speed chases should not be engaged nor allowed unless the most stringent of protocols is engaged and followed.
It's silly, disturbing, and just plain wrong to have an incident like this.
In speaking to the rest of the thread, was up by Fullerton the other week and said a prayer for Kelly Thomas's soul, that it rests in peace.
I don't usually do that.
I don't think you even read what I wrote before you called it terrible. I'd read more carefully next time.This is a terrible idea. Milwaukee tried no chase policing. They have reversed their decision.
Problem with no chase is that criminals start to realize that fleeing becomes a good strategy.
People argue "so what, you have the vehicle info, just arrest them later"
Those people have bad information. The people fleeing are often already wanted for something else. So obviously "arrest them later" is a pretty awful strategy. Especially when the vehicle being driven is also often not registered to them.
So you are in favor of chasing suspects?rockaction said:I don't think you even read what I wrote before you called it terrible. I'd read more carefully next time.
And try not -- not that I'm offended or wanked or anything -- to make other people's arguments my own through anticipatory negation of debate. You'll find, with me, I'm not offering trite positions and that they'll be generally off of the beaten path.
Thx;
The bolded seems -- and I'm not being contentious here -- that I'm not above high speed chases in certain instances. But I would reduce the number and danger of them, especially including citizen forfeiture of their own property at the whims of the police.So you are in favor of chasing suspects?
Count me in as thinking that high speed chases should not be engaged nor allowed unless the most stringent of protocols is engaged and followed.
I'm a natural law sympathizer, and there is virtually no societal reason not to let the property go to the thieving victors other than general deterrence
of course - did anyone ever think they wouldn't ?parasaurolophus said:Problem with no chase is that criminals start to realize that fleeing becomes a good strategy.
Agreed. Would love to hear the leaders of New York explain this oneWe should be united on this issue. I don't understand at all why not.
Nobody wants crime, or lawlessness. But we should all be appropriately concerned about the State's power over it's citizens. All of us.
Because sometimes the two sides come from radically differing agendas, sometimes borne out to bear.We should be united on this issue. I don't understand at all why not.
I’ve never heard of placing handcuffed people in the front seat. Is this common?Officer shoots handcuffed man.
The officer is being charged with murder...as he should be
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/handcuffed-man-shot-killed-inside-maryland-police-cruiser-n1124486
Quick google seems it smells like permanent marker or copier toner.Smelled PCP? I have never heard of this. Does not mean it is not a thing, just that I have never heard of it. Does PCP have a strong, detectable, or distinctive smell?
Yes. It reeks. And people put it in car vents to cure the "juice" or something. Stinks up the car.Smelled PCP? I have never heard of this. Does not mean it is not a thing, just that I have never heard of it. Does PCP have a strong, detectable, or distinctive smell?