Frostillicus
Footballguy
It is.
Last edited by a moderator:
So is your face.Top 50 maybe, also Jon Rauch is a stud and probably slept with your sister.
I figured someone would get it.What does RN think about it?
Bad posting - it's very re-watchable.It has not aged well.
A few funny spots hold up well, but overall it is now in meh territory
Better check the temperature in hell: Dr. Death and the Promoter of Peace agree on something.Top 50 maybe, also Jon Rauch is a stud and probably slept with your sister.
Groundhog Day. Though I liked What About Bob also, it doesn't have the same rewatchability quotient.Top 20 comedy
Actually, not sure if its that high.
What's better Groundhog Day or What About Bob?
Doesn't have the be a Top 5 Bill Murray movie to be the greatest movie of all-time.It's enjoyable and entertaining and all, but it may not even be in the Top 5 Bill Murray movies.
Yep.It has not aged well.
A few funny spots hold up well, but overall it is now in meh territory
I liked it when I was older.Just not that good unless you have the nostalgia of liking it when you were younger.
Say what now? If there are five other better Bill Murray movies, then the best Groundhog Day could rank is sixth overall.Doesn't have the be a Top 5 Bill Murray movie to be the greatest movie of all-time.It's enjoyable and entertaining and all, but it may not even be in the Top 5 Bill Murray movies.
love both, but probably go with Bob simply for the "son of a #####in' Bob!" line from Richard Dreyfus.Top 20 comedy
Actually, not sure if its that high.
What's better Groundhog Day or What About Bob?
You'd rather see him "get the guy"?Good movie but eventually the whole "get the girl" angle wears out.
Shut up.You'd rather see him "get the guy"?Good movie but eventually the whole "get the girl" angle wears out.
This is my anwer.It has not aged well.
A few funny spots hold up well, but overall it is now in meh territory
I have no idea how this makes any sense at all.There's a story I heard a while back, there was supposed to be some interfaith religious conference, where various leaders from different denominations were going to get together and talk about their religions adjusting to the modern world. There were going to be priests, bishops, rabbis, imams, swamis, monks, et cetera, someone for everyone from every big religion.
Anyway, one of the panels was going to be about using mainstream movies to convey ideas about religion. The organizer of the conference asked everyone who was going to appear on the panel to pick a movie that they felt they could use to talk about their religion. Well, just about everyone from every religion picked Groundhog Day as "their" movie. The Catholics, the Buddhists, the Jews, everyone wanted to stake a claim.
I think there ended up being a fight about which religion would get to present it.
Yup. It was a Museum of Modern Art series on faith in film:There's a story I heard a while back, there was supposed to be some interfaith religious conference, where various leaders from different denominations were going to get together and talk about their religions adjusting to the modern world. There were going to be priests, bishops, rabbis, imams, swamis, monks, et cetera, someone for everyone from every big religion.
Anyway, one of the panels was going to be about using mainstream movies to convey ideas about religion. The organizer of the conference asked everyone who was going to appear on the panel to pick a movie that they felt they could use to talk about their religion. Well, just about everyone from every religion picked Groundhog Day as "their" movie. The Catholics, the Buddhists, the Jews, everyone wanted to stake a claim.
I think there ended up being a fight about which religion would get to present it.
linkWhen the Museum of Modern Art in New York debuted a film series on “The Hidden God: Film and Faith” two years ago, it opened with Groundhog Day. The rest of the films were drawn from the ranks of turgid and bleak intellectual cinema, including standards from Ingmar Bergman and Roberto Rossellini. According to the New York Times, curators of the series were stunned to discover that so many of the 35 leading literary and religious scholars who had been polled to pick the series entries had chosen Groundhog Day that a spat had broken out among the scholars over who would get to write about the film for the catalogue. In a wonderful essay for the Christian magazine Touchstone, theology professor Michael P. Foley wrote that Groundhog Day is “a stunning allegory of moral, intellectual, and even religious excellence in the face of postmodern decay, a sort of Christian-Aristotelian Pilgrim’s Progress for those lost in the contemporary cosmos.” Charles Murray, author of Human Accomplishment, has cited Groundhog Day more than once as one of the few cultural achievements of recent times that will be remembered centuries from now. He was quoted in The New Yorker declaring, “It is a brilliant moral fable offering an Aristotelian view of the world.”
If I had to guess I would say it is a brilliant moral fable offering an Aristotelian view of the world. Just a guess though.I have no idea how this makes any sense at all.There's a story I heard a while back, there was supposed to be some interfaith religious conference, where various leaders from different denominations were going to get together and talk about their religions adjusting to the modern world. There were going to be priests, bishops, rabbis, imams, swamis, monks, et cetera, someone for everyone from every big religion.
Anyway, one of the panels was going to be about using mainstream movies to convey ideas about religion. The organizer of the conference asked everyone who was going to appear on the panel to pick a movie that they felt they could use to talk about their religion. Well, just about everyone from every religion picked Groundhog Day as "their" movie. The Catholics, the Buddhists, the Jews, everyone wanted to stake a claim.
I think there ended up being a fight about which religion would get to present it.