Why can't we be more like Iraq, Turks and Caicos, Cote D'Ivoire, Nauru (WTF is this?) and Ethiopia?!!"in the last 10 years our economy has only grown about 2% a year. You look at other countries and you at look at what their GDP is and they're unhappy when it is at 7,8,9%. And I speak to the leaders of the countries and they ask how we're doing, not well, not well. Why? GDP is down to 7% and I say we were down to 1% just a couple of months ago and we're going to change that around folks".
"not many people know that."He just claimed that Route 66 started in Springfield MO.
Well there ya go, you answered your own question. Previous homeowners would be grandfathered in. It would be rolled out over a number of years.How could you possible do away with this now? It's baked into the price of houses. You'd have to slowly unwind it over like 10 years or more to effectively do it in such a way that homeowners don't get screwed.
Hold on here I'm closing in a few weeksWell there ya go, you answered your own question. Previous homeowners would be grandfathered in. It would be rolled out over a number of years.
I hope he starts getting all the Springfield's confused, and starts talking about the Basketball Hall of Fame and their rivalry with Shelbyville.He just claimed that Route 66 started in Springfield MO.
So I guess nobody paid any attention to what happened in Kansas?Reagan cut corporate taxes and things just went......beautifully.
Pfffftttt...what does Buffet and his $75 billion know?He also said GDP can go MUCH higher than 3%. I saw and interview this morning with Warren Buffett this morning and he thinks we'll be at 2% for some time. Sooo......
If Buffett was so smart then HE would be president.Pfffftttt...what does Buffet and his $75 billion know?
We actually need @NCCommish for this job.tim why should eliminating the mortgage deduction credit be on the table fill us in bromigo
The trickle-down theory and the word "peon" come from the same source.Is this going to be one of those times where people try to tell us that cutting tax rates at the top help the lower end somehow?
most people in america do not have the largest mortgages and it helps the hell out of dummies like me and everyone i know you do this you would literally crush me at tax time brohan and most of the other guys on the floor if you dont like the rich guys getting fatter thats one thing but thats throwing the baby out with the bathwater if you ask me take that to the bank brochachosWe actually need @NCCommish for this job.tim why should eliminating the mortgage deduction credit be on the table fill us in bromigo
Basically, it's an unnecessary giveaway to those with the largest mortgages.
He doesn't care . It's the have & have nots. Pure jealousy.He wants to punish you because own a homemost people in america do not have the largest mortgages and it helps the hell out of dummies like me and everyone i know you do this you would literally crush me at tax time brohan and most of the other guys on the floor if you dont like the rich guys getting fatter thats one thing but thats throwing the baby out with the bathwater if you ask me take that to the bank brochachos
He can't even sound coherent with a teleprompter. SADGood lord that speech was a
I'm sorry, gb, basic tax math doesn't support your statement.most people in america do not have the largest mortgages and it helps the hell out of dummies like me and everyone i know you do this you would literally crush me at tax time brohan and most of the other guys on the floor if you dont like the rich guys getting fatter thats one thing but thats throwing the baby out with the bathwater if you ask me take that to the bank brochachos
Sorry, been working.tim why should eliminating the mortgage deduction credit be on the table fill us in bromigo
It depends on the details. There's also talk about increasing the standard deduction. If that gets increased enough, you may have not needed to itemize in the first place, bromingo.no im pretty sure that if you take away the mortgage deduction that id be hurtin i am not sure what you are getting at i mean i am not smart but i do my own taxes and i feel pretty sure about that one take that to the bank brohan
Forbes arguing why it needs to go.most people in america do not have the largest mortgages and it helps the hell out of dummies like me and everyone i know you do this you would literally crush me at tax time brohan and most of the other guys on the floor if you dont like the rich guys getting fatter thats one thing but thats throwing the baby out with the bathwater if you ask me take that to the bank brochachos
100,000 is upper middle class?Sorry, been working.
There's a lot of people who can answer this better than I can. I'm somewhat new to the subject, but my understanding is that people who earn $100,000 or more receive around 90% of the benefit, while poorer rent owners can't become home-owners. It's essentially a subsidy for the upper middle class and the wealthy.
But in any case, it's not really worth talking about since it's not going anywhere.
I don't see why anyone would think whatever harebrained idea Trump has will help them, unless they are multimillionaires.Prediction: "Tax reform" hurts individuals and helps corporations.
If they can figure out how to do this without crashing the housing market it may be doable. That market is very sensitive to inputs, though, so it's a tough one to get right.Sorry, been working.
