Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I'd rather have Cooper and the 1st, but I'm not giving up on Cooper yet, and I foresee a big dropoff from the first round of talent to the 2nd in this year's fantasy draft.
No. It might have been shrewd if he didnt give up the farm for Brown in the first deal. Not sure he came out ahead after both deals.
Are you saying that Freeman, Brady, and a late 2018 1st isn’t enough for Hunt? Seems like a big overpay for Hunt to me.
I challenged this trade as the site as the ability to over turned trades that are collusion but no over turn on this one also the 2 teams that traded I found out also are 2 teams that share another DFWC team together. Of course the Bell team made the playoffs so will be one of the teams I compete against for the league championship.
it's a high price so I'm not mad about it. Team B is a top4 team every year and has depth so it's probably good for both guys. Without much thought put into it, I'd pay that for Barkley if I had that kind of depth.
I'd probably take that for Barkley too if I'd earned the 1.1. That's the kind of trade that could jump start a franchise. But I can also understand someone rejecting it if they were deep and needed an elite player.
I love Mixon, but with how deep this draft is and starting all those receivers I would take the Funchess side
Really depends on how many people you start. If it is a deeper league 25+ roster spots with a taxi squad and start 7+ skill positions I would take the Mixon side, shorter benches and starters I would take the 1.01.Zyphros said:
2QB 3WR 3RB 2TE 1Flex 10 team league. 30 players deep. So the start 3RB is the kicker along with the choice of flexing another RB or not.
I ended up surviving this awful trade. Sure enough I played the team that got Newton, Allen and Collins in the Championship game but I was able to outscore him for the championship though it is going to be very tough to beat this team again next year.
The 19 1st. That’s often why bad teams stay bad, trade away their 1st a year in advance.
I absolutely don't feel that way myself.
Huge difference for me. IMO Guice is closer to Barkley than he is to the rest of the field
Not for me, I'd take 1.02 easy. I thought he was a yuge sell high at the start of this year.
Guice is not bulletproof like Barkley but agree here.
I am going to wait for the 1.02 owners in my leagues to get bitter for missing Barkley then sweep in and snag 1.02 from them in their disappointment. I'm friendly like that.
I think this may be where I am at as well. But I doubt I will wait until 1.01 has been selected. I'm more likely to start making offers as soon as I can. Others will want the pick too.
Receivers may end up like that but the RBs are way way way better this year.
