What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

QB Lamar Jackson, BAL (1 Viewer)

Good Lord, people.

Baltimore isn't drafting a RB in the 1st round. They're fine with Ingram, Edwards, and Hill. They may pick one late to use as a ST guy.

They need help at interior OL, ILB, Edge. They could also upgrade at possession WR, though I'd like to see how they adjust the offense before putting a name to that.
:lol:

Seriously. They just ran for more yards than any team in NFL history and they're going to waste their 1st rounder on another RB?

 
Yep...let’s re-evaluate Lamar Jackson who in is second year won the league MVP.....but since he and his entire team had a terrible game.....we need to re-evaluate.

This is insane hyperbole man. Seriously. It’s a joke. Right?

They were off for two weeks....let’s not count week 17 as a lot of backups played. And it showed last night. But despite being what looked like a rusty team to me they were in this game for almost 3 quarters but had a really bad night. 

It happens. And it happens to great players and teams. 

But.....we need to re-evaluate Lamar Jackson pronto coming off one of the greatest seasons for a QB ever. 

Good luck with that. 
“Peyton Manning didn’t win a playoff game until SIXTH year in NFL. Then he threw 3 INTs. No announcer said NFL “figured him out” or condemned his style.”  

 
I have really enjoyed this thread all year. Thnx all.

After last night, reactions like we have here today were expected by me.

All I have to say - right now: Thanks for an absolutely wonderful season LJ. You made my year much better. 

 
:shrug:

I've seen some mocks quoting league sources. Not pulling stuff out of thin air. Edward's is JAG, Hill is a COP back. Ingram is a possible cap casualty after 2020.2021 is not an overly impressive year at rb. ideally they should wait a year or two but the 2020 class is deep
I highly doubt "league sources" have any real info. on their draft plans when all of the focus has been on winning right now. Edwards had a 5.3 ypc, he's better than JAG, and no way are they cutting Ingram this year. He's only going to count a little over $5 mil against the cap and they'd only save ~$2 mil by cutting him. Unless he banged Harbaugh's wife, they aren't cutting a pro bowler who ran for 5 ypc and scored 15 TDs for that meager savings.

They won't be drafting a RB in the first round, makes zero sense.

 
I am more intrigued with the Raven offense than ANY OTHER NFL story this year.

They looked unstoppable last year and the knee-jerk reaction was that once the league got tape on this offense it would be neutralized but a funny thing happened this off season.

The Ravens pushed every single chip into the middle of the table, they pulled the rip cord, they crossed the bridge and burned it down to the ground.  

Their ain't no looking back.  

I'm not sold on Lamar as a passer but I am 100% bought in on Harb's going all-in on this offense and that Jackson will thrive as a runner/fantasy stud till someone can stop em and I'm not soo sure that the entire Baltimore organization would wager everything if they weren't completely sold on this offense working.

---------------------------------------------

The Athletic NFL‏Verified account @TheAthleticNFL Jul 24

John Harbaugh and the Ravens are trying to create something the league has never seen before with Lamar Jackson under center.

--------------------------------------------

Must hear from PFF. >>>>>>

-------------------------------------------

Video clip -  PFF round table discussion of unique Raven offense

PFF‏Verified account @PFF

‘This offense is going to look different than any other offense in NFL history’ - @PFF_Mike breaks down the Ravens' offense.
This is from July 31st of this year.  

I saw that the Ravens were doing something unique.  Something the league had never seen before.

chinawildman -- I'd hedge my bets here. Historically running QBs in novelty offenses are like bubble stocks, they peak early and look unstoppable but typically fade over time. Statistically speaking, it's usually a sell high. In the case of the ravens, the Titans ran EXACTLY the same defense teams used to stop Roman/Kaepernick and it worked so it's not like this is anything new.
What the Ravens are doing is unique.  They pushed in all of the chips and built around this offense and it produced historic stats List of records Lamar Jackson set/tide this year and the best record in  the league.  They made the playoffs and got a bye and ran into a historic performing RB and lost.  

 
Good Lord, people.

Baltimore isn't drafting a RB in the 1st round. They're fine with Ingram, Edwards, and Hill. They may pick one late to use as a ST guy.

