Zyphros
Footballguy
That's probably near consensus but would it be completely outlandish if someone had a Jones/Mack type ahead of them?I'd rank them:
Mixon/Chubb
KJ
Penny
Jones
Mack
That's probably near consensus but would it be completely outlandish if someone had a Jones/Mack type ahead of them?I'd rank them:
Mixon/Chubb
KJ
Penny
Jones
Mack
I used those blank lines to insinuate that yes, that would be crazy to meThat's probably near consensus but would it be completely outlandish if someone had a Jones/Mack type ahead of them?
I totally agree I'm just trying to figure out where the "bold ranker" would put those types of guys.I used those blank lines to insinuate that yes, that would be crazy to me
If I had Mixon (I wish I did), I would not trade him for Mack + Jones.
Hah, I'm not sure anyone outside of "Mack owner" would rank them near Mixon.I totally agree I'm just trying to figure out where the "bold ranker" would put those types of guys.
Chubb is faster than Mixon, but Mixon is a better receiver and more agile. The others aren't close for me.Now to pivot a little to other RB's like Marlon Mack, Aaron Jones, Nick Chubb, Kerryon Johnson and possibly Rashaad Penny after last night, all who I feel like have had that breakout performance.
I co-own a team in a 12 PPR dynasty league with @Bruce Hammond. In June, we traded Mixon and TE Everett for Chubb and Cobb. We wanted Cobb to help us out at WR, but I would have traded Mixon for Chubb straight up if necessary. So I definitely don't think there is any issue with Chubb being ranked higher. I do not think I would prefer any of the others to Mixon, though.Can we talk Mixon for a minute? He's so talented, but that offense doesn't run through him. And even when it does on the odd occasion, he doesn't really do anything super special with that opportunity. There has been no "coming out" party or anything but he's been rather consistent. His biggest game was Tampa but that was shootout and a bad team so we expect him to do really well. But I feel like he didn't announce his presence to the league or anything with any of his performances to date.
Now to pivot a little to other RB's like Marlon Mack, Aaron Jones, Nick Chubb, Kerryon Johnson and possibly Rashaad Penny after last night, all who I feel like have had that breakout performance.
And the question I have is, is it outrageous to possibly prefer any one of those to Mixon. It's not like Mixon has been bad at all, he's been really good, but I feel like he carries more value from name purposes rather than usage.
For me I think he's still firmly in the top12. Nobody this year really made their case to jump up ahead of him, so the WR1's are pretty much unchanged. I wouldn't say he's "elite" but he's a #1 WR for a dynasty team still. OBJ, Nuk, Michael Thomas, Hill might be the only ones I'd rank ahead of him in a startup. Which leaves him fighting with Evans, Diggs, Thielen, Adams, JuJu, AB, Julio, Green, for that 2nd tier I'd say. Personally I'd take Allen over most, if not all, of those guys in a startup.How do you rank him among the top WR’s?
Julio, Hopkins, OBJ, Thomas ... Etc
Definitely close in ppr. I tilt toward KJ there. The thing with KJ is he could be another rare three down Gurley DJ type weapon. Chubb doesn't have that ceiling. If Detroit retools offense in 2019 to run thought KJ he could finish rb1.Chubb >>>> KJ
As a Woods owner in multiple leagues, I would insta-reject both of those offers. Woods is the WR 9 on the year, 26, and under contract for three more seasons with an elite offense. He's a multi-year asset and high end WR2.Are PPR win now owners buying on Woods now with Kupp out? I probably overpaid but he's a guy who already had a nice floor and just gained a huge ceiling imo. Underrated talent (who ironically was overrated early on as a blue chip devy).
I dealt Landry + Gabriel for Woods in one league. That's probably the overpay imo, but Landry is not a guy I want to be relying on right now. Other deal was Fuller for Woods + Baldwin in another league. That one feels about right.
