Lifting this from a Darren Rovell question:
In the battle between Roger Goodell and Jerry Jones, who are you rooting for?
In the battle between Roger Goodell and Jerry Jones, who are you rooting for?
I read that earlier...so insane.As an Eagles fan I was rooting for Goodell until I heard the actual compensation demands... 50MM, jet for life, medical for family for life, etc. Now I just want a job in the league office.
I read that too. How sickening is that? I'm just baffled that Goodell has any leverage at all in getting a new contract.As an Eagles fan I was rooting for Goodell until I heard the actual compensation demands... 50MM, jet for life, medical for family for life, etc. Now I just want a job in the league office.
Forced to choose, I'd root for Goodell, though if those demands are for real, it would be hard. Goodell is more of a clueless incompetent, while Jones is more evil bully.
This is a GREAT post. I still love to watch football but the NFL has been a mess for a decade or moreThe NFL can suck it:
1. They fooked up the anthem protest issue
2. They continually fook up the concussion protocal situation
3. They continually fook up the domestic violence issues
4. They are a greedy bunch of fools
5. And now these two rich deekwads are having a tickle fight because one of them suspended the other guys player for the domestic violence issue
Wah Wah Wah......go screw yourself NFL.
You don't know a damn thing about the modern NFL, then.Jerry Jones had almost nothing to do with why the NFL has made the money it has made.
Jones and Goodell are both awful. I loathe Jones and would lean Goodell, except if those demands are real, they can both go jump into shark infested waters.
Maximum oof.Jerry Jones had almost nothing to do with why the NFL has made the money it has made.
Oh, I know plenty, and Jones had little to do with why the league has made so much money. The tv deals forged long ago along with long periods of labor peace set the NFL on track for success. And then fantasy football is what ultimately lead to the huge explosion beginning in the 90s.You don't know a damn thing about the modern NFL, then.
I side with Roger. Believe it or not, he's made the NFL owners an absolute #### ton of money. Go on all you want Cowboy fans about what Jones has done for the NFL's value, but Roger's contribution makes it pale in comparison.
Roger's real job is contracts. He has presided over every contract the NFL has agreed to since 2006. Well, the numbers don't lie. The NFL is now grossing over $14 billion every year. That number has risen exponentially since Goodell took over. In 2013 the average NFL franchise was valued at just over $800 million. The Cowboys were the highest, valued at $1.17 billion. Today, the average franchise is valued at over $2.4 billion and the Cowboys are valued at over $4.2 billion. The league owners owe Goodell a good chunk of change, no matter what your opinion on the man is.
Then, add that he gets to be the heel for all the nasty #### the owners don't want to deal with and you start to understand why the guy gets(and is asking for) so much.
Dude, you have it ALL wrong. Let's focus on just one of your many inaccuracies.Oh, I know plenty, and Jones had little to do with why the league has made so much money. The tv deals forged long ago along with long periods of labor peace set the NFL on track for success. And then fantasy football is what ultimately lead to the huge explosion beginning in the 90s.
Yes, Jones has always tried to expand the pie through lots of things like endorsements, stadium naming rights, PSLs, teams moving, etc. but those things are all built on the back of everything else and a much smaller portion.
When the league's TV ratings were weak and the TV committee headed by Art Modell was prepared to give back $300 million just to secure a CBS contract extension, Jones fought it, insisting it was too early to renegotiate, and drew Rupert Murdoch's Fox into the mix. One owner called him "a crazy wildcatter." But Jones was right: The league went on to sign new contracts for $1 billion, which set a standard for hardline negotiations, that turned into the $7 billion in network deals of today.
Your My dead great grandmother would have made the NFL the same amount of money and probably more since she wouldn't have botched every PR move in the last several years.Yes.
Your dead great grandmother would have made the NFL the same amount of money and probably more since she wouldn't have botched every PR move in the last several years.
Please be more cool than this.Your dead great grandmother would have made the NFL the same amount of money and probably more since she wouldn't have botched every PR move in the last several years.
