Ditka Butkus
Footballguy
I see it as the status quo in all nations intelligence communities...Do you see it as Russia violating Britain's sovereignty, by killing someone living in their country presumably under their protection and laws?
I see it as the status quo in all nations intelligence communities...Do you see it as Russia violating Britain's sovereignty, by killing someone living in their country presumably under their protection and laws?
Hit the nail on the head.The problem is bigger than that here, though. The Select Committees on Intelligence are supposed to function as an important nonpartisan check on our intelligence agencies. They were created in the 1970s after Church Committee and others unearthed crazy CIA stuff going on without anyone's knowledge. Their descent into mindless partisanship means that important check is gone.
BTW this is how you can tell that all the "deep state" conspiracy theory types are absolutely full of it. If they actually cared about abuses by the intelligence community they would want to protect the integrity of the select committees and would be absolutely furious with Nunes for the damage he's done to the credibility of the HPSCI with his behavior and his refusal to collaborate across the aisle on a committee report? Has anyone heard a single negative peep from any of them on this? I haven't.
Well, you'd be wrong. Again.I see it as the status quo in all nations intelligence communities...
It might be asking too much, but if the Dems retake the House it would be great if they proposed revamping the HPSCI to make it a 50/50 split regardless of who is in the majority.Hit the nail on the head.
At least the Senate Committee appears to be somewhat trying to do its job.
I guess there is still a reason Senators are held in much higher regard than House Reps. The House seems to be almost entirely made up of total hacks and nitwits. I say that as somebody who doesn't exactly hold the Senate in the highest regard either.
This strikes me as the type of thing that would just be reversed when the GOP takes it back. Like PayGoIt might be asking too much, but if the Dems retake the House it would be great if they proposed revamping the HPSCI to make it a 50/50 split regardless of who is in the majority.
In comparison to a country using their entire military to remove a president on foreign soil?...#### no. Using a nerve agent on foreign soil is beyond the pale and must be treated as such.
Yup, that's the problem. And even if you're wrong, the Dems would be justified to suspect it given the GOP's behavior in recent years. Another example of the damage being done by the Trump era and how hard it will be to unravel.This strikes me as the type of thing that would just be reversed when the GOP takes it back. Like PayGo
You are talking about war. So I'm confused, are you saying that during wartime, things are allowed, so these same things should be allowed during non-war? Or are you saying that we should treat this situation the same way as when the military removes a president (i.e., war)? If so, it sounds like you agree that this is something that must be retaliated against, possibly by the British ally United States.In comparison to a country using their entire military to remove a president on foreign soil?...
So you are fine with innocent people who quite possibly will DIE from this attack?I see it as the status quo in all nations intelligence communities...
I'd suggest that the GOP has waged an asymmetrical war on our institutions for a few years now. True, that Trump has taken it to 11 though.Yup, that's the problem. And even if you're wrong, the Dems would be justified to suspect it given the GOP's behavior in recent years. Another example of the damage being done by the Trump era and how hard it will be to unravel.
well, if they could put something like this into place that could only be un-done by a super-majority, I'd be for it.Yup, that's the problem. And even if you're wrong, the Dems would be justified to suspect it given the GOP's behavior in recent years. Another example of the damage being done by the Trump era and how hard it will be to unravel.
I’m going with the silver lining, and appreciating the notice. We have a lot of work to do in America once Dimwit Don is out of office.So you are fine with innocent people who quite possibly will DIE from this attack?
Not spies, not agents of anyone - just people getting lunch... you are ok with them being murdered?
Talk about ceding any moral high ground. Or moral compass at all. Man.
What we've learned about our fellow Americans. With allies like this...
Why would we be comparing those things?In comparison to a country using their entire military to remove a president on foreign soil?...
he needs to be in jail...such a clown.
whatabout...whatabout....don't discuss the particular issue...just introduce something else to distract or create false equivalence...Russia 101Why would we be comparing those things?
If the Brits are sure Russia was involved and they are offended, then they should retaliate in whatever fashion they choose...When did you guys turn into such warmongers?You are talking about war. So I'm confused, are you saying that during wartime, things are allowed, so these same things should be allowed during non-war? Or are you saying that we should treat this situation the same way as when the military removes a president (i.e., war)? If so, it sounds like you agree that this is something that must be retaliated against, possibly by the British ally United States.
there would be instantaneous tweets if that were the case...no need for further investigation....tweet first, facts later when Muslim's are involved....Russia or White supremacists...we have to wait and see, investigate, get all the information...then never hear of it again...Hey guys, its not like it was one of those Muslims that attacked someone on the streets of London.
This wouldn't have happened if the UK had more guns.there would be instantaneous tweets if that were the case...no need for further investigation....tweet first, facts later when Muslim's are involved....Russia or White supremacists...we have to wait and see, investigate, get all the information.