They need help at interior OL, ILB, Edge. They could also upgrade at possession WR, though I'd like to see how they adjust the offense before putting a name to that.
Looks like they have lots FAs on defense so it’s likely the direction they go. Obviously for  fantasy, I’m hoping it’s on the offensive side.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why does one have to be labled a "hater" just because they don't think he played well? If you are watching box scores, yeah he was amazing. If you dissect them further and if you actually watched the game, that wasnt the MVP out there 

in the end, this should fall on Harbaugh. He didnt adjust to what the Titans were doing at all
Because when you have a different opinion than someone some most people are too dumb, too lazy or both to understand. It’s frustrating. “Hater” and “triggered” are two of the worst words ever used.

 
It would be foolish to discount the future of a QB who won MVP in his second season and first full season starting who just turned 23 a few days ago. But that is more from an NFL perspective than a fantasy perspective.

I think it is highly unlikely he will come close to the rushing yardage he posted this year in any future season, mainly driven by my belief that if he continues running 12+ times per game in future seasons, it is inevitable he will sustain injuries and miss games... and I expect his coaches to scale back the volume on that in favor of a combination of (a) more passing (he averaged fewer than 27 pass attempts per game this season) as he gets better at it and likely gets WR help, and (b) letting the RBs carry the majority of the running game (Jackson had ~30% of the team's rushing attempts this season).

I also think it is unlikely he will ever hit a 9.0 TD percentage or 36 passing TDs again. Somewhat surprisingly, there are only 35 instances in NFL history in which a QB passed for 36+ TDs.

Going forward, IMO it is likely that Jackson's pass attempts and pass yardage go up, pass TDs come down, interceptions go up, and rushing attempts and yards come down. As a fantasy QB, it is pretty likely that he just had his career season. If you can get someone in your dynasty league to pay a super high price, it might not be a bad idea to sell. Note, I'm not saying he won't be a top 10 QB, just saying I doubt he will be consistently top 5, much less #1 by a huge margin like he was this year.

I don't say that to "hate" on Jackson, just being realistic.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Disagree. The Ravens were outcoached.....badly. Also they looked sluggish and rusty. Also....coaching. Incredible over reaction. 

They ran into what is right now the hottest team in the playoffs. It happens. 

Your takes are kinda laughable right now. They really are.
Please don't call other posters takes here laughable. I know that's tame but we're trying to have a board where we're excellent to each other. 

Disagree and state why and then discuss. It's a much better way to get good discussion I think. Thanks. 

 
It would be foolish to discount the future of a QB who won MVP in his second season and first full season starting who just turned 23 a few days ago. But that is more from an NFL perspective than a fantasy perspective.

I think it is highly unlikely he will come close to the rushing yardage he posted this year in any future season, mainly driven by my belief that if he continues running 12+ times per game in future seasons, it is inevitable he will sustain injuries and miss games... and I expect his coaches to scale back the volume on that in favor of a combination of (a) more passing (he averaged fewer than 27 pass attempts per game this season) as he gets better at it and likely gets WR help, and (b) letting the RBs carry the majority of the running game (Jackson had ~30% of the team's rushing attempts this season).

I also think it is unlikely he will ever hit a 9.0 TD percentage or 36 passing TDs again. Somewhat surprisingly, there are only 35 instances in NFL history in which a QB passed for 36+ TDs.

Going forward, IMO it is likely that Jackson's pass attempts and pass yardage go up, pass TDs come down, interceptions go up, and rushing attempts and yards come down. As a fantasy QB, it is pretty likely that he just had his career season. If you can get someone in your dynasty league to pay a super high price, it might not be a bad idea to sell. Note, I'm not saying he won't be a top 10 QB, just saying I doubt he will be consistently top 5, much less #1 by a huge margin like he was this year.

