Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
He was cheap, apparently. I don't think we can assume that Nunberg has any particular insight into what the campaign did in 2016 UNLESS the campaign was in contact with Roger Stone a lot during that time. I think that's a strong possibility, but who knows?
For all your cries about how unfair it is for people to pick on a mentally unstable man, I can't help but think that you're doing the same thing by calling him "mentally unstable" in the first place.
Listening to Rush over my lunch hour, Rush made the claim that the Trump campaign fired this guy three times. THREE TIMES!!!
I mean, the White House can just say he wasn't involved in the campaign and would have no basis to know. There's really no reason to smear him.Its weird - I had the same thoughts on my own. But, now that I see its part of the Trump talking points, not so sure.
this is the best line they keep pushing. and the sycophants buy it hook, line and sinker.
I worked for a guy for too long who treated every termination, regardless of cause, like it was a bad divorce and the spouses had been cheating with each other's siblings. That guy is one of the only people I know (knew) who completely understands Donald Trump.
Or unless the campaign was in contact with Steve Bannon a lot during that time. Nunberg and Bannon are apparently close.
If that's the type the man hires to do his dirty work, who else is Mueller supposed to get info from? When Trump starts hiring Roman Catholic Cardinals to be his Russian connection, he'll subpoena them. Until then, he has no choice but to go after the people that are there.
Nunberg may not appear to be the sharpest tool in the shed, but he apparently sold Trump on running a campaign based on "Ted Cruz's immigration message and Ross Perot's populist economic message." Hard to argue that Trump didn't run, and win, on just that.
I'm not sure if you're trying to tweak me or not. At least for the period when the DNC emails were released, the campaign was in contact with Bannon, as he was the campaign manager at that time.
I’m suggesting that there is some reason to suspect that Nunberg does have insight into what the campaign did in 2016 — via Bannon.
I hear ya. My post is primarily a blanket response to anything that suggests Trump wasn't a politician or considering a run before that escalator strained to bring him down in '15.
Drunk and mentally unstable seem to be the top two qualifications to be in this administration.
I think this information is also interesting in light of the blanket steel tariffs and upcoming potential negotiations on who gets hit. While these things may not hold up in a court of law, as we've seen with Wikileaks, they can do some serious damage. (I mean, to those that are not already covered in so much #### that any additional #### just slides off.)
All true. But I have two serious questions for you then:
It's not that he chooses dubious characters, it's that only dubious characters would choose to work with him
Not under Section 232 Investigation. The President has the power to act in the interest of national security. Commerce determined steel and aluminum imports have impacted national security.
It's funny that every single story we heard about from the goofballs on Twitter a year+ ago is now an actual subject of Mueller's questioning. I mean he apparently hasn't asked anyone about the pee tape yet, but other than that? Pretty much covered the bases.
This is like a slow motion car crash. Trumpers better put on their seat belts
