Not gonna lie - what I’ve heard about the Breonna Taylor case, there is definitely a case to be made that the officers were not clearly in the wrong to have used their firearms.The number of shots being responsibly fired for sure changes based on the circumstances. In this situation, I would say 1 shot would have been appropriate given the cops already tried other techniques to slow him down but couldn’t seem to do so and the fact that he leaned into his car. I think cops killing someone should be an absolute last resort though and I just don’t believe this was the case here.
I’ll admit this scenario is definitely a bit complicated and I can see the arguments for both sides. There are so many things Blake could have done better to prevent this from happening, but at the same time I don’t think what he did should have resulted in a death sentence which is essentially what the cop decided.
This isn’t a clear cut case of the officer being completely in the wrong like we’ve seen in the past with George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Elijah McClain, etc. The fact that I was just able to rattle off 3 names like that off the top of my head of cases that’ve happened in the past year alone might be why I’ve about had it with giving the cops the benefit of the doubt on anything related to this though.
Another bad apple
Now, yes, this is an isolated incident with a single officer acting completely inappropriately. This is not evidence that all officers are like this at all.
However, the fact that he is still a police officer given the history reported in this article combined with that behavior is why there's continued distrust growing with police forces. Those in charge continue to allow him to "protect and serve" when it's clear he is not fit to work as a police officer.
Off duty, drinking, hits and shoots the wrong guy.......but hey everything is fine nothing to see hereAbel has a history of high-profile on- and off-duty incidents, including being fired and charged criminally for pistol-whipping and accidentally shooting a man while Abel was off-duty and drinking on the South Side in 2008. A man allegedly punched Abel outside a bar. Abel pursued the man, hit him with his gun, and accidentally discharged his weapon, shooting the man in the hand. Turns out, though, it wasn’t even the man who bumped into Abel.
Makes sense. crump is as dishonest as trump. He smelled his own cooking style.
Just read the story and saw the video.Lancaster, PA - Guy runs at police wielding a knife and gets himself shot. People riot and start burning things. Who are the bad guys again?
this kind of crap is just way too common and is why the police absolutely cannot be trusted to manage and discipline their officers correctly without outside oversight. Guys like this one, Derek Chauvin, and Gerald Goines (bad cop with a history who made false statements to obtain the no knock warrant in last year's police shooting in Pecan Park, Houston that killed two innocent homeowners) shouldn't be on the streets with these kind of records of behavior and citizen complaints.Another bad apple
Now, yes, this is an isolated incident with a single officer acting completely inappropriately. This is not evidence that all officers are like this at all.
However, the fact that he is still a police officer given the history reported in this article combined with that behavior is why there's continued distrust growing with police forces. Those in charge continue to allow him to "protect and serve" when it's clear he is not fit to work as a police officer.
agreed on all counts, but I'll go a little further than you on 3 and 4: these protests are starting to lose the plot and do more harm than good to public willingness to support change when people are going nuts over stupid stuff like this, and I think the authorities ought to act decisively to shut them down as soon as there's any type of violence or destruction of property.Just read the story and saw the video.
1) Looks to be completely justified. I doubt you'll find anyone that thinks otherwise.
2) This shooting happened yesterday. The bodycam video is already released not even 24 hours later. That's exactly how it should be. Not weeks later. Or 6 months later.
3) Not surprised there's a protest following another police shooting resulting in a death. Any of the looters or rioters destroying property should be arrested and charged. Not acceptable (never has been).
4) Hopefully with the release of the video so quickly, these protests/riots will die down just as quickly. It's what should happen.
You didnt read the replies in the video link in that story then. Plenty of people thinking it wasnt justified.Just read the story and saw the video.
1) Looks to be completely justified. I doubt you'll find anyone that thinks otherwise.
Yep, what bizarro world do we live in? Dude is chasing a cop with a knife and people are upset the cop shoots him? What is wrong with this world.....disgusting.You didnt read the replies in the video link in that story then. Plenty of people thinking it wasnt justified.
Eta: no shortage of people blaming the officer.
Blue lives don't matter - that's all I can take away from the new view from liberal leftYep, what bizarro world do we live in? Dude is chasing a cop with a knife and people are upset the cop shoots him? What is wrong with this world.....disgusting.
What, you mean blaming the guy actually breaking the law? That’s not ok anymore. We’ve confirmed that at least .00125% of police in this country are bad people so we are going to treat all of them like criminals and defund them.Blue lives don't matter - that's all I can take away from the new view from liberal left
a touchy feely social worker would have been hacked to death by that guy and then magically the left would blame police for NOT being there
and if police hadn't showed up, police would have been blamed
it'd be nice if someone put blame on the guy with the knife .... you know, a personal responsibility kinda thing
I clicked on the link provided below. The short answer is no, no one is blaming the officer. Lots of people weighing in as lefties saying this is justified.Is anybody here actually arguing that the Lancaster shooting was unwarranted? It seems like it would be better to wait and see if anybody takes that position before preemptively lashing out at hypothetical people who are taking that position in your imagination.