I don't say that to "hate" on Jackson, just being realistic.
I agree. I think they should just be more purposeful with his legs. He doesn't need to be the first and second down rusher. Maybe they use them for a key first, definitely for a TD, but let the backs do the hard work

 
You don't have to be a hater to disagree, but when you hear comments about "novelty offense" after a QB in his 2nd year loses in the playoffs, yeah I get the responses. You have people coming out of the woodworks acting like Lamar is a glorified WR again and saying he shouldn't be the MVP in other threads, it's amazing. This loss doesn't diminish what he accomplished in the regular season, nor should it be a roadblock for him. He just needs to do work in the offseason like he did last year and who knows, maybe they make the Superbowl next year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The league will adapt and he will regress. See Mahomes. 

Doesn’t mean he won’t still be great and the Ravens will keep contending. But there are a few great young QBs in the AFC with similar potential. 

The Ravens wasted this opportunity. 

 
I do like Mahomes. Watson is fun to watch as he's so unpredictable- makes some awful plays and then bails out. However, there offense is pretty lame without Fuller. It is tough to watch Nuk do nothing but run 5 yard outs while Watson runs around in circles in the backfield.  I love Wilson but the Seahawks play like they think he's a weakness. Their ideal gameplan is to run the ball 40 times with Lynch and Homer to win 13-7. I feel great about Tannehill's resurgence but they don't tend to play the most exciting brand of football. San Fran is fine. It is creative how some times they give it to Mostert and sometimes they give it to Tevin Coleman. Kittle and Bosa are worth tuning in for though. 
well hello Mr. Sunshine

 
I'd hedge my bets here. Historically running QBs in novelty offenses are like bubble stocks, they peak early and look unstoppable but typically fade over time. Statistically speaking, it's usually a sell high. In the case of the ravens, the Titans ran EXACTLY the same defense teams used to stop Roman/Kaepernick and it worked so it's not like this is anything new.
There is a defensive formula to containing this offense, but it takes the right personnel to do it. Most teams don’t have that personnel or discipline. I don’t think it’s as easy as, “just do XYZ and it makes the stops this offense”. Heck, Jackson had 500+ yards of offense last night. They moved the ball just fine.

 
Maybe he’s great, maybe he’s overrated, maybe he just had a bad game, maybe he’ll never be great. I’m not a good enough QB evaluator to judge.

But when I hear stuff like “mental ineptitude” that sounds like racism to me. 

 
There is a defensive formula to containing this offense, but it takes the right personnel to do it. Most teams don’t have that personnel or discipline. I don’t think it’s as easy as, “just do XYZ and it makes the stops this offense”. Heck, Jackson had 500+ yards of offense last night. They moved the ball just fine.
Yea but the defensive formula is a bend but don't break philosophy so the team will get their yds. And I think discipline is much more important than personnel when trying to contain the RPO. 

 
Yea but the defensive formula is a bend but don't break philosophy so the team will get their yds. And I think discipline is much more important than personnel when trying to contain the RPO. 
You need to have big strong DTs that can stuff runs and really athletic linebackers. If your linebackers don’t have speed, good luck keeping edge contain on Lamar. And if your DTs can’t stuff the run inside, good luck keeping Ingram from running wild inside. Oh, and you’d better have a free safety than can shut down the deep ball.

 
It would be foolish to discount the future of a QB who won MVP in his second season and first full season starting who just turned 23 a few days ago. But that is more from an NFL perspective than a fantasy perspective.

I think it is highly unlikely he will come close to the rushing yardage he posted this year in any future season, mainly driven by my belief that if he continues running 12+ times per game in future seasons, it is inevitable he will sustain injuries and miss games... and I expect his coaches to scale back the volume on that in favor of a combination of (a) more passing (he averaged fewer than 27 pass attempts per game this season) as he gets better at it and likely gets WR help, and (b) letting the RBs carry the majority of the running game (Jackson had ~30% of the team's rushing attempts this season).

I also think it is unlikely he will ever hit a 9.0 TD percentage or 36 passing TDs again. Somewhat surprisingly, there are only 35 instances in NFL history in which a QB passed for 36+ TDs.

Going forward, IMO it is likely that Jackson's pass attempts and pass yardage go up, pass TDs come down, interceptions go up, and rushing attempts and yards come down. As a fantasy QB, it is pretty likely that he just had his career season. If you can get someone in your dynasty league to pay a super high price, it might not be a bad idea to sell. Note, I'm not saying he won't be a top 10 QB, just saying I doubt he will be consistently top 5, much less #1 by a huge margin like he was this year.

