Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
value wise its a good flip, but good luck guessing which weeks you should start Chris Thompson
I agree with almost all of your take here. Except Funchess I'll take him over McCoy every day. Snapcall if I woke up to that offer. Even if I'm wrong I don't care because I am simply never starting McCoy in my lineup again. The 2nd doesn't change that for me.
The 2nd is the most valuable thing in that deal to me. maybe I'll be completely wrong, but I'm not expecting much of anything from Funchess. I think he'll be the 4th option in that passing game behind Hilton, Ebron, and Campbell, and he's only on a 1 year deal. The more I think about it, I think its 2020 2nd>McCoy>Funchess for me. I could at least see McCoy having some relevance.
im higher on metcalf than most and he was going anywhere from 1.06-1.12 in a lot of the ppr rookie drafts ive seen, so this is about right
Agreed. I'm not super high on DK, but I figured it was worth the upside play. He could very well be another Treadwell, but the risk seemed worth the possible reward.
We'll see. I think Indy will find out pretty quickly what the Panthers did, and that is that Funchess isn't very good. They were hoping he'd be the #1 until Moore was ready, and not only did Moore outplay and outarget him, but Samuel did as well down the stretch, and those players are both similar to Campbell.
Give me Metcalf for sure. Drake has a way of rubbing coaches the wrong way, both Saban and Gase had no problems playing multiple guys over him. If I had any belief in Ballage, I'd think he's got a shot to be next in line. I think Miami's 2020 starting RB isn't currently on the roster yet.
These discussions confirm my view that Kupp is completely overvalued at this point (and I like him a lot). Admittedly I'm probably higher on Kirk than most, but to me they're almost equivalent assets and Kirk has more upside if anything.
He was wr15 in average fp/g last year and was the guy Goff looked to in the redzone. He might be wr2 or 3 in targets on his own team but he has incredible efficiency.
Now I think about it more, I think all of the Rams receivers are overrated for fantasy. Cooks in particular always has stats that look good at the end of the year, but when you're putting him in your lineup week to week, you never feel like you're getting sure thing points from an elite guy.
I think they have similar upsides, but right now Kupp has a much better qb and offense. Who knows what happens in AZ. Yes, by this time next year Kirk could be a huge value. I agree, but we already know Kupp can do it. We still dont know about Kirk
Depends on how much proof you require. Kirk's rookie year matches up pretty favorably to Kupp's. And that's without playing with professionals.
It's good that they invested in a new coach and quarterback but they also invested in new receivers.
I'll take 1.1 for a guy with a bad back and a rb who may or may not be starting in 2020
Same league - just dealt Courtland Sutton for a 2020 1st.
Superflex I take Jacobs and the 1st easily. Standard or PPR scoring, nope I still take Jacobs/1st easily. Makes me realize I have Jacobs too low in my rankings (or Amari too high, idk).
I think we're close enough there (although I wouldn't have Jacobs quite that high - probably same tier, but below Henry, Guice, KJ, maybe fornette) perhaps it's just a matter of positional value.
Yeah Superflex pushes this to the Jacobs side for me handily. It would be closer in non-SF but once you mix the QBs in for SF I can easily come up with 12 guys I REALLY like in next year's class. I think that pick will be a really nice prospect regardless of where in the 1st round it ends up.
