I can't figure out how some of his supporters aren't upset. You would think they would want change in the NFL not a payoff.
How on earth do you come up with this?
I can't figure out how some of his supporters aren't upset. You would think they would want change in the NFL not a payoff.
How on earth do you come up with this?
So you don't think you were wrong in what you argued with me and mocked me for in the last 200 pages?Link to me claiming I'm right and you're wrong? I don't think a settlement proves anything other than this was about getting a pay day more than being on a roster. You, Tim and others are making definitive claims about who was right and wrong.
Is it really the NFL that he’s been trying to change all along? Who ####### knew?I can't figure out how some of his supporters aren't upset. You would think they would want change in the NFL not a payoff.
at mocking you for 200 pages. Give me a break with that nonsense. It's embarrassing you take criticisms and truthful statements about Kaepernick personally like they are about you.So you don't think you were wrong in what you argued with me and mocked me for in the last 200 pages?
Okie Dokie Pokie (just an expression, not calling you Pokie). There is nothing more to be said if you contend that the settlement today proved you right all along and I have been wrong. I will not continue to argue with your revisionist history. People can review the thread for confirmation of your claims.
Then donate that money to something that helped the cause.Love all the people saying he didn’t have a case and he’s a loser and he sucks now saying he did this all for the money. It’s beautiful.
This is so disingenuous. There was nothing made public in the pre-grievance hearing process, so it is impossible to link to any evidence that was presented by Kaep's lawyers in the depositions or that had been found in discovery. The NFL guaranteed by the NDA, that any evidence will never see the light of day, so it can't be provided and you know that.at mocking you for 200 pages. Give me a break with that nonsense. It's embarrassing you take criticisms and truthful statements about Kaepernick personally like they are about you.
And you're right people can read this thread if they want and see post after post after post after post of you trolling things. If you think you won something tonight then go ahead and celebrate instead of spending your Friday night on the internet begging for an apology you don't deserve. Again, link me up some collusion and I'll admit I was wrong as I did claim there wasn't evidence of collusion against the NFL.
The NDA is mutual. Both sides guaranteed it.This is so disingenuous. There was nothing made public in the pre-grievance hearing, so it is impossible to link to any evidence that was presented by Kaep's lawyers in the depositions or that had been found in discovery. The NFL guaranteed by the NDA, that any evidence will never see the light of day, so it can't be provided and you know that.
Cool. I find you rather boring.It’s like tonydead is under the impression that Kaep is Kramer and the NFL is J Peterman.
truly fascinating
No, it's not disingenuous. You can't prove collusion occurred. I can't prove it did not occur nor am I trying to prove it. The onus is you to prove it existed especially after you claimed numerous times it did. Companies settle lawsuits all the time to save legal costs, help with PR, and other reasons. Sometimes they settle because they are guilty too. I'm not telling you what to believe here but you and Tim can shove an apology until you have some proof and stop telling me how I should interpret a settlement. And you wonder why people laugh at your nonsense.This is so disingenuous. There was nothing made public in the pre-grievance hearing, so it is impossible to link to any evidence that was presented by Kaep's lawyers in the depositions or that had been found in discovery. The NFL guaranteed by the NDA, that any evidence will never see the light of day, so it can't be provided and you know that.
So. For $60 million I would guarantee it too.They NDA is mutual. Both sides guaranteed it.
More like Kaep is Charlie and the NFL is the chocolate factory.It’s like tonydead is under the impression that Kaep is Kramer and the NFL is J Peterman.
truly fascinating
Because the NFL paid big bucks to suppress all the evidence with the NDA. Jeez Louise.No, it's not disingenuous. You can't prove collusion occurred. I can't prove it did not occur nor am I trying to prove it. The onus is you to prove it existed especially after you claimed numerous times it did. Companies settle lawsuits all the time to save legal costs, help with PR, and other reasons. Sometimes they settle because they are guilty too. I'm not telling you what to believe here but you and Tim can shove an apology until you have some proof and stop telling me how I should interpret a settlement. And you wonder why people laugh at your nonsense.
I like.More like Kaep is Charlie and the NFL is the chocolate factory.
That's your problem not mine. But the fact remains no collusion was proven. You can't argue that (though I'm sure you're going to try)Because the NFL paid big bucks to suppress all the evidence with the NDA. Jeez Louise.
Exactly. Did he do anything with his Nike money?Then donate that money to something that helped the cause.
