kittenmittens
Footballguy
Baker Mayfield should #### and let his on the file play do the talking.
Who does he think he is, Jalen Ramsey?
Who does he think he is, Jalen Ramsey?
Dude has no chillSame story with click-bait yellow-journalism headline >>>> NY POST Baker Mayfield trashes Daniel Jones as a loser
OTOH, he’s not wrong. I had the same take when they took Jones.Old school had lots of guys who said and did what they wanted and they didn't care.
------------------------
Evan SilvaVerified account @evansilva 1h1 hour ago
* Didnt call Jones a loser once * Stated an opinion that was rooted in fact (Jones went 17-19 at Duke) * Was commenting on a SportCenter segment * Was making a general point about what he feels is important in QB evals and not “trashing” Jones at all
Baker Mayfield to @GQMagazine: “I cannot believe the Giants took Daniel Jones. Blows my mind…Some people overthink it [what makes a good quarterback]. That’s where they go wrong. They forget you’ve gotta win.”
He was asked and gave his honest opinion so he told the truth....I went to listen to the context of how it came out and I'm shaking my head. How do you say that???? And this is coming from a Giants fan who rips Jones constantly... but you can't say what Mayfield said, that's just dumb.
NY POST HEADLINE THE DAY DANIEL JONES WAS DRAFTED Giants’ Daniel Jones pick is an utter disaster on so many levelsSame story with click-bait yellow-journalism headline >>>> NY POST Baker Mayfield trashes Daniel Jones as a loser
too many peaks and valleys w/ this approach IMO.On Bill Simmons fantasy podcast he and with Matthew Berry they talk about drafting Beckham, Chubb and Mayfield and they think its a good idea. While I can see a path in the draft that you could obtain all three, isnt this just lunacy or is there some method to the madness? I mean I thought it was crazy on first listen then I started thinking about and if, repeat if, the offense is lights out there there are plenty of points to go around in a game by game basis. I have never done this just wondering what you guys think?
That's where my head is at. You will have some crazy high scoring weeks but on the games that they flub you are dead in the water.too many peaks and valleys w/ this approach IMO.
I try to mitigate my floor when putting teams together.
Anyone who would say this doesn't know enough about Baker. He's got ego but not of the fragile, threatened by others variety.Two takeaways.
#1. Baker comes off as feeling threatened by this kid.
#2. Baker and OBJ were made for each other. They will crash and burn gloriously together.
or #3 ShamrockPride has no clue.....ding ding ding!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Two takeaways.
#1. Baker comes off as feeling threatened by this kid.
#2. Baker and OBJ were made for each other. They will crash and burn gloriously together.
You should double check your work.I believe a wise man once said "Nowadays, everybody wanna talk, Like they got somethin' to say, But nothin' comes out when they move their lips, Just a bunch of gibberish, like they got somethin' to say (forgot about Dre)"
In general, when we say bad things about other people that didn't need to be said, its because we are subconsciously seeking to elevate ourselves in our own minds or the minds of others.Anyone who would say this doesn't know enough about Baker. He's got ego but not of the fragile, threatened by others variety.
You should probably read what he actually said again, or for the first time. What you're describing isn't what really what happened, despite all the click bait.In general, when we say bad things about other people that didn't need to be said, its because we are subconsciously seeking to elevate ourselves in our own minds or the minds of others.
While an individual may, in general, convey a sense of bravado and self-confidence, these little slip-ups offer insight into subconscious fragility.
It's pretty basic stuff, whether the root cause is being short or playing on a small market team or not being as well endowed as Nick Foles.
The original article.You should probably read what he actually said again, or for the first time. What you're describing isn't what really what happened, despite all the click bait.
The headline was definitely misleading as he never calls the guy a loser, I'll give you that. But Mayfield brings up the subject of Daniel Jones on his own, and ####s on him out of the blue.Near our booth, a SportsCenter segment about the New York Giants catches Mayfield's eye. “I cannot believe the Giants took Daniel Jones,” Mayfield says, about New York's much-maligned draft-day decision to spend the sixth pick on the quarterback from Duke (whose college record was a measly 17–19). “Blows my mind.”
I tell Mayfield that I'm mystified that so many supposedly expert quarterback scouts seem unable to predict what makes a good NFL quarterback.
“Some people overthink it,” Mayfield says. “That's where people go wrong. They forget you've gotta win.”
It's college dude. Unless you're on one of maybe like 7 or 8 teams in this country, you're on a team of mostly nobodies. Coaching is far more important at college as well.jmo87usc said:By saying, “they forget you’ve got to win”, I’d say he pretty much called him a loser.
And he’s stating a fact. The guy had a losing record in college. But he needs to learn to keep his answers short and polished for now. One good rookie year doesn’t make you a draft analyst.
Love the BDN referenceSeniorVBDStudent said:In general, when we say bad things about other people that didn't need to be said, its because we are subconsciously seeking to elevate ourselves in our own minds or the minds of others.
While an individual may, in general, convey a sense of bravado and self-confidence, these little slip-ups offer insight into subconscious fragility.
It's pretty basic stuff, whether the root cause is being short or playing on a small market team or not being as well endowed as Nick Foles.
You have him figured out and all short men who come from small markets but your definitely have it wrong to assume short men may not be well endowed trust me on that one son but going with your basic conclusion Baker seems like a troubled fragile guy ready to crack at any moment.SeniorVBDStudent said:In general, when we say bad things about other people that didn't need to be said, its because we are subconsciously seeking to elevate ourselves in our own minds or the minds of others.
