BigSteelThrill
Footballguy
Bet your house on the Pats -3.
Nah. We sit in a deep zone, rush 3-or-4 with little pressure and watch Brady complete 44 of 60. No adjustments or anything all game long.This is a huge game for you guys.
This is where I’m at. The game is about matchups and the Steelers don’t match up well against the Pats offense. Now let’s just see whether the Pats D will be able to hold the Steelers offense to FGs.Overrated, both in terms of weekly matchup and playoff importance.
This is a vulnerable Pats team, and HFA doesn't make them anything resembling a slam dunk. In particular, they'd be vulnerable to a couple AFC West teams, but they've shown they can lay an egg against much less talented teams, too.
But still, this Steeler team simply isn't built to compete with them. They lack the talent or physicality to play man against the wideouts, the scheme or talent to bring pressure up the middle, and the athleticism to do ANYTHING with Gronk now that Shazier is gone. They're pinning 100% of their week 15 hopes on a lucky confluence of drops, fumbles, and Brady mistakes. Seems like a long-odds cocktail.
Yet Pittsburgh could, IMO, quite easily find themselves slotting into #2 in the AFC and still find themselves in nice playoff position. Their SB hopes don't hinge on home field. NE ought to throttle them anywhere, and I don't see Heinz as an important factor. NE is just a matchup nightmare for them. Their hopes hinge instead on seeing one of the handful of better equipped matchups for NE hand Bill & Tom their hats, then going into the subsequent game as a clear fave.
Very plausible, IMO, since this is far from a dominant Pats team.
Still a fun game, but not the season-defining one being spun in the hype.
Don't agree, it's as big of a regular season game as the NFL has seen in years.Overrated, both in terms of weekly matchup and playoff importance.
Yet Tomlin tries his hardest to try to make this into some kind of rivalry. HaI just heard on the radio that Brady is 22/0 TD/INT vs. Tomlin coached Steelers teams. I find that unbelievably amazing.
Yep. It's not a rivalry if one team wins almost all of the games.Yet Tomlin tries his hardest to try to make this into some kind of rivalry. Ha
I think not having Edelman will be biggest impact on making the dink and dunk game not as easy as they've made it look in the past.weather could effect this game as well. Possible rainy wet conditions I would think would favor Pitt in regards to the Brandy dink and dunk strategy that he usually destroys Pitt with
That was really Pitts fault running the zone D and not making any adjustments. While Edelman was great finding the soft spots Brandy still has WRs and RBs that can fill in admirably and do the same.I think not having Edelman will be biggest impact on making the dink and dunk game not as easy as they've made it look in the past.
A lot of folks have looked to that Miami game as a reflection on the state of the Patriots overall. NE and Brady haven't fared very well playing the Dolphins on the road. They won Super Bowls in three seasons when they played horribly in Miami and looked way out of sync, losing by an average of between 11-12 points per game.If pats play like they did on mnf they will lose. But I doubt they play like that again
Say what you will but they don't have a WR on that team remotely as good in the short game as Edelman or Welker before him. They'll need to use the RB's in that role Sunday and they are good at it but not as good as Edelman or as in sync with Brady as Edelman.That was really Pitts fault running the zone D and not making any adjustments. While Edelman was great finding the soft spots Brandy still has WRs and RBs that can fill in admirably and do the same.
If somehow Tomlin continues to use the soft zone Brady will continue to pick Pittsburgh apart
How has Tomlin tried to make it a rivalry?Yet Tomlin tries his hardest to try to make this into some kind of rivalry. Ha
NE 42 / PIT 24PIT 27 NE 20
just hoping there are no injuries on either side.
NE hasn’t scored 42 yet this season and you expect them to do it against PIT?NE 42 / PIT 24
Just hoping there are no excuses due to injuries on either side.
NE hasn't scored 42 yet this season because they've yet to play the Shazeer-less Steelers.NE hasn’t scored 42 yet this season and you expect them to do it against PIT?
If you believe the Steelers D “sucked” before the loss of Shazier, you need to get your head examined. With a healthy Shazier and Haden, this is one of the better defenses in football. You may want to check the results from earlier in the year.NE hasn't scored 42 yet this season because they've yet to play the Shazeer-less Steelers.
and PIT defense sucked BEFORE they lost Shazeer.
BAL with Joe Flacco just put up 38 on them last week. You think NE /Brady will put up less?
Please don't delete your post ...
I've already had my head x-rated.If you believe the Steelers D “sucked” before the loss of Shazier, you need to get your head examined. With a healthy Shazier and Haden, this is one of the better defenses in football. You may want to check the results from earlier in the year.
While I do think NE will put up lots of points today, saying that Jax puts up 30 points against them, as if it is a knock on the defense, doesn't make sense when you consider that 14 of the Jags points came off two pick-6's. The defense gave up 16 points that day. It is not their fault they lost that game (although the drive early in the 4th when the Jags ran it down their throats and took off half of the 4th Q clock was bad).I've already had my head x-rated.
Please point out which high powered offense PIT shut down this year.
They've played mostly buttercups all season long.
JAX put up 30 at Heinz field.
The Brett Hundley led Packers put up 28 on the Shazeer led defense in PIT.
Patriots are a different animal than both those teams and MIA just lit a fire under their balloon knot.
PIT's success rides completely on Ben, AB, and Bell.
