One of the things that made me go was when Carson made this catch in the 2017 preseason. There aren't a ton of RBs, especially bruisers like Carson, who can track and adjust to a deep pass like that. Carson is nothing if not interesting.Besides being the #1 RB on the Seahawks depth chart and having the trust of Cheatin' Pete, the one thing I liked is that Carson showed improved catching ability out of the backfield.
Seahawks coach Pete Carroll said RB Chris Carson "really took the lead at that position" and rookie Rashaad Penny "looked a little rusty."
Carroll indicated that Penny isn't where he was in camp and might see fewer reps until he's back to form. Carson looked to be the better player in Week 1 anyways, totaling 79 yards on 10 touches. Until the Hawks' backfield usage is certain, Carson can't be viewed as anything more than a FLEX option with RB3 upside in the event Penny is brought along slowly.
Source: Bob Condotta on Twitter
Sep 11 - 6:27 PM
Was wondering this myselfSeen nothing but Penny and Davis for all of the fourth quarter tonight.
Did something happen to Carson?
Mack is a legit story, Carson may simply be a scrub. Penny is expected to be in the lineup, the story on a national level would be Penny not being in the lineup. We are the only type of people who recognize something odd about Penny being in over Carson.Was wondering this myself
Booth guys are too busy talking incessantly about Mack to notice he hasn't been in
When has Carson been productive?Carrol certainly seems like he is confused about the RBs and their actual productivity.
They are not the contenders of years past but this isn't the worst team Russell Wilson has led and when Wilson is leading the team you always have a puncher's chance.This thing could be a mess for the whole season. I recall they didn’t have very many games where they were favored by Vegas. I think tonight is a small example of what the Seahawks will be offensively and it’s vomit inducing.
I see no reason to drop either but if it continues to be a split with negative game script neither is worth starting. I will continue to root for Penny and I think they are too. They had him running routes tonight and had him split out wide. He looks like a rookie to me who needs to regain the composure and confidence he had in college. Hopefully, he can do that.They are not the contenders of years past but this isn't the worst team Russell Wilson has led and when Wilson is leading the team you always have a puncher's chance.
As compared to Penny? Both games this year thus far.When has Carson been productive?
When given a chance when has he not?When has Carson been productive?
Chris Carson rushed six times for 24 yards in the Seahawks' 24-17, Week 2 loss to the Bears on Monday night.
Carson didn't catch his lone target. Carson rushed on the first three plays of the game, picking up 13 yards. He received another three carries before the break but appeared to be benched after halftime in favor of a Mike Davis-Rashaad Penny combo. Carson didn't appear to suffer an injury and remained in uniform with his helmet on. This comes six days after coach Pete Carroll said Carson "really took the lead" at running back. It's the latest in a long line of statements that eventually mean nothing from Carroll. Carson cannot be treated as anything more than a low-floor RB3 heading into Week 3 against the Cowboys.
Speaking after the Week 2 loss to the Bears, coach Pete Carroll said Chris Carson didn't get any second-half touches because he was "gassed" from playing special teams.
Okay. Maybe don't play your best running back on special teams then. Anyway, Carroll added he wanted to see what rookie Rashaad Penny could do with a bigger workload. The answer to that question? Not much. Penny was even worse, rushing 10 times for 30 yards, while dropping a pass and catching none. Meanwhile, Carson averaged a respectable 4.0 YPC in the first half only to never see the ball again. The Seahawks are a mess, especially on offense.
Chris Carson - RB - Seahawks
Speaking after the Week 2 loss to the Bears, coach Pete Carroll said Chris Carson didn't get any second-half touches because he was "gassed" from playing special teams.
Okay. Maybe don't play your best running back on special teams then. Anyway, Carroll added he wanted to see what rookie Rashaad Penny could do with a bigger workload. The answer to that question? Not much. Penny was even worse, rushing 10 times for 30 yards, while dropping a pass and catching none. Meanwhile, Carson averaged a respectable 4.0 YPC in the first half only to never see the ball again. The Seahawks are a mess, especially on offense.
Source: Gregg Bell on Twitter
Sep 18 - 12:50 AM
He’s never been productive. Not in the NFL, not in college. He has a flash play here or there. His ypc has stunk, his auxiliaries are average. Everyone loves the back that runs over DB’s that they’ll ignore everything to try to validate his role.When given a chance when has he not?