Hell, man. My grandmother's quicker and tougher than you pansies.STEADYMOBBIN 22 said:Your dead great grandmother would have made the NFL the same amount of money and probably more since she wouldn't have botched every PR move in the last several years.
There was some talk of that from Mike Florio. Seems incredibly far fetched but it was brought up apparently.I would love to see the other NFL owners ban together and take the Dallas Cowboys away from Jerry Jones.
Jerry is turning into the new Al Davis.
Nobody carries water for Goodell more than Kraft. I'm a Pats fan and it bothers me to no end.He also has a vendetta against Goodell for the same reason that Robert Kraft does.
Hi Murph,Nobody carries water for Goodell more than Kraft. I'm a Pats fan and it bothers me to no end.
He tried to have it both ways. There was certainly some anti-Goodell rhetoric to placate the fans. But actions speak louder than words. He never fought for the draft pick and by all accounts he's siding with Goodell vs. Jones.Hi Murph,
I would have agreed with this before Deflategate. Do you think it's still true?
See that's why I can't understand how does Goodell have such strong support. He's terrible at PR. He's botched every suspension I can think of. No matter your feelings on the anthem protest you'd be hard pressed to make the case that he's handled well. Big sponsors are publically calling Goodell out by name. Why would the owners be so unanimous to give him a raise?Question on the other owners wanting to bring action or discipline against Jones because Jones isn't in favor of extending Goodell's contract at the reported by Adam Schefter and Chris Mortensen 50Million per year plus private jet for life. (also disputed by the league).
Doesn't this sound like something is missing? A group puts together a committee to set a compensation package. And if you don't agree with the committee's decision, you're subject to having your team taken away?
There is no room for disagreement among owners as they decide an issue?
Thanks. That's sort of how I see it too. Although I don't see it as carrying water now. I see it more like Kraft went from being Goodell's most valuable ally to now he's just neutral or slightly negative.He tried to have it both ways. There was certainly some anti-Goodell rhetoric to placate the fans. But actions speak louder than words. He never fought for the draft pick and by all accounts he's siding with Goodell vs. Jones.
Agreed. That's what I find so odd.See that's I can't understand how does Goodell have such strong support. He's terrible at PR. He's botched every suspension I can think of. No matter your feelings on the anthem protest you'd be hard pressed to make the case that he's handled well. Big sponsors are publically calling Goodell out by name. Why would the owners be so unanimous to give him a raise?
This may be true. There's certainly plenty of Pats fans who think Kraft did enough. I'm just not one of them.I see it more like Kraft went from being Goodell's most valuable ally to now he's just neutral or slightly negative.
This was in Peter King's piece on Sunday:Thanks. That's sort of how I see it too. Although I don't see it as carrying water now. I see it more like Kraft went from being Goodell's most valuable ally to now he's just neutral or slightly negative.
Yes. I can see that for sure. I think it's more a reflection of who Kraft is and who Jones is. There are benefits to both. Kraft is playing the more mellow gentleman / team player type. Jones is more the maverick who puts his interests first. Not a criticism of either men. Just different styles.This was in Peter King's piece on Sunday:
Still, in that fateful conference call Nov. 2, after Jones’ threat, the source with knowledge of the call said Patriots owner and committee member Robert Kraft told Jones words to this effect: Jerry, my franchise got killed for a BS incident with so-called deflated footballs. We lost our quarterback for 25% of the season. We got fined a million bucks. We lost first- and fourth-round picks. For hogwash! But I took it. My fans killed me for it, but I try to be a good partner.
Seems to be like this would have been a perfect time for Kraft to stick it to Goodell but instead he is siding with him against Jerry. Very disappointing for Pats fans.
I'd think this would be the case. But not sure how much of a story it is. Jones feels the kneeling hurts Papa Johns which he's affected by. I doubt Papa John has many people he considers more in tune with the NFL than Jones so when he says something, I'd guess Papa John would be inclined to believe it.So, now there is a theory that Jerry Jones was behind the Papa Johns rant.
Jones owns more than 100 Papa Johns restaurants. I don't think that Papa John would have criticized the NFL without consent from his biggest franchisee.