...and not pay taxesThe church leaders made the decision to relocate both plaques (one honoring Washington, the other other honoring Robert E. Lee). I don't agree with their decision, but I respect their Constitutional right to do what they did.
I guess what bothers me is that they had to even think about it. I mean, now the father of our country makes people feel unsafe, in a church? Because of a plaque??It really doesn't bother me as it is an organization deciding to do it on their own. They are not being forced.
If white supremacists were raising a stink about potentially removing the Robert E. Lee plaque, then I could see why people might feel unsafe going to that church.I guess what bothers me is that they had to even think about it. I mean, now the father of our country makes people feel unsafe, in a church? Because of a plaque??
Not sure what that has to do with the Washington plaque? The article mentioned specifically that people felt unwelcome and unsafe because of that plaque.If white supremacists were raising a stink about potentially removing the Robert E. Lee plaque, then I could see why people might feel unsafe going to that church.
Actually the church stated that "the plaques" made some people feel unsafe or unwelcome. Notice the emphasis on plural.Not sure what that has to do with the Washington plaque? The article mentioned specifically that people felt unwelcome and unsafe because of that plaque.
I don't know why, but this made meI thought this was going to be a yelling at the sky thread
I was going by the text in the article, which stated:Actually the church stated that "the plaques" made some people feel unsafe or unwelcome. Notice the emphasis on plural.
You can read the full explanation from the church here.
It's almost like the author of the article had a clear agenda.I was going by the text in the article, which stated:
"Christ Church in Alexandria, Virginia will take down a memorial marking the pew where Washington sat with his family, saying it is not acceptable to all worshipers."
Certainly possible. Don't know. Was just responding to his comment and explaining why I commented as I did.It's almost like the author of the article had a clear agenda.
It's not unique to that website or me calling you out- it happens me as well. I will find an article that pushes a button and I post it or tell someone about it. Then, after I research the topic more, I discover that article left out some key details or misstated the situation.Certainly possible. Don't know. Was just responding to his comment and explaining why I commented as I did.
Oh yes, totally get that. Wouldn't surprise me one bit. It does, in fact, bother me if that is the case. Which it sounds like it very well may be.It's not unique to that website or me calling you out- it happens me as well. I will find an article that pushes a button and I post it or tell someone about it. Then, after I research the topic more, I discover that article left out some key details or misstated the situation.
Before forming an opinion on something, it's always best to get primary source information first.Oh yes, totally get that. Wouldn't surprise me one bit. It does, in fact, bother me if that is the case. Which it sounds like it very well may be.
Yep and confirm with multiple sources. Teaching history, I always preach this to kids but it is easy to fall for it yourself when you are just casually reading and not doing academic work. I actually might use this example here for a lesson in the future. I am always looking for modern examples of misleading journalism, propaganda, yellow journalism, fake news, etc.Before forming an opinion on something, it's always best to get primary source information first.