Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
TheBottomLine

Su'a Cravens - SS/LB WAS

119 posts in this topic

Any thoughts on this kid out of USC?  Rumored to be playing a hybrid SS/LB role.  Obviously can't help but to think about Deone Bucannon but he's not that kind of athlete.  Sneaky potential though?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you'll want to check out Jene's rankings and write up if you haven't seen that yet. He should be listed as a safety by MFL in the end, he's going to wear Sean Taylor's number he used as a rookie to honor him. I really like him in the fit he's going to have, considering him as a 2nd round pick in my 16 team league. Jene seems to be high on him based on his ranking as well.

http://subscribers.footballguys.com/apps/article.php?article=16bramel_combined_rookie_board_1.0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bummer, took him at 3.10 in my 10-teamer for extra LB depth.  I realize he has better value at DB, but DB's are also easier to come by.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MFL has officially switched him to Safety.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/4/2016 at 10:53 PM, TheBottomLine said:

Bummer, took him at 3.10 in my 10-teamer for extra LB depth.  I realize he has better value at DB, but DB's are also easier to come by.

No, man, that's not a bummer at all.

 

DB are easy to come by, but DBs that play LB are NOT easy to come by.  

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, massraider said:

No, man, that's not a bummer at all.

 

DB are easy to come by, but DBs that play LB are NOT easy to come by.  

Yeah, you are correct.  Having Deone, I definitely understand this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm looking to draft him in the 2nd round of my rookie draft. I'm hoping he is a starter at SS in base and plays linebacker in nickel and dime packages. I'm a Deone Bucannon owner and it has paid dividends. He has a DB # but plays LB. Big advantage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be cautious here.  Roto catches on to these things pretty quickly.  The reason we got Barron and Buchanon last year was because it didn't become obvious for those guys until later in the season and Roto/MFL doesn't update position listings after the season starts.  There's a decent chance that if he's lining up at LB a lot they redesignate him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever position he lines up at, he's going to be schemed to make plays. I'd rather he be listed as a safety but I'll take him either way.

Edited by WagesOfZin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On May 9, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Hankmoody said:

I'd be cautious here.  Roto catches on to these things pretty quickly.  The reason we got Barron and Buchanon last year was because it didn't become obvious for those guys until later in the season and Roto/MFL doesn't update position listings after the season starts.  There's a decent chance that if he's lining up at LB a lot they redesignate him.

Wearing a DB number may influence them, and don't think the Skins know where they want him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I fear that Roto will keep us hanging until right before the start of the season on this one.

My guess is he is going to be classed as a LB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/15/2016 at 9:11 PM, cr8f said:

Wearing a DB number may influence them, and don't think the Skins know where they want him.

Didn't stop them from listing Bucanon and Barron at LB.  Roto has taken note of him lining up at LB and actively compare him to Bucanon.

http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/11208/sua-cravens

Second-round pick Su'a Cravens played inside linebacker at rookie minicamp.
Cravens should get most of his snaps as a dime linebacker, but will also see time at safety and in nickel packages. The Redskins want to use him as their version of Deone Bucannon. Cravens dropped down to 215 pounds before the draft. May 14 - 6:25 PM
 
Redskins signed second-round S/LB Su'a Cravens to a four-year contract.
Cravens profiles as a hybrid safety-linebacker in the Deone Bucannon mold. Word out of the Redskins' facility is the team views him as a dime 'backer. May 9 - 11:27 AM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, Hankmoody said:

Didn't stop them from listing Bucanon and Barron at LB.  Roto has taken note of him lining up at LB and actively compare him to Bucanon.

http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/11208/sua-cravens

Second-round pick Su'a Cravens played inside linebacker at rookie minicamp.
Cravens should get most of his snaps as a dime linebacker, but will also see time at safety and in nickel packages. The Redskins want to use him as their version of Deone Bucannon. Cravens dropped down to 215 pounds before the draft. May 14 - 6:25 PM
 
Redskins signed second-round S/LB Su'a Cravens to a four-year contract.
Cravens profiles as a hybrid safety-linebacker in the Deone Bucannon mold. Word out of the Redskins' facility is the team views him as a dime 'backer. May 9 - 11:27 AM

LB is just where he started rookie camp, next week it could be elsewhere, but you are right next year it could be LB. I already lost Buchannon so hope he does move around. 

