barackdhouse
Footballguy
Lindsay. Not a big Kupp believer.FFPC, not involved
Phillip Lindsay and Chris Herndon
for
Kupp, 2.07, 2.10, 5.04
Also another deal with different owners
Carlos Hyde for a 2020 7th rounder
Lindsay. Not a big Kupp believer.FFPC, not involved
Phillip Lindsay and Chris Herndon
for
Kupp, 2.07, 2.10, 5.04
Also another deal with different owners
Carlos Hyde for a 2020 7th rounder
They both seem like equitable trades to me.FFPC, not involved
Phillip Lindsay and Chris Herndon
for
Kupp, 2.07, 2.10, 5.04
Also another deal with different owners
Carlos Hyde for a 2020 7th rounder
Really? I thought he looked fantastic before he got hurt. I believe him getting hurt really hurt the Rams' offense.Lindsay. Not a big Kupp believer.
But does he come back to pre-injury form? Always a risk with that...Really? I thought he looked fantastic before he got hurt. I believe him getting hurt really hurt the Rams' offense.
Is Hyde a free agent? He signed a two year deal with Cleveland I believe before being traded to Jacksonville.On the minor Hyde deal chances are super strong any team I have him on I'd end up cutting him but for cost of almost free I'd pay that to roster him before FA and then just hope for the best. Might not sign a place I'd consider him a keeper, but he might sign someplace I can now flip him for a higher pick. I'd take that gamble for a future 7th.
Sure, I think he will be fine. Frank Gore tore his left and right ACL, tore his right meniscus, and fractured a hip and he's headed to the HOF.But does he come back to pre-injury form? Always a risk with that...
I do like him and I agree about the Rams offense hurting without him. And I'm not overly concerned about his injury. I just think he is going to be a classic example of better for actual football than FF. I see him as a WR 2/3, but admittedly with weekly upside. There *is* value there, but I'd prefer Lindsay, who I think is far less replaceable.Really? I thought he looked fantastic before he got hurt. I believe him getting hurt really hurt the Rams' offense.
I would start all of them.I do like him and I agree about the Rams offense hurting without him. And I'm not overly concerned about his injury. I just think he is going to be a classic example of better for actual football than FF. I see him as a WR 2/3, but admittedly with weekly upside. There *is* value there, but I'd prefer Lindsay, who I think is far less replaceable.
I said I was a non believer but that's probably a bad choice of words. I meant in terms of fantasy. I like his game a lot otherwise. I don't know who I would start from one week to the next between Kupp, Woods and Cooks. I think it is certainly a fair trade, though.
I think there is more risk with Lindsey. Here is an undrafted RB that surprised. That doesn't necessarily mean he will maintain the starting job long term. I think there is less risk with Kupp long term.I do like him and I agree about the Rams offense hurting without him. And I'm not overly concerned about his injury. I just think he is going to be a classic example of better for actual football than FF. I see him as a WR 2/3, but admittedly with weekly upside. There *is* value there, but I'd prefer Lindsay, who I think is far less replaceable.
I said I was a non believer but that's probably a bad choice of words. I meant in terms of fantasy. I like his game a lot otherwise. I don't know who I would start from one week to the next between Kupp, Woods and Cooks. I think it is certainly a fair trade, though.
I don't recall the source but recall reading a few weeks ago he was likely to be released but you are right he is not a FA and I'm jumping the gun a bit assuming he's a FA. I'd still pay a 7th for him and see how the cookie crumbles.Is Hyde a free agent? He signed a two year deal with Cleveland I believe before being traded to Jacksonville.
I could see that.I don't recall the source but recall reading a few weeks ago he was likely to be released but you are right he is not a FA and I'm jumping the gun a bit assuming he's a FA. I'd still pay a 7th for him and see how the cookie crumbles.
FairI think there is more risk with Lindsey. Here is an undrafted RB that surprised. That doesn't necessarily mean he will maintain the starting job long term. I think there is less risk with Kupp long term.
Looking at his game logs, yeah maybe I am selling him short here. I'm still a bit afraid of the whack a mole syndrome with the Rams WRs though. Might come down to whether I felt I needed another WR or RB worse.I would start all of them.
Kupp was a strong WR1 up to the point he got hurt.
This is a great point. Kirk is on top of my test the waters list to try to acquire.Edgar said:Kirk missed the last month but was on pace for 833 yards. As a rookie WR with league-worst QB play, that’s incredible.
