fantasycurse42
Footballguy Jr.
Technology is hard and I cant figure out how to change what user is logged on.
Technology is hard and I cant figure out how to change what user is logged on.
Your explanation was you couldn't figure out how to log into the LD account, if I accept that, have to say, you're a bigger imbecile than I even give you credit for.
Now....Would you care to guess if my response was in the 90% or the 10%?
I am curious about one thing, and hopefully you could help me understand:
So @Limp Ditka was suspended (prob for not being excellent to someone) and you obviously couldn't go more than 30 minutes without FBG, so you started posting under this account. Now that LD has prob completed the suspension, why haven't you brought it back? I could make a simple guess, but I'd like you to tell us why.
Looking for those whole nine yards of info here.
Oh, and if you feel your way of responding within a post is better suited than using a different color, we can add stubborn to stupid. Prob just couldn't figure out how to change the font color, if I had to guess though.
I'll give you the answer you want to hear. Technology is hard and I cant figure out how to change what user is logged on.
You seem to get a little testy from time to timeYou seem like an angry person.
Didn't you just tell me to accept what I had been told 10 minutes ago?When someone prefaces a comment with something to the effect of "I'll give you the answer you want to hear" there's a 90% chance that they're ####### with you.
Let's use the below exchange as an example
Now....Would you care to guess if my response was in to 90% or the 10%?
Why? You can't seem to figure out how to use the private message function.Your explanation was you couldn't figure out how to log into the LD account, if I accept that, have to say, you're a bigger imbecile than I even give you credit for.
You can stop pandering now. We're obviously well past 'seem like'You seem like an angry person.
Don't you tell me when I can pander. I will fire up a "Pander Bear" alias so fast it will make your head spin.You can stop pandering now. We're obviously well past 'seem like'
I think you're angry with me bc I challenged your Labour Party quote? It is interesting you call me out (now multiple times today), yet the other part of the equation, who is equally responsible for this exchange (as well as many others), gets a pass from you, and you challenge only me. The timing is intriguing due to the aforementioned.Why? You can't seem to figure out how to use the private message function.
I told you that it wasn't worth it.Didn't you just tell me to accept what I had been told 10 minutes ago?
To clarify, you didn't really tell me anything, bc well, the truth is pretty ####### pathetic. Even more than not being able to figure out how to change users?
Excellent formatting in the previous post, btw.
As a matter of fact, I told you twice!Much like that meme you created, its not worth the effort.
Take it or keep on fantasizing about my actions. Your choice.as I said before, its not worth the effort. To be honest with you though, now there's two reasons.
I'm only perturbed that you seem to feel the need to spend several pages of a thread about an actual issue in the news trying to berate a poster about his account.I think you're angry with me bc I challenged your Labour Party quote? It is interesting you call me out (now multiple times today), yet the other part of the equation, who is equally responsible for this exchange (as well as many others), gets a pass from you, and you challenge only me. The timing is intriguing due to the aforementioned.
There are 300 pages of things to be perturbed about in this train wreck of a thread. I find it hard to believe this would be a breaking point as it relates to this particular thread.I'm only perturbed that you seem to feel the need to spend several pages of a thread about an actual issue in the news trying to berate a poster about his account.
Well, I'm not going to spend more time trying to convince you. Such is life.There are 300 pages of things to be perturbed about in this train wreck of a thread. I find it hard to believe this would be a breaking point as it relates to this particular thread.
That's going to take you days to straighten out.There are 300 pages of things to be perturbed about in this train wreck of a thread.
Everybody resurfaces in some form.If I ever get banned, you'll never see me again in any form.
Why was the ban unenforceable?Zahn was acting cynically, anyway. The flap helps him among local Republicans, even though he walked the unenforcable 'ban' back. He'll run for something at the state level, and likely waltz in. After that? We'll see.
I don't think that's how it works. You telling us your new alias name takes away all of the guess work of trying to figure out "who's alias are you"?Don't you tell me when I can pander. I will fire up a "Pander Bear" alias so fast it will make your head spin.
State contracting and bidding laws run counter:Why was the ban unenforceable?Zahn was acting cynically, anyway. The flap helps him among local Republicans, even though he walked the unenforcable 'ban' back. He'll run for something at the state level, and likely waltz in. After that? We'll see.
On top of that, there was an issue of whether the edict meant anything when Nike products were basically priced out anyway (same link):[Kenner] City Councilman Mike Sigur said Louisiana state law lets governments specify the types of products they want to buy but forbids disqualifying specific brands such as Nike. Still, he said, Zahn's directive was an administrative rule that so far has not come before the council in the form of any proposal to buy sports apparel.
...[Kenner City Councilman George] Branigan said that when he was president of the Muss Bertolino Playground Booster Club in 1995 and 1996, the club grossed more than $100,000 a year and spent its revenue buying uniforms for teams, paying umpires and building new ball fields. He said the club never bought Nike apparel back then because it was too expensive.
I agree that the move was purely cosmetic since I figured right away Nike had to be too expensive.State contracting and bidding laws run counter:
On top of that, there was an issue of whether the edict meant anything when Nike products were basically priced out anyway (same link):
...