 

If he lines up at S in base and LB in the dime he may stay where he is. It's a long off season so have to let it play out.

 

Adding, who would be the SS then, Ihenacho, Jarrett? If they do move him it may only be on passing downs and not play him at LB like Deone.

Edited by cr8f

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, cr8f said:

LB is just where he started rookie camp, next week it could be elsewhere, but you are right next year it could be LB. I already lost Buchannon so hope he does move around. 

 

If he lines up at S in base and LB in the dime he may stay where he is. It's a long off season so have to let it play out.

 

Adding, who would be the SS then, Ihenacho, Jarrett? If they do move him it may only be on passing downs and not play him at LB like Deone.

I'm not arguing that he is going to be LB.  I am cautioning that he could and not to over-invest.  I have no interest how they list him either way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am keeping an eye on him, but I think he will get overdrafted in my rookie draft, as after Barron/Buchanon last year, people are looking for the next pumped up SS playing LB.

The difference is, those guys were cheap.  Pretty sure I picked up both as FA.  Buchanon was just one of four safeties the Cards had, and suddenly was playing LB.  Barron was a failed top pick, cut by his team.  

 

I have a feeling Cravens will stay listed as a safety this year, only because I don't see the Skins in a rush to change his designation to a position that gets paid higher.  To the best of my knowledge, the MFL designations come from teams' own rosters, how the teams list them.  A player would have to make a full conversion to a different position in order for a team to change from a position with a certain salary, to one with a higher salary.  

The Raiders aren't going to list Khalil Mack as a DE until they have to, which sucks for fantasy owners.  Cravens, I think, will be listed as a safety until the team has completely abandoned all pretense of playing him as a safety, like the Cards and Rams with Buchanon and Barron.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given this is a below average offensive rookie class, would it be crazy to target this guy with a mid second round pick in rookie drafts.  If what Massraider says above is true, he may be listed as a safety all this year and possibly next (possibly dual designation would be best possible outcome). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Took him at 5.05, after Ramsey(not a CB required league), Joseph and Neal. Killebrew went at 5.12. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, massraider said:

I am keeping an eye on him, but I think he will get overdrafted in my rookie draft, as after Barron/Buchanon last year, people are looking for the next pumped up SS playing LB.

The difference is, those guys were cheap.  Pretty sure I picked up both as FA.  Buchanon was just one of four safeties the Cards had, and suddenly was playing LB.  Barron was a failed top pick, cut by his team.  

 

I have a feeling Cravens will stay listed as a safety this year, only because I don't see the Skins in a rush to change his designation to a position that gets paid higher.  To the best of my knowledge, the MFL designations come from teams' own rosters, how the teams list them.  A player would have to make a full conversion to a different position in order for a team to change from a position with a certain salary, to one with a higher salary.  

The Raiders aren't going to list Khalil Mack as a DE until they have to, which sucks for fantasy owners.  Cravens, I think, will be listed as a safety until the team has completely abandoned all pretense of playing him as a safety, like the Cards and Rams with Buchanon and Barron.  

For MFL leagues it's not about what the team lists.  The Raiders have listed Mack at DE since last year.  MFL imports from Rotoworld directly, and Roto STILL has Mack at LB.

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎5‎/‎25‎/‎2016 at 2:04 PM, matttyl said:

Given this is a below average offensive rookie class, would it be crazy to target this guy with a mid second round pick in rookie drafts.  If what Massraider says above is true, he may be listed as a safety all this year and possibly next (possibly dual designation would be best possible outcome). 

