Bruce Dickinson
Footballguy
We were looking for "John Barron"... Judges?.... They say "Close Enough"!Pickles?
Mister CIA gets the points and control of the board.
We were looking for "John Barron"... Judges?.... They say "Close Enough"!Pickles?
I'll take smelly gibbons for $400.We were looking for "John Barron"... Judges?.... They say "Close Enough"!
Mister CIA gets the points and control of the board.
I love Mooch's "I made a mistake in trusting in a reporter. It won't happen again" declaration so much. Mooch felt betrayed by these quotes getting printed when the purpose of his call was to harass a reporter to reveal a source. If he thought the call was off the record, then he was leaking a bunch of information to a reporter.Like, who knew the guy was gonna print it? I was ####### blowing off steam!
Those are really good. I feel like memes and shtick still have the ability to bring us together as a nation.
And a suitSo so so in. Reminds me a bit of The Fonz if you added the good coke and sprinkled in more anger.
Sad!Serious question @Joe Bryant - how are we supposed to deal with this significant administration member's quotes without violating the rules laid out in your manifesto?
Digging many of these way more than I should.
Someone get this...Now.Breuer imitating Pesci doing The Mooch tweets sounds pretty freakin' awesome.
White House history?Serious question. You guys are WAY more versed in political history than I am. Is there anyone in White House history that remotely approaches this level of the stuff Scaramucci said there? I'm fully aware my style of running a business or life is far from the rough and tumble Long Island business style. Fully get that. Donald Trump dislike aside, how far out of the norm was this?
My first thought is this was off the charts. But I don't know. i honestly can't name that many WH Communications Directors over the last 50 years.
So I'm asking how far out of the norm is this? Anyone remotely close?
I'd say the closest is probably Rahm Emmanuel, but he was Chief of Staff, not Communications. And Mooch is about 10x crazier so far.Serious question. You guys are WAY more versed in political history than I am. Is there anyone in White House history that remotely approaches this level of the stuff Scaramucci said there? I'm fully aware my style of running a business or life is far from the rough and tumble Long Island business style. Fully get that. Donald Trump dislike aside, how far out of the norm was this?
My first thought is this was off the charts. But I don't know. i honestly can't name that many WH Communications Directors over the last 50 years.
So I'm asking how far out of the norm is this? Anyone remotely close?
Rahm is smart enough to do his profanity-laced tirades behind closed doors. There's a long history of people like that -- I think LBJ is a prominent example. But those guys were generally effective at getting what they wanted with those strategies.I'd say the closest is probably Rahm Emmanuel, but he was Chief of Staff, not Communications. And Mooch is about 10x crazier so far.
Steve Castle: There are two kinds of people: sheep and sharks. Anyone who is a sheep is fired. Who is a sheep?
Dr. Zoidberg: Errr, excuse me... which is the one people like to hug?
Steve Castle: Gutsy question. You're a shark. Sharks are winners, and they don't look back because they have no necks. Necks are for sheep.
Steve Castle: Package delivery? Oh, God! [He covers his face.] Fantastic! Now, the first order of business is to blame everything on the guy before me. Professor?
Steve Castle: OK, let's work on your execu-speak. I'm worried about "blank".
Fry: Don't you worry about "blank". Let me worry about "blank".
Steve Castle: Good. I also would have accepted, "Blank? Blank? You're not looking at the big picture!"
Thanks. I edited my post to include other positions.I'd say the closest is probably Rahm Emmanuel, but he was Chief of Staff, not Communications. And Mooch is about 10x crazier so far.
No, no one is close.am. Is there anyone in White House history that remotely approaches this level of the stuff Scaramucci said there?
Staffers are a bit like offensive linemen. When everyone starts talking about you, you're probably doing a terrible job.Thanks. I edited my post to include other positions.
Where I'm going with this is I'm asking my conservative friends what they make of it. And I don't know enough about WH Staff history to know there.