Ergo, Zahn was making a cosmetic political maneuver, not a principled one. IMO.
whose?I don't think that's how it works. You telling us your new alias name takes away all of the guess work of trying to figure out "who's alias are you"?
Squiss does that to a lot of his threads and even will post the same tweet in multiple threads at the same timeWhen it falls off the front page Squissy will find a random tweet to bump it and stoke the flame and get it hot again.
When only 2-3 posts on this entire page are about Kaepernick it’s probably time to shut this down.
:lock:
This guy gets itwhose?
whose
huːz/
determiner & pronoun
1.
belonging to or associated with which person.
"Squistion asked whose round is it?"
It's much more bearable when you putthe trolls on ignore.When only 2-3 posts on this entire page are about Kaepernick it’s probably time to shut this down.
:lock:
Most effective quiet protest ever...everyone still talking about that guy and thing he stands for and the attention it is all getting that no one is talking about or what brohans take that to the bank
prove itJemele makes a good point:
Jemele Hill @jemelehill Sep 12
Because it constantly bears repeating ... Kenny Stills’ decision to take a knee was never about the flag or disrespecting veterans. 90 percent of the people criticizing Stills, Colin Kaepernick or any other player that has taken a knee, have never lifted one finger to aid a vet.
https://twitter.com/jemelehill/status/1039902470254874625
Perception...way too late for that to change. Original message was lost a long time ago. Stills needs to find a new way to get his message out..his own idea.Jemele makes a good point:
Jemele Hill @jemelehill Sep 12
Because it constantly bears repeating ... Kenny Stills’ decision to take a knee was never about the flag or disrespecting veterans. 90 percent of the people criticizing Stills, Colin Kaepernick or any other player that has taken a knee, have never lifted one finger to aid a vet.
https://twitter.com/jemelehill/status/1039902470254874625
Yeah, those kind of things never happen in this forum. This was the one to finally send you over the edge. Oh and LOL about this thread being an issue.I'm only perturbed that you seem to feel the need to spend several pages of a thread about an actual issue in the news trying to berate a poster about his account.
Which edge did I go over?Yeah, those kind of things never happen in this forum. This was the one to finally send you over the edge. Oh and LOL about this thread being an issue.
The one that RW just put there 23 minutes ago. You didn't see it this morning?Which edge did I go over?
There seems to be an Epic Problem in this thread that's causing you heartburn.Which edge did I go over?
Oh?There seems to be an Epic Problem in this thread that's causing you heartburn.
When only 2-3 posts on this entire page are about Kaepernick it’s probably time to shut this down.
:lock:
I see the censorship squad is out.
Good one guy.I see the censorship squad is out.
Understood.Edit - that’s wasn’t cool. Sorry - my intent was more time is being spent talking about things other nonsense than the Kaep situation. Let’s leave it to that.
Nike is in my portfolio! Don`t know how long the martyr campaign can last but if they are selling more product and making more $$$$ run with it.The recent Nike ad campaign fared well among males 18-44:
Nike: Early Indications Favorable on Kaep Campaign
That's for sure on the financial side. A lot of "politics" is about this now, this is just a direct example.Nike is in my portfolio! Don`t know how long the martyr campaign can last but if they are selling more product and making more $$$$ run with it.
I agree..all Nike cares about is the bottom line and it makes sense...but that is the big circle that leads back to Kappy. NFL owners care about the bottom line too and their fan base and that is why Kappy is selling Nikes and not a backup NFL QB.That's for sure on the financial side. A lot of "politics" is about this now, this is just a direct example.
Another example: Fox News and CNN. Ratings and money. Fox News. They don't care about politics. They care about ratings. Who's at home all day long? Old retirees. Put on what they want.
CNN made a decision in 2016 cycle: pay abnormally high attention to Trump, his ratings are amazing compared to anyone else. They reap what they sow.
Result: look at the tax code.
So it's all about "look at my portfolio" to some extent. And middle Joe may get a few percents off his income taxes, or benefit in their portfolio. But those with the serious net worth are those winning bigly. Think $10M and up. Follow the money.
Sure. Kaep was in that position because Trump dumped on him.I agree..all Nike cares about is the bottom line and it makes sense...but that is the big circle that leads back to Kappy. NFL owners care about the bottom line too and their fan base and that is why Kappy is selling Nikes and not a backup NFL QB.
It really is simplistic.
I doubt people answering surveys from anonymous phone numbers is really unbiased.The recent Nike ad campaign fared well among males 18-44:
Nike: Early Indications Favorable on Kaep Campaign
Then how do you suggest they go about the survey, Mr Gallop?I doubt people answering surveys from anonymous phone numbers is really unbiased.
It's not a perfectly random sample.I doubt people answering surveys from anonymous phone numbers is really unbiased.
Seriously? You mean the lost sales of chubby, non-athletic middle-aged white guys didn't do a lot to hurt their numbers? Color me shocked.Nike stock hits record high.
Lagging indicator. The 30% off rack at the outlet is overflowing. Give it a few more weeks.Seriously? You mean the lost sales of chubby, non-athletic middle-aged white guys didn't do a lot to hurt their numbers? Color me shocked.