If you take out the two games he got hurt in, he was the WR 4 on the year when he went out.Looking at his game logs, yeah maybe I am selling him short here. I'm still a bit afraid of the whack a mole syndrome with the Rams WRs though. Might come down to whether I felt I needed another WR or RB worse.
Even deal imo. Third year is generally the TE breakout. Funny thing is I was about to give up both, Njoku and Thielen along with a 2020 2nd for Gurley. Kinda glad it didn’t happen.FFPC
Gave David Njoku
Got Adam Thielen
From what I've examined over the years a TE's usually take their biggest jumps from year 1 to year 2, also if they don't take a sizeable jump in year two the odds suggest they never will. If you look back at some of the best fantasy TE's of last 15 years most of of them exploded in year two. In Njoku's case he did not explode last year, but he did check the box for sizeable second year improvement so I think he's on the right track.Even deal imo. Third year is generally the TE breakout. Funny thing is I was about to give up both, Njoku and Thielen along with a 2020 2nd for Gurley. Kinda glad it didn’t happen.
This doesn't seem intuitive. It feels like TEs tend to come out of nowhere once the fantasy world gives up on them and they move to their next team.From what I've examined over the years a TE's usually take their biggest jumps from year 1 to year 2, also if they don't take a sizeable jump in year two the odds suggest they never will. If you look back at some of the best fantasy TE's of last 15 years most of of them exploded in year two.
Njoku is so overrated imo. I own him and I'd jump at anything close to that. Looks like Tarzan, plays like Jane.FFPC
Gave David Njoku
Got Adam Thielen
Tough one because both are so volatile but I'd definitely take Cooper. He's the only decent pass catcher they have so they will get him the ball. Thielen was pretty bad the last half of the year and he's already getting decently old. Makes me nervous.I’ve been offered Thielen for Amari Cooper straight up. Tempted to take it
Prefer Cooper by a sizeable margin, myself.Tough one because both are so volatile but I'd definitely take Cooper. He's the only decent pass catcher they have so they will get him the ball. Thielen was pretty bad the last half of the year and he's already getting decently old. Makes me nervous.
Right, that's the way it feels, but it's incorrect.tangfoot said:This doesn't seem intuitive. It feels like TEs tend to come out of nowhere once the fantasy world gives up on them and they move to their next team.
Maybe not for the truly elite guys, but for solid (somewhere in the top-6) production. Guys like Olsen come to mind.
Adams and ertz for me by a lot and i don't even love adams.12 Team .5 PPR
Team A got AB, Landry, Graham, 1.9
Team B got D Adams, Sanders, Ertz
It was a toss-up for me even before I noticed team B was getting Ertz too. Big win for that side.Adams and ertz for me by a lot and i don't even love adams.
I'd rank the players this way. Adams, AB, Ertz, 1.9, Landry, Sanders and Graham.12 Team .5 PPR
Team A got AB, Landry, Graham, 1.9
Team B got D Adams, Sanders, Ertz
Wow, I really like Adams and Ertz side if it's Devante Adams.I'd rank the players this way. Adams, AB, Ertz, 1.9, Landry, Sanders and Graham.
I agree with previous responses to this trade and think the Adams side prevailed but unlike those responses I thought it was just a slight win for the Adams side, not one I'd labeled as "not close" or anything.
Just curious, what is not to like about Adams? He was the only viable WR GB had last season and he dominated against top coverage.Adams and ertz for me by a lot and i don't even love adams.
I love that he's young and plays with Rodgers, and he's clearly a pretty good player.Just curious, what is not to like about Adams? He was the only viable WR GB had last season and he dominated against top coverage.
You make some great points, thank you for the post. I was never a huge fan until this last season when he proved me wrong against top coverage. I agree with a lot of what you brought up though and think the main issue will be a more balanced offense moving forward. He is a TD magnet and should continue to get opportunities. The value in GB seems to be who will be the next young receiver to separate themselves from the others. No idea who that may be...may not be on the roster currently.I love that he's young and plays with Rodgers, and he's clearly a pretty good player.
But he had a career year because of his situation more than his talent. He was Rodgers number one, Green bay didnt have anyone else to throw to, and he got an almost 50 percent increase in targets (169 last year vs 117 and 121 the two years before).
