Dismattle said:
I think weve seen some Coachs assume a role, which leads to the HC position the next season.. (sorta formality for one reason or another)
Think the interim Coach being promoted has caused problems in the past, because of the Rooney rule.. (not so sure on a DC being promoted)
Im just saying this Team doesnt need any additional bad pub..
Sadly, I concur with you that its probably too bad Detroit didnt give the Coach more time.. I was just talking w/ my wife about this, because of the start of this yr is reminiscent of the 0-16 Seasons.
I believe Suh and his "play" overshadowed both the Team, and the Coach..
Back in the Navy it was sorta common to hear "One awe ####e, wipes out alot of attaboys"..
What do you think of the new Miami Coach? I wanna say that I think I like his vigor, but it also seemed like I was just hearing cliches..
I mean, Id be the first one to admit it looked like the players quit, so who knows how good some of em really play.
But, if the Coach is really good, I kinda like where the Team could potentially wind up ...
They weren't going to be fixed in four or five days. I think they get four off with a bye and...well however many practices til they play next.
I applaud him for wanting to do it himself and not assign this to his staff.
I do not know another way to quickly fix a poor football mindset then to have em' get back to basics and work hard. "get their hands dirty"
Common respect and appreciation are built over time. I don't know that he can offer them that more professional approach while trying to make this a quick fix situation. People want that and some fans are whining about his approach already saying it's not high school or peewee. I think it's fine.
During a quick makeover, if a guy gives a good effort the coach moves onto someone else and it goes down the line.
What I'm nervously waiting for from Fins fans is "why did soandso get cut?" ... or traded for peanuts. My guess is he's going to find a bad apple or two.
What I'm anxious for is the results based mindset Parcells and most of his coaches all had (geesh the reason he had a career really)
My guess would be Jennings, Miller and a couple on the OL are at risk. I do not feel they always give 100%. At times Miller runs into the lineman when the hole is "right there" and it drives me nuts. This could be construed as a negative but could also be Miller paying better attention to detail and improving.
After the "get down to business" stuff, then we'll see how he coaches gameplans/schemes.
Saunders has been around forever. He'll probably help with everything, not just O.
There's never been a Parcells team that didn't run often. With ZERO knowledge to create an expectation here- I'd see about acquiring Miller or Williams cheaply. IIRC Saunders likes the screen an awful lot.
If the rook is capable, I assume he's the first replacement if Campbell's displeased with a WR.
There's really nothing that can be done FF wise until they play. I'm only suggesting if you're itching to do something and feeling like a gamble here.
I'm very curious why every coach brings up Tannehill. I've watched a slew of interviews and read a ton of articles recently and...something is up with Ryan. My friend, a Fins writer, thinks Campbell is putting more on Ryan's shoulders. Another friend and I both think he doesn't much care for Tannehill. It could be none of this and just Tannehill is the guy to make an example of and lead by example. All just guesses...