I don't say that to "hate" on Jackson, just being realistic.
Yes, there have only been 34 seasons with 36+ passing TDs, but 20 of them have been in the past decade, so we've averaged 2 per year since 2010. And most of the people on the list have been on it more than once (Brees, Brady, Manning, Rodgers, Luck).

The league has changed. Unless we have a new change in rules or philosophies, we can expect that the top QBs are going to be throwing for 35+ TDs repeatedly in their careers. And there are 61 instances of 30+ TD since 2010, so over 6 QBs per year get to at least that level.

I'd bet on Jackson being among the six best passing QBs going forward, and the #1 rushing QB.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The league will adapt and he will regress. See Mahomes. 

Doesn’t mean he won’t still be great and the Ravens will keep contending. But there are a few great young QBs in the AFC with similar potential. 

The Ravens wasted this opportunity. 
Malhomes didn't regress though.  He was hurt.  In games he was completely healthy his numbers were all better than last season.

Here's things we know :

Lamar Jackson lead the league in td passes this year

Lamar Jackson ran for more yards this year than any qbs ever have

Lamar Jackson had a bad game

Let's all take a moment to simmer down.

 
Please don't call other posters takes here laughable. I know that's tame but we're trying to have a board where we're excellent to each other. 

Disagree and state why and then discuss. It's a much better way to get good discussion I think. Thanks. 
No problem Joe.

I just found it incredibly reactive and short sighted. But you are right.

 
yeah I love the fact that the running qb needs to work on his passing. Sure probably he needs to keep improving, but he did league the nfl in td passes.

 
IHEARTFF said:
yeah I love the fact that the running qb needs to work on his passing. Sure probably he needs to keep improving, but he did league the nfl in td passes.
Not to mention he hit one of his receivers in the chest on what would have been a TD if the dude had bothered to look for the ball.

The pass to Edwards on the INT was not perfect but it was pretty good. If Edwards catches it they're in the red zone. The game would have been totally different if the Ravens got the lead early.

He needs to tighten up his spirals. He could use one actually good receiver. Other than that I don't see any reason to expect he's not going to be in the conversation for the best QB in the league for years to come.

 
Not to mention he hit one of his receivers in the chest on what would have been a TD if the dude had bothered to look for the ball.

The pass to Edwards on the INT was not perfect but it was pretty good. If Edwards catches it they're in the red zone. The game would have been totally different if the Ravens got the lead early.

He needs to tighten up his spirals. He could use one actually good receiver. Other than that I don't see any reason to expect he's not going to be in the conversation for the best QB in the league for years to come.
Mahomes

WIlson

Jackson

Watson

These are your elite juggernaut QB’s moving forward IMO. All have great aspects to their game. All exciting to watch. All can extend the play better than most. All young. And all have weapons around them. 

I happen to think Josh Allen can keep developing and join this class soon. He needs a true #1 (John Brown really is better suited to be a #2 WR). And he needs to continue his improvement in the accuracy department. But he is highly athletic, can extend plays and I love his composure. He took a big step in year two IMO. I know he has a bunch of detractors, but he has the goods long term IMO. Bills fans should be happy they have a QB to develop and build around. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I happen to think Josh Allen can keep developing and join this class soon. He needs a true #1 (John Brown really is better suited to be a #2 WR). And he needs to continue his improvement in the accuracy department. But he is highly athletic, can extend plays and I love his composure. He took a big step in year two IMO. I know he has a bunch of detractors, but he has the goods long term IMO. Bills fans should be happy they have a QB to develop and build around. 
Here's a guy who should be a wr and not a qb.  Allen can't hit the broad side of a barn most throws and Jackson is getting critiqued because he's an exceptional runner.

Switch melanin between the two and we're talking about how amazing it is that Lamar was able to make so many plays with how little help he got from his receivers (something people say about Josh btw).

 
Here's a guy who should be a wr and not a qb.  Allen can't hit the broad side of a barn most throws and Jackson is getting critiqued because he's an exceptional runner.