There's a lot of people who can answer this better than I can. I'm somewhat new to the subject, but my understanding is that people who earn $100,000 or more receive around 90% of the benefit, while poorer rent owners can't become home-owners. It's essentially a subsidy for the upper middle class and the wealthy.
But in any case, it's not really worth talking about since it's not going anywhere.
If Congress could put something together that removed deductions for large corporations that have gamed the system and reduce the effective tax rate for small business we'd see some dramatic results. Small business drives this economy and they tend to pay "retail" taxes while large corporations have lobbyists to carve them out exemptions.Reducing the corporate tax rate, while removing some of the deductions, makes sense to me- in general. Of course, the devil is in the details, I don't know what those details are, and I highly doubt we'll find out today or anytime soon.
GDP did just hit 3%. Buffett said it just felt like 2%.He also said GDP can go MUCH higher than 3%. I saw and interview this morning with Warren Buffett this morning and he thinks we'll be at 2% for some time. Sooo......
Definitely something that should be done. The way we tax this is pretty crazy."Fourth and finally we want to bring back money from overseas."
So, he paid lip service to this but no details? Only detail was lowering the corporate tax rate to 15%?"The third principle in tax reform is tax relief for middle class families. In a way and I've been saying this for a long time but they have been the forgotten people but they won't be forgotten any longer I'll tell you that. We will lower taxes for middle income Americans so they can keep more of their hard earned paychecks and they can do a lot of things with those hard earned paychecks. And that really means buying products, ideally things made in this country, but that means they will go out and spend their money and it will be a beautiful thing to watch. This includes helping parents afford child care and the costs of raising of a family that is so important to Ivanka Trump. Very important to everyone in this room but so important to my daughter."
If they can figure out how to do this without crashing the housing market it may be doable. That market is very sensitive to inputs, though, so it's a tough one to get right.
If Congress could put something together that removed deductions for large corporations that have gamed the system and reduce the effective tax rate for small business we'd see some dramatic results. Small business drives this economy and they tend to pay "retail" taxes while large corporations have lobbyists to carve them out exemptions.
GDP did just hit 3%. Buffett said it just felt like 2%.
Definitely something that should be done. The way we tax this is pretty crazy.
"Billionaire investor Warren Buffett says it still feels more like a 2% economy to him despite the government today boosting its second-quarter GDP growth estimate to 3%. I would guess we are in a 2% growth economy now. Every now and then we think we are accelerating, and every now and then that maybe there's a double dip. It just seems to be a couple of percent."
I'ts always an estimate. They #### with the numbers for years after."Billionaire investor Warren Buffett says it still feels more like a 2% economy to him despite the government today boosting its second-quarter GDP growthestimate to 3%. I would guess we are in a 2% growth economy now. Every now and then we think we are accelerating, and every now and then that maybe there's a double dip. It just seems to be a couple of percent."
Exactly.I'ts always an estimate. They #### with the numbers for years after.
The consumer pays all taxes, so lowering this isn't really such a bad idea. It won't end up at 15% (always start negotiations tilted in your favor), but even 20-25% would be a huge boon for employment and small business growth here. It's one of the ideas that really should be enacted in some shape or form.So, he paid lip service to this but no details? Only detail was lowering the corporate tax rate to 15%?
WHAT COULD GO WRONG?!
Oh, Kansas? Right...
The fact that these statements were met with polite applause is telling.So, he paid lip service to this but no details? Only detail was lowering the corporate tax rate to 15%?
WHAT COULD GO WRONG?!
Oh, Kansas? Right...
Missed this.SHOUT OUTS!!!!
But Trump on Wednesday raised eyebrows when he thanked several members of his team by name and left Cohn -- who traveled with Trump to Missouri on Wednesday -- off the thank you list.
"Anybody I forget?" Trump said, before moving on with his speech.
What's the concern? If the mortgage interest deduction goes away, buyers will spend less on houses, driving down prices and lowering home values?If they can figure out how to do this without crashing the housing market it may be doable. That market is very sensitive to inputs, though, so it's a tough one to get right.
Everyone loses value on their home and goes underwater on their mortgage?What's the concern? If the mortgage interest deduction goes away, buyers will spend less on houses, driving down prices and lowering home values?
Pretty much. It leads to rich people building huge houses which is why realtors love it and lobby to keep it. Most middle class filers don't even try to get it. And for those that do the return is minimal.We actually need @NCCommish for this job.
Basically, it's an unnecessary giveaway to those with the largest mortgages.