NREC34
Footballguy
Yes. Hope he’s successful on this.timschochet said:Bump. No thoughts on this? I think President Trump is doing some good work here.
Yes. Hope he’s successful on this.timschochet said:Bump. No thoughts on this? I think President Trump is doing some good work here.
Probably shouldn't cuz, you know.....but, I'm gonna go ahead and give credit for getting the relief bill passed.
The anit-socialist GOPers have to be pissed though.
This is where i was until i realized basically NO ONE plays the retail and the price of a drug could be 1000 different prices for 1000 different insurance plans. It's probably the smallest step forward i could imagine.I'm all for this pressure on the health-care industry to be up front with pricing.
That and the fact that Trump seems to have a strategy of figuring out what the democrats are willing to agree on, and then refusing to work on those things until they stop investigating him. He's a child.This is where i was until i realized basically NO ONE plays the retail and the price of a drug could be 1000 different prices for 1000 different insurance plans. It's probably the smallest step forward i could imagine.
Probably to allow states to get Lethal Injections drugs from overseas...Notably he proposed allowing certain states to purchase prescription drugs from abroad- depending on the details that would be a very big deal, but why only certain states
What do you want us to say? The 10,000 foot goal is great. If we've learned anything, the devil's in the details. Until we get any sort of meaningful legislation out of this administration (hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha) we have to just sit here and waitBump. No thoughts on this? I think President Trump is doing some good work here.
You might want to read a little more about that agreement. Turns out there was NO result at all that wasn’t already agreed to before the threat of tariffs.Took me a while to find this thread. Two weeks of silence. I’m mildly surprised given the news about the Mexico gambit. I will say that Trump exercised his power well in this instance. Issuing a credible threat, he got a reasonable (albeit small) result with the threat of a tariff. While he may underestimate the damage done to US-Mexico relations in the long run, to get a quick “win” like he did was impressive.
Will do. Thanks.You might want to read a little more about that agreement. Turns out there was NO result at all that wasn’t already agreed to before the threat of tariffs.
I agree, Trump has done a nice job on this.Yesterday President Trump offered a series of new proposals to reduce health care costs:
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/09/trump-takes-on-surprise-medical-bills-in-push-to-lower-health-costs.html?recirc=taboolainternal
Notably he proposed allowing certain states to purchase prescription drugs from abroad- depending on the details that would be a very big deal, but why only certain states? At least some of this is bipartisan. I very much like that Trump is moving in this direction, even though if he is successful it’s the sort of thing that could help him get re-elected.
In no place is this more true than Israel/Palestine. By formally recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, I believe President Trump has guaranteed bloodshed for a whole new generation.I don’t think the fact that we haven’t entered new wars absolves him of the fact he may have increased the risk of new wars, which he has. We live with that every day. We have been fortunate, but overall the world is a riskier and more dangerous place because of him.
Donald Trump’s Huawei ban could backfire badly.I like the handling Huwei, and banning their 5G implementation in the US.
Well, handing over our entire cellular infrastructure to the Chinese government is much worse than Google having android sales issues.Donald Trump’s Huawei ban could backfire badly.
Google understands the risk to its dominance. It has just asked for the Android operating system to be exempted from the export ban. But it may be too late. Even if the Trump administration agrees or it lifts the ban as part of a broader trade deal, the Rubicon has been crossed, and the risk to Huawei and other Chinese companies has become visible.
It seems that some of the fronts on which antiwar folks have a problem with Trump- bombing Damascus and sanctioning Syria and backing Syrian rebels, sanctions and blatant provocations against Venezuela as a pretext for regime change, a more confrontational posture against Russia (and withdrawal from the INF treaty, which NATO supported)- have broad support among his supposed detractors. The neoconservatives have been pushing for an arms race with Russia for a long time, long before 2016; they were some of the loudest promulgators of Russia hysteria that certain people fell for. It could easily lead to full-blown war.I don’t think the fact that we haven’t entered new wars absolves him of the fact he may have increased the risk of new wars, which he has. We live with that every day. We have been fortunate, but overall the world is a riskier and more dangerous place because of him.