See above.You didnt read the replies in the video link in that story then. Plenty of people thinking it wasnt justified.
Eta: no shortage of people blaming the officer.
Can't help but think that the protests are going to generate more people feeling like they have the right to threaten police...and it will not end well for them.Yep, what bizarro world do we live in? Dude is chasing a cop with a knife and people are upset the cop shoots him? What is wrong with this world.....disgusting.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/2020/09/14/protests-erupt-in-pennsylvania-after-police-fatally-shoot-black-man-wielding-a-knife/amp/
maybe NBA players will wear his picture on shirts this week ?? celebrating an accused rapist last week, maybe a knife wielding guy this week? could happen :(What, you mean blaming the guy actually breaking the law? That’s not ok anymore. We’ve confirmed that at least .00125% of police in this country are bad people so we are going to treat all of them like criminals and defund them.
Huh? The first reply shown is some idiot talking about shooting in the knees. And if you read more from same dude he is dead serious.I clicked on the link provided below. The short answer is no, no one is blaming the officer. Lots of people weighing in as lefties saying this is justified.
See above.
Just click the link i provided. Will take ten seconds to see many.Is anybody here actually arguing that the Lancaster shooting was unwarranted? It seems like it would be better to wait and see if anybody takes that position before preemptively lashing out at hypothetical people who are taking that position in your imagination.
In response to somebody pointing out this guy stabbed four people last year.Don't agree with the police but he was charging at cop with a weapon. But hey maybe try using your stun gun first and if doesn't work then use ya pistol
OK even if he did, he doesn't deserve to get shot and killed by the police. Why not use a taser? That's the whole reason why people are upset. Police are not executioners. If you're afraid all the time don't be a police officer.
Did the officer think the guy was gonna throw the knife like a ninja? The fact that the office fled then shot shows the officer panicked. It was not a standoff. No “drop your weapon or we will fire.” Clear example of pisspoor training and a cop I’ll equipped to use deadly force.
Are police officers need to learn that pulling the trigger is never your first thought but your last. We must make them responsible for their actions. If I shot someone because I was afraid I would be in jail for the rest of my life. Why are they not
Not justified
Police are trained to kill, plain & simple.....minded.
Taser him? Not lethal bullet. Lol fu*king net gun (joke). Active shooter response programs teach people to throw phones and books. But the police are in so much danger from one dude, in the open, with a knife that they have to gun him down?
Another Biden...They shouldn’t need to shoot to kill. They are supposed to be trained professionals. They should be able to shoot to diffuse the situation.
police should not shoot to kill rather to disarm. why fire seven shots at a man while you can slow him down with one in the hand or leg
It seems that American police contrarely to police officers around the world does not practice any martial arts or any physical defense expertises, is it because most officers were former hairdressers or overweight?
It means that they have no de-escalation skills. Why are we holding our officers to such pathetically low standards?
Someone trained in non lethal combat could have easily disarmed and subdued him. Police could and should be trained for this. Unfortunately in this and most countries shoot to kill is the only training therefore history keeps repeating itself. Cowardly ignorance!
Well maybe more than one guy...There are other ways to disarm somebody with a knife
and the right continues to desperately lower the bar for what we should expect out of police. if u can’t disarm an autistic man with a knife, as a professional police officer, w/o killing him... then maybe u shouldn’t be a f***** cop
Ok, but that is only the first three replies right???Because if our police can’t handle a disabled man with a knife without ginning him down, then it’s well past time we take some serious action to rebuild them from the ground up.
Huh? The first reply shown is some idiot talking about shooting in the knees. And if you read more from same dude he is dead serious.
Then there is this...
This could have been handled differently. Why do cops always pull their gun first when they have other options and be trained to deescalate situations like this? Sure the guy had a knife but they have tasers and there are more than one of them. So sad.
Then this...
Cop didn’t even make an attempt to de-escalate or simply move away. Cop was way too trigger happy
More...
Has anyone watched the videos of police when they shoot dogs running towards them? This is what this video reminds me of. The complete lack of respect. The complete lack of appropriate training. Or the only training they've received is to shoot. And release footage asap.
More...
for those that are saying this was justifiable, if that was your son or daughter, would you still say yes my son or daughter should have been killed for running towards a cop with a knife? simple yes or no.
more...
It’s so weird that every mentally disturbed black guy with a knife gets executed but in England somehow their cops are trained enough to detain these same knife wielding individuals without deadly force. Why do our cops even have tasers?
More...
You know that other countries around the world handle people with weapons without immediately shooting them? Actual civilised countries I mean, but then again even third world countries (like the USA) often handle these situations without shooting first. US police are a disgrace
there are tons more like this.
Or just roundhouse kick it out of his hands and spar with him?I’m not sure why the cop didn’t just shoot the knife out if his hands.