My kind of mental gymnastics.No, no one is close.
Mooch speaks for the President, he is communications director for the White House, the nerve center of United States government. What he says is US policy. No president has ever attacked his own AG, his own chief of staff, his ow cabinet. It's like someone stabbing themselves in the arm and leg, so no we have never had this.
Actually there was Andrew Johnson, who got impeached for it.
It's an abomination of everything that is great about our political history.Thanks. I edited my post to include other positions.
Where I'm going with this is I'm asking my conservative friends what they make of it. And I don't know enough about WH Staff history to know there.
More on point."The Mooch did his homework"
Kudos to The Daily Show for putting this together.
(and to The Mooch for retweeting it)
I only know this because we saw Hamilton and have been listening to the soundtrack nonstop for the past monthMy kind of mental gymnastics.
I think you can make a pretty good argument that Thomas Jefferson might be up there. As Secretary of State he openly rebelled against the sitting President and bankrolled a newspaper behind the scenes to attack the administration that he was a part of. Jefferson wrote to Madison basically outlining his plan to do it in 19th century parlance.
As Vice President he openly feuded with John Adams when John was President. We basically didn't have an effective Vice President during that time, not that the office meant much back then. And John Adams as President ignored his cabinet and openly warred with them, but that was his own fault for keeping Washington's allies and not getting his own.
You could add Secretary Edwin Stanton during Lincoln's term, but only in a very small period of time, from when Lincoln was shot until Booth and his co-conspirators were killed. Stanton took control of the country at the moment and basically, though not formally, declared martial law without the power to do it and ran the government. But, in his defense, there was no functioning government in that moment as Lincoln was dying, Johnson was drunk, Sewerd was feared dead and Grant wasn't in Washington. Looking back through history, Stanton is admired for how he handled everything and it's hard to attack him for it.
In more recent times you have the idiocy of Secretary Alexander Haig after Reagan was shot. What he said and did in the 48 hours after the shots were fired were as close to criminal treason as a cabinet member could get without just declaring himself king.
I can't think of any press directors though. It's a relatively new position and a creation of the media establishment of the 20th century. Most of them aren't and haven't been insane. Of course, this administration takes the cake. But for members of an administration that rise to the level of Mooch and his current 21st century version of craziness, I'd be willing to argue that Thomas Jefferson was just as bad, and potentially worse.
Let's keep in mind that's before there were formally 2 parties and we had split coalition government in the executive branch as a rule. Ultimately the VP was made the same party as the president and the split executive government model was considered ineffective for just that reason, infighting was inevitable and damaging. Look at Aaron Burr, I think that would be the only example of anything like or worse than this. Again, that's why we changed the system. However this shows how the Republicans did not elect an actual Republican. The people TrumpMooch are attacking are solid, true, party Republicans, not anyone else.Thomas Jefferson
Very true. It was definitely one of the failings of the original text of the Article II executive. However, there were a rather large amount of unwritten gentlemen rules in 18th and 19th century politics in this country. Jefferson broke them all. Now, save for his abysmal failures that led to the War of 1812, he isn't exactly judged poorly for it because what he ended up doing was create a political dynasty that stretched to Jackson.I only know this because we saw Hamilton and have been listening to the soundtrack nonstop for the past month
the difference with Jefferson as VP is that he wasn't "chosen" for that position by the president. He came in 2nd and was therefore named VP. So he absolutely was a rival of John Adams through the election and thereafter.
and that's what I learned from a musical about the man who invented the Treasury Dept.
Earl Butz? His most famous quote cannot be reproduced here under the board moderation policy. Not the Press Secretary, but in the Administration.Serious question. You guys are WAY more versed in political history than I am. Is there anyone in White House history that remotely approaches this level of the stuff Scaramucci said there? I'm fully aware my style of running a business or life is far from the rough and tumble Long Island business style. Fully get that. Donald Trump dislike aside, how far out of the norm was this?