Except that King’s most recent comments, the ones which finally got him into trouble after so many years, were nothing new. King had made just as awful and blatant bigoted and racist comments for years, and Trump has publicly praised and embraced the guy.Ok, even I will concede this was the right decision by the White House:
Kyle GriffinVerified account @kylegriffin1 2h2 hours ago
The White House wouldn't allow Steve King to fly today with Trump on Air Force One. Trump was traveling to Iowa. King, who reps part of Iowa, asked to join Trump's entourage. Admin officials rejected the request.
We can only hope.I think I may have just awakened to what will go down as Trump's greatest contribution as U.S. President. He is putting on full display all of the various abuses of power, shameful turning of cheek, and lack of oversight that his predecessors in this office have enjoyed to varying degrees. Surely his successors, regardless of their party affiliation, will no longer partake in the same shadowy behavior. I mean, we Americans certainly aren't hypocrites. As soon as this guy is gone, future Presidents will have no choice but to be completely transparent and accountable. No more of this two or more Presidents did the same despicable things but only one is called to task for it. What a bright future that lies ahead.
You’re right, except I fear they are simply setting new precedent and will get away with millions more in their pockets, and we will see no change as whoever is in power continues to abuse it.I think I may have just awakened to what will go down as Trump's greatest contribution as U.S. President. He is putting on full display all of the various abuses of power, shameful turning of cheek, and lack of oversight that his predecessors in this office have enjoyed to varying degrees. Surely his successors, regardless of their party affiliation, will no longer partake in the same shadowy behavior. I mean, we Americans certainly aren't hypocrites. As soon as this guy is gone, future Presidents will have no choice but to be completely transparent and accountable. No more of this two or more Presidents did the same despicable things but only one is called to task for it. What a bright future that lies ahead.
You think this was about morals or optics? If King was a beautiful woman or rich (or both), he’d have been welcomed on board.Ok, even I will concede this was the right decision by the White House:
Kyle GriffinVerified account @kylegriffin1 2h2 hours ago
The White House wouldn't allow Steve King to fly today with Trump on Air Force One. Trump was traveling to Iowa. King, who reps part of Iowa, asked to join Trump's entourage. Admin officials rejected the request.
Definitely positive for the administration to push this.
This definitely sounds like a good thing but I can't help but picture Trump as Mr. Burns speculating where he is going to get some blood & organs of the young.Definitely positive for the administration to push this.
Where did you go for the lobsters? The precise location is a closely guarded secret for some.From a PURELY selfish perspective, his negative impacts on the lobster industry here in Florida yielded the easiest mini-season I've ever done. We had our quota in about an hour (30 per day). Going back when the regular season opens and stockpiling the freezer
From a PURELY selfish perspective, his negative impacts on the lobster industry here in Florida yielded the easiest mini-season I've ever done. We had our quota in about an hour (30 per day). Going back when the regular season opens and stockpiling the freezer
Boat GPS coordinance are left in wills....I am NOT kidding. We go into the keys. My FIL has a house on Big Pine Key. We've begun marking holes there, but he has a friend that we go with also and he goes into the channel off Cudjo Key...that's an experience. Depending on the tide, the current can be moving at 10-12 mph....it's crazy.Where did you go for the lobsters? The precise location is a closely guarded secret for some.
In Florida we have spiny lobster....not the lobsters with the pinchers. You're basically after the tail meat. It's all around better than the cold water lobster IMO....sweeter and if cooked right not as mushy. Anyway....we have a mini-season which is the last Wed and Thurs of July that recreational divers can go diving before the main season starts a couple weeks after.I don't know what any of this means. Can you explain to someone who just barely knows that the delicious lobster he eats actually lives in water?
The old song lyricsI laughed. Another great band name.
I tried to buy that shirt at the Picasso museum in Barcelona. Alas, none were big enough for me.I agree with him on windmills. Tilt at ‘em.