Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Agree. He’s one of the best I’ve seen play. Golden god is up there too. I just finished episode 23 and we are down to the final 3. I’ll put my next comment in a spoiler box.
You got me I'm a slow adapter to technology.Agree. He’s one of the best I’ve seen play. Golden god is up there too. I just finished episode 23 and we are down to the final 3. I’ll put my next comment in a spoiler box.
couldnt figure out how to do the spoiler tags properly....
Is this not how to do it?
test
the challenges in AU are tough , it was a great seasonMan for those that dont watch survivor Australia you really really need to. Great season once again. If you head to the survivor AU subreddit you will find what you need to watch
Man for those that dont watch survivor Australia you really really need to. Great season once again. If you head to the survivor AU subreddit you will find what you need to watch
Without having seen it I’m going to guess it’s because AUS features fewer insufferable idiots?
Man for those that dont watch survivor Australia you really really need to. Great season once again. If you head to the survivor AU subreddit you will find what you need to watch
Yea i agree with this. I havent seen the early ones. I have heard they are good though. But if you start with new seasons listed above thats a good start plus some of them end up on multiple seasons so its good to go back and see their gameplay.
Yea I don't think I've ever seen sour grapes or poor sportsmanship from those exiting except once. That was an American though good old Russell Hantz showing his ugly American side.waiver wire said:
from my understanding thats very common and to be expected in AU .
most of their challenges are tough but the last challenge for the 3 remaining contestants are brutal
I’m with you. Hoping one or two change my mind.is it bad i already hate the cast?
good question. I bet we see it if they allow it all the way down to when there is 4 or 3 people left.
I get it...but also just dont get it.
No. You deposit your die, then you reach into a bag and grab a paper that says "safe" or "not safe". There is only one "safe" in the bag. So if everyone rolls, only one will be safe.
Anyone who's un-self-aware enough to tell people to their face that he thinks they should get votes is probably going to be in the game for a long time. Modern juries will never vote for anyone like that to win, so the savvy players will want to get him to Final Tribal with them if they can.
Oh right, that part. Then probably everybody votes and the person who drew "safe" is immune. It's probably covered in the fine print of the rules but won't be brought up on the show if it doesn't come up.
Agreed. Not at all a big deal to me as it's simple enough to drop the one word, but it also seems silly for it to be any issue. It's become a neutral term. Especially when you consider nobody really uses the traditional "opposite" terms of gals or dolls anymore.
I think they tried too hard to find diversity, which isn’t surprising considering some of their past issues. I don’t mind it, but I think they went overboard with it. I mean they didn’t really respond properly to the sexual assault guy so now they want to look like they are a thought leader. Hey, add some diversity that you were lacking but make sure you don’t forget that you need the right personalities to create a little drama. I don’t think casting will go well when I would bet that the producers had some meetings saying, we need to have our first X winner. I think that we are seeing a bit more forced casting rather than organic let’s find some people who would make good TV and then make sure we get people from a lot of backgrounds from that group.
That’s a good point as well. Hopefully some people grow on us, but I feel the same way. The cast doesn’t grab me yet.
