Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
It's one the the worst ideas I've ever seen. It's patently unfair and gives rise to abuse.SayWhat? said:
Even without the delay (and I agree that is total crap) this would smell like collusion anyway. That just pushes is over the top. A RB1 and a top 3 pick for a TE (while he gets to use that TE all season)? How was this deal allowed? I see this league folding real quick.Hankmoody said:
don't get me wrong, don't love the pieces you gave up but seems like an overpay for Henry. It seems to me everyone is trying to write off D Murray early.
Not writing him off at all, he looks great. Just trying to get in on the ground floor on Henry while I can. I'm aiming for next year in this league--already dealt DT for Keenan Allen, for instance. Just trying to get things lined up for a new window on a re-tool.
that makes sense, I just think you are likely going to be waiting 2 years for Henry
Can see why Team A is 1-5. So he moves his early 2017 1 and downgrades at RB to get an average QB and 2nd rounder?
Irrelevantlod001 said:
I did actually give him a top 10 QB, as currently ranked in the leagues I'm in, which was far better than what he had.
Doesn't matter. He's not a top 10 dynasty QB and even if he were its terrible trade for him. When your team is bad and not playoff bound you don't sell your early picks for anything but premium and young assets.lod001 said:
I did actually give him a top 10 QB, as currently ranked in the leagues I'm in, which was far better than what he had.
Come on. Let me guess Team B is 3-3 and trying to make a run and is a perennial bottom feeder. Pick one of those rookies and they are worth what team A gave up.
Maybe. Or Team A could regret this one. Pryor has looked the part regardless of matchup or QB. Those 2017 1's have lost some luster.
Yes. I definitely think Shep is. Fitz and Edelman are old. Fitz probably done after next year. Edelman is banged up and underperforming. Shep will be a 3rd round startup pick next year. Fitz and Ed will be 7-10. Henry very close as well.
I'd take Henry. Not a fan of AA and we all know how these guys with drug problems tend to work out.
Well I don't think he is the reason that the GB offense has been horrible. Still, give me the picks.
Eh? Lacy's NFL career might be over, let alone fantasy relevance... I don't think GB is bringing him back (contract is up) after repeatedly struggling with weight issues every single camp, and I'm not betting on him being productive for another team if he can even make a roster. I think the most likely scenario is he gets signed to a "prove it" deal by another team and has to come into camp and earn the job, which he won't be able to do unless he gets himself into shape. Teams are going to stop saying "his name is Eddie Lacy" and start actually looking at the product.
Yeah he and his 5.1 ypc looked awful this year. His lowest ypc in a game this year was 3.8 which is pretty damn solid. I doubt many backs hit near 5 ypc and nearly 4 ypc in every game this year. Yes he didnt score TDs or catch anything out of the backfield but he wasn't the reason GBs offense struggled.Milkman said:
You should trade for him then. The Packers are going to let him and his ypc test the market. I guess they don't care if they lose him either.
I don't see to many RBs who remain in the starting role with under 4 ypc. Certainly not the most telling stat but far from useless.
