It's a 2017 first and a 2018 pickGreat for Philly if it's a high pick. This season was going to be a waste anyway.
Agreed. This is an absolute coup for Philly.I think this speaks loudly to how concerned the Vikings are about Bridgewater's career. They could have potentially muddled through this season with Hill and other journeymen, but were willing to deal 1st round pick for a QB who has a shot at being a starter for a couple of seasons.
That said, I personally would have kept the pick and used it on a QB in 2017 if I were that worried.
RW said 2017 1 and 2018 4As a Vikings fan, I'm excited Hill won't be the starter - that's essentially throwing the season away. But I'm having some sticker shock at what it cost to get Bradford and they haven't even reported what the 2018 pick is yet.
Makes more sense (as others have said) if Bridgewater might not be ready next year.
I think this speaks loudly to how concerned the Vikings are about Bridgewater's career. They could have potentially muddled through this season with Hill and other journeymen, but were willing to deal 1st round pick for a QB who has a shot at being a starter for a couple of seasons.
That said, I personally would have kept the pick and used it on a QB in 2017 if I were that worried.
Both of these imo. Bridge might be (hopefully he is) back but maybe not. Bradford could be good with the talent surrounding him. He's certainly playing with the best rb duo he ever has, so there should be less pressure. AD is nearing the end of his career, thus the Vikings needed to upgrade. Now, I think McCown could have been that upgrade for 16.I think on the Vikings end of things, they must see the window shutting after this year. The defense is good, AP hasn't hit the cliff yet (though I think it comes this year), and they have good talents at WR in Diggs, Treadwell and Wallace. They have a shot this year and they need a QB who is not back up level to make it happen.
IMO a bad move is sitting with your hands in your pockets wasting a year with a team that has a lot of talent. Bradford doesn't guarantee success however going into the season with Hill at QB guarantees no playoffs.Speilman is a great GM. This feels like a very bad move. Weird.
Oh I agree but I'm not sure this was the only move they had. I mean Spielman loves his draft picks.Vikings want to make a run. They have a good team. They can easily push the Packers for a division title again.
Freak'n incredible deal for the Eagles.Great deal for the eagles
TRich deal was midseason and don't think that trade is representative of anything other than a bad deal for the Colts.This isn't fantasy football, you don't just trade a first for a guy a week before the season and have it work out. Just ask the Colts and their saga with TRich.
Understand the need to upgrade from Hill, but this feels like a gigantic overpay. I mean McCown would have cost a 3 instead of a 1, and Bradford, though he has more upside, has disappointed everyone, everywhere he has been.
McGloin would have been younger and cheaper, so would Geno, Kaepernick, Glennon, McCoy.
Just don't see Bradford as that big of an upgrade from those guys. Bradford has NEVER been worth a 1st round pick, and the Rams and Eagles could both attest to that.
Philly knows how to negotiate.. That should be an obvious fact by now You call Philly, best bring some lubeThis isn't fantasy football, you don't just trade a first for a guy a week before the season and have it work out. Just ask the Colts and their saga with TRich.
How dare you slander Scott Mitchell like that.Sam Bradford is the modern day Scott Mitchell x10.