I think that was a wise investment. You should be able to sell him for a (probably significant) profit...likely before next year even begins.Well I was the buyer. I paid what's currently the #7 rookie pick in the upcoming rookie draft for him. If news comes out that Lynch is shutting it down, I will likely be able to sell for more - but in the meantime I'm using him till I know what the deal is with Forte and Lacy.Or sell him when it looks like Lynch is out of the way. He's shown enough that people will simply assume he'll be a workhorse RB1 (discounting the potential for competition to be brought in, a potential RBBC, etc.), and at least a few will be willing to pay you accordingly. The about what Hill could have netted you last offseason.They like him, but Im not sure he is the long term solution. I think they will look to replace Lynch with a RB in the 2016 draft or 2017 draft. The best hope is you get the end of this year and 2016 out of Rawls.in terms of future draft picks in a dynasty league, what's he worth? a top 4 pick in 2016? more? less?
Cash in on that assumption and convert that value into a more established/stable commodity.
True but that defensive unit disappears on the road.Same 49er team that held Freeman too like 10 yards two weeks ago
Seahawks re-signed RB Bryce Brown.
It's the latest sign that Marshawn Lynch (abdomen) will miss Week 12. Brown slots in behind Thomas Rawls and Fred Jackson.
Is there a RB out there you have a lot more confidence in this year at THIS point? Few teams are as committed to the run as Seattle.Start Rawls w/ confidence this week?
According to this infographic posted by @4for4_john (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CUmQ9PiWUAAcG3e.png), Rawls has to face the 1st and 2nd ranked run DST in PIT & MIN over the next 2 weeks.Is there a RB out there you have a lot more confidence in this year at THIS point? Few teams are as committed to the run as Seattle.Start Rawls w/ confidence this week?
Well, at this point (this weekend), he's playing a rested team who's coming off a bye and is pretty good against the run as it is. After this game, though, two average matchups and then a great game at home vs maybe the worst run defense in the league.Is there a RB out there you have a lot more confidence in this year at THIS point? Few teams are as committed to the run as Seattle.Start Rawls w/ confidence this week?
It's not ideal but it is in Seattle which helps. Also, they have shown they will utilize him in the pass game if he is getting stuffed.According to this infographic posted by @4for4_john (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CUmQ9PiWUAAcG3e.png), Rawls has to face the 1st and 2nd ranked run DST in PIT & MIN over the next 2 weeks.I'm having a tough time picking two out of Rawls, Stewart, and John Brown... Probably go Rawls/Stewart... But John Brown faces the 49ers.. Decisions decisionsIs there a RB out there you have a lot more confidence in this year at THIS point? Few teams are as committed to the run as Seattle.Start Rawls w/ confidence this week?
What are we looking at here from him against PIT, 20/80/1? is that to optimistic?Well, at this point (this weekend), he's playing a rested team who's coming off a bye and is pretty good against the run as it is. After this game, though, two average matchups and then a great game at home vs maybe the worst run defense in the league.Is there a RB out there you have a lot more confidence in this year at THIS point? Few teams are as committed to the run as Seattle.Start Rawls w/ confidence this week?
I'm thinking around 22 for 70 yds rush 8 yds receiving 0 TD ... Steelers are going to be ready for himWhat are we looking at here from him against PIT, 20/80/1? is that to optimistic?Well, at this point (this weekend), he's playing a rested team who's coming off a bye and is pretty good against the run as it is. After this game, though, two average matchups and then a great game at home vs maybe the worst run defense in the league.Is there a RB out there you have a lot more confidence in this year at THIS point? Few teams are as committed to the run as Seattle.Start Rawls w/ confidence this week?
You think? Why would they have been game planning for a back-up RB before last Sunday? Not a ton of tape out there on Rawls, but he's not all that different than Lynch I suppose. Maybe a bit quicker. I agree it'll be more of a challenge than the 49ers... but then again it is at home and PIT has to make the cross country journey.I'm thinking around 22 for 70 yds rush 8 yds receiving 0 TD ... Steelers are going to be ready for himWhat are we looking at here from him against PIT, 20/80/1? is that to optimistic?Well, at this point (this weekend), he's playing a rested team who's coming off a bye and is pretty good against the run as it is. After this game, though, two average matchups and then a great game at home vs maybe the worst run defense in the league.Is there a RB out there you have a lot more confidence in this year at THIS point? Few teams are as committed to the run as Seattle.Start Rawls w/ confidence this week?