True, the NFL must have paid Kaep multi-millions in hush money just for fun if it because he hadn't proven anything. And if you believe that I got some ocean front property in Arizona I would like to sell you.That's your problem not mine. But the fact remains no collusion was proven. You can't argue that (though I'm sure you're going to try)
He’s donated over a million dollars as of a year ago. You don’t have to be this much in the dark. Google can get you answers.Then donate that money to something that helped the cause.
The guy had my intere at first then as time went on I lost interest. I have no clue what actually happened after his Niner days.Exactly. Did he do anything with his Nike money?
His Nike contract has charitable donations from him and Nike written into it.Exactly. Did he do anything with his Nike money?
Don't care about answers, donate more money if all that worried about it.He’s donated over a million dollars as of a year ago. You don’t have to be this much in the dark. Google can get you answers.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sbnation.com/platform/amp/2018/1/31/16935356/colin-kaepernick-donate-organizations-million-dollar-pledge-10-for-10
We have no idea what the amount is.So. For $60 million I would guarantee it too.
I’m not saying the NFL is guilty, just pointing out that not every civil suit is all about the money as all the anti-Kaepers keep repeatingNo, but I'm glad you brought that one up. The settlement with a NDA lets the NFL avoid any trial by public opinion when found not guilty like OJ. Huge win for them.
For people like you there is no amount he could donate that would be enough. You’d just keep moving the goalposts.Don't care about answers, donate more money if all that worried about it.
What did the guy think was going to happen once he decided to ...the hell with this I;m taking a knee.
True, but considering what Kaep would have gotten in estimated lost QB pay in arbitration, I trust the estimates as to what it cost the NFL to make this go away now, as even if Kaep lost what had been uncovered in discovery and under deposition could have been devastating, plus if he had won, the CBA probably would have been voided costing much more to the NFL than the estimated $60-80 million.We have no idea what the amount is.
It should stay if for no other reason than to keep the trolls confined to one place.Biw that Kaep won can we delete the thread now?
They all showed up to this thread tonight. Imagine that.It should stay if for no other reason than to keep the trolls confined to one place.
Still no collusion was proven. Enjoy your Arizona beach house, buddy.True, the NFL must have paid Kaep multi-millions in hush money just for fun if it because he hadn't proven anything. And if you believe that I got some ocean front property in Arizona I would like to sell you.
People like me expect a man to realize those people n the stands paid big $$$$$$ and want a nice relaxing time at the football game, they don't need some guy disrupting a good time.For people like you there is no amount he could donate that would be enough. You’d just keep moving the goalposts.
Thumbs up. And I'm not saying the NFL isn't guilty, just pointing out the NFL has other legitimate reason to settle that seem to be completely lost on quite a few people in here.I’m not saying the NFL is guilty, just pointing out that not every civil suit is all about the money as all the anti-Kaepers keep repeating
We don’t have an estimation of the settlement amount. There’s a confidentiality agreement.True, but considering what Kaep would have gotten in estimated lost QB pay in arbitration, I trust the estimates as to what it cost the NFL to make this go away now, as even if Kaep lost what had been uncovered in discovery and under deposition could have been devastating, plus if he had won, the CBA probably would have been voided costing much more to the NFL than the estimated $60-80 million.
Zzzzzzz. Don't you ever come up with new material? Can you formulate an argument without an insult. It's like kindergarten in here.I like.
Dude, it can't be proven because of the terms of the settlement and you know that.Still no collusion was proven. Enjoy your Arizona beach house, buddy.
Dude, it was on Twitter so that pretty much makes it fact.We don’t have an estimation of the settlement amount. There’s a confidentiality agreement.
https://247sports.com/nfl/san-francisco-49ers/Article/Colin-Kaepernick-collusion-case-settlement-amount-NFL-129142821/We don’t have an estimation of the settlement amount. There’s a confidentiality agreement.
Yes you’ve said that repeatedly. So it’s weird a couple of you want an apology over something that wasn’t provenDude, it can't be proven because of the terms of the settlement and you know that.
I assure you, it’s not lost on me. One of my clients was in a major car accident, other party was 100% at fault, but the passenger in the other car died. The deceased person’s family ended up suing my client and the insurance company settled on an amount that actually hit her umbrella policy (which I advised her she should have) for $150k. Boggles my mind that the insurance company settled for an amount that large, but they knew the driver of the car at fault was a deadbeat and they probably wouldn’t be able to recoup any of the legal costs.Thumbs up. And I'm not saying the NFL isn't guilty, just pointing out the NFL has other legitimate reason to settle that seem to be completely lost on quite a few people in here.