Basically agree with everything Zyphros says here. I don't see any reason for a steep decline from Keenan Allen anytime soon. In fact, watching him play gives me a whole new level of appreciation for him as a player. He's not a burner and he's not physically imposing but he's so quick in and out of his cuts that he gets separation and makes people miss once he has the ball in his hands. He seems to have the skillset that will age well, assuming he doesn't suffer any more major injuries (which is probably the caveat with any player).Zyphros said:For me I think he's still firmly in the top12. Nobody this year really made their case to jump up ahead of him, so the WR1's are pretty much unchanged. I wouldn't say he's "elite" but he's a #1 WR for a dynasty team still. OBJ, Nuk, Michael Thomas, Hill might be the only ones I'd rank ahead of him in a startup. Which leaves him fighting with Evans, Diggs, Thielen, Adams, JuJu, AB, Julio, Green, for that 2nd tier I'd say. Personally I'd take Allen over most, if not all, of those guys in a startup.
Gurley was a pretty prolific receiver in college. He had almost as many catches in his last full season as CMC and Reggie Bush had for career highs in college.bumpman said:Chubb has only shown he can catch when thrown to. I see his ceiling as similar to Gurley. There was a time when people thought Gurley couldn’t catch too.
I will disagree somewhat here. He's way outside that top tier for me, not even in the discussion of guys like OBJ/Nuk/MT. It would take at least two 1sts to close the gap on those guys for me.Zyphros said:For me I think he's still firmly in the top12. Nobody this year really made their case to jump up ahead of him, so the WR1's are pretty much unchanged. I wouldn't say he's "elite" but he's a #1 WR for a dynasty team still. OBJ, Nuk, Michael Thomas, Hill might be the only ones I'd rank ahead of him in a startup. Which leaves him fighting with Evans, Diggs, Thielen, Adams, JuJu, AB, Julio, Green, for that 2nd tier I'd say. Personally I'd take Allen over most, if not all, of those guys in a startup.
I agree.I will disagree somewhat here. He's way outside that top tier for me, not even in the discussion of guys like OBJ/Nuk/MT. It would take at least two 1sts to close the gap on those guys for me.
Regarding people who've made their case to jump ahead of him, Cooks seems like an obvious one. Younger, less injury history, outperforming Allen, and much more clarity to his situation long term. Adams is similar, I would easily take him over KA. I would probably prefer Evans, Thielen as well, so then he starts next in that conversation with JuJu/AB for me.
I would take him ahead of Julio/Green/Diggs.
Nothing has changed for me. He's always been quite similar to Hopkins in fantasy points per target. Like almost exactly the same... I think they were both at 1.67 points per target. The different between them is that Keenan's targets have decreased as Rivers' attempts have decreased this season. And historically Keenan's never gotten the garbage time stats which have propped up Hopkins previous seasons, thus inflated people's future expectations.Keenan Allen
thoughts going forward? I’ve got a potential blockbuster deal in the works - the holdup, is I’d be receiving Allen in the package deal.
Im not going to get into any of the trade details - I’m just wondering how you guys view Keenan Allen going forward in dynasty?
Is he in the elite tier still? I was never a huge fan, but most people had him in their top 5 dynasty WR’s at the beginning of the season.
How are you feeling now? Are we worried about Phil Rivers falling off soon? Is Keenan really an elite talent? Or was he just a target hog on a team that needed to throw?
How do you rank him among the top WR’s?
Julio, Hopkins, OBJ, Thomas ... Etc
Waldman touches on this in his top 10 feature this week. https://twitter.com/MattWaldman/status/1061846416421777409bumpman said:Chubb has only shown he can catch when thrown to. I see his ceiling as similar to Gurley. There was a time when people thought Gurley couldn’t catch too.