Switch melanin between the two and we're talking about how amazing it is that Lamar was able to make so many plays with how little help he got from his receivers (something people say about Josh btw).
Lamar Jackson is a good passer (Year 2 he had 66% accuracy a 3% improvement from year 1). And he can become great. He is so young. Josh Allen....again accuracy is an issue.....now. He is still very young and can develop. He just needs to be 61-62%....he can get there. He was 58.8% in year 2. He made almost a 3% improvement from year 1. 

I mean for his career Dan Marino...whom I consider one of the very best to ever play the position had a 59.4% completion percentage (the Jimmy Years hurt him). 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
GroveDiesel said:
If he isn’t a HOFer it’s only because the people who write about the NFL and vote on the HOF simply don’t care about guards. Yanda was dominant for a long time.
He has been selected 1st team All Pro 2 times and 2nd team All Pro 5 times. That shows he was/is a great player. That does not show he is a HOFer.

PFR has a metric they named HOF Monitor. It is imperfect for sure, but it has Yanda at 63.58, with the average HOF guard at 102.29.

:shrug:  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here's a guy who should be a wr and not a qb.  Allen can't hit the broad side of a barn most throws and Jackson is getting critiqued because he's an exceptional runner.

Switch melanin between the two and we're talking about how amazing it is that Lamar was able to make so many plays with how little help he got from his receivers (something people say about Josh btw).
Who is REALLY critiquing the MVP of the league Jackson because of being an exceptional runner and a very, very good QB...all at the age of 22?

I think BAL as a whole is getting critiqued (and rightfully so) because they (as the number 1) rolled over and got abused in their own house (by the number 6)....with a little bit of "extra" being thrown on because for the past 12 weeks a good portion of the football media has been on BAL's sack  and some of their fans have been a little more insufferable than usual.  

 
He has been selected 1st team All Pro 2 times and 2nd team All Pro 5 times. That shows he was/is a great player. That does not show he is a HOFer.

PFR has a metric they named HOF Monitor. It is imperfect for sure, but it has Yanda at 63.58, with the average HOF guard at 102.29.

:shrug:  
I haven’t looked at how they determine that number for guards, but I have a hard time believing that you can create a good easily measurable metric with data available for guards.

 
I haven’t looked at how they determine that number for guards, but I have a hard time believing that you can create a good easily measurable metric with data available for guards.
I don't disagree about the challenge of building metrics to measure OL play, but I posted the average HOF guard score in the same metric, and Yanda is not close to it, although one component of the metric is Approximate Value, which only goes back to 1950. HOF Monitor is described here.

There are currently 20 guards in the HOF. 15 of them have more than 2 1st team All Pro selections. 2 of the other 5 played in the 20s-40s, and I'm really not sure how to compare across such different eras. The best comparison is probably Will Shields. He also had 2 1st team All Pro selections and 5 2nd team All Pro selections. But the offenses Shields played in were more successful, which boosts his AV, which, in turn, boosts his HOF Monitor score to 87, much higher than Yanda.

 
Bracie Smathers said:
This is from July 31st of this year.  

I saw that the Ravens were doing something unique.  Something the league had never seen before.

What the Ravens are doing is unique.  They pushed in all of the chips and built around this offense and it produced historic stats List of records Lamar Jackson set/tide this year and the best record in  the league.  They made the playoffs and got a bye and ran into a historic performing RB and lost.  
Sorry, but having watched 4 years of Kaepernick/Roman there's nothing here schematically I haven't seen before. Jackson is a much more talented runner and a better touch passer than Kaepernick for sure, but the system eventually gets figured out... it always does. Maybe they can get Jackson some bigger Wrs w/ large catch radiuses, but this year will likely be the easiest time he'll have running it.

