MarvinTScamper
Footballguy
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/07/hillary-clinton-blames-comey-wikileaks-and-misogyny-for-2016-loss.html
Still completely clueless? CHECK
Still completely clueless? CHECK
thanks Tips.She's not clueless at all. There is a certain amount of truth to what's she's saying. There is also, sadly, some things that she won't admit to herself, which is understandable as well.
There are a lot of factors why Hillary lost. One very important one that the article does not mention: the announcement, two weeks before the election, that Obamacare costs were going to significantly increase in 2017. I firmly believe that this one piece of horrible news for the Democrats changed a lot of votes in the swing states, particularly Florida and Pennsylvania.
She lost for lots of reasons, but the primary one is that she is a bad candidate. She is very bad at campaigning.She's not clueless at all. There is a certain amount of truth to what's she's saying. There is also, sadly, some things that she won't admit to herself, which is understandable as well.
There are a lot of factors why Hillary lost. One very important one that the article does not mention: the announcement, two weeks before the election, that Obamacare costs were going to significantly increase in 2017. I firmly believe that this one piece of horrible news for the Democrats changed a lot of votes in the swing states, particularly Florida and Pennsylvania.
I agree with this too. Not sure it's the primary reason, but it's a big one, and I was concerned about it from the start.She lost for lots of reasons, but the primary one is that she is a bad candidate. She is very bad at campaigning.
glad to see you found the old Av!!!!http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/07/hillary-clinton-blames-comey-wikileaks-and-misogyny-for-2016-loss.html
Still completely clueless? CHECK
After being with Bill all these years you would have thought her campaign would have been ready for misogyny...just bad game preparation...gotta study more film...The fact that she's using the word misogyny shows that she still doesn't get it.
asked for a name change too....we'll see if they come thruglad to see you found the old Av!!!!
the Republicans sure hope so...She is going to run again in 2020
Wait I thought we elected a narcissistic liar.thanks Tips.
I realize there are more factors. These aren't them.
The biggest reason she lost is that the entire opposition, and some of her own, recognize she's a narcissistic liar. You can blame the news, or you can blame her actions that the news reported. Most non-lapdogs can tell the difference.
I dont see how she would make it out of the primary's.She is going to run again in 2020
just another datapoint in how bad she is.Wait I thought we elected a narcissistic liar.
She sucks. Who cares?just another datapoint in how bad she is.
Agreed. I wish it hadn't been on my news feed, that I hadn't laughed about how ####### clueless she is. Naturally, you cared enough to post multiple times, so I guess the answer is: us.She sucks. Who cares?
Also she's a failed ex-candidate. She doesn't have supporters. What are they supporting, her efforts to walk her dog in the woods?
Acting like she's still some sort of opposition leader instead of just a retired old lady is exactly what Trump wants you to do. That's why he still talks about her more than he talks about policy.
We did, but the WAY they were narcissistic liars and what they lied about were completely different. That matters to many it seems.Wait I thought we elected a narcissistic liar.thanks Tips.
I realize there are more factors. These aren't them.
The biggest reason she lost is that the entire opposition, and some of her own, recognize she's a narcissistic liar. You can blame the news, or you can blame her actions that the news reported. Most non-lapdogs can tell the difference.
What exactly do you think they're supporting?
This is anecdotal but I heard many people out loud say they could never vote for a woman to be president. I highly doubt that's the reason she lost, but it certainly was a factor for some.The fact that she's using the word misogyny shows that she still doesn't get it.
She also received votes because she was a woman.This is anecdotal but I heard many people out loud say they could never vote for a woman to be president. I highly doubt that's the reason she lost, but it certainly was a factor for some.
I have no ####### clueWhat exactly do you think they're supporting?
Also mostly unrelated but I thought you'd like to see this.
Which means nothing when it comes to winning a Presidential election.11 million more people voted against Trump for President than voted for him.
Of course, but a very interesting fact, nonetheless.Which means nothing when it comes to winning a Presidential election.
37 states to 13 states is also an interesting factoid...Of course, but a very interesting fact, nonetheless.
Very much so, I agree.37 states to 13 states is also an interesting factoid...
She also received votes because she was a woman.
That's actually very interesting. Good find!Very much so, I agree.
So is the fact that the financial/economic output of those 37 states is a mere fraction of that of the other 13 states (and the discrepancies in literacy rates, education levels, dependence on the federal government rates, love of Putin, etc.). Comparisons are fun!
Well we can call it an affirmative action election...odd that after years of denigrating the GOP as the party of the rich it has now been flip-flopped...Very much so, I agree.
So is the fact that the financial/economic output of those 37 states is a mere fraction of that of the other 13 states (and the discrepancies in literacy rates, education levels, dependence on the federal government rates, love of Putin, etc.). Comparisons are fun!
It was truly unprecedented election on many levels. Never have so few with so little elected a President.That's actually very interesting. Good find!
Exactly. The parts of the country on welfare elected an unqualified President.Well we can call it an affirmative action election...
I have no idea, but neither does anyone else.
Here's how simple this is: if you flip Trump and Clinton's entire lives- their experience, their families (including Trumps divorces and statements about parenthood), their treatment of the opposite sex more broadly, their government and private sector experience, all of it- who wins the election?
If you admit Clinton wins in a massive landslide, you're admitting there's misogyny at work in the results. If you think the results would have been the same ... all due respect but you're out of your ####### mind.
Hate speech...Exactly. The parts of the country on welfare elected an unqualified President.
Well, the GOP still advocates for the interests of the rich, they just do it on the backs of suckers and dupes they have conned. So there is that.Well we can call it an affirmative action election...odd that after years of denigrating the GOP as the party of the rich it has now been flip-flopped...
I don't understand what you're changing and what you're keeping the same.
Here's how simple this is: if you flip Trump and Clinton's entire lives- their experience, their families (including Trumps divorces and statements about parenthood), their treatment of the opposite sex more broadly, their government and private sector experience, all of it- who wins the election?
If you admit Clinton wins in a massive landslide, you're admitting there's misogyny at work in the results. If you think the results would have been the same ... all due respect but you're out of your ####### mind.
Odd they are trying to help all the dems in urban areas...seems like a foolish strategy...Well, the GOP still advocates for the interests of the rich, they just do it on the backs of suckers and dupes they have conned. So there is that.
Wow, America must be pretty bigoted and rotten. If we can't elect a woman, how in the world could we ever elect a black, very Liberal man with Hussein as a middle name?
Here's how simple this is: if you flip Trump and Clinton's entire lives- their experience, their families (including Trumps divorces and statements about parenthood), their treatment of the opposite sex more broadly, their government and private sector experience, all of it- who wins the election?
If you admit Clinton wins in a massive landslide, you're admitting there's misogyny at work in the results. If you think the results would have been the same ... all due respect but you're out of your ####### mind.
Nope...I just go with the actual results and not the spin...Why do you hate the truth? You prefer fake news?
If Hillary was just treated with the grace that Sara Palin was she would have won in a landslide...Wow, America must be pretty bigoted and rotten. If we can't elect a woman, how in the world could we ever elect a black, very Liberal man with Hussein as a middle name?