Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
  • 0
Jlp0019

L. Miller and K. Allen for 1.2 and 1.6?

Question

I was offered L. Miller and K. Allen for 1.2 and 1.6? This is a 12 team league. 

Can Start 2-5 RB's and 3-6 WR's

I have Hill, Lacy, Gordon, Forte, Rawls,  and Conley, Crowder Diggs, Garcon, Eli Rogers, and D. Thomas. 

 

Would you keep the picks,  or take the players.

Edited by Jlp0019

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

19 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I think you are over paying a bit but it's not horrible.  I think I would keep the picks though.  At 1.2 you can get one of the top 2 RB if you would like and at 1.6 I think 1 WR and 4 RB are gone so a lot of talent available there as well.  I think Miller and 1.02 are pretty close and that part would be worth considering but I have a hard time giving up 1.6 for Allen because he just hasn't stayed healthy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I have to disagree...I believe miller is as good or better than any rb in this class (his situation not necessarily his talent) and no wr u get will b better than Keenan ...yes he has health issues but they r bad luck issues not soft tissue ie  hamstring...I take the players and not hope on picks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I think the offer is pretty fair. Talent wise, I take the players, but we all know about Allen and his health issues. Since you were offered the trade, I would try to get a little more. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I would go with the player side of the deal.  You know the players will perform very well at the NFL level.  There is no guarantee the picks will pan out.  Granted, I usually undervalue draft picks more than most so this would be an easy choice for me to take Miller and Allen.  I am not too worried about Allen's injury history because most of them have been somewhat strange (lacerated kidney) or unlucky (ACL).  It is not like he has chronic hamstring issues.

 

I take the players and am happy with it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I think the offer is relatively fair.  I would rather have the rookie RB than Miller but prefer Allen to 1.06.  So I personally would counter with just Allen for 1.06.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I stated in my post that it was reasonable.  My biggest issue against it is I don't think Miller and Allen make this team strong enough to be a contender for a championship so I'll take the younger pieces.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
24 minutes ago, Warhogs said:

I stated in my post that it was reasonable.  My biggest issue against it is I don't think Miller and Allen make this team strong enough to be a contender for a championship so I'll take the younger pieces.

Without knowing the rest of his roster it's hard to tell if he has a elite qb and te I believe he could compete

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Details are limited and depending on those spots he could compete if everyone stays healthy but the RB and WR depth on that roster look weak.  It looks like you start 8.  

Gordon

DT

Crowder

Garcon

Diggs

pick 1.2 or Miller

pick 1.6 or Allen

Lacy?

Not the worst but decent and a bench of Forte, Rawls, Conley and Eli Rogers. That isn't much of a bench.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

It's a pretty fair deal.  So it's simple.  If you think Miller and Allen vault you into title contention NOW, then take the deal.  If you're still rebuilding, keep the picks.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
52 minutes ago, Warhogs said:

Details are limited and depending on those spots he could compete if everyone stays healthy but the RB and WR depth on that roster look weak.  It looks like you start 8.  

Gordon

DT

Crowder

Garcon

Diggs

pick 1.2 or Miller

pick 1.6 or Allen

Lacy?

Not the worst but decent and a bench of Forte, Rawls, Conley and Eli Rogers. That isn't much of a bench.

I'm assuming that's Melvin Gordon right..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
  • 0

Picks for me, not close. I expect Miller to post better numbers with Osweiler gone but he's 5 years older than the very solid prospect RB you can draft now. I wouldn't want anything to do with Allen after the Chargers just spent a top 10 pick on MWilliams.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
6 hours ago, Warhogs said:

I stated in my post that it was reasonable.  My biggest issue against it is I don't think Miller and Allen make this team strong enough to be a contender for a championship so I'll take the younger pieces.

It's close, but this.^^^  

Yea, the trade rounds out your RB's but I don't see you winning the championship with Allen, DT... and ? at #3 WR.  And you've got some QB and TE issues to boot.  Miller and Allen are relatively young, but have their own faults to the point where I prefer the picks and the youth they bring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.