 
GroveDiesel said:
You need to have big strong DTs that can stuff runs and really athletic linebackers. If your linebackers don’t have speed, good luck keeping edge contain on Lamar. And if your DTs can’t stuff the run inside, good luck keeping Ingram from running wild inside. Oh, and you’d better have a free safety than can shut down the deep ball.
I mean are the Titans THAT special on defense?  Looked to me NOT trying to shoot the gaps to tackle him, but instead just keeping a spy in front of him at all times and taking good angles (even if it meant giving up a 4 yd run) seemed more important than athleticism. The spy always cheated towards the sideline and used that to his advantage. Jackson is ultimately a QB and doesn't wanna cut it back into the teeth of the defense to get smacked for a few extra yds.The Titans were perfectly content to give Jackson 100 yds rushing, so long as it took him 20+ times to get there. I suspect having Jackson run it 20 times a game for 5 YPC isn't ideal for the Ravens either.

And no you don't need a fast FS to shut down the deep ball their deep plays are all corner/seam routes by the TEs. 

 
Sorry, but having watched 4 years of Kaepernick/Roman there's nothing here schematically I haven't seen before. Jackson is a much more talented runner and a better touch passer than Kaepernick for sure, but the system eventually gets figured out... it always does. Maybe they can get Jackson some bigger Wrs w/ large catch radiuses, but this year will likely be the easiest time he'll have running it.
If this scheme isn't thoughtful and original, why does it take defenses a year and half to "figure it out"? Your logic is a catch 22. 

He's only 20 couple. He made a few mistakes, but he'll improve. This offense with Lamar Jackson is here to stay though, I'm pretty sure. 

 
If this scheme isn't thoughtful and original, why does it take defenses a year and half to "figure it out"? Your logic is a catch 22. 

He's only 20 couple. He made a few mistakes, but he'll improve. This offense with Lamar Jackson is here to stay though, I'm pretty sure. 
Like I said, Jackson is a much more talented runner and has his own unique tendencies so he will to some degree overcome schemes to stop him. Just because an offensive system gets "figured out" doesn't mean its no longer useful... it just means it grows less efficient over time. The Roman system was in SF for 4 years, but it never got better than that first year. If Jackson doesn't improve on his outside passing, I suspect you'll see that whole scenario play out again.

Yea he will probably get better, but his production may not as he'll have to work a lot harder to earn it going forward.

 
I don't disagree about the challenge of building metrics to measure OL play, but I posted the average HOF guard score in the same metric, and Yanda is not close to it, although one component of the metric is Approximate Value, which only goes back to 1950. HOF Monitor is described here.

There are currently 20 guards in the HOF. 15 of them have more than 2 1st team All Pro selections. 2 of the other 5 played in the 20s-40s, and I'm really not sure how to compare across such different eras. The best comparison is probably Will Shields. He also had 2 1st team All Pro selections and 5 2nd team All Pro selections. But the offenses Shields played in were more successful, which boosts his AV, which, in turn, boosts his HOF Monitor score to 87, much higher than Yanda.
What does getting named first team Team of the Decade do to a Guard's chances? If the NFL does what it has in the past, they'll be announcing the 2010s Team of the Decade before the Super Bowl and my guess is Yanda is named First Team.

Looking back from the 80s through the 00s, it is interesting to see that neither First Team Guard of the 00s - Faneca and Hutchinson - are in yet, though it looks like Faneca gets the nod this year. The 90s First Team Guards (Matthews and McDaniel) are in, as are the 80s (Hannah and Grimm). And the 00s Second Team Guards (Allen and Shields) are in .

I'd also say that being the face of the O Line that just destroyed the all-time NFL season rushing record will give Yanda's candidacy a boost. Also if he retires this year, not a lot of other strong HOF candidates in his class. Only ones I can think of potentially are Gore and Fitzgerald (if they retire), Witten and Suggs.

 
Sorry, but having watched 4 years of Kaepernick/Roman there's nothing here schematically I haven't seen before. Jackson is a much more talented runner and a better touch passer than Kaepernick for sure, but the system eventually gets figured out... it always does. Maybe they can get Jackson some bigger Wrs w/ large catch radiuses, but this year will likely be the easiest time he'll have running it.
Scheme + unique player. 