Your garbage time theory has been disproved. Hopkins is scoring more points this season, despite literally* zero garbage time. And how can those expectations have been inflated when he's delivering on them?Nothing has changed for me. He's always been quite similar to Hopkins in fantasy points per target. Like almost exactly the same... I think they were both at 1.67 points per target. The different between them is that Keenan's targets have decreased as Rivers' attempts have decreased this season. And historically Keenan's never gotten the garbage time stats which have propped up Hopkins previous seasons, thus inflated people's future expectations.
I think he’s very good, not elite. I think being Rivers’ top receiver will inflate production some.Keenan Allen
thoughts going forward? I’ve got a potential blockbuster deal in the works - the holdup, is I’d be receiving Allen in the package deal.
Im not going to get into any of the trade details - I’m just wondering how you guys view Keenan Allen going forward in dynasty?
Is he in the elite tier still? I was never a huge fan, but most people had him in their top 5 dynasty WR’s at the beginning of the season.
How are you feeling now? Are we worried about Phil Rivers falling off soon? Is Keenan really an elite talent? Or was he just a target hog on a team that needed to throw?
How do you rank him among the top WR’s?
Julio, Hopkins, OBJ, Thomas ... Etc
Solid.For context, I just dealt Kirk, 1st, and 2nd for Keenan Allen in a league where I'm a top contender. Those picks will likely be 8-12 of their rounds.
Oof.Allen went for 3 firsts about 5 weeks ago.
I ran the numbers fairly extensively in another thread a year ago. Garbage time absolutely leads to a higher fantasy points per target. As for 2018, it is out of line for his typical points per target. I would not expect him to continue at this rate. They are roughly the same as Allen's second half splits from last year. All good things come to an end.If Hopkins’ numbers were inflated by garbage time, why is he scoring at the same rate on a winning team? Hard to claim those expectations were inflated while he’s delivering on them.
I’m not sure FP/T a good metric to use to compare players. Tyler Lockette has to be performing at a HOF level, according to it.
Have you watched much Hopkins this year? It’s not a fluke. He finally has a quality QB throwing him the ball and other weapons around him. The quality of his targets improved. Now that his situation is as good Allen’s, his production is much better. Because he’s a much better football player.I ran the numbers fairly extensively in another thread a year ago. Garbage time absolutely leads to a higher fantasy points per target. As for 2018, it is out of line for his typical points per target. I would not expect him to continue at this rate. They are roughly the same as Allen's second half splits from last year. All good things come to an end.
FP/T is not a useful tool for small samples such as Lockett's 2018, especially when we can all see they'll be thrown off by a high or low number of TDs. But I do think it is a useful tool when you've got a multi-year starter and you are looking into the future (dynasty) since situations can and do change.
What is he supposedly better at? The main difference between them the past 2 years is TDs. As we've seen with Julio, it takes more than talent to get TDs. It often comes down to situation which is out of their control.Have you watched much Hopkins this year? It’s not a fluke. He finally has a quality QB throwing him the ball and other weapons around him. The quality of his targets improved. Now that his situation is as good Allen’s, his production is much better. Because he’s a much better football player.
Hands, body control, catch radius, and speed. Hopkins is one of the best redzone receivers in the league - it’s not an accident that he’s scoring more TDs.What is he supposedly better at? The main difference between them the past 2 years is TDs. As we've seen with Julio, it takes more than talent to get TDs. It often comes down to situation which is out of their control.
The theory that was debunked was that Hopkins was "QB proof" as we saw with 2016.Hands, body control, catch radius, and speed. Hopkins is one of the best redzone receivers in the league - it’s not an accident that he’s scoring more TDs.
(It’s also not an accident that Julio is more productive between then 20s than in the redzone, as great as he is. He’s better than prime Dez, but not in the redzone.)
The theory that was debunked was not that garbage time leads to production. The theory that was debunked was that garbage time propped up Hopkins’ numbers, that somehow catching passes from Osweiler (and Savage and Hoyer and Mallett and Yates and so on) was inflating his production, that he’d be less productive when his QB and offense and team improved. That theory fell on its face and never made any sense.