That was also his first 1000 yard season. He had 997 two years ago. 1386 yards is great, but it might not be predictive - randall cobb had 1287 yards in 2014 and never broke 1000 again.
Rodgers may be declining. He's had two down years in a row with injuries creeping in, and he's playing in a tough environment against tough defenses and is 35. Brady and brees are making it look easy to play well into your 40s, but maybe it's harder when you run around a lot and play in the cold. Maybe he's making so much money on his commercials that he's not staying in peak athletic shape. Maybe his body type just isn't built for it.
There's a good chance the packers improve their receivers. They may be in the Antonio brown or obj market, which would relegate adams to number two status immediately. There are other good options oom free agency and the draft who could allow rodgers to spread the ball out more.
And finally, he's been a touchdown machine when the packers were struggling to find a run game. Even if he keeps up the high target volume and Rodgers doesn't regress, he could see his touchdown numbers come down.
All of that is concerning to me. It doesn't mean i don't want him, but he's not the slam dunk wr1 that i think a lot of people think he is. I would still rather have him in dynasty than Antonio brown (who could see a huge drop in numbers on a new team) and i think he has upside to continue to improve even on his excellent 2018 numbers, but i think people are starting to over value him a little now.
I like Foster here, he seems to have an opportunity to receive targets with the Bills. Ronald Jones couldn’t beat out Barber and TB may be active in Free Agency for a RB.12 team PPR. 1 RB start. I'm the one getting Jones. Just figured he was worth taking a chance on.
Team A gave up Foster, Robert BUF WR
Team B gave up Jones, Ronald TBB RB
I'll take the SF RB's and Hilton pretty easily. A whole bunch of almost nothing on the other side.12 Team PPR/1.5 TE PPR
Team A got McKinnion/Breida, TY Hilton, Ian Thomas, 2.5
Team B Matt Ryan, Ingram, Duke Johnson, A Robinson, Crowder, 1.7
Agreed. It was risky. The other factor I took into account was age. Jones is only 21. Foster already 24.I like Foster here, he seems to have an opportunity to receive targets with the Bills. Ronald Jones couldn’t beat out Barber and TB may be active in Free Agency for a RB.
Foster for me, but I was never a Jones believer. I think Foster could carve out a WR2 season.Denver724 said:Agreed. It was risky. The other factor I took into account was age. Jones is only 21. Foster already 24.
Overall I think it's close to fair, even though I believe you lost out a bit. Don't the Redskins have one of the best offensive lines and just got hurt a little this past year? The QB situation leaves a lot to be desired, but if they make a move for a rookie I think they'll be better than people realize. I'll take the Tyreek/Guice side although I do love me some JuJu.Just made a pretty big one in FFPC.
Gave: Tyreek, Guice
Got: JuJu, Lindsay
This is just continued tinkering with my squad. I love Tyreek but feel he is a bigger risk than JuJu long term. He's basically 3 seasons older, has the checkered off field past, and is reilant on speed to make his game go. Going after the stud I prefer.
He asked for the RB swap to be included and I rank them similarly, so accepted his counter. As a Skins fan, I know quite well that next year is going to be a hot mess and could see Guice disappointing as a result. Figure Lindsay has just as much upside for the time being and won't be surprised if he's the more valuable of the two following next season. I may consider shopping him too.
Your statement about our oline has been true for three seasons now. At some point it stops being bad luck- we just have a lot of injury prone players. And Trent Williams keeps getting older.Overall I think it's close to fair, even though I believe you lost out a bit. Don't the Redskins have one of the best offensive lines and just got hurt a little this past year? The QB situation leaves a lot to be desired, but if they make a move for a rookie I think they'll be better than people realize. I'll take the Tyreek/Guice side although I do love me some JuJu.
What do you think you'll have to give up? I'm looking to get him this off-season but am not sure how much to spend for him.This is a great point. Kirk is on top of my test the waters list to try to acquire.
Cam and company rather easily for me.12 Team .5 PPR
Team A got
Roethlisberger, Ben PIT QB
Fournette, Leonard JAC RB
Yeldon, T.J. JAC RB
Allison, Geronimo GBP WR
Ertz, Zach PHI TE
Team B got
Newton, Cam CAR QB
McCoy, LeSean BUF RB
Crowder, Jamison WAS WR
Kelce, Travis KCC TE
2019 Draft Pick 1.05