Ok, so one 50 yard run? It’s short sighted. He had one good game last year (against a very bad run defense). Think they would even dream about splitting Carson out wide? This narrative from preseason is such a falsehood. Carroll created this scenario with his stupid ### commentary. Should never have made these wild assertations about a guy who has never been a workhorse.As compared to Penny? Both games this year thus far.
Maybe Carson is the fat ### is if he’s winded on 6 carriesMaybe they should put Penny’s fat ### on special teams.
This is Pete Carroll when he doesn't have a defense dominating the league. Just another ham & egger coach. Yeah, lets play Carson on special teams because we drafted Penny to be the man. No idea how to use Jimmy Graham, no idea which RB is actually better. Carroll is a bum and it's gonna start to show now.Carrol certainly seems like he is confused about the RBs and their actual productivity.
Wait. How is this NOT the worst team Wilson has lead?They are not the contenders of years past but this isn't the worst team Russell Wilson has led and when Wilson is leading the team you always have a puncher's chance.
He's been productive everytime he's been asked.He’s never been productive. Not in the NFL, not in college. He has a flash play here or there. His ypc has stunk, his auxiliaries are average. Everyone loves the back that runs over DB’s that they’ll ignore everything to try to validate his role.
There has been no indication about Carson’s productivity besides biased eyeballs that love when he crunches a DB. This board gets all steamy over two down bruisers but they have no place in today’s NFL. There is a reason he had close to zero productivity in college and there is a reason Seattle is turning away from him early.He's been productive everytime he's been asked.
No earthy idea what you are talking about with his ypc stinking. No idea what auxiliaries are either.
He's not got a lot of volume. That's about all you can come up with that would be accurate. I'll let you keep to your regularly schedule Penny stumping now.
Penny looked like a total plodder out there. He needs to drop fifteen or so if he wants to run like that.There has been no indication about Carson’s productivity besides biased eyeballs that love when he crunches a DB. This board gets all steamy over two down bruisers but they have no place in today’s NFL. There is a reason he had close to zero productivity in college and there is a reason Seattle is turning away from him early.
What’s the point of arguing this? Congrats that you think your eyeballs are better then mine. Let’s wait ten weeks and if the numbers back you up, I’ll admit it. Right now I think the line is bad and play calling is awful but he looks much the same as he did in college. Agile in space, picks through trash and nice short area burst when the room has been there which isn’t often. I love how everyone is giving every other rookie the benefit of the doubt even though Saquon has under 3 ypc outside his big run, Michel had the same problems with missing camp, Kerryon is fighting two JAG’s for work, Guice blew up his knee, Jones is inactive and Royce has lost a lot of 1/2nd down work to a UDFA and is invisible in the passing game. Guy deserves time and a chance. Not to be used as a device to point out Seattle’s incompetence last draft, that’s obvious. Worst thing that happened for the guy in fantasy circles in being taken in the first so fantasy goons promoting the RB doesn’t matter narrative can use him as their primary target for poor drafting.Penny looked like a total plodder out there. He needs to drop fifteen or so if he wants to run like that.
With Dallas on the docket, certainly is a terrible situation in the short term.Time to drop all Seahawks and just move on.
Not much, I guess. Just an observation, and that I think Carson looked a lot better than you're giving him credit for when he was in there. This seems like a departure from the "best man" winning the job, which has been Seattle's modus operandi under Carroll.What’s the point of arguing this? Congrats that you think your eyeballs are better then mine. Let’s wait ten weeks and if the numbers back you up, I’ll admit it. Right now I think the line is bad and play calling is awful but he looks much the same as he did in college. Agile in space, picks through trash and nice short area burst when the room has been there which isn’t often. I love how everyone is giving every other rookie the benefit of the doubt even though Saquon has under 3 ypc outside his big run, Michel had the same problems with missing camp, Kerryon is fighting two JAG’s for work, Guice blew up his knee, Jones is inactive and Royce has lost a lot of 1/2nd down work to a UDFA and is invisible in the passing game. Guy deserves time and a chance. Not to be used as a device to point out Seattle’s incompetence last draft, that’s obvious. Worst thing that happened for the guy in fantasy circles in being taken in the first so fantasy goons promoting the RB doesn’t matter narrative can use him as their primary target for poor drafting.
Carson's best runs were 9, 4 and 4 yards.Penny looked like a total plodder out there. He needs to drop fifteen or so if he wants to run like that.