I asked about people here, in this forum. Why are we arguing with/about dumbasses on Twitter who don't rise to the level of the worst FBG posters?Just click the link i provided. Will take ten seconds to see many.
Well you see he couldn’t find any examples from posters on this forum supporting it, so he had to search elsewhere. HTHI asked about people here, in this forum. Why are we arguing with/about dumbasses on Twitter who don't rise to the level of the worst FBG posters?
You are incorrect. If you see where I replied above somebody said that they didn't see anybody saying that at the link I provided. That was obviously untrue, so I posted some of the many tweets. That a problem for you?Yenrub said:Well you see he couldn’t find any examples from posters on this forum supporting it, so he had to search elsewhere. HTH
Million dollar bails for rioting? That seems a bit excessive and unconstitutional.More on Lancaster:
13 total people arrested
From that article:
At least eight of the suspects are not Lancaster residents, according to police. They said one of two people armed with handguns during the protests was charged with illegal possession.
And, here is the more unfortunate part of the story:
Shooting victim had paranoid schizophrenia and family was trying to get him mental help
I don't blame the officer for how he reacted. But, this is yet another incident where someone suffering from mental illness lost their life. I don't know what the right answer is. I do think we need to try and find it, though.
Also, while there was a second night of protests in Lancaster, it was much smaller and more peaceful
Not surprising since that video came out.
Give it a rest. Almost every freaking thread here does exactly that. B-b-b-but sides.Yenrub said:Well you see he couldn’t find any examples from posters on this forum supporting it, so he had to search elsewhere. HTH
As I understand it, the required dosage varies so much that these would frequently be ineffective or cause permanent damage.Still say police should be equipped with tranquillizer dart guns for these type of situations. Shoot a dart into the perp and then everyone back off for the 30-60 seconds, it takes to calm the person down. Then proceed. Think if George Floyd, the Atlanta guy, Blake, whoever were all popped with darts, calmed down and then subdued.
You send a social worker to Lancaster and there is a good chance he/she ends up sliced and diced like a Halloween movie.
Why not something like this?Still say police should be equipped with tranquillizer dart guns for these type of situations. Shoot a dart into the perp and then everyone back off for the 30-60 seconds, it takes to calm the person down. Then proceed. Think if George Floyd, the Atlanta guy, Blake, whoever were all popped with darts, calmed down and then subdued.
You send a social worker to Lancaster and there is a good chance he/she ends up sliced and diced like a Halloween movie.
He really wasn't but that has been discussed forever so no reason to revisit that.As I understand it, the required dosage varies so much that these would frequently be ineffective or cause permanent damage.
Also, George Floyd is a pretty bad example here. He was calm, and in a car, until the police escalated the situation for no reason.
Playing devil's advocate here, why would we expect a tranquilizer to be more effective than a taser?He really wasn't but that has been discussed forever so no reason to revisit that.
As far as taking a chance of a sedative or 4 bullets in the back the former sounds better. I am not a doctor but I think 4 bullets in the back might cause a little more permanent damage.
Almost?Give it a rest. Almost every freaking thread here does exactly that. B-b-b-but sides.
Say the situation is chaotic and there some sort of force has to be used. If you were the perp given these options what would you choose?Playing devil's advocate here, why would we expect a tranquilizer to be more effective than a taser?
My question isn't really about what option I would want used on me. Obviously, the answer is none. I'm not a doctor either, but I'm having a hard time coming up with a reason to expect that a tranquilizer would be more effective than a taser, pepper spray, or other, existing, non-lethal options.Say the situation is chaotic and there some sort of force has to be used. If you were the perp given these options what would you choose?
1. A sedative
2. Beat over the head with a billy club.
2. Tased with an high voltage electrical current.
3. Shot with 9MM Glock bullets at close range.
I think anything other than 4 bullets is a better solution.My question isn't really about what option I would want used on me. Obviously, the answer is none. I'm not a doctor either, but I'm having a hard time coming up with a reason to expect that a tranquilizer would be more effective than a taser, pepper spray, or other, existing, non-lethal options.
Additionally, if we're discussing alternatives to shooting, I'm assuming that the situation requires immediate resolution. I doubt that the movie version of a tranquilizer, in which the recipient calmly falls asleep within seconds, is not the reality. Isn't a taser a more immediate solution?
Maybe. But that doesn't answer either of the questions I posted. Is there any reason to believe this would be more effective than a taser? Is there any reason to believe this would be immediate enough to be a solution at all?I think anything other than 4 bullets is a better solution.
I have no idea but other non-lethal options need to be and should be explored.Rich Conway said:Maybe. But that doesn't answer either of the questions I posted. Is there any reason to believe this would be more effective than a taser? Is there any reason to believe this would be immediate enough to be a solution at all?
I don't know if this particular suggestion would be better or worse than, say, tasers. But, non-lethal options exist now, yet police frequently jump straight to the lethal option. I question the assumption that adding yet another non-lethal option would lead to different outcomes.I have no idea but other non-lethal options need to be and should be explored.