Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I'm big on quality over quantity in fantasy so I'd take Bell's side. The higher end your players are, the easier it is to start players and when new player bursts onto the scene, you'll have room to start him next to Bell instead of picking 2 of 3 equal backs.
Russ Wilson
Doug Martin
Devonta Freeman
AJ Green
Chris Hogan
Zach Ertz
Duke Johnson
Butker
Bengals
Bench:
Golden Tate
Ted Ginn
Deandre Washington
Jalen Richard
IR: Corey Coleman.
Didn't give team because I didn't want to give away what side I was getting. I feel the upgrade from Doug to Bell most often outweighs the downgrade from Hogan to Marvin, Ginn or Tate. Looking to see if I'm in the minority, and whether or not people find this deal to be "fair". Thanks!
I do care about "fair". That said I think this deal is obviously "fair". Also no chance I'd drop Jones. I'd start him over Ginn this week assuming Tate is out. Thanks again!
You seem pretty biased. No offense meant, I just don't see how one could say that about either side involved in this trade. Would you mind explaining your reasoning?
I tallied up the Value ratings from the Top 200 Going Forward, which accounts for scarcity & the impact an elite player will have RoS. The side getting Bell wins this trade, and it’s not close. Put another way, if it was a 3-for-1 trade, it’s still Side A (receiving Bell) by a considerable margin.
I tallied up the Value ratings from the Top 200 Going Forward, which accounts for scarcity & the impact an elite player will have RoS. The side getting Bell wins this trade, and it’s not close. Put another way, if it was a 3-for-1 trade, it’s still Side A (receiving Bell) by a considerable margin.
Interesting. Can't say I'm familiar with this tool or it's biases though. Much like everyone else it probably underrates both Hogan and Duke. They aren't going away.
I tallied up the Value ratings from the Top 200 Going Forward, which accounts for scarcity & the impact an elite player will have RoS. The side getting Bell wins this trade, and it’s not close. Put another way, if it was a 3-for-1 trade, it’s still Side A (receiving Bell) by a considerable margin.
Interesting. Can't say I'm familiar with this tool or it's biases though. Much like everyone else it probably underrates both Hogan and Duke. They aren't going away.
The value rating is data driven and is a derivative of Value Based Drafting, which 15-20 years led Joe Bryant to create FBGs. It introduced now common concepts about positional scarcity. It remains a valuable method for drafting and comparing the relative value of players across different positions.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.