I respect you and apologize if my sarcasm comes off as biting. I really don’t understand doubling down here, seeing what Hopkins is doing with a capable QB. (Finally!) But if things fall apart and Hopkins ends up being less productive with Watson - I’ll be back for crow.The theory that was debunked was that Hopkins was "QB proof" as we saw with 2016.
It's all good. I've just watched a lot of Hopkins and always thought he was overrated due to volume, garbage time, and the discrediting of the surprising QB play he got from Fitzpatrick and Hoyer. It was funny to me that being saddled with QBs who temporarily over-performed led to the "QB proof" label that came crashing down with Brock.I respect you and apologize if my sarcasm comes off as biting. I really don’t understand doubling down here, seeing what Hopkins is doing with a capable QB. (Finally!) But if things fall apart and Hopkins ends up being less productive with Watson - I’ll be back for crow.
I don’t own him, unfortunately, and for whatever reason, I haven’t gone out of my way to target him, but I also like him.Price check on Anthony Miller?
I'm very impressed by what I see from him...
FWIW, PFF receiving grades:FF Ninja said:It's all good. I've just watched a lot of Hopkins and always thought he was overrated due to volume, garbage time, and the discrediting of the surprising QB play he got from Fitzpatrick and Hoyer. It was funny to me that being saddled with QBs who temporarily over-performed led to the "QB proof" label that came crashing down with Brock.
I disagree that Hopkins is actually better at all the aspects you listed. They both have very low drops and I don't recall Hopkins' reception perception numbers, but I know Allen excelled at contested catches (I assume Hopkins did, too). Neither of them is a burner, but Allen's recorded 40 time came after rehabbing from an MCL injury. I can't speak to catch radius, but they are similarly sized.
Either way, we've got probably 8 more years to watch these guys play. It'll be interesting to see how their careers end up. To me they are very similar players with greatly different fantasy prices at the moment.
Thanks for this. Good stuff.FWIW, PFF receiving grades: ...
Thanks, I don't have PFF although I pull data from their free stuff whenever I can. His stats so far this season have been impressive, just as Allen's regression from last season have been disappointing. I still think the softer coverage during garbage time assisted Hopkins in the past, although I'd be curious to know the formula for PFF grades.Altogether, Hopkins seems to be clearly better, even though I also think highly of Allen.
I think for now, he's a top15 WR. With what looks like a strong WR class, plus a lot of the 2018 rookies making their names known, I don't see him lasting as a top15 guy for very much longer. Is he pretty good? Yes he is, but he isn't a pillar of a dynasty team. He's a WR2 for fantasy purposes with a more than decent chance IMO for him to move down that list. I'd sell him and wouldn't be looking to buy personally. I count 10 sure fire WR's I'd take ahead of him in a startup with a possible 3-5 more. Add in 3-5 more rookies coming in and he's outside the top20 all of a sudden.What would you pay for Diggs?
As a Diggs owner, I’ve been disappointed with what he’s given me this last year but I wouldn’t take a mid 1st for him. I’d need a top 3-4 pick because while he is injury prone, if he ever figures out how to take care of his body, he will be an animal year round.I think for now, he's a top15 WR. With what looks like a strong WR class, plus a lot of the 2018 rookies making their names known, I don't see him lasting as a top15 guy for very much longer. Is he pretty good? Yes he is, but he isn't a pillar of a dynasty team. He's a WR2 for fantasy purposes with a more than decent chance IMO for him to move down that list. I'd sell him and wouldn't be looking to buy personally. I count 10 sure fire WR's I'd take ahead of him in a startup with a possible 3-5 more. Add in 3-5 more rookies coming in and he's outside the top20 all of a sudden.
But to answer your question I'd say his value is right around a mid 1st. I wouldn't pay it since I see him declining when a new crop comes to the NFL, but I'm sure someone would.