I'm in total agreement with this; my posting was really about Carson not looking too badly against a stout defensive front. Penny certainly did get that vote of confidence and usage spoke volumes about where both are potentially headed in the offense.It's not like either one played awesome, it was a tough d that was wrecking their line. But penny got several big votes of confidence from the coaches last night and was in the game when it was on the line. That's a big shift from two weeks ago.
If I was articulate and not tilting, this is how I would have argued.Carson's best runs were 9, 4 and 4 yards.
Penny's best were 10, 6 and 4.
Carson got them one first down, a 2 yard run on 2nd and 1 after he got 9 on his first carry of the game.
Penny got them two - a 10 yard run was a 4 yard run after his own 6 yard run where he made a nice move and had to stretch for a first down.
More importantly, Carson was in on no scoring drives
Penny was in on their first td drive and the subsequent drive that ended with the interception. He carried the ball nine times in 14 plays on those two drives. The touchdown pass to Lockett was off a play action fake to penny. The interception was an underthrown pass to penny.
Most importantly, the coaches just plain used penny in more fantasy friendly ways.
Carson played rb and special teams.
Penny played rb and wide receiver.
Carson got spelled by penny
Penny never got spelled by Carson
It's not like either one played awesome, it was a tough d that was wrecking their line. But penny got several big votes of confidence from the coaches last night and was in the game when it was on the line. That's a big shift from two weeks ago.
Penny got hit at the handoff twice when the defender broke through the line. Once for 0 yards and one for negative one.Oh, but we shouldn't forget Carson averaged 4 YPC while Penny averaged 3 YPC. I'd like to see elusiveness ratings and YAC before I judged the better night. All we know is what the coaches thought, and they look like they want to use the first-rounder going forward, a point EBF has made numerous times on this board, the validity of which I've paid attention to.
Yeah, true. I'm just trying to use a better measurement than my vision. I'm sort of admitting my own limitations in what I'm personally seeing on a football field.You can't take plays away, but ypc in a small sample size is virtually meaningless.
https://twitter.com/Liz_Mathews/status/1042154481482231808Chris Carson remains atop the Seahawks' running back depth chart for Week 3.
"Gassed" from playing special teams — really (at least according to coach Pete Carroll) — Carson did not touch the ball in the second half of Monday's dispiriting loss to the Bears. Any time Carroll opens his mouth, he signs Carson's praises, but the usage has not matched the verbiage so far this season. Carson will be a risky, low-end FLEX play for Week 3 against the Cowboys.
A few posts earlier you compared three rushing attempts of Penny's vs Carsons. I assume you did it to infer something, but would seem like a pretty small sample size to make a meaningful comparison.Penny got hit at the handoff twice when the defender broke through the line. Once for 0 yards and one for negative one.
If Wilson doesn't hand him the ball on those plays he finishes with 8 for 31 instead of 10 for 30.
You can't take plays away, but ypc in a small sample size is virtually meaningless.
Yes, it is a small sample size. The point I was making was that people said Carson outplayed penny this week. Or that penny was plodding. And they pointed to a difference in yards per carry on a small sample size. But penny's 3 best runs were better than Carson's 3 best - penny had runs of 10, 6 and 4 compared with Carson's 9, 4 and 4. And penny got hit behind the line of scrimmage twice as he was receiving the handoff, resulting in carries of 0 and minus one. So Carson's 6 carries for 24 and Penny's 10 for 30 look like they're a whole yard per carry different, but the reality is they both looked decent.A few posts earlier you compared three rushing attempts of Penny's vs Carsons. I assume you did it to infer something, but would seem like a pretty small sample size to make a meaningful comparison.
Agreed. I liked him a lot as a sleeper last year and was bummed when he got hurt.Carson has averaged 4.6 YPC over 62 career carries. Thats all we have, and that aint bad.
Draft capital is definitely part of it. But it's also his ceiling. If I have two guys playing similarly right now but one has worked as hard as anyone to get there and the other is just getting started, I want to reward the hard worker, but I still want the higher ceiling guy to get reps so he can reach his potential.Completely agree that the coaching staff is pushing Penny in for playing time. None of us know the reason and the coaching staff just flat out making crap up doesn't help us know the reason. Penny barely played in preseason, gained a crapton of weight and is averaging 2.2ypc so far this year....I'm not sure how you establish "trust" in a player based on that.
Right now what he has is draft capital and I'd bet that's getting him in the game, we'll see what he does with it.
The seahawks lost their first game and with Carson as the starter, they had 3 points through three quarters this week.Sitting at 0-2, can't say its worked well for the Seahawks so far.