What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

The Trump Years- Every day something more shocking than the last! (8 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
You realize that loyal to Trump trumps loyal to country to his fervent supporters right?
I don't.  Seems ill advised.

Also, I don't recognize that news source in the link so am giving it the same credibility as I see from Trump supporters that buttress their opinions by quoting www.totallynotaconspiracytrumpisgreat.org

 
Swamp Cleaning.  Promises made. Promises kept.  
Requiring that an employee swear a minimal oath to follow and defend the constitution and the laws of a particular state likely passed constitutional muster. 
 

Requiring a person swear an oath to a particular person is grossly un-American. I’d suggest that firing somebody for not affirming loyalty to a particular person is right there with that. 

 
Requiring that an employee swear a minimal oath to follow and defend the constitution and the laws of a particular state likely passed constitutional muster. 
 

Requiring a person swear an oath to a particular person is grossly un-American. I’d suggest that firing somebody for not affirming loyalty to a particular person is right there with that. 
No loyalty oath. Basically, if you are some Democrat political employee that is actively doing political things (e.g campaigning, volunteering, donating), then you have a red flag and have to hit the bricks.  In my experience, this is pretty standard procedure when a Dem takes office.  Republicans tend to be more forgiving.   
 

 
knowledge dropper said:
No loyalty oath. Basically, if you are some Democrat political employee that is actively doing political things (e.g campaigning, volunteering, donating), then you have a red flag and have to hit the bricks.  In my experience, this is pretty standard procedure when a Dem takes office.  Republicans tend to be more forgiving.   
 
Firing somebody for actively doing political things would seem to run grossly afoul of the first amendment in most circumstances. 

 
knowledge dropper said:
No loyalty oath. Basically, if you are some Democrat political employee that is actively doing political things (e.g campaigning, volunteering, donating), then you have a red flag and have to hit the bricks.  In my experience, this is pretty standard procedure when a Dem takes office.  Republicans tend to be more forgiving.   
 
The article suggests their review goes to career civil service employees too, which is far from standard procedure under any administration post-Pendleton Act.

 
knowledge dropper said:
No loyalty oath. Basically, if you are some Democrat political employee that is actively doing political things (e.g campaigning, volunteering, donating), then you have a red flag and have to hit the bricks.  In my experience, this is pretty standard procedure when a Dem takes office.  Republicans tend to be more forgiving.   
 
No, no, no, no, a thousand times, no. This hasn't been standard procedure ever. 

 
knowledge dropper said:
No loyalty oath. Basically, if you are some Democrat political employee that is actively doing political things (e.g campaigning, volunteering, donating), then you have a red flag and have to hit the bricks.  In my experience, this is pretty standard procedure when a Dem takes office.  Republicans tend to be more forgiving.   
 
Can you show your work? I’m simply not sure this is true.

 
Can you show your work? I’m simply not sure this is true.
I’m not sure how I can link 25+ years of personal experience.  Sorry.  
 

ETA.  That’s why many in civil service are smart to Register as an independent even though they aren’t. I worked for one agency head that knew all party affiliations on day one.  Boff Sidezzz do it.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I’m not sure how I can link 28 years of personal experience.  Sorry.  
I think if someone loses their job because they post that AOC “needs a round” it’s deserved. If someone loses their job because they said “trump is a moron” on Facebook (or fbgs) I think that’s probably illegal. If whoever suggested Jr and Ivanka is should visit covid19 patients worked in government and  had repercussions because of what they implied it could possibly be warranted (I’m more of a Bird law guy so this may not be true, but I would understand it.) If someone is fired simply because they are a Republican or Democrat is definitely wrong. There are instances where someone serves at the pleasure of the office, and those are legitimate. I don’t know that anyone is being fired for that, or for “not being loyal.” I don’t think it’s ok for either party.
 

Would you be willing to give an example of your experiences? You don’t have to give the whole 28 years, just an instance where someone was fired based on political affiliation (or clarify exactly what you are accusing dems that take office of doing?) You may be right, and it’s hard to measure against what this administration has just begun doing. It’s a pretty bold accusation for either side to make.

 
I think if someone loses their job because they post that AOC “needs a round” it’s deserved. If someone loses their job because they said “trump is a moron” on Facebook (or fbgs) I think that’s probably illegal. If whoever suggested Jr and Ivanka is should visit covid19 patients worked in government and  had repercussions because of what they implied it could possibly be warranted (I’m more of a Bird law guy so this may not be true, but I would understand it.) If someone is fired simply because they are a Republican or Democrat is definitely wrong. There are instances where someone serves at the pleasure of the office, and those are legitimate. I don’t know that anyone is being fired for that, or for “not being loyal.” I don’t think it’s ok for either party.
 