Not crazy, I've seen him go in the 2nd a couple of times. For me it would depend on if the 3 QBs were off the board and I had decent depth at WR/RB/LB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone seriously think he's being groomed to be an ILB in their base D?  The report from OTAs means nothing other than he will likely see some time in the middle of the field at the second level on passing downs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Bronco Billy said:

Does anyone seriously think he's being groomed to be an ILB in their base D?  The report from OTAs means nothing other than he will likely see some time in the middle of the field at the second level on passing downs. 

I don't, but didn't see Deonne Buchan as an ILB either. I think he'll play several positions, they like his versatility.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is creeping into the second round in rookie drafts now.

Any position change on MFL before week 1 is going to cause a lot of pain.......

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, scothawk said:

He is creeping into the second round in rookie drafts now.

Any position change on MFL before week 1 is going to cause a lot of pain.......

They gave him a DB number so probably won't change, before week 1 at least. 

 

Adding,

He played ILB with the 2nd team the first OTA, this week and next week's  schedule (May 31, June 1-2, June 6-9) may tell us more. 

Edited by cr8f

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, cr8f said:

They gave him a DB number so probably won't change, before week 1 at least. 

 

Adding,

He played ILB with the 2nd team the first OTA, this week and next week's  schedule (May 31, June 1-2, June 6-9) may tell us more. 

I still fear the worst here no matter what his number is. Ive seen it too many times before with these late season changes.

Im only drafting him in leagues where I need ILB help as well, just in case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, scothawk said:

I still fear the worst here no matter what his number is. Ive seen it too many times before with these late season changes.

Im only drafting him in leagues where I need ILB help as well, just in case.

I hope not after losing DE Jerry Hughes and S Buchanan to LB this year. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, cr8f said:

They gave him a DB number so probably won't change, before week 1 at least. 

 

Adding,

He played ILB with the 2nd team the first OTA, this week and next week's  schedule (May 31, June 1-2, June 6-9) may tell us more. 

Mark Barron still has a DB number though, so Rotoworld/MFL does not treat that as determinative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 31/05/2016 at 3:35 PM, Don Quixote said:

Mark Barron still has a DB number though, so Rotoworld/MFL does not treat that as determinative.

We need to find out who makes the position changes at Roto, and then look at his fantasy squads to see who he owns, or more importantly, doesn't own. :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, scothawk said:

We need to find out who makes the position changes at Roto, and then look at his fantasy squads to see who he owns, or more importantly, doesn't own. :)

 

Buccanon is still #20 and listed at S on arizonacardinals.com. 

 

And the FBG rankings have Cravens as an OLB. Maybe for this year they are right. 

Edited by cr8f

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, cr8f said:

Buccanon is still #20 and listed at S on arizonacardinals.com. 

 

And the FBG rankings have Cravens as an OLB. Maybe for this year they are right. 

AZ.com can say what they like, it doesn't impact on fantasy position designation. The homepage is pimping Matt Barkley for crying out loud.

As for OLB, I though the  fluff was that he was playing at ILB?

This ride has many ups and downs to come.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, scothawk said:

AZ.com can say what they like, it doesn't impact on fantasy position designation. The homepage is pimping Matt Barkley for crying out loud.

As for OLB, I though the  fluff was that he was playing at ILB?

This ride has many ups and downs to come.

 

 

 

That's for sure, maybe the rankings here will end up being the right ones. If that's the case I'll need a safety.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now rotoworld has him at ILB, but MFL doesn't (yet).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, cr8f said:

Now rotoworld has him at ILB, but MFL doesn't (yet).

I think MFL has various times that they do batch changes to match rotoworld.  I wouldn't expect the change until training camp is under way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still potential for him to change and change back

Not a massive surprise though. Ive still drafted hi in leagues where I needed LB help and slightly earlier in leagues that credit pass defenses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dang.  Was hoping to get a year at S from him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rotoworld jumping the gun here listing him at ILB after first practices. TC should signal where he plays.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How are they jumping the gun? He has played exclusively at the linebacker position and the coaches have mentioned nothing about putting him out at safety. He isnt even a starter. I think there is a lot of wishful thinking going on here. He will be a solid player one day but right now he is clearly being over drafted. He is not a safety. He is a linebacker.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.