Vick was a unique talent but not the passer (52.6% completion never more than 2,936 passing yards and high of 21 passing TDs in a single season) of Lamar (66.1% completion, 36 passing TDs, 3,127 passing yards this past year).  Kap wasn't as good of a passer (59.8% career completions, never more than 21 TDs in a season high over 600 rushing yards in any season) as Lamar.  Kap caught teams off guard but they adjusted, that has not happened with Lamar.

In 2018 after 8 games, the Ravens switched from Flacco to Lamar.  At that time the Ravens ranked 31st in the league in rushing.  Lamar started the final 8 games and they finished 2nd in rushing.  People said that NFL defenses would figure out the scheme like Kap and the pistol. 

I noted the league had never seen anything like it before because of the commitment to the scheme.  The entire organization bought into and built for the scheme.   

The NFL has been trending to 11 personnel (69% of the time in 3WR) groupings.  Baltimore ran 3 wides 48% of the time.  The NFL have been building teams on the passing game looking for chunk plays.  Copycat league, Lamar is a unique player, teams don't build an offense around one unique player/scheme, Bill Polian wanted to make him a WR, yadda yadda yadds.  Point is the Ravens went in a diametrically opposite direction to the rest of the league.

That is what I saw and was eager to see if NFL defenses could adjust.  They couldn't adjust

 
What does getting named first team Team of the Decade do to a Guard's chances? If the NFL does what it has in the past, they'll be announcing the 2010s Team of the Decade before the Super Bowl and my guess is Yanda is named First Team.

Looking back from the 80s through the 00s, it is interesting to see that neither First Team Guard of the 00s - Faneca and Hutchinson - are in yet, though it looks like Faneca gets the nod this year. The 90s First Team Guards (Matthews and McDaniel) are in, as are the 80s (Hannah and Grimm). And the 00s Second Team Guards (Allen and Shields) are in .

I'd also say that being the face of the O Line that just destroyed the all-time NFL season rushing record will give Yanda's candidacy a boost. Also if he retires this year, not a lot of other strong HOF candidates in his class. Only ones I can think of potentially are Gore and Fitzgerald (if they retire), Witten and Suggs.
He'll get in. Guards aren't celebrities so he'll probably have to get the right timing, but he'll get in.

7 pro bowls, 2 all pros, and only 23.5 sacks allowed in 13 years. The latter is great in and of itself. I only know of Quinton Spain as having a chance at besting that and that's because he's on an all time great phenomenal pace of 1 sack per year.

 
What does getting named first team Team of the Decade do to a Guard's chances?
I don't know if it literally affects their chances or if it is just an indicator of quality of their other qualifications. Comments on candidates:

  • I would say Zack Martin is definitely a 1st team All Decade guard ahead of all others.
  • I think Quenton Nelson is better than Yanda and arguably the best guard in the NFL, but he only played 2 seasons in the decade 2010-2019, so the timing of his entry to the NFL doesn't set him up well to make an All Decade team using those years.
  • Jahri Evans has more 1st team All Pro selections in the decade than Yanda, and a better HOF resume overall.
  • I may have missed others (e.g., @Bri mentioned Spain).
 
I don't know if it literally affects their chances or if it is just an indicator of quality of their other qualifications.
It literally impacts the tracking - from the website:

The base formula uses weighted Approximate Value (which is 100% of the player's peak year, 95% of their second-best year, 90% of their third-best, and so on) as a starting point. Bonuses are added for Pro Football Hall of Fame All-Decade selections, MVP awards, Defensive Player of the Year awards, first-team AP All-Pro selections, championships and Pro Bowls, in descending weights

 
Like I said, Jackson is a much more talented runner and has his own unique tendencies so he will to some degree overcome schemes to stop him. Just because an offensive system gets "figured out" doesn't mean its no longer useful... it just means it grows less efficient over time. The Roman system was in SF for 4 years, but it never got better than that first year. If Jackson doesn't improve on his outside passing, I suspect you'll see that whole scenario play out again.

Yea he will probably get better, but his production may not as he'll have to work a lot harder to earn it going forward.
You're also forgetting Lamar is younger than the qbs coming out for this draft.  He'll improve as a pocket passer as he runs less in the coming seasons to protect his body, in turn making the times he does run with it more effective as teams will have to do more to account for passes outside.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top