I deal with it the same way that we all did when we invaded foreign land and killed civilians in order to remove a country's president....I'm not real good with hypocrisy..So you are fine with innocent people who quite possibly will DIE from this attack?
Not spies, not agents of anyone - just people getting lunch... you are ok with them being murdered?
Talk about ceding any moral high ground. Or moral compass at all. Man.
What we've learned about our fellow Americans. With allies like this...
This is an odd approach to take on a situation where chemical weapons were used in the midst of another country, where innocent folks have been affected, and goes against international law/norms.If the Brits are sure Russia was involved and they are offended, then they should retaliate in whatever fashion they choose...When did you guys turn into such warmongers?
But you seem to be suggesting not that it's hypocritical, but that it's OK because we have done it to.I deal with it the same way that we all did when we invaded foreign land and killed civilians in order to remove a country's president....I'm not real good with hypocrisy..
So you are ok with both - so as not to be hypocritical? Or against both?I deal with it the same way that we all did when we invaded foreign land and killed civilians in order to remove a country's president....I'm not real good with hypocrisy..
You can drop the whataboutisms and just say "yes."I deal with it the same way that we all did when we invaded foreign land and killed civilians in order to remove a country's president....I'm not real good with hypocrisy..
please stop with the logic.But you seem to be suggesting not that it's hypocritical, but that it's OK because we have done it to.
If you were offended by our actions, then those by Russia were wrong as well. You seem to be condoning them, not pointing out the hypocrisy in condemning those actions while our country has done bad things in the past.
Deflection, whataboutism. Pretty weak BS reply, even considering the low standards of your recent posts.In comparison to a country using their entire military to remove a president on foreign soil?...
Right wing bots haven’t received their talking points, so they’re muddling along, and making a mess of it.Well, today is going swimmingly.
I didn't say they weren't.....It just doesn't register on my "oh my god meter"...But you seem to be suggesting not that it's hypocritical, but that it's OK because we have done it to.
If you were offended by our actions, then those by Russia were wrong as well. You seem to be condoning them, not pointing out the hypocrisy in condemning those actions while our country has done bad things in the past.
we've killed people so who cares if Russia kills peopleI took a lot of cold medicine today, so maybe it's just me, but I can't understand what the hell DB is trying to say. Is it that state-sponsored terrorism is ok because war exists?
How many civilians need to be injured or killed by nerve gas used in public before it registers?I didn't say they weren't.....It just doesn't register on my "oh my god meter"...
I don't think he has thought about it that deeply, but basically yes.I took a lot of cold medicine today, so maybe it's just me, but I can't understand what the hell DB is trying to say. Is it that state-sponsored terrorism is ok because war exists?
Just accept your good fortune and move on.I can't understand what the hell DB is trying to say.
Well, clearly more than the Russian client regime in Syria has killed. So a handful more civilians in an allied country is really no biggie.How many civilians need to be injured or killed by nerve gas used in public before it registers?
A few people got sick because an enemy state tried to rub off a spy....You guys act like they bombed Iraq!Deflection, whataboutism. Pretty weak BS reply, even considering the low standards of your recent posts.
Yeah, I'm just gonna add some bourbon to this cold medicine and call it a day.Just accept your good fortune and move on.
We all have different meters.I didn't say they weren't.....It just doesn't register on my "oh my god meter"...But you seem to be suggesting not that it's hypocritical, but that it's OK because we have done it to.
If you were offended by our actions, then those by Russia were wrong as well. You seem to be condoning them, not pointing out the hypocrisy in condemning those actions while our country has done bad things in the past.
cmon, Russia are our friends...they make mistakes every now and then that we should overlook but they bring so much more to our budding relationship.These aliens have got to quit ####### with us in this simulation. We have actual republicans explaining to us that it's okay to release WMD's on the streets of London.
Iraq, Syria, whatever.A few people got sick because an enemy state tried to rub off a spy....You guys act like they bombed Iraq!
Sorry, but this doesn't make sense to me.I deal with it the same way that we all did when we invaded foreign land and killed civilians in order to remove a country's president....I'm not real good with hypocrisy..
Yup. Rich as hell and has carte blanche to do whatever he pleases for as long as he knows the U.S. will do absolutely nothing about it.Just had a thought.
Putin must be the most powerful person in world history now.
Might need a reference to Hillary invading Iraq, but overall pretty good.Matthias said:"I'm a Patriot Who Loves my COUNTRY, but I am AGOG that you're refusing to admit that our Country Does BAD THINGS?"
That about cover it?
Xi Jinping, and it isn’t close.Just had a thought.
Putin must be the most powerful person in world history now.
I suppose they both have carte blanche to do whatever they want with this president in office.Xi Jinping, and it isn’t close.