My first thought is this was off the charts. But I don't know. i honestly can't name that many WH Communications Directors or other positions over the last 50 years.
So I'm asking how far out of the norm is this for someone in such a prominent WH position? Anyone remotely close?
This is John McCain's style. Over the top with vulgarities. Part of the reason McCain hated Mitt was because Romney never swore and of course never drank alcohol.Rahm is smart enough to do his profanity-laced tirades behind closed doors. There's a long history of people like that -- I think LBJ is a prominent example. But those guys were generally effective at getting what they wanted with those strategies.
Love the new Kelly Anne Conway avatar.This is John McCain's style. Over the top with vulgarities. Part of the reason McCain hated Mitt was because Romney never swore and of course never drank alcohol.
Nixon had a really bad mouth but he didn't speak this way to the press or public.Serious question. You guys are WAY more versed in political history than I am. Is there anyone in White House history that remotely approaches this level of the stuff Scaramucci said there? I'm fully aware my style of running a business or life is far from the rough and tumble Long Island business style. Fully get that. Donald Trump dislike aside, how far out of the norm was this?
My first thought is this was off the charts. But I don't know. i honestly can't name that many WH Communications Directors or other positions over the last 50 years.
So I'm asking how far out of the norm is this for someone in such a prominent WH position? Anyone remotely close?
:reported:Love the new Kelly Anne Conway avatar.
My apologies. I was on a mobile. I've switched to a computer now and can clearly see it's Herman Munster in drag.:reported:
not fair to my avatar
I've heard the same. In fact I recall literally hearing some of the Nixon stuff. Definitely would get him a timeout here.My understanding is that both the Nixon and LBJ tapes were filthy, but that's private deliberations.
Im going to give you a mulligan on the Mr FordMy apologies. I was on a mobile. I've switched to a computer now and can clearly see it's Herman Munster in drag.
We can call it a "Ronson" in this instance, I think.Im going to give you a mulligan on the Mr Ford
There is a time-honored tradition of politicos going off on foul-mouthed tirades to a reporter. Usually those tirades are not reported because they are off-the-record. This tirade was NOT off-the-record, likely because Scaramucci was not savvy enough to tell the reporter to keep it off the record.Serious question. You guys are WAY more versed in political history than I am. Is there anyone in White House history that remotely approaches this level of the stuff Scaramucci said there? I'm fully aware my style of running a business or life is far from the rough and tumble Long Island business style. Fully get that. Donald Trump dislike aside, how far out of the norm was this?
My first thought is this was off the charts. But I don't know. i honestly can't name that many WH Communications Directors or other positions over the last 50 years.
So I'm asking how far out of the norm is this for someone in such a prominent WH position? Anyone remotely close?
Do you have a link?NY Post reporting that Trump loved Scaramucci's rant. Which doesn't surprise me at all.
I doubt it, the scales weren't tipped after the Access Hollywood video was released and it was dismissed as "locker room talk" - and there are people in this forum still cheering the selection of Scaramucci. I don't know where the tipping point is for some, but I don't think that would be it.If Trump comes out officially in support of Scaramucci like his son did, I think that might finally tip the scales for some people. "Sources say" are one thing. But when it's clear for the world to see like https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/890900449422974976 is something else.
Probably right. But I do think it's a little different now as the Access Hollywood thing did have some reacting like our Governor Bill Haslam who said Trump should drop out the race. But most I saw were more on the "stay the course" we have to defeat Hillary angle. This feels a little different as it's not a contest anymore. They can pull back support and there guy has still won. But that's probably thinking too simply on my part.I doubt it, the scales weren't tipped after the Access Hollywood video was released and it was dismissed as "locker room talk" - and there are people in this forum still cheering the selection of Scaramucci. I don't know where the tipping point is for some, but I don't think that would be it.
There's a difference ?My apologies. I was on a mobile. I've switched to a computer now and can clearly see it's Herman Munster in drag.