You're the one who claimed that they "sucked". It doesn't matter who they played. They were ranked as one of the top defenses in football for most of the year and actually carried the offense for the first half of the season. Lol at citing that Jacksonville game. Instead of looking at the final score, take a look at what actually happened in that game. I'll give you the Packers game. That was probably their worst performance of the year. To say that the defense has "sucked" is a huge stretch (to put it lightly).I've already had my head x-rated.
Please point out which high powered offense PIT shut down this year.
They've played mostly buttercups all season long.
JAX put up 30 at Heinz field.
The Brett Hundley led Packers put up 28 on the Shazeer led defense in PIT.
Patriots are a different animal than both those teams and MIA just lit a fire under their balloon knot.
PIT's success rides completely on Ben, AB, and Bell.
I'll agree with you on this one though. Both teams have significant injuries.NE 42 / PIT 24
Just hoping there are no excuses due to injuries on either side.
Currently the Steelers D is 6th in total yds against, 7th in total points against, 2nd in sacks, 2nd in pass D and actually 9th in rushing D. Those are numbers that reflect a pretty good defense. Not great but definitely good.If you believe the Steelers D “sucked” before the loss of Shazier, you need to get your head examined. With a healthy Shazier and Haden, this is one of the better defenses in football. You may want to check the results from earlier in the year.
And?I've already had my head x-rated.
Please point out which high powered offense PIT shut down this year.
They've played mostly buttercups all season long.
JAX put up 30 at Heinz field.
The Brett Hundley led Packers put up 28 on the Shazeer led defense in PIT.
Patriots are a different animal than both those teams and MIA just lit a fire under their balloon knot.
PIT's success rides completely on Ben, AB, and Bell.
All you are doing is pointing out is how pathetic the teams are that they faced.Currently the Steelers D is 6th in total yds against, 7th in total points against, 2nd in sacks, 2nd in pass D and actually 9th in rushing D. Those are numbers that reflect a pretty good defense. Not great but definitely good.
It's honestly not even relevant. You made an assertion that the defense "sucked". I'm simply refuting that assertion. Listing the teams who they played makes no difference. There is no factual data to support your claim that they "suck". They shut down bad teams which is exactly what a good defense is supposed to do. BTW, they also did pretty well against KC early in the season when they were firing on all cylinders.All you are doing is pointing out is how pathetic the teams are that they faced.
Tell us how these opponents ranked offensively. CLE, IND, CHI, CIN, TEN, DET.
26th, Last, 30th, 24th, (I dunno ... just guessing)
PIT defense hasn't had a performance against a top ranked offense.
Not that these are the 2007 Patriots ... but they're still at a level well above these other teams that PIT has faced.
Well when NE puts up 42 on them today (as I predicted and was mocked for) you can come back in here and explain that it wasn't the Steelers sucky defense ... because 7 points were by NE's defense and PIT turnovers and the rain and the bad call by a ref and Tomlin peed down his leg and whatever other excuse.It's honestly not even relevant. You made an assertion that the defense "sucked". I'm simply refuting that assertion. Listing the teams who they played makes no difference. There is no factual data to support your claim that they "suck". They shut down bad teams which is exactly what a good defense is supposed to do. BTW, they also did pretty well against KC early in the season when they were firing on all cylinders.
Ok you're changing the story now so I'm done. I don't know why it's so difficult for people to just admit when they're wrong. Good luck to your team today.Well when NE puts up 42 on them today (as I predicted and was mocked for) you can come back in here and explain that it wasn't the Steelers sucky defense ... because 7 points were by NE's defense and PIT turnovers and the rain and the bad call by a ref and Tomlin peed down his leg and whatever other excuse.
They were good like 6 weeks ago. But have gotten seemingly worse every week. Brady owns the Steelers defense and today will be no differentCurrently the Steelers D is 6th in total yds against, 7th in total points against, 2nd in sacks, 2nd in pass D and actually 9th in rushing D. Those are numbers that reflect a pretty good defense. Not great but definitely good.
Fixed it for you. Before the GB game, they gave up more than 17 points twice all season. One was Ben's 5 int game against Jacksonville (in which 2 were actually Jax defensive TDs). The other was an overtime loss to Chicago. Currently without Shazier and Haden, the defense is pretty bad. But that wasn't the argument.They were good like64 weeks ago. But have gotten seemingly worse every week. Brady owns the Steelers defense and today will be no different
Hey congrats on the nail biter of a win. You were a bit off with your prediction. Hopefully you’ll at least admit that the 2 teams are fairly evenly matched.Well when NE puts up 42 on them today (as I predicted and was mocked for) you can come back in here and explain that it wasn't the Steelers sucky defense ... because 7 points were by NE's defense and PIT turnovers and the rain and the bad call by a ref and Tomlin peed down his leg and whatever other excuse.
Indeed.Hey congrats on the nail biter of a win. You were a bit off with your prediction. Hopefully you’ll at least admit that the 2 teams are fairly evenly matched.
They don’t have an answer for Gronk (few teams do) and I fear that will be their downfall if they meet again. I was just encouraged that the coaching staff made adjustments and didn’t play the same style of D that the Pats carve up every year. Great game and good luck the rest of the way. I actually think the AFC might be wide open this year. I could see Jax or KC beating either the Pats or Steelers.Indeed.
Steelers are better than I gave them credit for ... even without AB.
I was surprised to see them playing mostly man defense ... but it worked (other than Gronkowski).