If it seems to good to be true ...it usually isYou think? Why would they have been game planning for a back-up RB before last Sunday? Not a ton of tape out there on Rawls, but he's not all that different than Lynch I suppose. Maybe a bit quicker. I agree it'll be more of a challenge than the 49ers... but then again it is at home and PIT has to make the cross country journey.I'm thinking around 22 for 70 yds rush 8 yds receiving 0 TD ... Steelers are going to be ready for himWhat are we looking at here from him against PIT, 20/80/1? is that to optimistic?Well, at this point (this weekend), he's playing a rested team who's coming off a bye and is pretty good against the run as it is. After this game, though, two average matchups and then a great game at home vs maybe the worst run defense in the league.Is there a RB out there you have a lot more confidence in this year at THIS point? Few teams are as committed to the run as Seattle.Start Rawls w/ confidence this week?
Mike GarafoloVerified account @MikeGarafolo 27m27 minutes ago
Indications are Seahawks RB Marshawn Lynch is expected to miss about 4-5 weeks with his abdominal injury. Hope is he's back strong late Dec.
Ian Rapoport @RapSheet 19m19 minutes ago
#Seahawks RB Marshawn Lynch is set to have surgery on his sports hernia tomorrow morning, source said. Expected to be out about a month.
vs Week 15? Cleveland? In Seattle? Pffshaw.tough week 14 matchup with raven who just held gurley in check.
ThisNo way, FJaxIs Brown the handcuff for Rawls now?
Wouldn't F-Jax continue with his 3rd down duties as opposed to being an every down back?ThisNo way, FJaxIs Brown the handcuff for Rawls now?
If Rawls goes down, Seattle is screwed.Wouldn't F-Jax continue with his 3rd down duties as opposed to being an every down back?ThisNo way, FJaxIs Brown the handcuff for Rawls now?
So it would make sense to infer that Brown would get early down work with F-Jax sprinkled in while handling 3rd downs?If Rawls goes down, Seattle is screwed.Wouldn't F-Jax continue with his 3rd down duties as opposed to being an every down back?ThisNo way, FJaxIs Brown the handcuff for Rawls now?
FJax is old and slow. He doesn't have nearly enough juice left to be an every-down back.
Possibly. Sig thinks FJax could be a feature back for 2-3 weeks, but I don't agree. It could be a 50/50 split.So it would make sense to infer that Brown would get early down work with F-Jax sprinkled in while handling 3rd downs?If Rawls goes down, Seattle is screwed.Wouldn't F-Jax continue with his 3rd down duties as opposed to being an every down back?ThisNo way, FJaxIs Brown the handcuff for Rawls now?
FJax is old and slow. He doesn't have nearly enough juice left to be an every-down back.
A better name is "Got You're Under Rawls"Good for you.Changed my team name to Ooh Baby I Like It Rawls
That seems like pretty low risk for a pretty big reward. Rawls would probably be rosterable even if Lynch came back and worst case I'd think you'd have no trouble trading him to the Lynch owner next year.So what is the consensus of Lynch coming back to Seattle? In a unique contract league I have the opportunity to extend Rawls another year, but then he's uncuttable.
Good points.I wonder how good the Steelers run-d really is. If you look at the offenses they've faced, very few actually run the ball well.
1- @New England - 28th rushing offense - Dion Lewis went 15-69. 4.6 ypc. The rest was Brady.
2 - San Francisco - 18th rushing offense - 49ers actually ran for over 100 yards but 50 of it was Kap
3 - @St Louis - 7th rushing offense but this was Gurley's 1st game and he only got 6 carries
4 - Baltimore - 22nd rushing offense
5 - @San Diego - 30th rushing offense
6 - Arizona - 10th rushing offense - stuffed them while Palmer threw for 421 yds
7 - @Kansas City - 9th rushing offense - West went 22-110-1, 5.0 ypc and 2-19 receiving
8 - Cincinnati - 12th rushing offense - stopped them but Hill still had 4.0 ypc
9 - Oakland - 23rd rushing offense - Murray went 17-96-0, 5.6 ypc
10 - Cleveland - 31st rushing offense
Throwing out the St Louis game, they have faced 3 rushing offenses in the top 12 and stopped 2 of them at home. The 3rd, on the road, roughed them up pretty good and controlled the game.
Seattle is the top rushing offense in the league and playing at home. Of course, Wilson's rushing stats skews their ranking but his running only helps Rawls.
I kinda like Rawls Deep.A better name is "Got You're Under Rawls"Good for you.Changed my team name to Ooh Baby I Like It Rawls