Would you be willing to give an example of your experiences? You don’t have to give the whole 28 years, just an instance where someone was fired based on political affiliation (or clarify exactly what you are accusing dems that take office of doing?) You may be right, and it’s hard to measure against what this administration has just begun doing. It’s a pretty bold accusation for either side to make.
It’s unlawful to fire a civil servant for partisan reasons.  Civil service employees can file grievances with the Meeit Systems Protection Board if there are violations of this law.  Of course, Trump has basically hollowed out that agency so anything goes these days.  But that hasn’t been true in the past.

 
It’s unlawful to fire a civil servant for partisan reasons.  Civil service employees can file grievances with the Meeit Systems Protection Board if there are violations of this law.  Of course, Trump has basically hollowed out that agency so anything goes these days.  But that hasn’t been true in the past.
Not all jobs people consider civil service are actually protected.   Protected jobs are normally safe, but there are ways around that by job abolishment or office closures.  

 
It’s unlawful to fire a civil servant for partisan reasons.  Civil service employees can file grievances with the Meeit Systems Protection Board if there are violations of this law.  Of course, Trump has basically hollowed out that agency so anything goes these days.  But that hasn’t been true in the past.
Exactly 

 
Not all jobs people consider civil service are actually protected.   Protected jobs are normally safe, but there are ways around that by job abolishment or office closures.  
You are arguing in bad faith.  You are taking a specific situation and trying to imply that it happens more broadly. 

Yes, political appointees (including Schedule C politicals) can be let go.  But "typical" federal employees can't.  And no, there is no great history of protected federal civil servants being fired by "both sides" because of political speech. 

We really need to have some standards for this board. 

 
You are arguing in bad faith.  You are taking a specific situation and trying to imply that it happens more broadly. 

Yes, political appointees (including Schedule C politicals) can be let go.  But "typical" federal employees can't.  And no, there is no great history of protected federal civil servants being fired by "both sides" because of political speech. 

We really need to have some standards for this board. 
I am going on MY experience.  No bad faith.  Attitudes like yours is why this board is on its last legs.  Be more excellent to other posters.  

 
I am going on MY experience.  No bad faith.  Attitudes like yours is why this board is on its last legs.  Be more excellent to other posters.  
Right but you haven’t expounded on your experience other than “it’s too vast to get into.” Enlighten us.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Right but you haven’t expounded on your experience other than “it’s too vast to get into.” Enlighten us.
One example, One party had established a level of management for people that had worked on a campaign. Within a year of the office changing hands the positions were abolished.  Based upon their tenure or territorial rights they were put on the streets or in jobs with no real role.  

 
I have been a government employee for over 20 years and work with people who have all sorts of differing political views, including many elected officials from both sides.   I have yet to see a government employee fired for their political affiliation or political comments made at work, in private, or on Facebook.  I've seen employees fired for divulging confidential information, undermining the goals and objectives of a department, and harassing other employees, but never for not being "loyal" to an elected official.

In my experience, employees who are devotedly loyal to elected individuals don't last long once those elected officials leave office because the "loyalty", if such a thing can be quantified, belongs to the government organization and the laws that entity operates under.  When an employee hitches their wagon to a particular individual, that employee has often demonstrated an inability to further the broader goals of the political subdivision in favor of a specific, individualized agenda.       

 
I need a poll of these people who think Bernie Sanders played for the Lions to find out how many of them won't drink Corona beer because of the virus.  Bet the number is higher than you think.
Bernie had great feet and balance and I prefer Dos Equis anyway*

*not an actual quote, yet

 
Really inspires confidence....

"We're ordering a lot of supplies. We're ordering a lot of, uh, elements that frankly we wouldn't be ordering unless it was something like this. But we're ordering a lot of different elements of medical."
 

-- Trump on the coronavirus

 
"We're ordering a lot of supplies. We're ordering a lot of, uh, elements that frankly we wouldn't be ordering unless it was something like this. But we're ordering a lot of different elements of medical."
Oh Father Trump, you really knocked it out of the ballpark yet again!

 
Really inspires confidence....

"We're ordering a lot of supplies. We're ordering a lot of, uh, elements that frankly we wouldn't be ordering unless it was something like this. But we're ordering a lot of different elements of medical."
 

-- Trump on the coronavirus
JFC. The "businessman" doesn't even understand supply and demand.

Ordering supplies doesn't do much good when they all come from China, which is not producing them, because they are in lockdown.

 
JFC. The "businessman" doesn't even understand supply and demand.

Ordering supplies doesn't do much good when they all come from China, which is not producing them, because they are in lockdown.
"Sorry we couldn't save your grandma, the meds were on order. Vote for me!"*

*not an actual quote yet

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top