Cobb is so interesting because his decline seems to have more to do with the Packers offense changing around him and him getting left out. He was expected to be the 1 in the year Jordy went down and his inability to do so seems to have lost him the trust of Rodgers. Add in injuries this year and you have a guy worth a 3rd at best right now. I disagree about him not being the type to age well. He’s a slot guy who made his hay on finesse rather than size, he is exactly the type who is supposed to age well but has inexplicably been left farther and farther behind due to injury, trust, and an ineffective offense (the Pack should be doing so much more with Rodgers as QB than they have this year). He’s a hold for me just because his value is low and I want to see where he goes but I don’t think I would be buying. If he can’t come back healthy to GB this year and carve out a role with no competition for the #2 spot other than MVD, I can’t see him going somewhere else and getting it done.Randall Cobb? Where's he going next year? He's 28 and his contract is up and he isn't the type of WR that ages well imo.
It seems we're not far off in where we might value Diggs so I'm ok with it be a top end first as well. I think that's more the sellers market than the buyers though. I just view him more pessimistically than probably most do so I might be a bit conservative with that "mid 1st".As a Diggs owner, I’ve been disappointed with what he’s given me this last year but I wouldn’t take a mid 1st for him. I’d need a top 3-4 pick because while he is injury prone, if he ever figures out how to take care of his body, he will be an animal year round.
Cobb is so interesting because his decline seems to have more to do with the Packers offense changing around him and him getting left out. He was expected to be the 1 in the year Jordy went down and his inability to do so seems to have lost him the trust of Rodgers. Add in injuries this year and you have a guy worth a 3rd at best right now. I disagree about him not being the type to age well. He’s a slot guy who made his hay on finesse rather than size, he is exactly the type who is supposed to age well but has inexplicably been left farther and farther behind due to injury, trust, and an ineffective offense (the Pack should be doing so much more with Rodgers as QB than they have this year). He’s a hold for me just because his value is low and I want to see where he goes but I don’t think I would be buying. If he can’t come back healthy to GB this year and carve out a role with no competition for the #2 spot other than MVD, I can’t see him going somewhere else and getting it done.
If you have other top RBs besides Chubb to start, I think that’s exactly the kind of price you have to pay for Hill. He IS already top 5 in 0.5 PPR.How do you guys value T Hill? I have an aging elite WR Corp and was hoping to get younger. I think he could easily be a top 5-7 WR in my 0.5PPR
As a data point, he was offered to me for Julio, Chubb and a 2nd (prob mid round). Doesn’t seem like a bad price though I am loathe to move Chubb as I think he’s going to be a stud. I’d rather move Cook than Chubb in that deal.
Yeah, he’s WR4 currently on a ppg basis. I love Julio but to be able to shave 5 years for similar to better production would be great. Plus Mahomes’ age.If you have other top RBs besides Chubb to start, I think that’s exactly the kind of price you have to pay for Hill. He IS already top 5 in 0.5 PPR.
I like Hill but I'm not expecting Mahomes to throw for 5000 yards and 55 TDs every year. Even if he remains an elite QB there is a lot of room for regression in that offense.Yeah, he’s WR4 currently on a ppg basis. I love Julio but to be able to shave 5 years for similar to better production would be great. Plus Mahomes’ age.
I countered with Cook and he said he’d do it. I like Chubb more than Cook.
I agree with that but I believe Hill can still be top 5-7 even if Mahomes levels off. He was WR7 in my 0.5PPR last year with Smith (granted it was a great year for Smith).I like Hill but I'm not expecting Mahomes to throw for 5000 yards and 55 TDs every year. Even if he remains an elite QB there is a lot of room for regression in that offense.
I like that move. Nice.Yeah, he’s WR4 currently on a ppg basis. I love Julio but to be able to shave 5 years for similar to better production would be great. Plus Mahomes’ age.
I countered with Cook and he said he’d do it. I like Chubb more than Cook.