The chances of him proving everything that was needed to void the CBA was slim to none. If he has that kind of evidence he’s not settling, ever.It was about money for both sides.
Kaepernick wanted to recover the money he would have earned if he hadn't been cut.
The NFL wanted to retain the money that they would have lost if the CBA had been voided.
So, the NFL ended up paying $80 million to avoid losing potentially billions. Maybe they consider that to be a good deal, but it's still a disaster. They could have convinced the Cardinals or some other loser team to sign him to the veteran's minimum and then cut him after a year, and they would have saved themselves $75 million.
Right. One guy at Bleacher Report gathered up all of the speculation and teeeted out a range. Really reliable.https://247sports.com/nfl/san-francisco-49ers/Article/Colin-Kaepernick-collusion-case-settlement-amount-NFL-129142821/
That being said, there are multiple figures around the NFL that have a rough estimate of how much money Kaepernick actually received in this settlement. According to Mike Freeman of Bleacher/Report, NFL team officials are speculating that the former 49ers quarterback was paid in the range of $60 to $80 million. He continued to say that it wasn't an official figure, but all of the speculation voiced by the NFL higher-ups agreed on this range.
It is not just one guy at Bleacher saying this. That has been a consistent range I have seen from other links discussing this.Right. One guy at Bleacher Report gathered up all of the speculation and teeeted out a range. Really reliable.
We have no idea what the number is. There’s an NDA.
Could you please share them? Not doubting you, just wondering if they mostly stem from Mike Freeman's report. As a side note, apparently Freeman made the news cycle many years back for lying about his credentials.It is not just one guy at Bleacher saying this. That has been a consistent range I have seen from other links discussing this.
So it was all about the money! Just kidding. It's my opinion Keap gave up a lot more in the NDA and the amount of money while large to normal people is meaningless to the NFL. Therefore victory to the NFL. And they got it done in the off season so it's not talked about all next year. That alone pays for itself.I assure you, it’s not lost on me. One of my clients was in a major car accident, other party was 100% at fault, but the passenger in the other car died. The deceased person’s family ended up suing my client and the insurance company settled on an amount that actually hit her umbrella policy (which I advised her she should have) for $150k. Boggles my mind that the insurance company settled for an amount that large, but they knew the driver of the car at fault was a deadbeat and they probably wouldn’t be able to recoup any of the legal costs.
Everything I have read references the same guy.Could you please share them? Not doubting you, just wondering if they mostly stem from Mike Freeman's report. As a side note, apparently Freeman made the news cycle many years back for lying about his credentials.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/2004/01/10/puffed-up-resume-costs-sportswriter-a-new-job/614e71c1-4e6a-40a7-9d2e-dbc1750d69fc/
I just recall seeing this from multiple sources, and I don't recall them all quoting Mike Freeman, although that could be possible. It seems a reasonable figure given what Kaep would have gotten in damages for estimated lost QB pay given that the amount would be calculated by an arbitrator, who has a duty to reach a fair settlement for both sides. It stands to reason it would take an outrageous sum of that amount to buy Kaep's silence, and make him go away and never ever discuss this again.Could you please share them? Not doubting you, just wondering if they mostly stem from Mike Freeman's report. As a side note, apparently Freeman made the news cycle many years back for lying about his credentials.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/2004/01/10/puffed-up-resume-costs-sportswriter-a-new-job/614e71c1-4e6a-40a7-9d2e-dbc1750d69fc/
Straw Man. It was not claimed that the settlement amount was leaked.So within hours of the settlement the amount leaked is credible but after two years there’s nothing about collusion. Good times.
If he got $80M, then it was way more than "going away" money. He wouldn't have earned that much from the 49ers contract that he voided.The chances of him proving everything that was needed to void the CBA was slim to none. If he has that kind of evidence he’s not settling, ever.It was about money for both sides.
Kaepernick wanted to recover the money he would have earned if he hadn't been cut.
The NFL wanted to retain the money that they would have lost if the CBA had been voided.
So, the NFL ended up paying $80 million to avoid losing potentially billions. Maybe they consider that to be a good deal, but it's still a disaster. They could have convinced the Cardinals or some other loser team to sign him to the veteran's minimum and then cut him after a year, and they would have saved themselves $75 million.
Like I said above, he got ‘go away’ money and that’s what he wanted.
I think the main thing that he wanted was the money that he would have earned if he hadn't been cut. He got that and much more.Like I said above, he got ‘go away’ money and that’s what he wanted.