While an individual may, in general, convey a sense of bravado and self-confidence, these little slip-ups offer insight into subconscious fragility.
It's pretty basic stuff, whether the root cause is being short or playing on a small market team or not being as well endowed as Nick Foles.
Referred to as an ad hominem attack, a debating tactic which deflects from the subject of interest focusing instead on the arguer. It's a logical fallacy. An often used strategy of our great President. But I'm sure you don't have any problem with Trump attacking opponents constantly, why would you have a problem with Mayfield attacking a random colleague for no reason?You have him figured out and all short men who come from small markets but your definitely have it wrong to assume short men may not be well endowed trust me on that one son but going with your basic conclusion Baker seems like a troubled fragile guy ready to crack at any moment.
Assuming everything else you say with your theory is correct that subconscious seeks to evaluate with our own minds does your conscious power of perception have anything to say about people who evaluate Baker Mayfield?
Are they above petty jealousy due to obvious superior intellect or is the reason they take shots pretty obvious?
Spot on the topic of Baker Mayfield.Referred to as an ad hominem attack, a debating tactic which deflects from the subject of interest, focusing instead on the arguer. It's a logical fallacy. An often used strategy of our great President. But I'm sure you don't have any problem with Trump attacking opponents constantly, why would you have a problem with Mayfield doing the same thing?Are they above petty jealousy due to obvious superior intellect or is the reason they take shots pretty obvious?
No need to to go around in circles here. I'm trying to stick to the subject of Mayfield, you know, the title of the thread. Trying.Referred to as an ad hominem attack, a debating tactic which deflects from the subject of interest focusing instead on the arguer. It's a logical fallacy. An often used strategy of our great President. But I'm sure you don't have any problem with Trump attacking opponents constantly, why would you have a problem with Mayfield attacking a random colleague for no reason?
No attack was madeNo need to to go around in circles here. I'm trying to stick to the subject of Mayfield, you know, the title of the thread. Trying.
Attacking other quarterbacks out of the blue for no reason is not a good look. Has he even met Daniel Jones? It's fair to consider his motivations. Is he just a jack-### or is he lacking in certain areas which make him feel inadequate?
A tweet from Baker backtracking which does not include his actual words? Well done.
In his mind? Lol.A tweet from Baker backtracking which does not include his actual words? Well done.
Here's what actually happened: unprompted by the interviewer, Mayfield said was "blown away" the Giants took Daniel Jones, because it was a bad choice at least in his mind.
Yeah, we know everybody hates Daniel Jones. Kudos to Mayfield for joining in and kicking the dude while he's down. And here's to you @Bracie Smathers sticking to the subject!In his mind? Lol.
The majority reaction to the Daniel Jones pick..
100 years worth of tickets to watch Daniel Jones
Isn't the right thread for it, so I'll just say this then go back to enjoying have Baker as my team's QB.It's college dude. Unless you're on one of maybe like 7 or 8 teams in this country, you're on a team of mostly nobodies. Coaching is far more important at college as well.
So while yes, "it's a fact", be careful not to overvalue W/L in college. I know I'm not telling you anything you don't already know.
NopeIsn't the right thread for it, so I'll just say this then go back to enjoying have Baker as my team's QB.
Over-valuing W/L in college is a thing, as is actual statistical output - but there is a floor. If you QB a team that's below it then that's a major red flag. And I think Jones is below that floor with both the W/L and his actual output. Good NFL QB's make those around them better. Jones quite simply didn't do that.
Watch em run 40x.
Baker Mayfield underwent precautionary X-rays on his injured hand following Sunday's Week 1 loss to the Titans.
Mayfield didn't look right in the opener, throwing three interceptions including a pick-six to Malcolm Butler late in Sunday's blowout loss to Tennessee. The former No. 1 pick took a beating against the Titans, taking five sacks and a safety behind the Browns' anemic offensive line. Luckily, it appears he escaped with just a bruised hand. Baker will look to rebound against the Jets—who he defeated for his first NFL victory last year—on Monday Night Football.
SOURCE: Jake Trotter on Twitter
Sep 9, 2019, 12:46 PM ET
OL was a problem last year as well. I think they'll work out the kinks. Once Robinson was ejected, we knew it'd be a rough game. He'll be back next week and already expressing remorse for his actions. He knows he let the team down with that situation.OL is a major problem. Better start dialing up quick 1-2 second throws.
I was wondering if this monken guy was gonna mess everything up. There were grumbling in TC or preseason I'd I recall.Kitchens and Monken need to get on the same page with play calls. Some of the drives I got to see from the game didn't look like the same drives last year.
Monken isn't calling any plays, Kitchens is.I was wondering if this monken guy was gonna mess everything up. There were grumbling in TC or preseason I'd I recall.Kitchens and Monken need to get on the same page with play calls. Some of the drives I got to see from the game didn't look like the same drives last year.
Won't be no monies squandered at QB?
Keith Britton @KeithBritton86
#Browns HC Freddie Kitchens on status update on Baker Mayfield (hand): "X-rays were negative so we're good to go. I'm pretty sure he'll be fine. I can't say anything definitive right now. I'm pretty certain he'll be fine." Says he doesn't expect Baker to miss any time.
I get that, but the plays are designed by both of them - as well as the game plan. Freddie may have been calling the plays, but let's not act like Monken wasn't involved.Bracie Smathers said:Monken isn't calling any plays, Kitchens is.